On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>
> > Does anyone know how to determine which file system a disk was
> > formatted with, if fdisk -l doesn't show it?
>
> I would use gparted from the command line or from Gnome's /
> Applications / System Tools menu
>
> yum install gparte
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> If 'fdisk -l /dev/sda' does not show anything, either the disks were
> never partitioned or formatted, at least not as a bare drive. What kind
> of disk is this (I know it says USB above, but I am assuming these are
> bare disk(s) that you
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> On 06/25/2011 06:46 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Does anyone know how to determine which file system a disk was formatted
> with,
> > if fdisk -l doesn't show it?
> [snip]
> > I need to see what data is on a bunch of disks that
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Saturday, June 25, 2011 07:46:01 AM Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> > Does anyone know how to determine which file system a disk was formatted
> > with, if fdisk -l doesn't show it?
>
> blkid -s TYPE
>
> On a C5 box here:
> [root@backup670 ~]# blkid -s
On 06/26/11 12:58 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> All the drives are old 160GB SATA. There's 1x 160GB IDE as well.
>
> They were used in the office on various machines, so no hardware RAID,
> but they definitely had some data on them.
> I did get some drives with software RAID on and could recover the
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:04 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/26/11 12:58 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> >
> > All the drives are old 160GB SATA. There's 1x 160GB IDE as well.
> >
> > They were used in the office on various machines, so no hardware RAID,
> > but they definitely had some data on them.
On 06/26/11 1:11 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> It's hard to say. They've been in the cupboard for along time and I
> don't know which tech did what on them, which is why I'm trying to see
> which file systems were on them last, so that I can see what data is
> on them.
well, if as you say...
> [roo
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Rudi Ahlers
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] how do determine last file system on disk?
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:04 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> On 06/26/11 12:58 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>>
>>> All the drives are old 160GB
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
> >
> > It's hard to say. They've been in the cupboard for along time and I don't
> > know which tech did what on them, which is why I'm trying to see which
> file
> > systems were on them last, so that I can see what data is on them.
>
> W
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Rudi Ahlers
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] how do determine last file system on disk?
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>> It's hard to say. They've been in the cupboard for along
>>> time an
On 06/26/11 1:18 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> > [root@HP-DL360 ~]# file -s /dev/sda
>> > /dev/sda: empty
> I'm guessing the tech wiped them clean.
or they were spares for a raid system, never used.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca m
Dear all,
I would like to forward a port to an internet server, but failed. can you
help me?
Server: eth0: 192.168.1.250, Port: 8080 TCP, CentOS 5.6
Remote server: IP: a.b.c.d Port: 8181
Forward path: client1(192.168.1.10) -> 192.168.1.250:8080 (forward) -> a.b.c.d
Port: 8181
--
At Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:58:16 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> >
> > If 'fdisk -l /dev/sda' does not show anything, either the disks were
> > never partitioned or formatted, at least not as a bare drive. What kind
> > of disk
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> Wondering: could these extra 2 drives have been 'spare' disks that were
> never actually installed? And got mixed in with the 'used' drives?
>
>
I doubt it since there are quite a few drives that were part of a RAID set
and I could get s
> I'm wondering, that since Jumbo Frames was supposed to be better for
> bulk transfers, why am I seeing these results? Is it the ElRepo
> drivers I used to enable higher MTUs or possibly some kind of oddity
> with the realtek NICs I am using? Or am I mistaken about the benefits
> of jumbo frames
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> Now the question is whether the overheads reduction, even at sub-10GBs
> speeds, may be significant if the host/guest are VMs instead of actual
> physical machines.
If you are going to use it on virtual interfaces, I would think it would
help, especially if you have
On Sunday 26 June 2011 12:53:07 muiz wrote:
> Dear all,
> I would like to forward a port to an internet server, but failed. can you
> help me? Server: eth0: 192.168.1.250, Port: 8080 TCP, CentOS 5.6
> Remote server: IP: a.b.c.d Port: 8181
>
>
> Forward path: client1(192.168.1.10) -> 192.16
Max Pyziur wrote:
> Are there any views in this CentOs user community on [using port 587]?
Yes. Not only is enabling 'submission' a good idea, but you should also
enable 'smtps' (which is different from smtp+tls):
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=submission, Name=
I have the samba problems solved thanks to the help of folks on
this forum, but I do not have the php umask problems solved.
The www directory is /var/www/html and the html directory is
owned by apache and is in the apache groups with the following
permissions:
drwxrwsr--
A sub-driectory, /va
On 06/26/11 3:53 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> It is also possible that the drives got 'wiped' somehow, eg they were
> on the bottom shelf when the cleaning crew came by with the floor waxing
> machine...
in that scenario, you would get nothing but servo errors from the drive,
they wouldn't even fin
Thanks Marian,
The server only has one IP. I think I should add more iptables records, only
one NAT record is not enough,isit correct? If yes , then how?
2011-06-26 23:38:58，"Marian Marinov" wrote：
>On Sunday 26 June 2011 12:53:07 muiz wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I would like to forward a port
On Monday 27 June 2011 00:08:08 muiz wrote:
> Thanks Marian,
> The server only has one IP. I think I should add more iptables records,
> only one NAT record is not enough,isit correct? If yes , then how?
Huh, I'm sorry yes you need a second rule. So the rules are:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:42:16 +0200:
> it's 2 different list, with different people
> and different input
Ask on one list first, wait, if you ask on another provide what you got so
far from the other list. That is plain courtesy.
Kai
__
I accidentally noticed this error written to the warn log on my Dell
R200's when the machines booted up after latest kernel update. Google
doesn't have this exact error, only a few with differently named devices,
but all seem to have to do with USB.
Could this be a bug?
Didn't see this error on
I have the samba problems solved thanks to the help of folks on
this forum, but I do not have the php umask problems solved.
The www directory is /var/www/html and the html directory is
owned by apache and is in the apache groups with the following
permissions:
drwxrwsr--
A sub-driectory, /va
>
>
> yes cool isn't it, that webpage is updated! actually that's what makes
> it useful.
> besides, read the title text on that page again:
> "QA dates are tentative dates for internal planning only. These are not
> official release dates, but only a guide for the QA team. All target
> dates are s
So,
to go back to the topic what is the current status for 6.0? Will it happen
in June or July?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> My goal is to have any created directories and files to have 774
> permissions.
Hi Todd,
Am I correct in assuming the php script that creates the directory
uses the mkdir() function? If so something along the lines of:
mkdir('mydir', 0774); should suffice. The 0 can be changed to 2, 4 or
6 depe
On Monday, June 27, 2011 10:46 AM, robert mena wrote:
> So,
>
> to go back to the topic what is the current status for 6.0? Will it
> happen in June or July?
>
I vote "who cares?"
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:25:21AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
> I vote "who cares?"
I vote "http://qaweb.dev.centos.org";.
John
--
I begin by taking. I shall find scholars later to demonstrate my perfect right.
-- Euripides (c
Dear Marian and all,
It seems don't works:
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j DNAT -p tcp --dport 8080 --to
a.b.c.d:8181
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT -s 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 --to
a.b.c.d
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_foward
I check the Fedora iptables setting: /etc/
On Monday 27 June 2011 06:50:27 muiz wrote:
> Dear Marian and all,
> It seems don't works:
> /sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j DNAT -p tcp --dport 8080 --to
> a.b.c.d:8181 /sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT -s
> 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 --to a.b.c.d echo 1 >
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/i
On Monday, June 27, 2011 11:48 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:25:21AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>
>> I vote "who cares?"
>
> I vote "http://qaweb.dev.centos.org";.
>
Too bad that does not seem to be good enough for some.
_
Marian, I'm very happy you're online :)I think I have try the record you
mention just now. And I would like to clear what I have done (the scripts I
test):/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j DNAT -p tcp --dport 8080 --to
a.b.c.d:8181
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT -s 192.168.0
On Monday 27 June 2011 07:15:33 muiz wrote:
> Marian, I'm very happy you're online :)I think I have try the record you
> mention just now. And I would like to clear what I have done (the scripts
> I test):/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j DNAT -p tcp --dport 8080
> --to a.b.c.d:8181 /sbin/ipt
Mark Bradbury wrote:
>
> yes cool isn't it, that webpage is updated! actually that's what makes
> it useful.
> besides, read the title text on that page again:
> "QA dates are tentative dates for internal planning only. These are not
> official release dates, but only a guide f
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I accidentally noticed this error written to the warn log on my Dell
> R200's when the machines booted up after latest kernel update. Google
> doesn't have this exact error, only a few with differently named devices,
> but all seem to have to do with USB.
> Could this be a
Marian Marinov wrote:
> On Monday 27 June 2011 07:15:33 muiz wrote:
>> Marian, I'm very happy you're online :)I think I have try the record you
>> mention just now. And I would like to clear what I have done (the scripts
>> I test):/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j DNAT -p tcp --dport 8080
>>
38 matches
Mail list logo
