On Jun 20, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>>> There is no reason that should be true. Copying 20GB out of an LV
>>> should take exactly the same amount of time as copying 20GB out of a file.
>>
>> What about the destination? Would
On Jun 20, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:32:03PM +0200, Markus Falb wrote:
>> On 20.6.2011 21:19, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
>>> LVM; pvcreate, vgcreate, lvcreate. What's a partition? :-)
>>
>> But your filesystem has still to be aligned correctly. Is lvm 4k
Grasping a full understanding of setting default Users, Groups
and Masks has alluded me over the years, but now I find myself in
a situation where manually "setting" the file/directory
attributes is becoming a pain.
I understand the fundamentals of the file attributes, though from
time to time
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Todd Cary wrote:
> Grasping a full understanding of setting default Users, Groups
> and Masks has alluded me over the years, but now I find myself in
> a situation where manually "setting" the file/directory
> attributes is becoming a pain.
>
> I understand the fundamentals of
John Hodrien wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Todd Cary wrote:
>> My /var/www/html files have been manually set by me to
>> apache/apache 774. This allows my PHP applications to access the
>> files, and I assume this is a "good" setting.
>>
>> Now, my server is connected via Samba to my desktop. If
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 18:27:11 John Hodrien wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Todd Cary wrote:
> > Grasping a full understanding of setting default Users, Groups
> > and Masks has alluded me over the years, but now I find myself in
> > a situation where manually "setting" the file/directory
> > attri
On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:30 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Todd Cary wrote:
>
>>> My /var/www/html files have been manually set by me to
>>> apache/apache 774. This allows my PHP applications to access the
>>> files, and I assume this is a "good" setting.
On 6/21/2011 8:30 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Todd Cary wrote:
>
>>> My /var/www/html files have been manually set by me to
>>> apache/apache 774. This allows my PHP applications to access the
>>> files, and I assume this is a "good" setting.
>>>
>>
On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Todd Cary wrote:
>
>
> On 6/21/2011 8:30 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> John Hodrien wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Todd Cary wrote:
>>
My /var/www/html files have been manually set by me to
apache/apache 774. This allows my PHP applications to access t
I've been running Firefox 4 on Centos 5 (had to find a libstdc++.so.6 for
it by perusing newer systems from which I could steal one, but it's been
fine since then).
Well, today firefox pushed down an update to Firefox 4.0.1 without saying
what it was, and it turns out to have been firefox 5. fine,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:54 PM, fred smith
wrote:
> anybody else seen this? anyone got suggestions on what I should try next?
Try to disable all the extensions and see if it helps. If it does then
enable them back one by one until you find the guilty one.
Are you using anti-static flooring?
I know in our new server room extension there was some very expensive lino that
went down.
This sort of stuff:
http://www.afloor.co.uk/vinyl-flooring-lino/anti-static-flooring.html
--Russell
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mail
fred smith wrote:
> I've been running Firefox 4 on Centos 5 (had to find a libstdc++.so.6 for
> it by perusing newer systems from which I could steal one, but it's been
> fine since then).
>
> Well, today firefox pushed down an update to Firefox 4.0.1 without saying
> what it was, and it turns out
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:46:09AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
> > I've been running Firefox 4 on Centos 5 (had to find a libstdc++.so.6 for
> > it by perusing newer systems from which I could steal one, but it's been
> > fine since then).
> >
> > Well, today firefox push
fred smith writes:
> I've been running Firefox 4 on Centos 5 (had to find a libstdc++.so.6 for
> it by perusing newer systems from which I could steal one, but it's been
> fine since then).
Is that 64-bit, and did you ever get flash to work? Doesn't work here,
although the same flash plugin work
fred smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:46:09AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> fred smith wrote:
>>> I've been running Firefox 4 on Centos 5 (had to find a libstdc++.so.6 for
>>> it by perusing newer systems from which I could steal one, but it's been
>>> fine since then).
>>>
>>> Well
- Original Message -
| fred smith wrote:
| > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:46:09AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
| >> fred smith wrote:
| >>> I've been running Firefox 4 on Centos 5 (had to find a
| >>> libstdc++.so.6 for
| >>> it by perusing newer systems from which I could steal one, but
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:35:36PM +0100, Lucian wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:54 PM, fred smith
> wrote:
> > anybody else seen this? anyone got suggestions on what I should try next?
>
> Try to disable all the extensions and see if it helps. If it does then
> enable them back one by one unt
This may not be the best from a security perspective but as you use
samba, why not just set it to force the correct user, group and mask
setting for that share?
My server at home is setup that way and it works just fine.
-Drew
On 06/21/2011, Todd Cary wrote:
> Grasping a full understanding of s
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:56:14PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> fred smith writes:
> > I've been running Firefox 4 on Centos 5 (had to find a libstdc++.so.6 for
> > it by perusing newer systems from which I could steal one, but it's been
> > fine since then).
>
> Is that 64-bit, and did you ever
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:18:38AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:46:09AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> >> fred smith wrote:
> >>> I've been running Firefox 4 on Centos 5 (had to find a libstdc++.so.6 for
> >>> it by perusing newer systems
On 06/22/2011 01:22 AM, Todd Cary wrote:
> Grasping a full understanding of setting default Users, Groups
> and Masks has alluded me over the years, but now I find myself in
> a situation where manually "setting" the file/directory
> attributes is becoming a pain.
>
> I understand the fundamentals
22 matches
Mail list logo
