On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Don Krause wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 04:53:11PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:32:14PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
I've been asked for ideas on building a rather la
Udo Siewert wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:58:55 +0200
> Udo Siewert wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:25:11 +0200
>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>> > All 3 DVD-s (2 x x86_64 + i386) are burned on K3B 0.12.17 on CentOS
>>> 5.6.
>>>
>>> x86_64 is tested and works. i386 not yet tested but it
In article <22f345fb082accaea3abb2d0e9db0134.squir...@www.bubbanfriends.org>,
Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:10 PM, James B. Byrne
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed Jul 13 15:03:40 EDT 2011, Michael Best mbest at pendragon.org
> >> wrote:
> >>> Like this:
> >>>
> >>> MAILTO=testad
James Pearson wrote:
> James Pearson wrote:
>
>>Installing 64bit CentOS6 only installs x86_64 and noarch RPMS - however,
>>I have a number of legacy 32bit apps that require a number of 32bit RPMS
>>to be installed.
>>
>>Does anyone know how to get the installer to install the 32bit versions
>>o
I'm trying to use autofs with Active Directory.
This works:
autofs_ldap_auth.conf:
/etc/sysconfig/autofs:
LDAP_URI="ldap://domaincontroller1 ldap://domaincontroller2";
This also works if I replace the auth with a DIGEST-MD5 from GSSAPI (which
gets used by default). Good so far.
However, I
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:58:28 +0200
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Udo Siewert wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:58:55 +0200
> > Udo Siewert wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:25:11 +0200
> >> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> >>
> >> > All 3 DVD-s (2 x x86_64 + i386) are burned on K3B 0.12.17 on
On Jul 15, 2011, at 7:02 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> I'm trying to use autofs with Active Directory.
>
> This works:
>
> autofs_ldap_auth.conf:
>
> usetls="yes"
>tlsrequired="yes"
>authrequired="yes"
>clientprinc="nfs/myhost@MYDOMAIN"
> />
>
> /etc/sysconfig/autofs:
>
> LDAP_UR
amd64_edac: probe of :00:18.2 failed with error -22
Logwatch shows this error on several machines - laptop and desktops -
all running C 5.6. It never appears on the data centre servers.
I have 'googled' but can not identify what error 22 is. One German
posting suggests it is related to the E
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Ross Walker wrote:
> Did you try the built-in round robin DNS, which is the domain name itself?
>
> This works for me.
Works fine as long as I don't enable TLS, at which point it fails.
Jul 15 14:19:37 centos6 automount[15860]: init_ldap_connection: lookup(ldap):
TLS requir
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 05:57 +0200, Udo Siewert wrote:
> A shot in the dark: my DVD image burned by K3B won't also boot. Using
> Brasero and all was fine. Not reproducable, but worth the attempt.
I used Brasero: failed to boot.
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_6
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 22:17 -0600, Devin Reade wrote:
> My successful burns (although not tried with CentOS 6 yet) have been
> using growisofs directly:
>
> growisofs -speed=1 -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=image.iso
Tried this: failed to boot.
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 21:36 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
> Can you read other discs burned by that burner in the server machine? I
> understand that it has a DVD/CD burner, but is a CDRW burner? Can you
> attach this drive to a USB cable or move it to the affected machine to see
> if the proble
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 09:32 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> ETCDisolinux: Found something at drive = EF
> No DEFAULT or UI configuration directive found!
> boot:
>
> The same disc works fine in my 4 year old HP laptop, and when installing
> CentOS 6 as a KVM.
I've tried everything people hav
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Ross Walker wrote:
>
>> Did you try the built-in round robin DNS, which is the domain name itself?
>>
>> This works for me.
>
> Works fine as long as I don't enable TLS, at which point it fails.
>
> Jul 15 14:19:37 centos6 automount[1
On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:02 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/14/11 7:39 AM, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
>> What is the reason to avoid ZFS ? IMHO for such systems ZFS is the best.
>
> Oracle, mostly.
How about Nexenta then? Their product is solid, their prices reasonable and I
think their in good
Always Learning wrote:
> amd64_edac: probe of :00:18.2 failed with error -22
>
> Logwatch shows this error on several machines - laptop and desktops -
> all running C 5.6. It never appears on the data centre servers.
>
> I have 'googled' but can not identify what error 22 is. One German
> pos
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 05:57 +0200, Udo Siewert wrote:
>> A shot in the dark: my DVD image burned by K3B won't also boot. Using
>> Brasero and all was fine. Not reproducable, but worth the attempt.
>
> I used Brasero: failed to boot.
>
> Ranbir
>
Then it is not a sof
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 05:57 +0200, Udo Siewert wrote:
>>> A shot in the dark: my DVD image burned by K3B won't also boot. Using
>>> Brasero and all was fine. Not reproducable, but worth the attempt.
>> I used Brasero: failed to boot.
>>
>>
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:46, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 09:32 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
>> ETCDisolinux: Found something at drive = EF
>> No DEFAULT or UI configuration directive found!
>> boot:
>>
>> The same disc works fine in my 4 year old HP laptop, and when
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 18:01, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Yahoo = micro$oft since the buy-out last year - any wonder they don't
> respond well to FOSS??
probably it was April fools day joke.
from wikipedia:
In February 2008, Microsoft Corporation made an unsolicited bid to
acquire Yahoo! for USD $44.6
James Pearson wrote:
> James Pearson wrote:
>> James Pearson wrote:
>>
>>> Installing 64bit CentOS6 only installs x86_64 and noarch RPMS - however,
>>> I have a number of legacy 32bit apps that require a number of 32bit RPMS
>>> to be installed.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know how to get the installer t
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I had a problem with 32-bit rpms on 64-bit system. I tried to install
> krusader-2.0.0.i386 in 64-bit system, and it reported that files from
> openssl(I think) x86_64 conflicts with files in same package but i686.
> That means that there are packa
Hello,
I've got a CentOS box that i'm wanting to set up svnserve on. I've
read much, and am confused. Does svnserve support data encryption and
also restricting users from specific repositories?
I'm thinking of a single repo structure under /var/svn-repos and I've
got two users user1 and user2, ea
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 11:20 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
> Two thoughts:
>
> 1. Others have already inquired as to your motivation to move away from
> ZFS/Solaris. If it is just the hardware& licensing aspect, you
> might want to consider ZFS on FreeBSD. (I understand that unlike
>
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Burning DVDs (was: CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot)
>
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 22:17 -0600, Devin Reade wrote:
>> My successful burns (although not tried with CentOS 6 ye
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 17:05 +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
> Did you check the integrity of the downloaded iso image
> before burning it?
The download is good. I made sure to do the checksum before burning the
image.
> Can you try to burn the iso on different machine
> at a slow speed. See if it b
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 16:06 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Just saw your other reply. Then just do not use DVD-RW, but plain DVD-R.
I was going to try that, but seeing as how a Fedora 15 x86_64 ISO burnt
to the same rewritable DVD boots properly, I don't see how a DVD-R will
resolve the CentO
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot
>
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 09:32 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
>> ETCDisolinux: Found something at drive = EF
>> No DEFAULT or UI con
On Friday, July 15, 2011 09:35:22 AM Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 05:57 +0200, Udo Siewert wrote:
> > A shot in the dark: my DVD image burned by K3B won't also boot. Using
> > Brasero and all was fine. Not reproducable, but worth the attempt.
>
> I used Brasero: failed to bo
I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
(in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message
"Not configured to listen on any interfaces!"
when I "sudo service dhcpd restart".
I realise n
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 16:06 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Just saw your other reply. Then just do not use DVD-RW, but plain DVD-R.
>
> I was going to try that, but seeing as how a Fedora 15 x86_64 ISO burnt
> to the same rewritable DVD boots properly, I don't se
I have a number of programs I wrote on Centos 5 (x86_64) and for one of
the programs I do
ldd programX
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff2cb86000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00352860)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x003527e0)
libxml2
On 7/15/2011 9:41 AM, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
> I've got a CentOS box that i'm wanting to set up svnserve on. I've
> read much, and am confused. Does svnserve support data encryption and
> also restricting users from specific repositories?
>
> I'm thinking of a single repo structure under /var
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 07:45:56 PM John R Pierce wrote:
> DVD-R has slightly more capacity which is important
> here. I think the differennce in reliability is a red herring.
There is a difference in the technology used for burning, and I've seen where
DVD- burning did not work but DVD+ d
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have a number of programs I wrote on Centos 5 (x86_64) and for one of
> the programs I do
>
> ldd programX
> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff2cb86000)
> libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00352860)
> libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x000
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: John R Pierce
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] problems with burning i386 centos 6 dvd
>
> On 07/14/11 4:14 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> I've also looked into the differences between DVD-R(W)
>> disks, and the DVD+R(W) disks. It app
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
> (in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
> and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
>
> I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
> under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message
> "Not configured to listen on any interfaces!"
> when I "sudo
On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
> (in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
> and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
>
> I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
> under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message
> "Not configured to listen on any
Hi all,
How can I install gnome 3 to CentOS 5.6 or CentOS 6.0?
Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--On Friday, July 15, 2011 12:49:59 PM -0400 Jerry Geis
wrote:
> Is it safe to assume then that if I switch to C6 and recompile my program
> and then put the C6 version on all my C5 systems (updates that kind of
> thing) that everything
> will be compatible and run just fine.
Maybe not, and alm
Jake Shipton wrote:
> On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
>> (in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
>> and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
>>
>> I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
>> under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message
>> "Not con
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> From: John R Pierce
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] problems with burning i386 centos 6 dvd
>>
>> On 07/14/11 4:14 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>> I've also looked into the differ
On 07/15/2011 07:15 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How can I install gnome 3 to CentOS 5.6 or CentOS 6.0?
Afaik you can't. I don't think there is Gnome 3 for CentOS 5.6 or 6.x.
Why not just use Fedora 15 (in a VM)? Fedora 15 has Gnome 3 out of the box.
I have no idea if it's possible at
I don't have ifconfig on my new installation of CentOS 5.6, but it is on
my server in the cloud. What package contains it?
Thanks,
John
--
John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
Abilitiessoft, Inc.
http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Madison, Wisconsin USA
Developing software for people wi
On 07/15/2011 02:39 PM, John J. Boyer wrote:
> I don't have ifconfig on my new installation of CentOS 5.6, but it is on
> my server in the cloud. What package contains it?
> Thanks,
> John
>
root@vsh02:~# yum provides "*/ifconfig"
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached
On Fri, July 15, 2011 2:39 pm, John J. Boyer wrote:
> I don't have ifconfig on my new installation of CentOS 5.6, but it is on
> my server in the cloud. What package contains it?
net-tools
Make sure /sbin is in the PATH of the account you are using.
___
On 07/15/11 11:39 AM, John J. Boyer wrote:
> I don't have ifconfig on my new installation of CentOS 5.6, but it is on
> my server in the cloud. What package contains it?
that musthave been a really stripped install. I just installed C6
minimal which was about the most stripped install I've ever
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> as a rule, you should declare ALL subnets in simple form:
>
> subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { }
>
> so ISC DHCP knows about them. Why, I do not know, but it is supposed to
> be in newer versions (more strict rules for config file.)
Thanks for your respons
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only
> set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface.
What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can only set DHCP service
on the first IP on the interface"?
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail:
On 07/15/2011 02:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Jake Shipton wrote:
On 07/15/2011 05:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I've installed CentOS-6 on my server
(in parallel to CentOS-5.6)
and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd.
I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd
under CentOS-6, but I'm get
On 7/15/2011 1:54 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> as a rule, you should declare ALL subnets in simple form:
>>
>> subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { }
>>
>> so ISC DHCP knows about them. Why, I do not know, but it is supposed to
>> be in newer versions (more stri
On Friday, July 15, 2011 02:46:53 PM John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/15/11 11:39 AM, John J. Boyer wrote:
> > I don't have ifconfig on my new installation of CentOS 5.6, but it is on
> > my server in the cloud. What package contains it?
> you -are- looking in /sbin/ right?
/sbin is not by default in
Alle,
We currently have a CentOS 5.6 x86-64 server running using about 70G of
a 500GB hardware raid partition. We'd like to install 6.0 alongside this
installation in a dual boot configuration. We tried to install using the
"Use Free Space" installation option, but the installer did not se
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only
>> set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface.
>
> What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can only set DHCP service
> on the first IP on the interfac
Camron W. Fox wrote:
> Alle,
>
> We currently have a CentOS 5.6 x86-64 server running using about 70G of
> a 500GB hardware raid partition. We'd like to install 6.0 alongside this
> installation in a dual boot configuration. We tried to install using the
> "Use Free Space" installation option, but
Camron W. Fox wrote:
> Alle,
>
> We currently have a CentOS 5.6 x86-64 server running using about 70G of
> a 500GB hardware raid partition. We'd like to install 6.0 alongside this
> installation in a dual boot configuration. We tried to install using the
> "Use Free Space" installation optio
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:30:33PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, July 15, 2011 02:46:53 PM John R Pierce wrote:
> > you -are- looking in /sbin/ right?
Yes. I tried to install net-tools and found it was already installed, so
I tried sbin.
Thanks,
John
>
> /sbin is not by default in a n
On 7/15/2011 2:56 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>>> and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only
>>>set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface.
>>
>> What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can
--On Friday, July 15, 2011 10:54:35 PM +0800 Christopher Chan
wrote:
> I would not touch ZFS on FreeBSD with a ten-foot pole.
Would you care to elaborate as to why? And specifically if it
is particular to FreeBSD or ZFS or the combination.
I've not used it so I do not have any opinions on it.
I'm doing an update on a machine that does have VMs running on it, and I
see a number of complaints to the effect of
WARNING:
/lib/modules/2.6.18-194.32.1.el5/weak-updates/kmod-kvm/kvm-intel.ko needs
unknown symbol kvm_vcpu_init
WARNING:
/lib/modules/2.6.18-194.32.1.el5/weak-updates/kmod-kvm/kvm-in
Am 15.07.2011 22:39, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
> I'm doing an update on a machine that does have VMs running on it, and I
> see a number of complaints to the effect of
> WARNING:
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.32.1.el5/weak-updates/kmod-kvm/kvm-intel.ko needs
> unknown symbol kvm_vcpu_init
> WARNING:
>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/15/2011 2:56 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>>
and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only
set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface.
>>> What exactly do you mean wh
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I'm doing an update on a machine that does have VMs running on it, and I
> see a number of complaints to the effect of
> WARNING:
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.32.1.el5/weak-updates/kmod-kvm/kvm-intel.ko needs
> unknown symbol kvm_vcpu_init
> WARNING:
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-194
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, yonatan pingle wrote:
*snip*
> Any pros vs cons on using a bootable USB thumb drive instead of CD/DVD ?
>
> this might be the better solution as the images just grow larger and
> larger each update.
>
> I find it much faster to install from USB.
I think that's an option I'm
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I'm doing an update on a machine that does have VMs running on it, and I
>> see a number of complaints to the effect of
>> WARNING:
>> /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.32.1.el5/weak-updates/kmod-kvm/kvm-intel.ko
>> needs unknown symbol kvm_vcpu_init
>>
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I'm doing an update on a machine that does have VMs running on it, and I
>>> see a number of complaints to the effect of
>>> WARNING:
>>> /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.32.1.el5/weak-updates/kmod-kvm/kvm-intel.ko
>>> needs
Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, yonatan pingle wrote:
>
> *snip*
>
>> Any pros vs cons on using a bootable USB thumb drive instead of CD/DVD ?
>>
>> this might be the better solution as the images just grow larger and
>> larger each update.
>>
>> I find it much faster to install from
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] problems with burning i386 centos 6 dvd
>
> Keith Roberts wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, yonatan pingle wrote:
>>
>> *snip*
>>
>>> Any pros vs cons on using a bootable U
On 7/15/2011 3:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> and there is no mention of interfaces, just their IP's, and you can only
> set DHCP service on the first IP on the interface.
What exactly do you mean when you say that "you can only set DHCP service
on the first IP on the i
Is there any way to configure things so sshd starts even if a filesystem
mentioned in fstab has errors that fail the automatic fsck at boot? Due
to some power issues I'm sitting at work for a long fsck to complete -
or more likely fail, so I can run it manually like it will tell me on
the cons
On Saturday, July 16, 2011 04:24 AM, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Friday, July 15, 2011 10:54:35 PM +0800 Christopher Chan
> wrote:
>
>> I would not touch ZFS on FreeBSD with a ten-foot pole.
>
> Would you care to elaborate as to why? And specifically if it
> is particular to FreeBSD or ZFS or the
On 7/15/2011 6:37 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Saturday, July 16, 2011 04:24 AM, Devin Reade wrote:
>> --On Friday, July 15, 2011 10:54:35 PM +0800 Christopher Chan
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I would not touch ZFS on FreeBSD with a ten-foot pole.
>>
>> Would you care to elaborate as to why? And speci
Hello,
Thanks, and apologies if this is a repeat message.
I'm not really wanting to do an apache setup for this project. What my
structure will be like I think will be /var/svn and under that parent
directory repos# where that equals a separate project.
I've read that svnserve can hook in to sas
Les Mikesell wrote:
>> But what puzzles me is, what defines the correspondence
>> between interface and network,
>> eg in my case eth1 -> 192.168.2.0/24
>>
>> Surely this should be there independently of dhcpd ?
>
> Dhcpd shouldn't care about the name of the interface, but if the request
> hasn't
Steve Clark wrote:
> You have to have a subnet declaration(s) that matches an existing
> subnet(s) that is configured on the interface(s) you want to provide
> dynamic addresses for.
But how exactly is a subnet, in my case 192.168.2.0, "configured"
on the interface eth1 ?
--
Timothy Murphy
e
On 7/15/2011 6:55 PM, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks, and apologies if this is a repeat message.
>
> I'm not really wanting to do an apache setup for this project.
You make it sound like that's a hard thing. It's basically a 'yum
install httpd mod_dav_svn' and an edit to /etc/httpd/conf
On Jul 15, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>>> But what puzzles me is, what defines the correspondence
>>> between interface and network,
>>> eg in my case eth1 -> 192.168.2.0/24
>>>
>>> Surely this should be there independently of dhcpd ?
>>
>> Dhcpd shouldn't
You'll have to hope that ssh does not reside on the same file system that has
errors.
You probably better off getting a remote access card or a terminal that allows
you to console into the server - sort of like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dell_DRAC
On Jul 15, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Les Mike
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 10:07 -0400, DV wrote:
> I would try the bios setting AHCI (vs. compatibility mode) if you have it.
>
> http://www.911cd.net/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t23099.html
>
> This is the SATA Advanced Host Controller Interface:
>
> http://www.techmetica.com/howto/sata-ahci-mode-
- Original Message -
| On 7/15/2011 6:37 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
| > On Saturday, July 16, 2011 04:24 AM, Devin Reade wrote:
| >> --On Friday, July 15, 2011 10:54:35 PM +0800 Christopher Chan
| >> wrote:
| >>
| >>> I would not touch ZFS on FreeBSD with a ten-foot pole.
| >>
| >> Would
Dear All
I need to put my centos 5.6 server as firewall server in fron of a
windows-running node before connecting it to the net. Can you please
let me know what stuff do I need to put on my centos server?
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.o
On 7/15/11, hadi motamedi wrote:
> Dear All
> I need to put my centos 5.6 server as firewall server in fron of a
> windows-running node before connecting it to the net. Can you please
> let me know what stuff do I need to put on my centos server?
> Thank you
Hadi;
Under most circumstances, CentO
On 7/16/11, Cody Jackson wrote:
> On 7/15/11, hadi motamedi wrote:
>> Dear All
>> I need to put my centos 5.6 server as firewall server in fron of a
>> windows-running node before connecting it to the net. Can you please
>> let me know what stuff do I need to put on my centos server?
>> Thank you
On 07/15/11 9:57 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
> > Read up on iptables, understand the concepts behind it. This is a good
> > thing to take slow if you're not familiar with it. Security is not to
> > be rushed. :)
which part of that did you not understand?
--
john r pierce
On 7/16/11, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/15/11 9:57 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
>> > Read up on iptables, understand the concepts behind it. This is a good
>> > thing to take slow if you're not familiar with it. Security is not to
>> > be rushed. :)
>
>
> which part of that did you not understand?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
wrote:
..
> I have all of the SATA channels set to AHCI mode, which includes the
> Pioneer burner. I was thinking that maybe I should try changing the
> BIOS setting to IDE, but then tossed it aside as crazy talk.
>
> After y
On 07/15/11 10:07 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
> Sorry. I just didn't get the basic configuration. I mean enabling the
> windows machine to get Internet service from the centos connected
> server (with respect to the ip configuration sent). I am now reading
> the iptables manual and I understand on how
87 matches
Mail list logo
