--On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 3:04 AM +0100 Always Learning
wrote:
> You need to do a little on-line reading about USB (the effective
> replacement for Centronics (parallel) ports and RS232/RS423 serial
> ports. Also about the PCI replacement called PCI-Express.
I see USB as being on par more
--On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 11:57 PM -0700 John R Pierce
wrote:
> the x86_64 architecture has teh same basic instructions as x86_32, but
> with more registers which are also wider 64 bit registers.
As someone who coded in assembler for PDP-11, PDP-10, 8086, and 68000, I
have to report that m
Sorry to be mean. But there are things off-topic and there are things
ooo-tooocc. And this one belongs in the
second category. Really, please take this elsewhere. Thanks.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
In article <50117.213.157.4.156.1314117697.squir...@nimrod.dscd.de>,
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > In article
> > ,
> > Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> >> I removed sendmail - but it also removed clamav-milter. When I tried
> >> to re-install clamav-milter it would have pulled sendmail back in so I
> >> a
On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 10:38:30 PM Drew wrote:
> > The older ISA (now called PATA = Parallel ATA) has been replaced by SATA
> > (Serial ATA). SATA has 3 speeds. Most new disks are either SATA 2 or
> > SATA 3 speed.
>
> IDE I assume you meant. :) ISA was the old bus PCI replaced.
Yes, but, te
On 08/24/11 12:05 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> As someone who coded in assembler for PDP-11, PDP-10, 8086, and 68000, I
> have to report that more registers is a Very Good Thing. Just how many more
> registers do you get when going to 64-bit?
indeed, thats the main performance gain, other than the
On 08/24/2011 01:59 AM John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/23/11 9:21 PM, ken wrote:
>> I haven't looked up and compared the lists of instructions
>> on 32- vs. 64-bit CPUs, but generally the bigger processors have more,
>> and more sophisticated, instructions. This means, e.g., that instead of
>> takin
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> I would like to upgrade my system to a 64 bit machine. I'd like to find a
> bare bones platform to build on. I'm not looking to spend a lot of money on
> this as it is a home system. I looked on the CentOS sponsor page but only
> saw hosting s
--On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 9:17 PM -0400 Thomas Dukes
wrote:
> I need PCI slots for an additional NIC and a 32 bit video capture card
> used for zoneminder.
Check with the zoneminder people to see what video capture options you can
get today that will work with their code. Fewer and fewer m
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 9:17 PM -0400 Thomas Dukes
>
> wrote:
>
>> I need PCI slots for an additional NIC and a 32 bit video capture card
>> used for zoneminder.
>
> Check with the zoneminder people to see what video capture options you can
> get today that will work
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Sorry to be mean. But there are things off-topic and there are things
> ooo-tooocc. And this one belongs in the
> second category. Really, please take this elsewhere. Thanks.
>
I've seen many threads about har
Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> Anyway, have you anything experience with CyberPower UPS's?
Small ones, for workstations? Yep, I've got one on mine at home. Been good.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Always Learning
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Hardware upgrade help
>
> I suggest:
>
> mini-tower / half-tower
> AMD 4 core processor with virtualization facility
> (AMD are cheaper than Intel
On 08/24/11 1:16 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> Ebay sell SATA -> PATA and vica versa adapters, plus others.
> So you should be able to use existing PATA drives on a newer
> SATA m/b with the right adapter.
not even worth the bother. SATA DVD-RW drives that are probably 6X
better than the last ATA
Please don't argue. Just don't send any more way off-topic stuff in the
future. Thanks.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 13:43
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] UPS issues with PFC PSU
>
> Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>
> > Anyway, have yo
Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
>> Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>> Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>>
>> > Anyway, have you anything experience with CyberPower UPS's?
>>
>> Small ones, for workstations? Yep, I've got one on mine at home. Been
good.
>
> Have you found a program to commun
How exactly is it OT if he needs the UPS to talk to CentOS??
please stop being so stuckup
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Sorry to be mean. But there are things off-topic and there are things
> ooo-tooocc. And this one belongs in the
>
Well!! This has been an adventure. I really appreciate all the help!!
Found this on tigerdirect:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4
01989&sku=B69-1317
Again, any advice, comments, etc., regarding any incompatibilites would be
welcomed!!
TIA,
Eddie
___
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:04:59AM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> How exactly is it OT if he needs the UPS to talk to CentOS??
Please don't top-post.
Because the original post made no mention of "CentOS" at all. At least
that's my guess and that's also the first impression I had about the
post.
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 21:16 +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
> Ebay sell SATA -> PATA and vica versa adapters, plus others.
> So you should be able to use existing PATA drives on a newer
> SATA m/b with the right adapter.
I was trying to avoid mentioning that 'name' in case one of the readers
got u
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:18 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:04:59AM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> How exactly is it OT if he needs the UPS to talk to CentOS??
>
> Please don't top-post.
>
> Because the original post made no mention of "CentOS" at all. At least
> that'
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:19 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> not even worth the bother. SATA DVD-RW drives that are probably 6X
> better than the last ATA versions are $19. SATA hard disks are dirt
> cheap for terabytes.
Wish we had those low prices in England. Buyers should be aware that
HDD
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> Because the original post made no mention of "CentOS" at all. At least
>> that's my guess and that's also the first impression I had about the
>> post.
Sorry I should have initially stated it was for CentOS6.
>>
>
> well, where else would h
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:26:39AM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> well, where else would he connect the UPS to? His fish tank?
Based on past nonsensical threads in this list that is indeed a
possibility, yes.
> Surely if someone has a PC, and is subscribed to a Linux mailing linux
> and asks for
25 matches
Mail list logo
