From: Always Learning
> Executing 'whoami' confirms Apache is the user. Giving Apache group rw
> on the /etc/sysconfig/iptables and ensuring the /sbin/iptables is
> executable by all, fails to resolve the problem.
> Is there any method of running iptables from an Apache originated
> process ?
I
Hi all,
I have a server which is really difficult to restart because
of usage requirements
and the fact that it's in a co-lo rack so miles away. I've added a
couple of drives which
I'd like to bring up and add to LVM but the config I know is in the
PERC BIOS and
requires a reboot.
Can the
How did you add the spare drives in the first place? Need a reboot that time?
나의 iPhone에서 보냄
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Le 22/08/2011 12:27, Fajar Priyanto a écrit :
> How did you add the spare drives in the first place? Need a reboot
> that time?
>
I assume that the hard drives are hot pluggable, but the point is to add
them to the Perc Raid volume group. I doubt it is possible without a
reboot, but you it shou
>I have a DRBL server, basically an nfs fileserver, which I am rebuilding. I
>want to
>put the high i/o directories on a separate raid array for performance.
>Currently
>everything is under / in one raid array.
>
>How can I tell which directories, obviously other than /home, are getting high
>rea
Dear List,
I have been getting system crash, syslog is reporting the following in
stdout...please advise.
Message from syslogd@saturn at Aug 21 03:38:08 ...
kernel: Northbridge Error, node 0
Message from syslogd@saturn at Aug 21 03:38:08 ...
kernel:ECC/ChipKill ECC error.
Message from sysl
Although I have the alias defined in /etc/aliases and /etc/postfix/aliases,
I'm not receiving root mail. Following the previous thread about unreceived
logwatch mail, I tested with a manual run of logwatch, and found that my ISP
is rejecting the mail because it is seeing an envelope carrying my
On Monday 22 Aug 2011 12:49:21 Anne Wilson wrote:
> Although I have the alias defined in /etc/aliases and /etc/postfix/aliases,
> I'm not receiving root mail. Following the previous thread about
> unreceived logwatch mail, I tested with a manual run of logwatch, and
> found that my ISP is rejectin
> : host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said: 550-Verification
>failed for 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope Sender:
>Domain must resolve in DNS! (in reply to RCPT TO command)
It looks like your outgoing mail from your local user(s) needs to be
masqueraded or the whole server does.
_
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:07 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> : host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said:
> 550-Verification
> failed for 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope
> Sender:
> Domain must resolve in DNS! (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Once your email is out on the Internet is needs
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> : host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said: 550-Verification
>> failed for 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope Sender:
>> Domain must resolve in DNS! (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>
> It looks like your outgoing mail from your local
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:12:54PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:07 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> > : host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said:
> > 550-Verification
> > failed for 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope
> > Sender:
> > Domain must resolve in DN
On Monday 22 Aug 2011 13:12:54 Always Learning wrote:
> Once your email is out on the Internet is needs a genuine Internet email
> address. xxx.lan is known only to your internal system and it is not an
> Internet email address.
>
Exactly - and my problem is knowing where it is getting this from.
On Monday, August 22, 2011 12:10:07 PM Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a server which is really difficult to restart because
> of usage requirements
> and the fact that it's in a co-lo rack so miles away. I've added a
> couple of drives which
> I'd like to bring up and add to LVM bu
On Monday, August 22, 2011 01:36:11 PM Lisandro Grullon wrote:
> Dear List,
> I have been getting system crash, syslog is reporting the following in
> stdout...please advise.
Sure, please don't use "reply" when starting a new thread.
> Message from syslogd@saturn at Aug 21 03:38:08 ...
> kernel:
Thank you peter for the input...I don't think its the motherboard as I
have 5 of these boxes and they all experiencing the same problem
(running the latest bios). I tried switching the RAM around and did
manual timing at 667 in the BIOS, hope this fixes the problem. Kingston
won't be too happy if I
On 22/08/2011 15:29, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 22 Aug 2011 13:12:54 Always Learning wrote:
>> Once your email is out on the Internet is needs a genuine Internet email
>> address. xxx.lan is known only to your internal system and it is not an
>> Internet email address.
>>
> Exactly - and my pro
Le lun 22 aoû 2011 14:29:29 CEST, Anne Wilson a écrit:
> ...
> Aug 22 14:02:12 borg postfix/smtp[2071]: B4693A377C: to=,
> relay=mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98]:25, delay=0.43,
> delays=0.09/0.02/0.15/0.18, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
> mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said: 550-Verificatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Kjellström wrote the following on 8/22/2011 8:34 AM:
> On Monday, August 22, 2011 12:10:07 PM Kevin Thorpe wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I have a server which is really difficult to restart because
>> of usage requirements
>> and the fact that it's in
Actually, the "main suspect" is the program or person that is sending out
mail with an unqualified sender, e.g. just "user". Change it to a
qualified sender (e.g. with a resolvable FQDN).
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cen
On 8/22/2011 9:26 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Actually, the "main suspect" is the program or person that is sending out
> mail with an unqualified sender, e.g. just "user". Change it to a
> qualified sender (e.g. with a resolvable FQDN).
>
With sendmail you can set 'MASQUERADE_AS' in sendmail.mc to
On 22/08/2011, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:12:54PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:07 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
>>
>> > : host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said:
>
> If you're running postfix, you might want to also edit /etc/aliases.
> The las
On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:11:51 PM Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Friday, August 05, 2011 05:25:13 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> > On 8/5/2011 9:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > > Our X520 are still stable except for one recent problem, 2.6.18-238.9.1
> > > -> 2.6.18-238.12.1 broke it quite bad.
Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> I have a server which is really difficult to restart because
> of usage requirements and the fact that it's in a co-lo
> rack so miles away. I've added a couple of drives which
> I'd like to bring up and add to LVM but the config I know is in the
> PERC BIOS and requires a
I have a shared web server that users can SSH / SFTP into to access their
web content. Each users home directory is in a change root, and I use
"mount -o bind" to put their respective webpage's document root into their
home directory. Recently I was made aware that the contents of the mount's
sou
It is obvious you run both Sendmail and Postfix, ending in trouble. The
sendmail binary (which is a symlink) still points to Sendmail, though you
seem to have configured Postfix as you system's MTA.
> I have been careful to re-map transports and restart postfix after any
> changes to the config fi
On 08/22/2011 07:01 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> I have a shared web server that users can SSH / SFTP into to access their
> web content. Each users home directory is in a change root, and I use
> "mount -o bind" to put their respective webpage's document root into their
> home directory. Recentl
One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum
install postfix followed by a yum remove sendmail. No need to deal with
alternatives if you don't intend to deal with sendmail anyway.
Regards.
Dennis
On 08/22/2011 08:45 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> It is obvious you
On 22 August 2011 20:48, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 08/22/2011 07:01 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
>> I have a shared web server that users can SSH / SFTP into to access their
>> web content. Each users home directory is in a change root, and I use
>> "mount -o bind" to put their respective w
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:15 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 22 August 2011 20:48, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
> wrote:
> > On 08/22/2011 07:01 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> >> I have a shared web server that users can SSH / SFTP into to access
> their
> >> web content. Each users home directory is in a
Hello list!
Well I have delved back into my proftpd config in the hopes of resolving my
issues and having a working server. :)
I believe I have the passive mode issue that I was expereriencing last time
mostly worked out. But there are still a couple of things going on with this
config that
On 22 August 2011 19:45, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
>> Anne
>
> alternatives --config mta
>
> Switch to Postfix. Validate by
>
> alternatives --display mta
>
> then remove Sendmail if you do not use it.
>
Thanks - that's what I was looking for.
alternatives --display mta
mta - status is manual.
l
32 matches
Mail list logo
