Re: [CentOS] eth enumeration order

2011-09-20 Thread Volker Poplawski
On 19.09.2011 23:48, Robert Spangler wrote: > On Monday 19 September 2011 11:04, the following was written: > >> So >> How do you specifiy the order in which NICs are enumerated? >> or at least how to tell centos to stop messing with the >> 70-persistent-net.rules? > > Add the hardware

[CentOS] Kickstart mdraid on two disks, from usb key detected as sda instead of sdc...

2011-09-20 Thread John Doe
Hi, I am trying to adapt my kickstart usb key to optionally auto-setup mdraid on two disks...  But I have one server that keeps attaching the usb key to sda instead of sdc... My kickstart creates the raid devices on sdb and sdc partitions; but then I expect it not to work once the key is unp

[CentOS] sudo wildcards problem: for every argument a *-wildcard? Better solution?

2011-09-20 Thread Sven Aluoor
Hi folks I allow the user tommy to run this command as root sudoCommand: /app/appname/connectors/*/*/current/bin/* With "sudo -l" he sees the sudoers, but is unable to execute. $ sudo /app/appname/connectors/zur/namename/current/bin/othername agentsvc --i --u root --sn 1m7command Sorry, user to

Re: [CentOS] mdadm and drive identification?

2011-09-20 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Is there another easy way I can positively ID a drive by serial number and the >/dev/sd[a-z] that mdadm sees? I don't know of a tool like tune2fs or *fstune that works for mdraid. You might try on the mdadm list where Neil Brown hangs out... Given the wealth of easy ways to manage and monitor

Re: [CentOS] sudo wildcards problem: for every argument a *-wildcard? Better solution?

2011-09-20 Thread John Doe
From: Sven Aluoor  I allow the user tommy to run this command as root > sudoCommand: /app/appname/connectors/*/*/current/bin/* > $ sudo /app/appname/connectors/zur/namename/current/bin/othername > agentsvc --i --u root --sn 1m7command > Sorry, user tommy is not allowed to execute > '/app/appname/

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-20 Thread Ross Walker
On Sep 19, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 18:41 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: >> On Sep 17, 2011, at 7:49 PM, Craig White wrote: >> >>> At some point, security updates for 6.1 will be released and then it >>> becomes a matter of deciding to install it based on the evid

[CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread Lanny Marcus
I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in some information, when I received a .pdf file. I have KPDF installed, but that seems to only have Reader capability. Trying to install xpdf, with yum, I get this dependency error from rpmforge: 1:xpdf-3.02-8.el5.rf.i386 from rpmf

Re: [CentOS] LVM lvresize/lvextend requires some space in /etc to grow a logical volume?

2011-09-20 Thread m . roth
Johnny Tan wrote: > Anyway, here's the real issue with LVM, at least in CentOS-6: > > [root@jttest ~]# df > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/vg_main-lv_root >1548144 1548144 0 100% / > > [root@jttest ~]# lvextend -L

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 Update request

2011-09-20 Thread Bruce Bowler
Karanbir Singh writes: > > On 09/14/2011 10:30 PM, Digimer wrote: > > Hi devs, [snip] > unless someone else gets to it before me, I will get together a plan and > post it up there ( but not today and perhaps not tomorrow either ). > > Step-1, get the major security stuff into 6.0/cr/. Any

Re: [CentOS] eth enumeration order

2011-09-20 Thread m . roth
Volker Poplawski wrote: > On 19.09.2011 23:48, Robert Spangler wrote: >> On Monday 19 September 2011 11:04, the following was written: >> >>> So >>> How do you specifiy the order in which NICs are enumerated? >>> or at least how to tell centos to stop messing with the >>> 70-persistent-

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread m . roth
Lanny Marcus wrote: > I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in > some information, when I received a .pdf file. > > I have KPDF installed, but that seems to only have Reader capability. > > Trying to install xpdf, with yum, I get this dependency error from > rpmforge: Po

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Lanny Marcus wrote: > I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in > some information, when I received a .pdf file. > > I have KPDF installed, but that seems to only have Reader capability. > > Trying to install xpdf, with yum, I get this dependency error from rpmforge: > 1:x

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread samuel machua
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:04:20 -0400 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: > > I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in > > some information, when I received a .pdf file. > > > > I have KPDF installed, but that seems to only have Reader > > capability. > > > > Tryi

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread Robert Heller
At Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:25:44 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:04:20 -0400 > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > Lanny Marcus wrote: > > > I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in > > > some information, when I received a .pdf file. > > > > > > I

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread Scott Robbins
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:04:41PM +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > > For your purpose though, I'm not sure xpdf can edit pdfs. When I have to > do that I use AdobeReader from the adobe site. xpdf cannot edit pdfs. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread John Doe
From: Lanny Marcus > Trying to install xpdf, with yum, I get this dependency error from rpmforge: > 1:xpdf-3.02-8.el5.rf.i386 from rpmforge has depsolving problems >   --> Missing Dependency: libXm.so.4 is needed by package > 1:xpdf-3.02-8.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) > Error: Missing Dependency: libXm

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 09/20/2011 04:40 PM, John Doe wrote: > So apparently no "libXm.so.4" in base, repoforge or elrepo... There's a 32 bit version of openmotif in CentOS 5.7 x86_64. It would probably need a few extra rpm's as well. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread m . roth
Robert Heller wrote: > At Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:25:44 -0400 CentOS mailing list > wrote: >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> > > I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in >> > > some information, when I received a .pdf file. >> > > >> > > I have KPDF inst

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > On 09/20/2011 04:40 PM, John Doe wrote: >> So apparently no "libXm.so.4" in base, repoforge or elrepo... > > There's a 32 bit version of openmotif in CentOS 5.7 x86_64. Right, as Nicolas pointed out in his post, openmotif 32-bit is missing in

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in > some information, when I received a .pdf file. > > Received a contract via email and I would like to add some information > and send it back via email. > THANK YOU, to each

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread Rob Kampen
Lanny Marcus wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in some information, when I received a .pdf file. Received a contract via email and I would like to add some information and send it back vi

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread Robert Nichols
On 09/20/2011 10:58 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > Adobe Reader I would gladly install, if I knew the proper yum command. > I have the Adobe Repository installed, but so far, no joy, getting yum > to install it. :-) With the Adobe repository installed, "yum search adobereader" should give you a list o

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread m . roth
Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Lanny Marcus > wrote: >> I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in >> some information, when I received a .pdf file. >> > >> Received a contract via email and I would like to add some information >> and send it back

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread Craig White
On Sep 20, 2011, at 9:36 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Lanny Marcus >> wrote: >>> I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in >>> some information, when I received a .pdf file. >>> >> >>> Received a contract via em

[CentOS] is oprofile working on CENTOS 6.0 ?

2011-09-20 Thread William Reich
Hi I am trying to use oprofile with centos 6.0. I know that the debug-info for the kernel is not available, so I believe I used the correct switches to account for this. here is my script... # reset everything opcontrol --shutdown rm /root/.oprofile/da* opcontrol --separate

Re: [CentOS] is oprofile working on CENTOS 6.0 ?

2011-09-20 Thread William Reich
I was using oprofile 0.9.6-7 on a 64bit computer. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS 6.0 box

2011-09-20 Thread Jon Detert
I installed CentOS 6.0 on 2 different x86_64 boxen. Both originally had selinux installed and enabled. I never touched selinux other than to remove as much of it as I could via rpm -e. As far as I can tell, here are the remaining packages that have something to do with it: # rpm -qa | grep -

Re: [CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS 6.0 box

2011-09-20 Thread James Edwards
On 9/20/2011 1:48 PM, Jon Detert wrote: > I installed CentOS 6.0 on 2 different x86_64 boxen. Both originally had > selinux installed and enabled. I never touched selinux other than to remove > as much of it as I could via rpm -e. As far as I can tell, here are the > remaining packages that h

Re: [CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS 6.0 box

2011-09-20 Thread Jon Detert
- Original Message - > From: "James Edwards" > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:52:34 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS > 6.0 box > > On 9/20/2011 1:48 PM, Jon Detert wrote: > > I installed CentOS 6.0 on 2 differe

Re: [CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS 6.0 box

2011-09-20 Thread James Edwards
On 9/20/2011 2:14 PM, Jon Detert wrote: >> Did you disable SELinux by changing 'SELINUX=disabled' in >> /etc/sysconfig/selinux? Wouldn't that be easier than removing all > I did not do so explicitly. But it is set to disabled as described above. > I assume the rpm -e did that. So, there must be

[CentOS] Finding i/o bottleneck

2011-09-20 Thread Nicolas Ross
Hi list ! We have a very busy webserver hosted in a clustered environment where the document root and data is on a GFS2 partition off a fiber-attached disk array. Now on busy moments, I can see in htop, nmon that there is a fair percentage of cpu that is waiting for I/O. In nmon, I can spot th

[CentOS] Installation of 6.0

2011-09-20 Thread Al Sparks
Some observations. When I installed 6.0 (base install), the installation interface did not guide me through a network configuration.  I do static IP addresses, not DHCP. I ended up manually configuring the various /etc/sysconfig files.  I forgot to do the GATEWAY configuration and it took me

Re: [CentOS] Installation of 6.0

2011-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/21/11, Al Sparks wrote: > > Some observations. > > When I installed 6.0 (base install), the installation interface did not > guide me through a network configuration. I do static IP addresses, not > DHCP. IIRC, it's in this small unobstrusive rectangular box that says "Setup Networking" or

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-20 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Lanny Marcus >>> I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in >>> some information, when I received a .pdf file. >> > and the rpm file is AdobeReader_enu Thank yo

Re: [CentOS] Installation of 6.0

2011-09-20 Thread Craig White
On Sep 20, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Al Sparks wrote: > > > Some observations. > > When I installed 6.0 (base install), the installation interface did not guide > me through a network configuration. I do static IP addresses, not DHCP. > > I ended up manually configuring the various /etc/sysconfig

Re: [CentOS] is oprofile working on CENTOS 6.0 ?

2011-09-20 Thread William Reich
I did a opcontrol --deinit and echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog and then ran the script and everything seems to work now. wr From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of William Reich Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 1:23 PM To: cento

Re: [CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS 6.0 box

2011-09-20 Thread Robert Nichols
On 09/20/2011 12:48 PM, Jon Detert wrote: > I installed CentOS 6.0 on 2 different x86_64 boxen. Both originally had > selinux installed and enabled. I never touched selinux other than to remove > as much of it as I could via rpm -e. As far as I can tell, here are the > remaining packages that

Re: [CentOS] Installation of 6.0

2011-09-20 Thread Robert Nichols
On 09/20/2011 02:49 PM, Craig White wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Al Sparks wrote: > >> >> >> Some observations. >> >> When I installed 6.0 (base install), the installation interface did not >> guide me through a network configuration. I do static IP addresses, not >> DHCP. >> >> I en

Re: [CentOS] Installation of 6.0

2011-09-20 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 04:44:35 PM Robert Nichols wrote: > On 09/20/2011 02:49 PM, Craig White wrote: > > Guessing that you didn't look/watch the console on first boot but rather > > used ssh to connect from another station. If you haven't rebooted the > > system since the first boot, hoo

Re: [CentOS] Installation of 6.0

2011-09-20 Thread Craig White
On Sep 20, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 09/20/2011 02:49 PM, Craig White wrote: >> >> On Sep 20, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Al Sparks wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Some observations. >>> >>> When I installed 6.0 (base install), the installation interface did not >>> guide me through a netwo

Re: [CentOS] eth enumeration order

2011-09-20 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 20 September 2011 04:10, the following was written: > On 19.09.2011 23:48, Robert Spangler wrote: > > On Monday 19 September 2011 11:04, the following was written: > >> So > >> How do you specifiy the order in which NICs are enumerated? > >> or at least how to tell centos

Re: [CentOS] Installation of 6.0

2011-09-20 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 20 September 2011 17:39, the following was written: > On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 04:44:35 PM Robert Nichols wrote: > > On 09/20/2011 02:49 PM, Craig White wrote: > > > Guessing that you didn't look/watch the console on first boot but > > > rather used ssh to connect from another

Re: [CentOS] Finding i/o bottleneck

2011-09-20 Thread Chad Gross
Hi Nicolas, While this doesn't exactly answer your question, I was wondering what scheduler you were using on your GFS2 (Note: I have not used this file system before) block. You can find this by issuing 'cat /sys/block//queue/scheduler' ? By default the system uses cfq, which will show up as [cf

Re: [CentOS] Installation of 6.0

2011-09-20 Thread Al Sparks
> I guess it would all depend on what ISO you are using then because I built a > new system this weekend using 'CentOS-6.0-x86_64-minimal.iso' and upon reboot > I never get anything for first boot.  I had to edit my configuration files by > hand to get the system online. > > NetworkManager is a PO

Re: [CentOS] Installation of 6.0

2011-09-20 Thread Robert Nichols
On 09/20/2011 04:43 PM, Craig White wrote: >> Operation of the firstboot script depends on having a GUI installed. It >> doesn't get executed if you installed just the base system. > > actually, I haven't installed RHEL or CentOS v 6.x at all - just going on > recollection but even if it boo

Re: [CentOS] mdadm and drive identification?

2011-09-20 Thread Philip Pinto
You might want to try smartctl -a /dev/sda it would report something like this among other things Device Model: WDC WD3200YS-01PGB0 Serial Number:WD-WCAPD3169758 > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Joseph L. Casa

Re: [CentOS] mdadm and drive identification?

2011-09-20 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>You might want to try > >smartctl -a /dev/sda it would report something like this among other things Like the op said, it won't work through the hba. But Megacli will enumerate this with a -PDList. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-20 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 09:18 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > On Sep 19, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Craig White wrote: > > > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 18:41 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > >> On Sep 17, 2011, at 7:49 PM, Craig White wrote: > >> > >>> At some point, security updates for 6.1 will be released and then i