[CentOS] centos6 xen

hi, is there any chance to see a xen kernel + xen in centosplus probably? or is any recommend 3rd party repo available yet which provides this? cheers, juergen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

On 07/28/2011 08:01 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: > hi, > > is there any chance to see a xen kernel + xen in centosplus probably? or > is any recommend 3rd party repo available yet which provides this? if someone was to step up and offer to manintain it, and a few people to help test it - CentO

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

Hello Kb, theres myoungs repo available, he maintains a 2.6.32 kernel for fedora which has been ported to rhel/centos 6 as well. http://xenbits.xen.org/people/mayoung/ perhaps this could be a base for cplus xen. for me it worked fine so far, but i whouldnt take it onto production until further

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: > > i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :) Far from it. Xen still has a place as a dom0. John -- Since when do we have to agree with people

Re: [CentOS] Subnet expansion

From: Fajar Priyanto > Currently I have this network: > 10.1.16.0/22. > 10.1.16.0-10.16.17.254 are DHCP managed > 10.1.18.0-10.1.19.254 are statically assigned > If I need to expand it to: > 10.1.16.0/20 > 1. What is the best way to do it with minimal network disruption? I am no subneting pro bu

[CentOS] /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (24333) - No such process

Hello I've installed a new mailserver with CentOS 6.0 x86_64. For the reporting I need logcheck. I've the same problem as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678436 Description of problem: I installed logcheck and now I get mails from cron with the following error message: Subject:

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

Hi, A few more questions :) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: >> >> i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :) > > Far from it.  Xen still has a place as a dom0. What are the re

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

Am 28.07.11 11:23, schrieb Peter Peltonen: > Hi, > > A few more questions :) > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: >>> >>> i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :) >> >> Far fro

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

On 07/28/2011 10:23 AM, Peter Peltonen wrote: > What are the reasons for people staying with Xen as dom0, just the > learning curve? Or are there some technical considerations as well? while they are all relevant and good questions, please start a new thread when going off on a tangent from the e

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart and CentOS 6...

From: John Doe > I am trying to upgrade my kickstart usb key to 6.0 and I ran into a few > issues. > I boot with: >   append initrd=initrd.img ks=hd:sdb2:/ks.cfg repo=hd:sdb2:/centos > and in the ks.cfg I have: >   harddrive --partition=sdb2 --dir=/centos > and on sdb2 I have: >   sdb2:/centos/C

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Peltonen wrote: > Hi, > > A few more questions :) > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: >>> >>> i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :)

Re: [CentOS] non PAE support

On 28 July 2011 03:09, Robert Heller wrote: > At Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:39:55 -0500 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> >> >> On Jul 27, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> >> > >> > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 10:15 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: >> > >> >> you can build the kernel RPM on any other

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] How to remove Microsoft soft raid?

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 11:17 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote: > Drew wrote on 07/21/2011 11:09 AM: > >> From the sounds of it it's fake raid. M$ doesn't leave any signatures > > on their raid system that linux will detect. dm/md raid can see > > fakeraid signatures in newer versions so the installer ma

Re: [CentOS] Subnet expansion

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:53 PM, John Hodrien wrote: >> Currently I have this network: >> 10.1.16.0/22. >> 10.1.16.0-10.16.17.254 are DHCP managed >> 10.1.18.0-10.1.19.254 are statically assigned >> >> If I need to expand it to: >> 10.1.16.0/20 >> > I think the answer to this part is not trivially

Re: [CentOS] non PAE support

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 11:33 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote: > "ok mum, lets get you setup with centos6..oh dear.. it looks like you > bought your laptop at exactly the wrong period in intel's mobile cpu > history...unlucky. Ah well, lets go down to $PC_VENDOR and get you > something with m$'s lates

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

On 07/28/2011 11:49 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: > Am 28.07.11 11:23, schrieb Peter Peltonen: >> Hi, >> >> A few more questions :) >> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: i think i a

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Peltonen > wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: i think i am not the only one who wants

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:27:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote: > > 2. A so-called Enterprise Operating System like RHEL. And your gratuitous edit of this point serves what purpose exactly? John -- People learn something every day, and a lot of

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

I can definitely say why I need Xen... My reasons are partially selfish - I have some older hardware at home that does not support native hardware virtualization (two Dell Precision 470s and a Dell Poweredge SC 430)... By using Xen, the performance is great for me using VMs... Using qemu d

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

Le 28/07/2011 13:27, Tom H a écrit : > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Peltonen >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison >>> wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] How to remove Microsoft soft raid?

> Whatever raid metadata was written by WinXP-64 was destroyed and I was > able to do a proper install of CentOS 6. I'd still strongly recommend, if you haven't done so, check your BIOS to make sure your SATA controller doesn't have RAID mode enabled. I've seen the odd weird interaction between Li

[CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads

hi guys, Just a quick note about adding [SOLVED] tags to the Subject lines on email lists : Dont do it, it does not help and makes no difference to the content - yet, it breaks threading of responses. Unline web forums, email clients will try and thread using the Subject and in-reply-to header

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

hi, On 07/28/2011 08:01 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: > is there any chance to see a xen kernel + xen in centosplus probably? or > is any recommend 3rd party repo available yet which provides this? having spoken to a couple of people who have shown interest in this issue over the last few mont

Re: [CentOS] Subnet expansion

On 7/28/11 4:18 AM, John Doe wrote: > > >> 2. If I keep some machine with 22 subnet mask, will it still be able >> to talk to the other machines in it's range? Linux boxes seem to mostly work with the wrong netmask, but I've seen things that don't. Your subnet broadcast will be wrong. > They wo

Re: [CentOS] non PAE support

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote: *snip* > ... and do not forget to pay the GBP 90 (Euro 100, USD 150) compulsory > Windoze tax on the new computer ! In England it is impossible, in my > experience, to purchase a new computer from a major retailer without > paying the Windoze tax. Yes.

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote: > To: CentOS mailing list > From: Karanbir Singh > Subject: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads > > hi guys, > > Just a quick note about adding [SOLVED] tags to the Subject lines on > email lists : Dont do it, it does not help and makes n

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: > > Is that why it's frowned upon to use a current thread to > start a new one? Like doing a 'reply to' and then changing > the subject line? > > Kind Regards, > > Keith Roberts > > --

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads

In article , Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: > > > > Is that why it's frowned upon to use a current thread to > > start a new one? Like doing a 'reply to' and then changing > > the subject line? > > Yup. Even if you change the subject, the email header

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:41 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:27:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote: >> >> 2. A so-called Enterprise Operating System like RHEL. > > And your gratuitous edit of this point serves what purpose exactly? That blaming CentOS for the switch to KVM and the d

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/28/2011 09:59 AM Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article > , > Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: >>> Is that why it's frowned upon to use a current thread to >>> start a new one? Like doing a 'reply to' and then changing >>> the subject line? >> Yup.

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

Regards, Marc Deop On Thursday 28 July 2011 11:14:38 ken wrote: > On 07/28/2011 09:59 AM Tony Mountifield wrote: > > In article > > , > > Rudi Ahlers wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: > >>> Is that why it's frowned upon to use a current thread to > >>> start a ne

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiplefactors

> > As a test, I appended a couple words to the previous subject line. > If > > this causes this email to show up as the beginning of a new thread to > > you, please report that back to us along with the email reader and > > version you're using. (Of course this is far from a rigorous test, > but

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/28/2011 04:19 PM, Marc Deop wrote: > This discussion makes no sense to me. If the email client is using the > subject for threading it is doing something wrong (or you specifically set it > that > way). > > As Ken said, there are headers used to organize the emails. the thing is that not a

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiplefactors

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 10:49 -0500, Owen Beckley wrote: > Because of corporate requirements, I use Microsoft Outlook 2007 to > read email. I use View->Arrange By->Conversation to read this forum. > Each time someone changes the subject line, it appears to me as a new > conversation. > > For examp

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 77, Issue 8

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] centos6 not using /etc/gdm/custom.conf

If anyone really needs to do this, there is a patch in the gdm srpm called plymoth.patch that changes the parameters. It's located on line 225. If you change that to what you need and recompile it, it should work. Not that I recommend this... Regards, Stephen Jamieson -Original Message---

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On Thursday 28 July 2011 16:52:07 Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 07/28/2011 04:19 PM, Marc Deop wrote: > > This discussion makes no sense to me. If the email client is using the > > subject for threading it is doing something wrong (or you specifically > > set it that way). > > > > As Ken said, there

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/28/11 8:52 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > the thing is that not all mail clients will set the in-reply-to headers, > whuch is why clients like thunderbird, evolution and mutt will use the > subject line as well to thread messages. Its the "References:" header that controls threading in mail cli

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/28/11 10:21 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > So the mail clients that don't set these headers should be fixed, right? I > mean, fix the broken software rather than try to fix human habits in order to > keep using broken software. a frequent cause of missing "References" seems to be users who get

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/28/2011 06:21 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > So the mail clients that don't set these headers should be fixed, right? I > mean, fix the broken software rather than try to fix human habits in order to > keep using broken software. > Habit is an interestion term, same with convention - the fact

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 7/28/2011 12:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 07/28/11 10:21 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >> So the mail clients that don't set these headers should be fixed, right? I >> mean, fix the broken software rather than try to fix human habits in order to >> keep using broken software. > > a frequent cau

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 18:49 +0100, Thunderbird Fan (KB) wrote: > ideally people would > stop using yahoo mail / squirrelmail etc. ... and use a *real* email programme ? -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@ce

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/28/2011 06:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > Its the "References:" header that controls threading in mail clients > that support it. I'm using thunderbird, and afaik, it won't revert to > Subject based pseudo threading in the absence of References. Subject > line changes don't break the threa

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/28/2011 06:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > But the thing I'd like mailers to do is to call attention to messages > that belong to a thread where I've replied earlier. Is there a way to > get thunderbird to do that? > yes, I mark email threads I am interested in with a flag, and its easy to wo

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/28/2011 06:54 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 18:49 +0100, Thunderbird Fan (KB) wrote: > >> ideally people would >> stop using yahoo mail / squirrelmail etc. > > ... and use a *real* email programme ? > > 'real' is hard to quantify, but an email client that does the right

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 7/28/2011 12:57 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 07/28/2011 06:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> But the thing I'd like mailers to do is to call attention to messages >> that belong to a thread where I've replied earlier. Is there a way to >> get thunderbird to do that? >> > > yes, I mark email threa

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

on 7/28/2011 11:04 AM Les Mikesell spake the following: > On 7/28/2011 12:57 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 07/28/2011 06:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> But the thing I'd like mailers to do is to call attention to messages >>> that belong to a thread where I've replied earlier. Is there a way to

[CentOS] How to test for '.' in a script

I am trying to check for a single period '.' in a shell variable. $ I=. $ echo $I . $ if [[ "$I" -eq '.' ]]; then echo true; fi -bash: [[: .: syntax error: operand expected (error token is ".") All other variants of this construct, with and without escape characters, single and double quote combi

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/28/2011 06:54 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > My argument here is that not > all mail clients do, therefore sticking with subject line sanity would > help increase the number of threads that can stay together. > I agree with KB on this one. Way I see it is, you could go everyone to install a

Re: [CentOS] How to test for '.' in a script

> $ if [[ "$I" -eq '.' ]]; then echo true; fi > -bash: [[: .: syntax error: operand expected (error token is ".") -eq is for numbers == is for strings See "man bash". -Owen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote: > > +1 that's what my hosting provider gives on my webmail > service, and I think it's a nice application to use. Please excuse the untimely response - been busy. I'd give users Exchange and OWA before I would even consider Horde an

Re: [CentOS] centos6 xen

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:44:18AM -0400, Tom H wrote: > > That blaming CentOS for the switch to KVM and the deprecation of Xen > doesn't make sense since it's simply re-rpm'ing RHEL. Ok, that makes sense and I fully agree :) I blame the lack of bacon for not understanding that earlier. Thanks

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

John R. Dennison wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote: >> >> +1 that's what my hosting provider gives on my webmail >> service, and I think it's a nice application to use. > > Please excuse the untimely response - been busy. > > I'd give users Exchange and OWA befo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > John R. Dennison wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote: > >> > >> +1 that's what my hosting provider gives on my webmail > >> service, and I think it's a nice application to use. > > > > Please e

Re: [CentOS] How to test for '.' in a script

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, James B. Byrne wrote: > I am trying to check for a single period '.' in a shell variable. > > $ I=. > $ echo $I > . > $ if [[ "$I" -eq '.' ]]; then echo true; fi if [ "$I" = '.' ]; then ... Use a single = rather than -eq (which tests numeric equality) and use single brack

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On this list, we are not supposed to talk about politics, religion, guns and helmet laws... Oops That's my motorcycling lists! ;) I guess the first three pertain to 'all' list except for those devoted to one or more of those three topics. Although, it can be really hard to refrain sometimes

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

In article <4e319b13.8000...@hogranch.com>, John R Pierce wrote: > On 07/28/11 8:52 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > the thing is that not all mail clients will set the in-reply-to headers, > > whuch is why clients like thunderbird, evolution and mutt will use the > > subject line as well to thread m

[CentOS] kvm module and boot order

I use kvm-amd a lot to do test installs. I am using it with qemu-kvm-0.14 the lastest. I think your supposed to be able to give your command line and add the parameter " -boot dc" so it initially boots with the cdrom (d) and then after reboot will boot do the HD or c. This never works for me. It

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:28 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > As Americans we must always remember that we all have a common enemy, an > > enemy that is dangerous, powerful and relentless. I refer, of course, to > > the federal government. > > > > -- Dave Barry (3 July 1947-), Pulitzer Prize-wi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:50:00PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > Excess noise removed. It was a .signature quote. It's not fodder for this list. If you've a point to make or a comment to make about what I include in my .signature database then take it up with me _off-list_; otherwise please e

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

> the thing is that not all mail clients will set the in-reply-to > headers, whuch is why clients like thunderbird, evolution and mutt > will use the subject line as well to thread messages. Apple Mail does that too and it makes the threading unusable IMO. If the clients are too dumb to adhere to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:50:00PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:28 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > > As Americans we must always remember that we all have a common enemy, an > > > enemy that is dangerous, powerful and relentless. I refer, of course, to > > > t

[CentOS] i am not qble to install centos 6

Hi CentOS Team, i am not able to install CentOS 6.0 , while installing 1) Insert your CentOS 6.0 installation DVD into DVD drive 2) In the pre-boot phase of system startup press to enter UEFI Boot Manager 3) Enter 'UEFI Boot Sett

Re: [CentOS] i am not qble to install centos 6

On 07/28/11 23:14, sridhar sri wrote: > Hi CentOS Team, > i am not able to install CentOS 6.0 , while > installing > > 1) Insert your CentOS 6.0 installation DVD into DVD drive > 2) In the pre-boot phase ofsystem startup > pre

Re: [CentOS] i am not qble to install centos 6

On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 02:44 +0530, sridhar sri wrote: > when i press the F11 i am not able go to boot options , for that i > used the del and esc, OK. Are you using SATA or PATA hard disks (HDD) ? What processor (CPU) does your machine have ? How much RAM does your machine have. Please note

[CentOS] [Fwd: [SOLVED] Re: How to test for '.' in a script]

On Thu, July 28, 2011 14:30, James B. Byrne wrote: > I am trying to check for a single period '.' in a shell variable. > > $ I=. > $ echo $I > . > $ if [[ "$I" -eq '.' ]]; then echo true; fi > -bash: [[: .: syntax error: operand expected (error token is ".") > . . . > > How does one check to s

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issues ; Segmentation fault

On Jul 26, 2011, at 2:06 PM, "Frank M. Ramaekers" wrote: > Mine just segfault on the next one (I was having problems with dag): > > # yum --disablerepo=dag check-update > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > * addons: mirrors.tummy.com > * base

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/28/2011 07:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > I don't want to mark anything, I want the mailer to know that I am > interested in replies to my own messages. And I generally read/reply on > an assortment of different computers with a common imap server so it > would have to track the references to

Re: [CentOS] yum segfault - rpmforge problem?

On Jul 26, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote: > > *snip* > >> Programmes that abort because of bad data are defective programmes and >> need rectification. No good programmer ever accepts that other people's >> data will always be valid. > > +1

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

On 07/28/2011 10:01 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote: > Personally, I like the idea of the [SOLVED] tags because they can > indicate when help is no longer needed. There is a fundamental problem with that - this list isnt a support list, its a list of and for people who use CentOS to talk about CentOS. By

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Webmail

> I'd give users Exchange and OWA before I would even consider Horde and its ilk Well, we want free software, if I wanted to pay for a good webmail server I'd go for Axigen, as my experience, excellent option running on CentOS. J. ___ CentOS mailing li

[CentOS] how to use centos 6 live cd with virtualbox on win xp

If I try to start live cd with Virtual box; it say: "no boot medium found system halted" --- Michel Donais___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Adding the [SOLVED] Tag to break threads -- multiple factors

> There is a fundamental problem with that - this list isnt a support > list, its a list of and for people who use CentOS to talk about > CentOS. By thinking of it as a one way support system you have > reduced the list to essentially a bugtracker / issuetracker / support > thread and that in itse

Re: [CentOS] how to use centos 6 live cd with virtualbox on win xp

Hi Michael, try next tutorial. http://www.potstuck.com/2010/05/05/how-to-setup-centos-in-virtualbox/ Njegos On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Michel Donais wrote: > If I try to start live cd with Virtual box; it say: "no boot medium found > system halted" > > > --- > Michel Donais > _