>> >> You need at least a 2.6.38 kernel.
>> >>
>> >> From: http://intellinuxgraphics.org/2011Q1.html
>> >>
>> >
>> > And in case of CentOS it means Redhat needs to backport the driver to
>> > el6
>> > 2.6.32 kernel.
>>
>> I admit that my secret dream is that RH already would have done that for
>>
My problem was 'cmdline' (worked fine with CentOS 5 though)...
I switched to 'text' and it works now (with the DVD isos).
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Dear all,
We're trying to use Nessus to monitor our system and we're having a hard
time mapping the package versions from RedHat to CentOS in order to be
able to report against CVE (vulnerability reports).
After some research, we think that the mapping is as follows (using
HTTPD as the example
2011/8/1 Gabriel Tabares :
> Dear all,
>
> We're trying to use Nessus to monitor our system and we're having a hard
> time mapping the package versions from RedHat to CentOS in order to be
> able to report against CVE (vulnerability reports).
How do you use nagios to cve monitoring? Is there plugi
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:21:24PM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2011/8/1 Gabriel Tabares :
> >
> > We're trying to use Nessus to monitor our system and we're having a hard
> > time mapping the package versions from RedHat to CentOS in order to be
> > able to report against CVE (vulnerability repo
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Eero Volotinen
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] RedHat to CentOS packages
>
> 2011/8/1 Gabriel Tabares :
>> Dear all,
>>
>> We're trying to use Nessus to monitor our system and we're having a hard
>> time mapping the package ver
On 01/08/11 17:10, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We're trying to use Nessus to monitor our system and we're having a hard
> time mapping the package versions from RedHat to CentOS in order to be
> able to report against CVE (vulnerability reports).
>
> After some research, we think that th
--On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 12:54 AM -0300 Rogelio
wrote:
> The free DHCP solution, ISC, seems to be having scaling issues (i.e.
> handling only about 200 DHCPDISCOVER and 20 DHCPRENEW requests)
Over what time period?
Have you asked on the ISC DHCP mailing list? They'll know best how to tune
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Ned Slider wrote:
> But as outlined in that thread it is not always easy (or indeed
> possible) to establish which upstream source a given CentOS modified
> package is built from. A more reliable method would be to check the
> changelog.
A most reliable mechanism would be to e
--On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:44 AM -0500 cbul...@gmail.com wrote:
> We are trying to track some specific rules using LOG as target.
> Everything is working well but the problem is that iptables is flooding
> the console with LOG messages.
In addition to the other suggestions, you could switc
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 12:54 AM -0300 Rogelio
> wrote:
>
>> The free DHCP solution, ISC, seems to be having scaling issues (i.e.
>> handling only about 200 DHCPDISCOVER and 20 DHCPRENEW requests)
I've only been watching this thread with half att
On 08/01/2011 03:23 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:44 AM -0500 cbul...@gmail.com wrote:
We are trying to track some specific rules using LOG as target.
Everything is working well but the problem is that iptables is flooding
the console with LOG messages.
In additio
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 06:00:26 PM Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> On Friday 29 July 2011 22:45, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> > I have a tested copy of EL6 that I would like to duplicate to a
> > number of similar servers, but can't seem to find a sane howto on the
> > subject. TLDP's "Hard disk upgrade
13 matches
Mail list logo
