On 2011-07-25 19:10, Les Mikesell wrote:
> My questions for any filesystem experts are:
>
> Is there a way to adjust the existing md partitions to get the right
> alignment for 4k sectors without having to do a file-oriented copy to
> new partitions? A resize + a dd copy to shift the position migh
Hi all,
Can pls share your experience on this?
Currently I have this network:
10.1.16.0/22.
10.1.16.0-10.16.17.254 are DHCP managed
10.1.18.0-10.1.19.254 are statically assigned
If I need to expand it to:
10.1.16.0/20
1. What is the best way to do it with minimal network disruption?
2. If I keep
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Not sure how that can be with a "graphical" install on kickstart and
>> asking also @general-desktop and @internet-browser in my kickstart file.
>
> Yeah, they changed the group names, as I think I mentioned last week. To
> *stupid* things, like "GNO
The release announcement for CentOS-6.0 posted on CentOS-announce on Sun
Jul 10 mentioned that:
> Since upstream has a 6.1 version already released, we will be using a
> Continous Release repository for 6.0 to bring all 6.1 and post 6.1
> security updates to all 6.0 users, till such time as Cent
From: John R Pierce
> thats by "cylinder", which is an old MSDOS legacy thing. I believe
> parted and probably some other programs let you partition by sector instead.
In my kickstart pre script, I use:
... | sfdisk -H $HEADS -S $SECTORS -uS --force -L $DEVICE
For SSDs, I saw the recommended
On 07/26/2011 10:08 AM, Lintula wrote:
> Are there still no security updates available for CentOS 6, or have I
> just managed to completely miss how to access them?
if you run a yum update, you will see that all 6.0 updates ( except, yes
firefox and xulrunner ) are all in place. The 6.1/ stuff sho
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> Can pls share your experience on this?
>
> Currently I have this network:
> 10.1.16.0/22.
> 10.1.16.0-10.16.17.254 are DHCP managed
> 10.1.18.0-10.1.19.254 are statically assigned
>
> If I need to expand it to:
> 10.1.16.0/20
>
> 1. What is th
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 05:21:58 AM John Doe wrote:
> From: John R Pierce
> > thats by "cylinder", which is an old MSDOS legacy thing. I believe
> > parted and probably some other programs let you partition by sector instead.
> In my kickstart pre script, I use:
> ... | sfdisk -H $HEADS -S $S
Several points (all for "enterprises I've worked at")
1) Folks tend to hold onto hardware WAY past the expiration date. We
still have SunFire v1xx boxes alive and some x86 boxes that aren't 64
bit capable. If they want the latest OS, buy new hardware.
2) I've never seen an OS upgraded across majo
[root@host ~]# yum clean all
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, protectbase
Cleaning up Everything
Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors
[root@ost ~]# yum search libcli
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, protectbase
Determining fastest mirrors
* base: centos-distro.cavecreek.net
* elrepo: elrepo.imt-syste
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 01:51:18 AM 夜神 岩男 wrote:
> This is roughly what Microsoft used to aim for (somewhere on the road
> between XP and 8 they seem to have totally quit the idea, though).
As a slightly off-topic aside, there is a youtube video out there about doing
just that; the video shows
Mine is occurring on dag:
# yum clean all
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Cleaning up Everything
Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors
# yum check-update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Determining fastest mirrors
* addons: mirrors.tummy.com
* base: mirrors.netdna.com
* extras
On 7/26/2011 9:03 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> I'm sure that some of these major upgrades *can* be done, but in a land where
> the package is the unit of OS granularity, and package maintenance practices
> vary from package to package as to 'upgradeableness,' it really becomes a
> task, and this is
I'm having trouble to get rules in /etc/security/console.perms.d to work
properly. I have found no clue reading forums. The same problem appear
also in Scientific Linux6 and Fedora13/14. The rule i add works fine on
centos 5.
hostname:/etc/security/console.perms.d# ls -l
total 4
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro
Under centos 5 I modified /etc/gdm/custom.conf to
auto login with the following:
[daemon]
AutomaticLoginEnable=true
AutomaticLogin=myuser
TimedLoginEnable=true
TimedLogin=myuser
TimedLoginDelay=0
This doesnt seem to work in Centos 6.
What is the new way to accomplish auto login under X11.
Thanks
> 00:01
> rpmforge | 1.1 kB
> 00:00
> rpmforge/primary | 3.9 MB
> 00:20
> rpmforge: [## ]
> 471/10722Segmentation fault
>
We've had the same p
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 10:45:42 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
> Keep in mind that the Linux kernel itself makes no concessions to
> backwards compatibility and demands that all related modules be
> recompiled to match changes.
One of my paragraphs originally included a fairly lengthy passage on k
On 7/26/2011 10:18 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> Keep in mind that the Linux kernel itself makes no concessions to
>> backwards compatibility and demands that all related modules be
>> recompiled to match changes.
>
> One of my paragraphs originally included a fairly lengthy passage on kernel
> ABI c
I finally was able to create a VM in which to load and "play" with
CentOS 6, and the first time I went to update the kernel I ran into
this:
Downloading Packages:
kernel-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
| 22 MB 01:11
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeed
> We've had the same problem. It helped to recursively delete all cached
> files in /var/cache/yum. Just run yum update again and you shoudl be fine.
This does not help here. I started from an empty /var/cache/yum directory.
The problem is related to rpmforge, there is no segfault with
--disab
When I created a CentOS VM (using VMWare WorkStation), I installed
with the first DVD, and the disk partitioning and installation was all
done automatically with almost no input required from me.
The problem with this is that the /boot partition was too small (under
50MB) and I couldn't update the
On 07/26/2011 04:33 PM, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
>> We've had the same problem. It helped to recursively delete all cached
>> files in /var/cache/yum. Just run yum update again and you shoudl be fine.
>
> This does not help here. I started from an empty /var/cache/yum directory.
> The problem is r
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Mark wrote:
> When I created a CentOS VM (using VMWare WorkStation), I installed
> with the first DVD, and the disk partitioning and installation was all
> done automatically with almost no input required from me.
>
> The problem with this is that the /boot partiti
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 16:40 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> this is a problem with the metadata from rpmforge, a couple of guys are
> working through the issue in #yum on irc.freenode.net, feel free to join
> them.
Seems an issue with yum too, seeing that it segfaults over bad data.
This has been
On 7/26/2011 10:46 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Mark wrote:
>> When I created a CentOS VM (using VMWare WorkStation), I installed
>> with the first DVD, and the disk partitioning and installation was all
>> done automatically with almost no input required from me.
>>
>>
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:32 -0700, Mark wrote:
> grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
Google first result:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246#c2
"never ever rpm -U a kernel... really."
Could it be you upgraded instead of installed the new kernel?
Regards,
Leonar
We have the same problem with DAG repositories.
Regards,
Mathieu.
Le 26/07/2011 17:59, Leonard den Ottolander a écrit :
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 16:40 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> this is a problem with the metadata from rpmforge, a couple of guys are
>> working through the issue in #yum on irc
On 07/26/2011 04:59 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Seems an issue with yum too, seeing that it segfaults over bad data.
> This has been reported upstream:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725798
I dont really see that as a yum issue, the problem is bad metadata in
rpmforge.
- K
I've been running FreeRadius 2 on Centos 5.5 for a while now. So far so
good. I'm now looking to make connecting to our WPA secured wireless easier.
The RADIUS server is running in a VM and since the system is in use I
have copied the original and used that copy to create a test
environment. I
On 7/26/2011 12:12 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 04:59 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>> Seems an issue with yum too, seeing that it segfaults over bad data.
>> This has been reported upstream:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725798
>
> I dont really see that as a yum
On 07/26/2011 05:19 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
> While the problem is bad metadata, should yum really be left off the
> hook for segfaulting when it gets bad data? Shouldn't yum catch that
> error with checks, then exit gracefully with an error code?
sure, but you need to take this upstream to get a
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 17:12 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> I dont really see that as a yum issue, the problem is bad metadata in
> rpmforge.
A programme that crashes on bad input is what I'd call broken. Abort
yes, segfault no.
Regards,
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/researc
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/26/2011 10:46 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> I have reported the problem to VMware:
>>
>> http://communities.vmware.com/thread/309617
>
> Is this an artifact of offsetting the start of a partition for block
> alignment after already computing
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 17:22 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> sure, but you need to take this upstream to get attention.
This has happened as I mentioned earlier.
> I just dont
> see this as an important enough issue to fix within centos here.
No such suggestion was made. We all know CentOS behav
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:12:23PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 04:59 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > Seems an issue with yum too, seeing that it segfaults over bad data.
> > This has been reported upstream:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725798
>
> I dont re
On 07/26/2011 05:43 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> (thought: could bad metadata cause an exploitable segfault?)
>
if you can create something like that - make sure you report it to the
right places!
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Stephen Harris wrote:
>> I dont really see that as a yum issue, the problem is bad metadata in
>> rpmforge.
>
> A segfault is a bug, even if it's only triggered by bad data :-)
I agree. It should report that the checksum is bad, and skip to the next
repo.
> (thought: could
On 07/26/2011 05:34 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>> I just dont
>> see this as an important enough issue to fix within centos here.
>
> No such suggestion was made. We all know CentOS behaves like upstream
> and the fix will probably trickle down soon enough.
ah you see, we have a bit of room
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 18:34 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 17:22 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > sure, but you need to take this upstream to get attention.
>
> This has happened as I mentioned earlier.
>
> > I just dont
> > see this as an important enough issue
Tried to run yum this morning on CentOS 5.x 64bit and ran into weird
issue this morning:
[root@server ~]# yum clean all
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Cleaning up Everything
Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors
[root@server ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Determining fastest mirrors
*
I should read a bit more before I post, sorry. I did google though.
yum --disablerepo=rpmforge update
Seems to work fine. Thanks.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Matt wrote:
> Tried to run yum this morning on CentOS 5.x 64bit and ran into weird
> issue this morning:
>
> [root@server ~]# yu
Gimp on Centos 5 has somehow lost its ability to load a pdf file on three (i386)
different computers. I'm pretty sure that this used to work.
When I try to load a PDF file I get the initial box titled "Load Postscript"
with rendering and antialiasing options, but when I hit OK I get an error
mess
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Frank Cox wrote:
> Gimp on Centos 5 has somehow lost its ability to load a pdf
> file on three (i386) different computers. I'm pretty sure
> that this used to work.
just a stab in the dark here -- upstream issued an update to
poppler / evince that obsoleted xpdf (gratuiti
For CentOS KVM migrations use the virt-v2v package part of base.
See this link,
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization/chap-Virtualization-v2v-migration.html
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 13:37:08 schrieb Timothy Kesten:
> Hi Folks,
>
> is here someone who
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote:
*snip*
> Programmes that abort because of bad data are defective programmes and
> need rectification. No good programmer ever accepts that other people's
> data will always be valid.
+1
Kind Regards,
Keith
---
On Jul 26, 2011 9:09 AM, "Leonard den Ottolander"
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:32 -0700, Mark wrote:
> > grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
>
> Google first result:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246#c2
> "never ever rpm -U a kernel... really."
>
> Coul
Mine just segfault on the next one (I was having problems with dag):
# yum --disablerepo=dag check-update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* addons: mirrors.tummy.com
* base: centos.mirror.lstn.net
* extras: mirrors.tummy.com
* rpmforge: apt.
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:47:39 -0400 (EDT)
R P Herrold wrote:
> perhaps a needed helper application is now absent?
If I convert a pdf to a ps file using pdf2ps (included in the ghostscript rpm),
gimp can load that pdf file without any problem.
Gimp can load a pdf file on Centos 6.
Something has g
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:07 -0700, Mark wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:32 -0700, Mark wrote:
> > > grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
Pasting the above into google renders lots of results that might help
you track down your specific problem. Things like duplicate disk labe
At Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:16:54 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:07 -0700, Mark wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:32 -0700, Mark wrote:
> > > > grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
>
> Pasting the above into google renders lots of results that mi
On 7/26/2011 3:11 AM, Andrzej Szymanski wrote:
> On 2011-07-25 19:10, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> My questions for any filesystem experts are:
>>
>> Is there a way to adjust the existing md partitions to get the right
>> alignment for 4k sectors without having to do a file-oriented copy to
>> new partit
Well I verified that putting the following line in /etc/sudoers works
zabbix ALL=NOPASSWD: /var/lib/zabbix/bin/start_puppet
However if I put it in /etc/sudoers.d/zabbix-puppet it does not. Exact same
spacing and everything.
The file was created with Puppet , and based on these errors I'm at a
l
Does anyone know what I would have to modify in 6 if I wanted to run on an
older Pentium M CPU without PAE? Is it just the kernel that needs to be
rebuilt (maybe while installed in a system with a supported CPU)? Or are there
other components that would cause problems and need to be rebuilt to
If your using CentOS 5.x you may have a problem with perl...here's some
notes I have on the subject
# virt-v2v -f virt-v2v.conf -ic esx://server.com/?no_verify=1 -op vm_local
VMname
Can't locate object method "show_progress" via package
"Sys::VirtV2V::Transfer::ESX::UA" at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_p
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:32:14PM -0700, John R Pierce spake thusly:
> I've been asked for ideas on building a rather large archival storage
> system for inhouse use, on the order of 100-400TB. Probably using CentOS
> 6.The existing system this would replace is using Solaris 10 and
> ZFS, b
On 07/26/2011 03:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Thank you! That seems to have worked, but now I'm curious as to why the
> partition on the old drives didn't go to the end of the disk - which I
> had expected would have left no extra room. Was the dos style rounding
> computing the end of a cylinder
Hi,
Is libpri rpm version 1.4.12 for CentOS 5.6 made available ?
[root@ ~]# rpm -qa | grep libpri
libpri-1.4.11.5-1_centos5
[root@ ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.6 (Final)
[root@ ~]#
[root@ ~]# yum list updates | grep libpri
[root@ ~]#
Please suggest/guide further.
Regards,
Kaus
Hi Kaushal,
libpri is not in CentOS. I think that it is in EPEL.
Please see following field of "Repo.".
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -q centos-release
centos-release-5-6.el5.centos.1
[root@localhost ~]# yum info libpri
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
(snip)
Ava
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Tadashi Jokagi wrote:
> Hi Kaushal,
>
> libpri is not in CentOS. I think that it is in EPEL.
> Please see following field of "Repo.".
>
> [root@localhost ~]# rpm -q centos-release
> centos-release-5-6.el5.centos.1
> [root@localhost ~]# yum info libpri
> Loaded plug
Hi Kaushal，
i also installed libpri.
please perform 'yum info'.
==
[root@server ~]# yum provides libpri
libpri-1.4.7-1.el5.i386 : An implementation of Primary Rate ISDN
Repo: epel
Matched from:
libpri-1.4.7-1.el5.x86_6
On 07/26/11 4:27 PM, Kevin K wrote:
> Does anyone know what I would have to modify in 6 if I wanted to run on an
> older Pentium M CPU without PAE? Is it just the kernel that needs to be
> rebuilt (maybe while installed in a system with a supported CPU)? Or are
> there other components that wo
I trying to try out CentOS 6 in an Oracle VirtualBox running on
Ubuntu. Has anyone been able to get this configuration working?
When I try to boot the "Live" ISO it starts to do the countdown but
when it reaches zero it gets stuck - nothing else happens. No error
messages and since the install nev
62 matches
Mail list logo
