Re: [CentOS] Firefox 5 on Centos 5.6

2011-06-22 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
fred smith wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:35:36PM +0100, Lucian wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:54 PM, fred smith >> wrote: >>> anybody else seen this? anyone got suggestions on what I should try next? >> Try to disable all the extensions and see if it helps. If it does then >> enable the

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 5 on Centos 5.6

2011-06-22 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
James A. Peltier wrote: > > There is the libsdc++-4.1.2-50.el5 package and the gcc44 packages, both can > be installed without messing with the core system > > Yes there is, but it does not provide (GLIBCXX_3.4.9), only up to (GLIBCXX_3.4.8). Closest (GLIBCXX_3.4.9) is for Fedora 10, little to

[CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread Kevin Thorpe
Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? The CUPS printing guide is a horrendous maze of options. I've got nearly there but I've got one thing wrong and I don't know where to look. I set up our two printers (HP K5400s) using the GUI printer tool. Both print the test page just fine. I set up t

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread m . roth
Kevin Thorpe wrote: > Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? > > The CUPS printing guide is a horrendous maze of options. I've got > nearly there but I've got > one thing wrong and I don't know where to look. > > I set up our two printers (HP K5400s) using the GUI printer tool. Both The GUI

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread Kevin Thorpe
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:44 PM, wrote: > Kevin Thorpe wrote: >> Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? >> >> The CUPS printing guide is a horrendous maze of options. I've got >> nearly there but I've got >> one thing wrong and I don't know where to look. >> >> I set up our two printers (HP

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread Benjamin Hackl
Dear Kevin, On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:16:54 +0100 Kevin Thorpe wrote: > Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? > > The CUPS printing guide is a horrendous maze of options. I've got > nearly there but I've got > one thing wrong and I don't know where to look. you have to do the following: I

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread Kevin Thorpe
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Benjamin Hackl wrote: > Dear Kevin, > > On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:16:54 +0100 > Kevin Thorpe wrote: > >> Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? > you have to do the following: > > In CUPS https://localhost:631/ setup your printers and set the printer > driver

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread m . roth
Kevin Thorpe wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Benjamin Hackl > wrote: >> Dear Kevin, >> >> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:16:54 +0100 >> Kevin Thorpe wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? > >> you have to do the following: >> >> In CUPS https://localhost:631/ setup your prin

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread Kevin Thorpe
>>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:16:54 +0100 >>> Kevin Thorpe wrote: >>> Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? >>> In CUPS https://localhost:631/ setup your printers and set the printer >>> driver for each printer to local raw printer > And you say that, using localhost:631, you did add pr

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread m . roth
Kevin Thorpe wrote: On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:16:54 +0100 Kevin Thorpe wrote: > Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? > In CUPS https://localhost:631/ setup your printers and set the printer driver for each printer to local raw printer > >> And you say that, using

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread Kevin Thorpe
> In CUPS https://localhost:631/ setup your printers and set the printer > driver for each printer to local raw printer >> >>> And you say that, using localhost:631, you did add printer, then >>> selected make and model, and chose one of the drivers, and it still >>> doesn't do the right th

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread Kevin Thorpe
>> Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? Bah! I saw that lpr could print PS but smbclient coudn't so in desperation I restarted samba. Now it prints PS. Why is completely beyond me. That's why I couldn't work out what I'd done wrong - I hadn't. -- Kevin Thorpe Head of IT PI Benchmark

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:22:57 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > >>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:16:54 +0100 > >>> Kevin Thorpe wrote: > >>> > Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? > > >>> In CUPS https://localhost:631/ setup your printers and set the printer > >>> driver for each pri

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread m . roth
Kevin Thorpe wrote: >>> Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? > > Bah! I saw that lpr could print PS but smbclient coudn't so in desperation > I restarted samba. Now it prints PS. Why is completely beyond me. > That's why I couldn't work out what I'd done wrong - I hadn't. > Did you fix

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread m . roth
Kevin Thorpe wrote: >>> Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? > > Bah! I saw that lpr could print PS but smbclient coudn't so in desperation > I restarted samba. Now it prints PS. Why is completely beyond me. > That's why I couldn't work out what I'd done wrong - I hadn't. > Following up

Re: [CentOS] CUPS not rendering documents via Samba

2011-06-22 Thread Kevin Thorpe
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:41 PM, wrote: > Kevin Thorpe wrote: Hi guys, any CUPS / Samba experts out there? >> >> Bah! I saw that lpr could print PS but smbclient coudn't so in desperation >> I restarted samba. Now it prints PS. Why is completely beyond me. >> That's why I couldn't work o

[CentOS] inconsistent DNS results - ping vs dig vs nslookup

2011-06-22 Thread robert henrichs
I am getting what I believe to be inconsistent replies/results from my CentOs machine, trying to ping URLs. Pinging by URL fails the DNS lookup, while pinging the IP address (that should have been returned) works. The DNS lookup also fails NSLOOKUP, but interestingly, dig and wget return A re

Re: [CentOS] inconsistent DNS results - ping vs dig vs nslookup

2011-06-22 Thread Owen Beckley
> -Original Message- > Behalf Of robert henrichs > Subject: [CentOS] inconsistent DNS results - ping vs dig vs nslookup > > I am getting what I believe to be inconsistent replies/results from > my CentOs machine, trying to ping URLs. Pinging by URL fails the DNS > lookup, while pinging th

Re: [CentOS] inconsistent DNS results - ping vs dig vs nslookup

2011-06-22 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
robert henrichs wrote: > I am getting what I believe to be inconsistent replies/results from > my CentOs machine, trying to ping URLs. Pinging by URL fails the DNS > lookup, while pinging the IP address (that should have been returned) > works. The DNS lookup also fails NSLOOKUP, but interesti

Re: [CentOS] inconsistent DNS results - ping vs dig vs nslookup

2011-06-22 Thread Robert Henrichs
Thanks All, Answering multiple questions: *** I started off with Google's DNS servers- 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 with the same results. The current set were copied off other working wkstas on the LAN . Same type results with "ping www.yahoo.com" and "ping www.yahoo.com". Just changed it to

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 5 on Centos 5.6

2011-06-22 Thread Mike Hanby
What if you try: mv ~/.mozilla start firefox5 and see if it works, if it does, then restore your .mozilla and figure what the offending extension / plugin is. Mike > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Ljubomir Ljubojev

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 5 on Centos 5.6

2011-06-22 Thread Mike Hanby
sorry mv ~/.mozilla ~/.mozilla.orig > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Mike Hanby > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:37 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox 5 on Centos 5.6 > > What if you try:

Re: [CentOS] inconsistent DNS results - ping vs dig vs nslookup

2011-06-22 Thread Ryan Ivey
> what's a good link to read about how the resolv.conf file is > constructed? esp. the "search" entry? > man resolv.conf > > *** > This was part of the wget response: > www.henrichs.orgcanonical name = ehost-services119.com. > Name: ehost-services119.com > Address: 69.64.155.165 >

Re: [CentOS] Using umask

2011-06-22 Thread Todd Cary
Many thanks to you and DrewI am the only user... Todd On 6/21/2011 11:05 PM, Anthony wrote: > On 06/22/2011 01:22 AM, Todd Cary wrote: >> Grasping a full understanding of setting default Users, Groups >> and Masks has alluded me over the years, but now I find myself in >> a situation where ma

Re: [CentOS] inconsistent DNS results - ping vs dig vs nslookup

2011-06-22 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/22/2011 3:30 PM, Robert Henrichs wrote: > > > what's a good link to read about how the resolv.conf file is > constructed? esp. the "search" entry? The 'search' should only apply if you don't supply the domain portion of the name. Each nameserver address should be queried until one resp

Re: [CentOS] inconsistent DNS results - ping vs dig vs nslookup

2011-06-22 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Robert Henrichs wrote: > > root@pbx:~ $ cat /etc/resolv.conf > search isp.com >nameserver 8.8.4.4 >nameserver 216.146.36.36 >nameserver 8.8.8.8 Whats with the "search isp.com"? Try removing that and try again. Try first without rebooting. I am looking what it actually does. I do not

Re: [CentOS] inconsistent DNS results - ping vs dig vs nslookup

2011-06-22 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Robert Henrichs wrote: >> root@pbx:~ $ cat /etc/resolv.conf >> search isp.com >>nameserver 8.8.4.4 >>nameserver 216.146.36.36 >>nameserver 8.8.8.8 > Whats with the "search isp.com"? Try removing that and try again. Try > first without rebooting. > > I am l

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 5 on Centos 5.6

2011-06-22 Thread grace rante
I'm able to run firefox5_x64 on my Centos 5.6 system. * Download libstdc++-4.3.0-8.x86_64.rpm to /tmp * cd /tmp ; cpio -idv libstdc++-4.3.0-8.x86_64.rpm | cpio -i --make-directories Copy contents of unpacked libraries: * cp /tmp/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6* /path/to/firefox5_x64/ Run firefox * /p

Re: [CentOS] inconsistent DNS results - ping vs dig vs nslookup

2011-06-22 Thread Devin Reade
--On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 03:30:18 PM -0500 Robert Henrichs wrote: > root@pbx:~ $ cat /etc/resolv.conf > search isp.com >nameserver 8.8.4.4 >nameserver 216.146.36.36 >nameserver 8.8.8.8 Get rid of the leading whitespace if it actually exists in that file. It shouldn't make a diff

[CentOS] Year in log files

2011-06-22 Thread Fajar Priyanto
Hi, Can we display year in log files timestamp? We are being audited and the auditor wants to know when we apply certain patches. yum.log shows it, but it doesn't have the year. I can argue based on common sense, but it would be much nicer if the year is there. Example: Apr 12 11:41:25 Updated: k

Re: [CentOS] Year in log files

2011-06-22 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:18 AM, lists-centos wrote: > You should set that log to rotate annually. That should address your > issue, in addition to keeping logwatch from picking up year-old > entries. Yes it's rotated annually. That's why I can argue based on common sense, by comparing the CESA

Re: [CentOS] Year in log files

2011-06-22 Thread Giovanni Tirloni
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Hi, > Can we display year in log files timestamp? > We are being audited and the auditor wants to know when we apply > certain patches. > yum.log shows it, but it doesn't have the year. > I can argue based on common sense, but it would be m

[CentOS] OT: DHCP address pool for specific MAC manufacturer

2011-06-22 Thread Raymond Lillard
Dear CentOS, This is somewhat off-topic, but I do hope to implement this on a CentOS system, so here goes... I would like to be able to setup a dhcpd (or like) daemon to maintain two IP address pools. One for devices whose leading three octets of the client MAC address are specified and the othe

[CentOS] Chicken and egg question: passwd and cronjob

2011-06-22 Thread Fajar Priyanto
Hi all, Let's say I activate password expiration for every account (including root) for every 90 days. I understand that cronjob for root will fail when the password expires. The question is, if I setup a cronjob every 90 days to renew the root password like: echo diFficulT123 | passwd --stdin roo

Re: [CentOS] Chicken and egg question: passwd and cronjob

2011-06-22 Thread KevinO
On 06/22/2011 11:46 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > I mean at second 1 on the 90th day, which will run first? > - The cronjob to renew the password > - Or the password expiration, thus preventing the cronjob from running. > just setup the password renewing job to run one minute earlier or don't expi