On Friday, July 29, 2011 08:02:20 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> If the machines are pretty much identical, clonezilla should work. Boot
> the machine with a 'clonezilla-live' CD or USB drive. If you can attach
> the target drive to the same machine you can go disk->disk. Otherwise,
> connect to some
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Jake Shipton wrote:
> On 07/29/2011 12:48 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
>> Heck, I'd settle for people coming back to a "problem / issue" thread
>> and updating on how or what the actual problem was or what they did to
>> get the thing to work properly.
>>
>> So often
So here goes...
First some back story
-Centos 5 with latest updates as of yesterday. kernel is
2.6.18-238.19.1.el5
-setup is raid 1 for /boot and lvm over raid6 for everything else
- The / partition (lvm "RootVol") had run out of room... (100%
full, things where falling appart...)
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011, Cliff Pratt wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list
From: Cliff Pratt
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple
factors
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Jake Shipton wrote:
On 07/29/2011 12:48 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
Heck, I'd settle for p
On 07/30/2011 06:37 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 08:07:38PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to use oprofile to debug a problem with idle virtual machines
>> eating 10% cpu but apparently the debuginfo packages for Centos 6 do not
>> exist and so I ca
Am 30.07.2011 10:37, schrieb Sean Hart:
> So here goes...
> First some back story
> -Centos 5 with latest updates as of yesterday. kernel is
> 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5
> -setup is raid 1 for /boot and lvm over raid6 for everything else
>
> - The / partition (lvm "RootVol") had run out o
On 07/29/2011 02:21 PM Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:05:27AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> On 07/29/11 10:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Well, my new workstation has an internal speaker, as well as the jacks for
>>> external. I want beeps, if necessary, but I can't fi
At Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:45:42 -0700 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> I have a tested copy of EL6 that I would like to duplicate to a number of
> similar servers, but can't seem to find a sane howto on the subject. TLDP's
> "Hard disk upgrade howto" is embarrassingly antiquated: when's the
I installed CentOS 6 to Acer 7750 laptop, which has Intel Sandybridge CPU
( i5-2410M) with integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000.
By default X won't use intel driver for graphics, but vesa instead, which
limits the resolution to 1024x768. I tried to force the use of intel driver
by writing a xorg.c
On 7/30/11 2:03 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> On Friday, July 29, 2011 08:02:20 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> > If the machines are pretty much identical, clonezilla should work. Boot
>
> > the machine with a 'clonezilla-live' CD or USB drive. If you can attach
>
> > the target drive to the same mach
I see in my overnight email spool:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726872
I am amused because this kind of request comes up time and
time again with respect the package management system
It is technically _possible_ to attain this kind of rollbacks,
in some tightly controlled e
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:12:28 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 7/30/11 2:03 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> > On Friday, July 29, 2011 08:02:20 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> >
> > > If the machines are pretty much identical, clonezilla should work. Boot
> >
> > > the machine with a 'clonezilla-l
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 10:37:37 AM R P Herrold wrote:
> I see in my overnight email spool:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726872
>
> I am amused because this kind of request comes up time and
> time again with respect the package management system
...
I had to check my cal
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 11:18:34 AM Robert Heller wrote:
> dd can be problematic if the target and source disks are different
> (sizes, geometry, etc.), since dd will do a literal sector-by-sector
> copy, which is not generally advisable (and why o why to people *keep*
> suggesting it? -- it is
Hey, at least the bug poster took the time to write it up nicely. Still
impossible...
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> I see in my overnight email spool:
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726872
--
Jim
Hi list,
I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their
domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
thus www.mydomain.org goes to one of godaddy's servers but the
mydomain.org and mail.mydomain.org and ns1.mydomain.org all go elsewhere.
My website desi
Am 30.07.2011 18:55, schrieb Rob Kampen:
> Hi list,
> I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their
> domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
> thus www.mydomain.org goes to one of godaddy's servers but the
> mydomain.org and mail.mydomain.org and ns1.
On 07/30/2011 12:55 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Hi list,
> I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their
> domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
> thus www.mydomain.org goes to one of godaddy's servers but the
> mydomain.org and mail.mydomain.org and ns1
Hello Rob,
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 12:55 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
>
> Again, the standard practice in the industry is for name.org and
> www.name.org to be "tied" together.
True, standard practice, but that doesn't mean that it *has* to be done
like this.
> they say that out of close to 1
> mi
It's extremely common for an HTTP connection to the unqualified
first-level domain to direct one to the website home page, but whether
that is accomplished by having the IPs be the same or by way of an
HTTP redirect, I would not say there's any clear winner. However, it
is not a universal practic
On 7/30/11 11:55 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Hi list,
> I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their domain
> and
> storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
> thus www.mydomain.org goes to one of godaddy's servers but the mydomain.org
> and
> mail.mydomain.org and
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:51:04 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Saturday, July 30, 2011 11:18:34 AM Robert Heller wrote:
> > dd can be problematic if the target and source disks are different
> > (sizes, geometry, etc.), since dd will do a literal sector-by-sector
> > copy, which is not ge
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Bart Schaefer
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] www.mydomain.org and mydomain.org should resolve to the
> same IP
>
> It's extremely common for an HTTP connection to the unqualified
> first-level domain to direct one to the w
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:55:33 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
> Hi list,
> I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their
> domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
> thus www.mydomain.org goes to one of godaddy's servers but the
> mydomain.or
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:03:23PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 06:37 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 08:07:38PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm trying to use oprofile to debug a problem with idle virtual machines
> >> eating 10% c
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:45:15PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:55:33 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
> > I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their
> > domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
> > Again, the standard p
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:45:15PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:55:33 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their
domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.
On 7/30/11 12:30 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:51:04 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Saturday, July 30, 2011 11:18:34 AM Robert Heller wrote:
>>> dd can be problematic if the target and source disks are different
>>> (sizes, geometry, etc.), since dd will do a li
At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:19:40 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 7/30/11 12:30 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:51:04 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Saturday, July 30, 2011 11:18:34 AM Robert Heller wrote:
> >>> dd can be problematic if the target
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 30.07.2011 10:37, schrieb Sean Hart:
>> So here goes...
>> First some back story
>> -Centos 5 with latest updates as of yesterday. kernel is
>> 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5
>> -setup is raid 1 for /boot and lvm over raid6 for everythin
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 10:17 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> It's extremely common for an HTTP connection to the unqualified
> first-level domain to direct one to the website home page, but whether
> that is accomplished by having the IPs be the same or by way of an
> HTTP redirect, I would not say
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Sean Hart wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> Am 30.07.2011 10:37, schrieb Sean Hart:
>>> So here goes...
>>> First some back story
>>> -Centos 5 with latest updates as of yesterday. kernel is
>>> 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5
>>>
On 07/29/11 11:22 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And I've had the external speakers jacked in both in the front
> "headphones" jack, and the traditional one in the back, and sound comes
> both out of the external speakers and a speaker inside the machine.
sound cards have a myriad of different ways
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:15 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> If you remove the ServerAlias from the apache config these
> domains can be safely separated, even on IP if you wish.
>
> I'm hosting a kind of fall back page at http://ottolander.nl which is
> what shows up if someone tries to a
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:12 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> www is typically just an A record and not a subdomain.
Why is it not a sub-domain ?
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 18:19 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> How do you disable gnome-panel on centos 6?
>
> Before I could at least kill gnome-panel on centos 5, however
> on centos 6 even kill -9 gnome-panel restarts it again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Panel
GNOME Panel is a highly confi
Am 31.07.2011 01:05, schrieb Always Learning:
>
> On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:12 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
>> www is typically just an A record and not a subdomain.
>
> Why is it not a sub-domain ?
A subdomain would have their own zone and could be delegated.
Alexander
_
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 01:20 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 31.07.2011 01:05, schrieb Always Learning:
> >
> > On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:12 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> >
> >> www is typically just an A record and not a subdomain.
> >
> > Why is it not a sub-domain ?
>
> A subdomai
On 07/30/11 9:55 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Again, the standard practice in the industry is for name.org and
> www.name.org to be "tied" together.
if the domain is primarily a website, for sure, in fact, many of my
websites prefer domain.com to www.domain.com and in fact, I redirect the
latter to
On Friday 29 July 2011 22:45, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> I have a tested copy of EL6 that I would like to duplicate to a
> number of similar servers, but can't seem to find a sane howto on the
> subject. TLDP's "Hard disk upgrade howto" is embarrassingly
> antiquated: when's the last time you saw LIL
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 16:49 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> ServerName astronomy.santa-cruz.ca.us
> DocumentRoot //html
> ErrorLog /./logs/error_log
> CustomLog //logs/access_log common
>
>
>
> ServerName astro.santa-cruz.ca.us
>
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 16:49 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>
>>
>> ServerName astronomy.santa-cruz.ca.us
>> DocumentRoot //html
>> ErrorLog /./logs/error_log
>> CustomLog //logs/access_log c
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 13:47 +1200, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 16:49 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> ServerName astronomy.santa-cruz.ca.us
> >> DocumentRoot //html
> >> Er
On 07/30/11 6:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> You can amalgamate that into a single entry .
that doesn't do the redirect. I *want* it so that if you go to any of
these URLs...
http://astro.santa-cruz.ca.us
http://www.astro.santa-cruz.ca.us
http://www.astronomy.santa-cruz.ca.u
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 2:39 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/30/11 6:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>> You can amalgamate that into a single entry .
>
> that doesn't do the redirect. I *want* it so that if you go to any of
> these URLs...
>
> http://astro.santa-cruz.ca.us
> http://www
hello list!!
I'm attempting to find out why this cron job isn't running. the host is centos
5.6 on i386 just so you know.
0 3 * * * /bin/alldb >
/home/bluethundr/backupdb/alldb-$(date +%Y%m%d%H%S).sql
The job is meant to backup all the databases on a mysql serve
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:39 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/30/11 6:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> > You can amalgamate that into a single entry .
>
> that doesn't do the redirect. I *want* it so that if you go to any of
> these URLs...
>
> http://astro.santa-cruz.ca.us
> h
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> hello list!!
>
> I'm attempting to find out why this cron job isn't running. the host is
> centos 5.6 on i386 just so you know.
>
>
> 0 3 * * * /bin/alldb >
> /home/bluethundr/backupdb/alldb-$(date +%Y%m%d%H%S).s
On 07/30/2011 11:07 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> 03***/bin/alldb > /home/bluethundr/backupdb/alldb-$(date
> +%Y%m%d%H%S).sql
I think the date paremters (percent etc) is causing you problems here.
Try it simple first:
* * * * */bin/alldb > /home/bluethundr/backupdb/alldb-t
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 03:19:01PM +1200, Cliff Pratt wrote:
>
> Tim, the program is run by cron in a different environment to the
> standard online environment. Is /bin/alldb a script? If so, *any*
> program in the script should have a full path, or the PATH enviroment
> variable should be specifi
50 matches
Mail list logo