On 07/04/11 11:44 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> Otherwise, the single large UPS becomes the single point of failure.
the good big ones are fully redundant and every component is hot swappable.
but yeah, distributed UPS the way google did it is rather sweet. As
long as part of their operating
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:44:30PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Can people at least pretend to keep this list on-topic? 89 responses
for an off-topic post is a little much, don't you think?
Item 3 under Guidelines as listed at:
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16
Steven Crothers wrote:
> Hook up ethernet, if its not POE, you plug it in, attach all the various
> usb cables, vga, serial, ps/2, ect ect to the server and let it hang. When
> your server is unresponsive just go ahead and hit the IP you assigned to
> your Spider, and you get a full console, virtu
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Charles Polisher wrote:
>
> If you're running a database on it, you might re-think using a
> journaled filesystem. For that, ext2 will be faster and much
> less prone to unrecoverable data loss.
>
Did you mean EXT4, or in actual fact EXT2? I thought EXT4 was faster
From: Mark Weaver
> Has anyone seen a supported hardware list on CentOS 6? I've been looking
> around for the last few days; even looked at RedHat's site but didn't
> find one.
Maybe try here:
https://hardware.redhat.com/
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
Mark Weaver wrote:
> On 7/4/2011 10:41 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:30:08PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
>>> Has anyone seen a supported hardware list on CentOS 6? I've been looking
>>> around for the last few days; even looked at RedHat's site but didn't
>>> find one.
>>>
>>
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Steven Crothers wrote:
>
>> Hook up ethernet, if its not POE, you plug it in, attach all the various
>> usb cables, vga, serial, ps/2, ect ect to the server and let it hang. When
>> your server is unresponsive just go ahead and hit the IP you assigned to
>> your Spider, and
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 11:09 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Mark Weaver wrote:
> > On 7/4/2011 10:41 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:30:08PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
> >>> Has anyone seen a supported hardware list on CentOS 6? I've been looking
> >>> around for the las
Mark,
On Tuesday, July 5, 2011 you wrote:
> Has anyone seen a supported hardware list on CentOS 6?
Check my question regarding the same question from May. 3rd this year
with the subject "list of supported hardware".
There is a list of certified hardware, but no list of supported hardware.
I fi
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
wrote:
> On 7/5/11, Eric B. wrote:
> > The strange behaviour here is when listing the parent directory (..).
> > In this case, ls .. is listing the contents of Mail/ directory - not
> > /home/eric.
> >
> > In the past, I always recall being able
On 7/5/2011 5:09 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Mark Weaver wrote:
>> On 7/4/2011 10:41 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:30:08PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
Has anyone seen a supported hardware list on CentOS 6? I've been looking
around for the last few days; even l
On 7/5/2011 5:33 AM, B.J. McClure wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 11:09 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Mark Weaver wrote:
>>> On 7/4/2011 10:41 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:30:08PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Has anyone seen a supported hardware list on CentOS 6
>>
>> If you're running a database on it, you might re-think using a
>> journaled filesystem. For that, ext2 will be faster and much
>> less prone to unrecoverable data loss.
>
> Did you mean EXT4, or in actual fact EXT2? I thought EXT4 was faster than
> EXT2?
>
The optimum on an EXT basis for a f
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 07:28 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>>
>>> If you're running a database on it, you might re-think using a
>>> journaled filesystem. For that, ext2 will be faster and much
>>> less prone to unrecoverable data loss.
>>
>> Did you mean EXT4, or in actual fact EXT2? I thought EXT4
On 7/5/11 6:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>>
>>> If you're running a database on it, you might re-think using a
>>> journaled filesystem. For that, ext2 will be faster and much
>>> less prone to unrecoverable data loss.
>>
>> Did you mean EXT4, or in actual fact EXT2? I thought EXT4 was faster than
Hi
I am trying to install CentOS 5.6 on HP DL 180 G6 which has HP Smart
Array B110i SATA RAID Controller Driver. I have 4 * 500 GB SATA HDD
and configured RAID 1+0 using System BIOS, the BIOS detects usable
disk space as 940GB disk space, when i start installing the OS, it
does not detect HP Smart
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:43:37PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
> On 7/4/2011 10:41 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:30:08PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
> >> Has anyone seen a supported hardware list on CentOS 6?
> >>
> >> I've got a Dell Inspiron 1501 with a Dell Wireless 1390
>
> Is the OS X firewall blocking nfs?
>
> How are you mounting the export? If you're not trying it from within
> Terminal, does it work from within it?
> __
The OS X firewall dos not appear to be a factor. Actually it works
just fine when I turn off the
Christopher Chan wrote:
> James Hogarth wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If you're running a database on it, you might re-think using a
> >>> journaled filesystem. For that, ext2 will be faster and much
> >>> less prone to unrecoverable data loss.
> >>
> >> Did you mean EXT4, or in actual fact EXT2? I thought EX
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 06:52:47AM -0300, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
> wrote:
>
> > On 7/5/11, Eric B. wrote:
> > > The strange behaviour here is when listing the parent directory (..).
> > > In this case, ls .. is listing the contents of Mail/ di
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to install CentOS 5.6 on HP DL 180 G6 which has HP Smart
> Array B110i SATA RAID Controller Driver. I have 4 * 500 GB SATA HDD
> and configured RAID 1+0 using System BIOS, the BIOS detects usable
> disk space as 940GB disk space, when i start installing t
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Charles Polisher wrote:
>
>
> (I'm sharpening my axe for the "Use ZFS, it's bulletproof" discussion.)
>
> --
> Charles Polisher
>
>
> ___
>
>
HAHA, what's your take on ZFS then?
We've been running ZFS on a few storage ser
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 10:26 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> (I'm sharpening my axe for the "Use ZFS, it's bulletproof" discussion.)
>
/me puts on asbestos suit...stares...switches to asbestos armor instead.
>
>
> HAHA, what's your take on ZFS then?
>
> We've been running ZFS on a few storage se
>I am trying to install CentOS 5.6 on HP DL 180 G6 which has HP Smart
>Array B110i SATA RAID Controller Driver. I have 4 * 500 GB SATA HDD
>and configured RAID 1+0 using System BIOS, the BIOS detects usable
>disk space as 940GB disk space, when i start installing the OS, it
>does not detect HP Smar
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>I am trying to install CentOS 5.6 on HP DL 180 G6 which has HP Smart
>>Array B110i SATA RAID Controller Driver. I have 4 * 500 GB SATA HDD
>>and configured RAID 1+0 using System BIOS, the BIOS detects usable
>>disk space as 940GB disk space, when i start installing the OS,
I still get this
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 12]
Timeout:
Trying other mirror.
Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: update
failure: repodata/repomd.xml from update: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
Error: failure: repodata/repomd.xml
From: Kaushal Shriyan
> I am trying to install CentOS 5.6 on HP DL 180 G6 which has HP Smart
> Array B110i SATA RAID Controller Driver. I have 4 * 500 GB SATA HDD
> and configured RAID 1+0 using System BIOS, the BIOS detects usable
> disk space as 940GB disk space, when i start installing the OS,
On 5.7.2011 17:36, Torintino T wrote:
> when i wget it resolves to : 41.215.241.82
>
>
> --18:31:14--
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/i386/repodata/repomd.xml
>=> `repomd.xml'
> Resolving mirror.centos.org... 41.215.241.82
> Connecting to mirror.centos.org|41.215.241.82|
On Saturday, July 02, 2011 09:00:54 AM Jason Pyeron wrote:
> You will either need many different batteries for the different voltages (1.2,
> 3.3, 5, 12, -12, -5) or a DC ATX power supply (not cheap and not very powerful
> until the 48V input variety)
A company called PowerStream produces DC input
Using centos 5.x, sendmail, as a server, downloading mail with
thunderbird (although this happened with outlook too)
every 5 or 6 months I open my mail client (thunderbird) and one of my
mail accounts decides to download 1,000 or so mails from my server. Old
mail that I had already downloaded b
On 07/05/11 7:10 AM, Charles Polisher wrote:
> In general and with some simplifiying assumptions, a database
> consists of statically pre-allocated files. The process of extending
> the files happens at birth. The relative speed over the lifetime
> of the database is dominated by raw I/O, not by ex
Boris Epstein wrote:
Is the OS X firewall blocking nfs?
How are you mounting the export? If you're not trying it from within
Terminal, does it work from within it?
__
The OS X firewall dos not appear to be a factor. Actually it works
just fine w
on 7/5/2011 9:34 AM Bob Hoffman spake the following:
> Using centos 5.x, sendmail, as a server, downloading mail with
> thunderbird (although this happened with outlook too)
>
> every 5 or 6 months I open my mail client (thunderbird) and one of my
> mail accounts decides to download 1,000 or so
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
>> We've been running ZFS on a few storage servers, both in the office and
>> for our hosting clients for about 2 years now and all I can say it that
>> it's rock solid.
>
> +1
>
> Although I have seen screams from others on the opensolaris/o
On 7/5/2011 1:06 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
>> /me wonders what an md raid array with an ext3 fs that has its journal
>> on an ssd in full data journal mode give in terms of performance.
>
> I honestly haven't tried this yet, probably cause when I looked at how
> this works, it's only the journal whi
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> How much can that matter? Reads are going to be cached in main RAM
> anyway - which is pretty cheap these days.
>
> --
> Les Mikesell
> lesmikes...@gmail.com
> ___
Yes, but I suppose it a
On 7/5/2011 1:30 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> How much can that matter? Reads are going to be cached in main RAM
>> anyway - which is pretty cheap these days.
>>
>
>
> Yes, but I suppose it all depends on the needs of the server in question :)
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Boris Epstein wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Boris Epstein
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] mounting a CentOS 5.5-based NFS partitions from a Mac OS
> X machine
>
>>
>> Is the OS X firewall blocking nfs?
>>
>> How are you mounting the export? If you're not trying it fr
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Bob Hoffman
> Subject: [CentOS] getting old mail every 5 months or so
>
> Using centos 5.x, sendmail, as a server, downloading mail with
> thunderbird (although this happened with outlook too)
>
> every 5 or 6 months I ope
Yes, it's my ISP's DNS issue, i used another global DNS instead and it worked.
Thanks a lot
To: centos@centos.org
From: markus.f...@fasel.at
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 17:55:25 +0200
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mirror URL Times Out
On 5.7.2011 17:36, Torintino T wrote:
> when i wget it resolves to : 41.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/5/2011 1:30 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Les Mikesell
> wrote:
> >>
> >> How much can that matter? Reads are going to be cached in main RAM
> >> anyway - which is pretty cheap these days.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Y
On 7/2/2011 7:34 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> I could in principle imagine all that coming in the future, but the
> "monitor == shades" thing is just only Fi with no Sci in it. A human eye
> cannot focus properly on any object which is closer to the eye than 10-15 cm
> (depending on the eye qua
Hi, I'm currently using, CentOS release 4.8 (Final) and wanted to update the
pam_tally module to support unlock_time.
I understand this is only support on centos 5.x and up. What are my options
for updating pam_tally to support unlock_time, can I simply download and
update from a centos repo or s
Hi all,
I'm trying to rebuild a pretty old server. For this, I need a copy of
the CentOS 4.3 i386 DVD ISO, ideally. The torrent on the CentOS vault is
not working... Does anyone have a copy of:
CentOS-4.3-i386-binDVD.iso (md5sum: ca5ccf17951f4b4ef0460c7847e0f2ac)
Kicking around? I'd be m
At Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:51:15 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>I'm trying to rebuild a pretty old server. For this, I need a copy of
> the CentOS 4.3 i386 DVD ISO, ideally. The torrent on the CentOS vault is
> not working... Does anyone have a copy of:
>
> CentOS-4.3-i386-
On 07/05/11 1:51 PM, Digimer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to rebuild a pretty old server. For this, I need a copy of
> the CentOS 4.3 i386 DVD ISO, ideally. The torrent on the CentOS vault is
> not working... Does anyone have a copy of:
>
> CentOS-4.3-i386-binDVD.iso (md5sum: ca5ccf17951f4b4
On 05/07/11 10:09, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Mark Weaver wrote:
>> On 7/4/2011 10:41 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:30:08PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
Has anyone seen a supported hardware list on CentOS 6? I've been looking
around for the last few days; even loo
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:14 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Kaushal Shriyan
>
>> I am trying to install CentOS 5.6 on HP DL 180 G6 which has HP Smart
>> Array B110i SATA RAID Controller Driver. I have 4 * 500 GB SATA HDD
>> and configured RAID 1+0 using System BIOS, the BIOS detects usable
>> disk sp
>Please help me understand.
If the device requires an additional driver, unless its packaged as a dd for
use at
install, how can you install and then add a driver?
Disable RAID mode, set it to AHCI, then Anaconda will see all the individual
discs
at which point during install you can choose to
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>Please help me understand.
>
> If the device requires an additional driver, unless its packaged as a dd for
> use at
> install, how can you install and then add a driver?
>
> Disable RAID mode, set it to AHCI, then Anaconda will see all th
On 07/05/2011 05:34 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:51:15 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to rebuild a pretty old server. For this, I need a copy of
>> the CentOS 4.3 i386 DVD ISO, ideally. The torrent on the CentOS vault is
>> not working
On 07/05/2011 05:48 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/05/11 1:51 PM, Digimer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to rebuild a pretty old server. For this, I need a copy of
>> the CentOS 4.3 i386 DVD ISO, ideally. The torrent on the CentOS vault is
>> not working... Does anyone have a copy of:
>>
On Tuesday 05 July 2011 21:31:50 Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 7/2/2011 7:34 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > I could in principle imagine all that coming in the future, but the
> > "monitor == shades" thing is just only Fi with no Sci in it. A human eye
> > cannot focus properly on any object which is cl
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Boris Epstein wrote:
>>>
>>> Is the OS X firewall blocking nfs?
>>>
>>> How are you mounting the export? If you're not trying it from within
>>> Terminal, does it work from within it?
>>
>> The OS X firewall dos not appear to be a factor. Actuall
I was looking at the marketing hype on those machines, and they look
like they take a standard 3.5" SATA drive. OTOH, some pictures of
the HP model drives for the microserver look like there's some type
of handle on the front. I'm assuming that this is the "hard disk
carrier" mentioned in the in
On 07/05/11 8:04 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
> Does the basic microserver ship with four of those drive carriers,
> or do they have to be purchased separately?
>
> Also, would anyone who has a CentOS-based microserver with a
> remote access card care to share any observations about that
> card, such as
> On 07/05/11 7:10 AM, Charles Polisher wrote:
> > In general and with some simplifiying assumptions, a database
> > consists of statically pre-allocated files. The process of extending
> > the files happens at birth. The relative speed over the lifetime
> > of the database is dominated by raw I/O,
On 07/05/11 9:04 PM, Charles Polisher wrote:
> The PostgreSQL wiki seems to say that database tables are
> allocated in 1GB extents. In workloads with which I am
> familiar, with an RDBMS the extents don't bounce
> around all that much, i.e. the vast majority of writes do
> not result in a change t
58 matches
Mail list logo
