Hello,
I'm trying to rebuild redhat openssl rpm with eliptic curve support
enabled. What I did is just edit the spec file and modify the
configure parameters from no-ec to enable-ec.
Not surprisingly the package does not build with this enabled:
http://pastie.org/2334009
This appears to be deliber
> Install Open Office. It is supposed to be 100% compatible with M$ Office
> and you are unlikely to lose your cursor. It is in the usual
> repositories.
Maybe Office 97. :P
We used it in some limited form during the last few years (Boss wanted
to save on costs) and while it's *okay* at handling
2011/8/7 Lucian :
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to rebuild redhat openssl rpm with eliptic curve support
> enabled. What I did is just edit the spec file and modify the
> configure parameters from no-ec to enable-ec.
> Not surprisingly the package does not build with this enabled:
> http://pastie.org/233
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2011/8/7 Lucian :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to rebuild redhat openssl rpm with eliptic curve support
>> enabled. What I did is just edit the spec file and modify the
>> configure parameters from no-ec to enable-ec.
>> Not surprisingly the pa
2011/8/7 Lucian :
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> 2011/8/7 Lucian :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to rebuild redhat openssl rpm with eliptic curve support
>>> enabled. What I did is just edit the spec file and modify the
>>> configure parameters from no-ec to enable-ec.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> But, still the source it not compiling after removing hobble-openssl
> script. maybe red hat also removed some definitions from evp.h ?
>
I can confirm that the build still fails even after nuking the hobble
script. When I get some time I
2011/8/7 Lucian :
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>
>> But, still the source it not compiling after removing hobble-openssl
>> script. maybe red hat also removed some definitions from evp.h ?
>>
>
> I can confirm that the build still fails even after nuking the hobble
> sc
Hi,
Just wondering if the QA site will also have info & updates on the
progress of 6.1?
Thanks!
Parick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 03:05:42PM +0700, LHT. Qu???c wrote:
> Does anyone try Xen in Kernel 3.0? I use "$ git clone
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git
> linux-3.0.0-xen" command and it works.
>
Btw you don't need to get jeremy's tree anymore for Xen dom0 support,
you
On 08/08/2011 12:01 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 03:05:42PM +0700, LHT. Qu???c wrote:
>> Does anyone try Xen in Kernel 3.0? I use "$ git clone
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git
>> linux-3.0.0-xen" command and it works.
>>
> Btw you don't need to
10 matches
Mail list logo