On Wednesday 10 Aug 2011 18:59:14 Paul Heinlein wrote:
> Oddly, when using sssd+ldap, getent without a specific key won't
> return ldap account information, but with a key it will. That is,
> "getent passwd" will return only accounts in the local /etc/passwd
> database, but "getent passwd bob" w
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Michael Gliwinski wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 Aug 2011 18:59:14 Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> Oddly, when using sssd+ldap, getent without a specific key won't
>> return ldap account information, but with a key it will. That is,
>> "getent passwd" will return only accounts in the local
dear All,
I'm trying to set Shadow options in Ldap with the help of phpLDAPadmin.
This is *what I know :
* */Shadowmax : /maximum nr of days a pw can be valid
* /ShadowLastchange : /contains the last change of the shadow file
* Shadowwarning : nr of days before expiration to warn user.
*What
From: Nguyen Vu Hung
> IIRC, libsafe was officially included in previous versions of Redhat.
> However, I found that libsafe is not on CentOS 5.6 yum repo.
> Is that any reason that such a good library like libsafe is excluded?
> Maybe is there any better alternative for libsafe recently?
No idea
From: Digimer
> http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF06a/15351-15351-4237916-4237918-4237917-4248009.html
It looks quite nice, although a tiny bit too big for me (no real need the room
for 4 HDs + 1 HD or DVD).
Saw that one guy was able to install a Smart Array P410 with 512MB BBC too (too
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Keith Roberts
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:36 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] ffmpeg
>
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
>
> *snip*
>
> >
Am Thu, 11 Aug 2011 03:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
schrieb John Doe :
> From: Digimer
>
> > http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF06a/15351-15351-4237916-4237918-4237917-4248009.html
>
> It looks quite nice, although a tiny bit too big for me (no real need
> the room for 4 HDs + 1 HD or DVD). Saw tha
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:02 +0200, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> dear All,
>
> I'm trying to set Shadow options in Ldap with the help of
> phpLDAPadmin.
>
> This is what I know :
>
> * Shadowmax : maximum nr of days a pw can be valid
> * ShadowLastchange : contains the last change of the shadow file
Paul,
Always Learning wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 17:10 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> listadmin,
>>
>>Can you PLEASE, PLEASE find *any* other blacklist than manitu? This
>> asshole's method was ok a dozen years ago; these days, with hosting sites
>> hosting tens or hundreds of thousa
Always Learning wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> Waste of time and resources. Learn how to properly handle email and
>> none of this nonsense is necessary.
>
> Properly handling emails means, to me, not being too reliant on others
> whose faults and omissions
Hi Mark,
> You don't seem to understand the issue. My hosting provider has
> literally hundreds of thousands of domains. The email gets funneled for
> all, I assume, except those paying for co-location, through their
> heavy-duty mailhost. manitu sees spam coming from that mailhost, and
> blo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/2011 05:51 PM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
> On 8/10/2011 5:40 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> SELinux? I'm out of ideas apart from that.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
> audit2allow logged.
>
> I suppose I can try temporary turning selinux off to see if it ma
Hello Graig,
I'll follow your advise and drop this.
Thanks for the link, it's very interesting.
grt, James
Op 11-08-11 13:02, Craig White schreef:
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:02 +0200, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>> dear All,
>>
>> I'm trying to set Shadow options in Ldap with the help of
>> phpLDA
Hi Mark,
> > Why not run your own mail server ? I use Exim (a Sendmail replacement)
> Because I'm not going to pay for colocation, or whatever. This is my
> personal domain, etc, and I'm paying about $6US for it a month. I'm not
> running a business, and so don't want to pay $$$ to Verizon for
Always Learning wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
>> You don't seem to understand the issue. My hosting provider has
>> literally hundreds of thousands of domains. The email gets funneled for
>> all, I assume, except those paying for co-location, through their
>> heavy-duty mailhost. manitu sees spam coming fr
we block with manitu = nixspam as our primary RBL (followed by Spamhaus).
Results are excellent. Their blocking is very reasonable. It's also
possible to ask for inclusion in the whitelist. Obviously your great ISP
Roadrunner isn't interested in inclusion or is sending out so many spam
that the
On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 05:11:12 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> This is annoying. I've been trying to get motion working correctly on
> CentOS 6.
> I installed faad2-libs. It *still* will not install, telling me the same:
> Error: Package: ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.el5.x86_64
> (rpmfusi
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 09:09 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> The real problem is manitou.net, and their "algorythm". 15 years ago, it
> might have been reasonable to track mailhosts, and block all mail coming
> from that host. For the last 10 years, at least, it's *wrong*. Even the
> best of 'Net
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 06:52 +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote:
>
> > Why not run your own mail server ? I use Exim (a Sendmail replacement)
> > on several servers. I refuse incoming mails where the sender's HELO /
> > EHLO does not match the sender's IP hos
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> we block with manitu = nixspam as our primary RBL (followed by Spamhaus).
> Results are excellent. Their blocking is very reasonable. It's also
> possible to ask for inclusion in the whitelist. Obviously your great ISP
> Roadrunner isn't interested in inclusion or is sending o
On 8/11/2011 8:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Obviously I don't know your computer situation. It seems your present
>> 'service' is not always reliable, so is there anything we can do to help
>> you devise an alternative plan ?
>
> No, you still don't understand.
How much sympathy do you expe
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:52:47AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/11/2011 8:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >
>
> So move them to gmail. Price is right. End of problem.
If you don't
> like their browser interface, use pop/imap and authenticated smtp.
Did gmail ever fix their "featur
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/11/2011 8:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> 1. I'm not going to join this list, or any other, from multiple email
>> accounts
>
> So move them to gmail. Price is right. End of problem. If you don't
No. Not ever. I have no intention of using a service that will have
*y
On 8/11/2011 9:58 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:52:47AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 8/11/2011 8:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
>>
>> So move them to gmail. Price is right. End of problem.
>
>
>
>
> If you don't
>> like their browser interface, use pop/imap and auth
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:02 AM, wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 8/11/2011 8:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>> 1. I'm not going to join this list, or any other, from multiple email
>>> accounts
>>
>> So move them to gmail. Price is right. End of problem. If you don't
>
> No. Not ever. I
On 8/11/2011 10:02 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> So move them to gmail. Price is right. End of problem. If you don't
>
> No. Not ever. I have no intention of using a service that will have
> *years*, at least, of backups of all my mail, including stuff that was
> hypothetically d/l and *delete
Hi,
I try to set up
- A centos 6 firewall
- With proxy-arp (I know: arp is not supported in ipv6)
with ipv6.
Arp does not exist for ipv6. So I have added:
sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.default.proxy_ndp=1
To use the neighbor proxy facility.
How to activate ipv6 forwarding? As far
I work with ffmpeg a lot. I recommend that you don't try to build the rpms
which are constantly out of date. ffmpeg is a moving target so I recommend
compiling it from git. It's relatively easy and you can find most of the
dependencies in either epel or rpmforge (lame, xvid, faac etc...). There are
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Brandon Ooi wrote:
> I work with ffmpeg a lot. I recommend that you don't try to build the rpms
> which are constantly out of date. ffmpeg is a moving target so I recommend
> compiling it from git. It's relatively easy and you can find most of the
> dependencies
What do I need to enable XFS support in CentOS 6? is there a "CentOS
Plus" kernel yet that enables this ?
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
On 08/11/2011 06:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> What do I need to enable XFS support in CentOS 6? is there a "CentOS
> Plus" kernel yet that enables this ?
>
>
xfs is available in the stock distro
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://l
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:17:50 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/11/2011 06:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> What do I need to enable XFS support in CentOS 6? is there a
>> "CentOS
>> Plus" kernel yet that enables this ?
>>
>>
>
> xfs is available in the stock distro
Only for the x86_64 kernel.
Brandon Ooi wrote:
> I work with ffmpeg a lot. I recommend that you don't try to build the rpms
> which are constantly out of date. ffmpeg is a moving target so I recommend
> compiling it from git. It's relatively easy and you can find most of the
Not to be insulting, but I *wish* folks would rea
On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
> Always Learning wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
>>> Waste of time and resources. Learn how to properly handle email and
>>> none of this nonsense is necessary.
>>
>> Properly handling emails means, to me, not being
Craig White wrote:
>
> On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
>
>> Always Learning wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
Waste of time and resources. Learn how to properly handle email and
none of this nonsense is necessary.
>>>
>>> Properly handling ema
Sorry, mouse ran away there with the last post with no comments.
Craig White wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
>> Always Learning wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> You don't seem to understand the issue. My hosting provider has
>> literally h
On 08/11/2011 10:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
>> On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
>>> Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
>>> You don't seem to understand the issue. My hosting provider has
>>> literally hundreds o
On Thursday, August 11, 2011 01:25:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Now, so far, motion, and ffmpeg, are not available for 6.
> rpmfusion/updates/free/testing has faad2. I don't see ffmpeg, much less
> motion. So I'm stuck trying to work from an 5 repository for ffmpeg.
There are basic dependency i
Josh Miller wrote:
> On 08/11/2011 10:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Craig White wrote:
>>> On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
>>
You don't seem to understand the issue. My hosting provider h
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Thursday, August 11, 2011 01:25:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Now, so far, motion, and ffmpeg, are not available for 6.
>> rpmfusion/updates/free/testing has faad2. I don't see ffmpeg, much less
>> motion. So I'm stuck trying to work from an 5 repository for ffmpeg.
>
> Th
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 13:56 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > If an RBL has designated a particular SMTP server or range of SMTP servers
> > as a source for spam then the solution lies with those that own the SMTP
> > servers to satisfy the RBL and get the blocks removed.
>
On Thursday, August 11, 2011 01:05:46 PM Brandon Ooi wrote:
> I work with ffmpeg a lot. I recommend that you don't try to build the rpms
> which are constantly out of date. ffmpeg is a moving target so I recommend
> compiling it from git.
This breaks, with regularity, ZoneMinder for one. I succe
On 08/11/11 10:23 AM, Morten Stevens wrote:
>> xfs is available in the stock distro
> Only for the x86_64 kernel.
ah. i needed to install xfsprogs and xfsdump to get mkfs.xfs.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
___
On 08/11/2011 11:12 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Josh Miller wrote:
>> In fact, that is one of the single most effective mechanisms used to
>> combat spam, in my experience and will cut down the amount accepted at
>> the gateway(s) by up to 95%.
>
> I'm not sure who you're answering or agreeing wi
Always Learning wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 13:56 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Craig White wrote:
>
>> And that's *EXACTLY* what I'm saying is the wrong thing to do. Dunno
>> where you live, but go ahead, for whoever provides 'Net access to your
>> home: call them up, or email them, and tel
On Aug 11, 2011, at 10:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Sorry, mouse ran away there with the last post with no comments.
>
> Craig White wrote:
>> On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
>>> Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
>>> You don't
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:12:03 -0400:
> I'm not sure who you're answering or agreeing with, but my point is still
> that 90% of everybody blocked has no clue whatever about what to do about
> it, and esp. the people with infected systems. A standard channel *to* an
> ISP for t
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:46:22 -0400:
> I'm sorry, nobody seems to get what I've been saying: I haven't been on
> roadrunner for two years. I'm sending this email via bluehost, my current
> hosting provider.
Ok, so you use Bluehost and one of their mailservers got on the list
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: John R Pierce
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 6 and XFS
>
> On 08/11/11 10:23 AM, Morten Stevens wrote:
>>> xfs is available in the stock distro
>> Only for the x86_64 kernel.
>
> ah. i needed to install xfsprogs and xfsdu
On 8/11/2011 1:16 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> Let me know when they get back to you. I'll look for your email sometime
>> around the time when you move and change providers.
>
> You can not change the world on your own, even a little bit, without
> some help. Help from mass 'Internet connection
Josh Miller wrote:
> On 08/11/2011 11:12 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Josh Miller wrote:
>>> In fact, that is one of the single most effective mechanisms used to
>>> combat spam, in my experience and will cut down the amount accepted at
>>> the gateway(s) by up to 95%.
>>
>> I'm not sure who you'
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:12:03 -0400:
>
>> I'm not sure who you're answering or agreeing with, but my point is
>> still that 90% of everybody blocked has no clue whatever about what
>> to do about it, and esp. the people with infected systems. A standard
>
On 08/11/2011 03:38 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Digimer
>
>> http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF06a/15351-15351-4237916-4237918-4237917-4248009.html
>
> It looks quite nice, although a tiny bit too big for me (no real need the
> room for 4 HDs + 1 HD or DVD).
> Saw that one guy was able t
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:46:22 -0400:
>
>> I'm sorry, nobody seems to get what I've been saying: I haven't been on
>> roadrunner for two years. I'm sending this email via bluehost, my
>> current
>> hosting provider.
>
> Ok, so you use Bluehost and one of t
On 8/11/2011 1:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Be pragmatic. Accept partial defeat. Get an alternative email
>> arrangement and you may become more happier.
>
> NO. I WILL *NOT* allow the goddamned spammers to block me from the 'Net,
> and I'm *not* willing to have them cost me my email, and go
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 08:53:02PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Is it really the first time that you hear about the concept of RBLs? They
> have been around for years and have proven to be one of the most effective
> ways to combat spam, still.
I'll love to see how they handle IPv6 once machines
How do you change the LUKS filesystem password?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
Could CentOS kernel keepers apply following patch on current kernel?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95785/
(Current as: 2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64)
With the patch applied, and a ".local" kernel built, I get 30% higher
throughput with vmxnet3 in my IP routing node, than when using e100
> Hi,
>
> Could CentOS kernel keepers apply following patch on current kernel?
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95785/
>
> (Current as: 2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64)
Maybe it could go into the plus kernel, but I'm quite sure it will not be
put into the standard kernel.
Did you check if it is
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could CentOS kernel keepers apply following patch on current kernel?
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95785/
(snip)
> Could this be applied on stock CentOS kernel so that I could return on
> un-customized kernel use?
Because
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:07:49 -0400:
> No. I've been blocked for a period ranging from hours to several days, and
> kept getting myself unbanned, a number of times in the last couple of
> years.
I see. So you got what you paid for.
Kai
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:03:45 -0400:
> I'm sorry if I've confused you.
*You* confused things. You mixed ISPs and hosting. You can't. You were
talking largely about ISPs and how their customers get blocked from
sending mail directly and how they don't have a clue. I was try
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, ken wrote:
> How do you change the LUKS filesystem password?
[Caveat: this is sort of from memory; I don't have a luks-encrypted
device handy for testing...]
First, add a second key (password):
cryptsetup luksAddKey /dev/XXX
Then delete the original key
cryptsetup
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:17:02 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> The issue is a bug in vmxnet3 driver, which is not able to disable
> LRO mode when the kernel is telling the driver to do so.
> The patch for it applies on 2.6.32 kernels as well as 2.6.38/39 where
> it got applied to baseline.
What is wit
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
*snip*
> Many/most ISP's provide an upstream SMTP relay as part of
> the service. If they do, configure it as your smart_host
> and it will fix the problem. If they don't, find some
> other relay service.
Is this any good?
http://www.noreply.org/echol
On 8/11/2011 4:56 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> *snip*
>
>> Many/most ISP's provide an upstream SMTP relay as part of
>> the service. If they do, configure it as your smart_host
>> and it will fix the problem. If they don't, find some
>> other relay service
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Morten Stevens
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:17:02 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
>
>> The issue is a bug in vmxnet3 driver, which is not able to disable
>> LRO mode when the kernel is telling the driver to do so.
>> The patch for it applies on 2.6.32 kernels as well
--On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 01:52:21 PM -0400 Harold Pritchett
wrote:
> [harold@newmick ~]$ sieveshell localhost
> connecting to localhost
> unable to connect to server at /usr/bin/sieveshell line 170.
Try specifying both --user and --authname as appropriate. sieveshell
can be misleading in
I notice that the smartd service is not running by default on a new
installation. But palimpsest seems to get updated statistics every so often as
when I check the statistics on a drive it says "last updated" some number of
minutes ago.
So if smartd isn't running, where does palimpsest get its inf
At Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:57:59 -0600 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> I notice that the smartd service is not running by default on a new
> installation. But palimpsest seems to get updated statistics every so often as
> when I check the statistics on a drive it says "last updated" some number of
>
Hi swapping out bash for tsch doen't work unfortunately. The window that gets
created when you do this only stays open for a split second. You are right, bash
is on the Centos server, it is just that the many custom environment variables
at my workplace only work in a tsch shell. Anyone know a wa
Ngày 04:16 12/08/2011, ken viết:
> How do you change the LUKS filesystem password?
Please take a look at our wiki
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/EncryptedFilesystem
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:42:46 -0400
Robert Heller wrote:
> Almost all modern disk are S.M.A.R.T capable. What this means is that
> various information about the disk, mostly relating to its health can be
> monitored. This includes things like sector errors. If smartd is
> running root will get E
>As smartd isn't running in the default Centos configuration, where does
>palimpsest get its information? Is it a self-contained program that doesn't
>require smartd or is something else happening behind the scenes?
I think you misunderstood the first reply: smartd, as in the init script is a
me
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 04:05:47 +
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I think you misunderstood the first reply: smartd, as in the init script is a
> means to alert root of pending issues, _it_ doesn't present the data, _that_
> init script simply checks it and reports it. You don't need it running to
> ma
>Which still doesn't answer my question. Perhaps I'm wording it poorly -- I'll
>try again:
Perhaps palimpsest runs smartctl and queries the device itself? Perhaps it
borrowed
code from the project and runs the query itself? I don't have any servers with
GUI's,
couldn't tell you...
_
76 matches
Mail list logo
