Re: [CentOS] Unable to grep 5 mins logs

2011-06-14 Thread ankush grover
>> >> It is really slow when 2-3 greps are combined. >> > > But it will do the job until you solve this with more elegance. > > What you can try is to compile search pattern from 2-3 date outputs so > it will match the text in the log. > > > dayname="$(date "+%a")"; month="$(date "+%b")"; time="$(d

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Mark Bradbury wrote: > On 13 June 2011 23:53, James B. Byrne > wrote: > > > I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information > given on this site: > > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar > > > > It seems every time I look at that si

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 09:22 -0700, Craig White wrote: > easier just to give up - I moved my new servers to ubuntu - no more new > CentOS installs any more. I'm just going to maintain the CentOS 5 installs at > this point. Holy shit, man! I'd never, by choice, put in an Ubuntu server. Debian, su

[CentOS] Dell openmanage srvadmin on 5.6

2011-06-14 Thread Kevin Thorpe
Hi all, I'm just trying to get Dell openmanage to run on my Centos 5.6 box. The monitoring stuff appears to have installed but the web server stuff is complaining it needs openwsman 2.2.3 or later and I can only find that for RHEL/Centos 6, not 5. Can anyone point me at a suitable rpm, or d

Re: [CentOS] Dell openmanage srvadmin on 5.6

2011-06-14 Thread Eero Volotinen
2011/6/14 Kevin Thorpe : > Hi all, >       I'm just trying to get Dell openmanage to run on my Centos 5.6 > box. The monitoring > stuff appears to have installed but the web server stuff is > complaining it needs openwsman > 2.2.3 or later and I can only find that for RHEL/Centos 6, not 5. > > Can

Re: [CentOS] Dell openmanage srvadmin on 5.6

2011-06-14 Thread Kevin Thorpe
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2011/6/14 Kevin Thorpe : >> Hi all, >>       I'm just trying to get Dell openmanage to run on my Centos 5.6 >> box. The monitoring >> stuff appears to have installed but the web server stuff is >> complaining it needs openwsman >> 2.2.3 or l

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 06:49 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 09:22 -0700, Craig White wrote: > > easier just to give up - I moved my new servers to ubuntu - no more new > > CentOS installs any more. I'm just going to maintain the CentOS 5 installs > > at this point. > >

Re: [CentOS] Dell openmanage srvadmin on 5.6

2011-06-14 Thread Phil Schaffner
Kevin Thorpe wrote on 06/14/2011 08:20 AM: ... > That's exactly what I was trying to do. > Error: Missing Dependency: openwsman-server>= 2.2.3 is needed by > package srvadmin-itunnelprovider-6.5.0-1.151.1.el5.x86_64 > (dell-omsa-specific) It seems to be in the Dell repo: http://linux.dell.com/rep

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread m . roth
Craig White wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 06:49 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: >> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 09:22 -0700, Craig White wrote: >> > easier just to give up - I moved my new servers to ubuntu - no more >> new CentOS installs any more. I'm just going to maintain the CentOS 5 >> installs

Re: [CentOS] Dell openmanage srvadmin on 5.6

2011-06-14 Thread Kevin Thorpe
Hmmm... I don't know how to do this but I know a man who can so it'll wait. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote: > Kevin Thorpe wrote on 06/14/2011 08:20 AM: > ... >> That's exactly what I was trying to do. >> Error: Missing Dependency: openwsman-server>= 2.2.3 is needed

Re: [CentOS] Compiling PHP and MySQL

2011-06-14 Thread John Doe
From: "Dvorkin, Asya" > Is there a way to find out what are the usual configure options that are used > to > compile binaries that are available through yum? php -i | grep configure or check from the srpm... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:19 AM, wrote: > Craig White wrote: >> >> heck it's still Linux and pretty much the same. >> >> Red Hat went far too long between releases and it is clear to me that I >> can't possibly rely on CentOS for timeliness. > > Timeliness, dunno. Ubuntu (or fedora) for productio

Re: [CentOS] Recall: EXTERNAL: A bridge problem

2011-06-14 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > on 6/13/2011 12:07 PM Massey, Ricky spake the following: >> Massey, Ricky would like to recall the message, "EXTERNAL: > [CentOS] A bridge problem". > Although recall would be nice, internet mailing lists are forever! > What is said cannot be unsaid... ESPECIALLY

Re: [CentOS] Bash rotating tab completion with list

2011-06-14 Thread yonatan pingle
Hello Dotan, you might want to ask your sysadmin about this, it's a package that can be compiled from source. last time a checked ( a long time back ), they use both redhat 7.3 and solaris as the core system in the univ ( in tel-aviv at least ). you can check the system version & type with a simp

Re: [CentOS] Bash rotating tab completion with list

2011-06-14 Thread Dotan Cohen
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 17:49, yonatan pingle wrote: > Hello Dotan, > > you might want to ask your sysadmin about this, it's a package that > can be compiled from source. > last time a checked ( a long time back ), they use both redhat 7.3 and > solaris as the core system in the univ ( in tel-aviv

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 06/14/2011 06:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Timeliness, dunno. Ubuntu (or fedora) for production? NOT IF I HAVE ANY > CONTROL!!! Given how many developers write incredibly fragile code, that > is utterly dependent upon a very, very special environment, I guarantee > that the almost daily up

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread m . roth
Benjamin Franz wrote: > On 06/14/2011 06:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Timeliness, dunno. Ubuntu (or fedora) for production? NOT IF I HAVE ANY >> CONTROL!!! Given how many developers write incredibly fragile code, that >> is utterly dependent upon a very, very special environment, I guarante

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/14/2011 10:06 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Benjamin Franz wrote: >> On 06/14/2011 06:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> >>> Timeliness, dunno. Ubuntu (or fedora) for production? NOT IF I HAVE ANY >>> CONTROL!!! Given how many developers write incredibly fragile code, that >>> is utterly depen

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Trutwin, Joshua
> heck it's still Linux and pretty much the same. There's a lot more than just a kernel to break a system. > Red Hat went far too long between releases and it is clear to me that I can't > possibly rely on CentOS for timeliness. Maybe I'm just in a different kind of environment, but why do you

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 11:23 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 6/14/2011 10:06 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Benjamin Franz wrote: >>> On 06/14/2011 06:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Timeliness, dunno. Ubuntu (or fedora) for production? NOT IF I HAVE ANY CONTROL!!! Given how many deve

[CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread Fajar Priyanto
Hi guys, Sorry for the OT. For the last couple of weeks I notice that the static in my server room is worrisomely noticeable. I cannot see what may be causing it Care to share some of your experience what may be the cause and the remedy? Thank you. _

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 11:26 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote: >> heck it's still Linux and pretty much the same. > > There's a lot more than just a kernel to break a system. > >> Red Hat went far too long between releases and it is clear to me that I can't >> possibly rely on CentOS for timeliness. >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: > On 6/14/2011 10:06 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Benjamin Franz wrote: >>> On 06/14/2011 06:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Timeliness, dunno. Ubuntu (or fedora) for production? NOT IF I HAVE ANY CONTROL!!! Given how many developers write incredibly fragile code

Re: [CentOS] Dell openmanage srvadmin on 5.6

2011-06-14 Thread Eero Volotinen
2011/6/14 Kevin Thorpe : > Hmmm... I don't know how to do this but I know a man who can > so it'll wait. just follow instructions at web page. step 1 (on root terminal): wget -q -O - http://linux.dell.com/repo/hardware/OMSA_6.5/bootstrap.cgi | bash step 2 (on root terminal): yum install s

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread m . roth
Christopher Chan wrote: > On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 11:23 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 6/14/2011 10:06 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Benjamin Franz wrote: On 06/14/2011 06:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Non-LTS are virtually the same as Fedora releases; experimental > releases. Eve

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread m . roth
Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Hi guys, > Sorry for the OT. > For the last couple of weeks I notice that the static in my server > room is worrisomely noticeable. > I cannot see what may be causing it > Care to share some of your experience what may be the cause and the > remedy? > Change the settings

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 06/14/2011 08:39 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Hi guys, > Sorry for the OT. > For the last couple of weeks I notice that the static in my server > room is worrisomely noticeable. > I cannot see what may be causing it > Care to share some of your experience what may be the cause and the remedy?

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > Hi guys, > Sorry for the OT. > For the last couple of weeks I notice that the static in my server > room is worrisomely noticeable. > I cannot see what may be causing it > Care to share some of your experience what may be the cause > and the remedy? > > Thank

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Jerry Franz
On 06/14/2011 08:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Yeah, but some people appear to think (or at least that was what I got > from the post of the guy I was replying to) that fedora is good enough for > production. *blink* Absolutely not. I was talking about Ubuntu Server LTS. I don't use Fedora

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread m . roth
Jerry Franz wrote: > On 06/14/2011 08:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Yeah, but some people appear to think (or at least that was what I got >> from the post of the guy I was replying to) that fedora is good enough >> for production. > > *blink* > > Absolutely not. I was talking about Ubuntu S

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread Kevin Thorpe
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Hi guys, > Sorry for the OT. > For the last couple of weeks I notice that the static in my server > room is worrisomely noticeable. > I cannot see what may be causing it > Care to share some of your experience what may be the cause and t

Re: [CentOS] Dell openmanage srvadmin on 5.6

2011-06-14 Thread Kevin Thorpe
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2011/6/14 Kevin Thorpe : >> Hmmm... I don't know how to do this but I know a man who can >> so it'll wait. > > just follow instructions at web page. > > step 1 (on root terminal): wget -q -O - > http://linux.dell.com/repo/hardware/OM

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/14/2011 10:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Non-LTS are virtually the same as Fedora releases; experimental >> releases. Even some LTS releases get pushed out the door with major bugs >> in various packages. The only plus is that it is possible to do >> major-rev upgrades provided that you

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/14/2011 10:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >>> Ok... do you have in-house developed software? I've got one team that's > >>> 10? 11? to 13 was a nightmare, and X wouldn't work until I got rid of >>> gnome, and put KDE on >>> >>> I want solid and stable. >> >> I don't get the comparisons.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4

2011-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
Are the updates supposed to be synced to the mirrors before the announce message goes out? Only a random few machines could get these updates yesterday. Also, is there some reason behind the package name/numbering going from: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.21.b17.el5 to java-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: > On 6/14/2011 10:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Ok... do you have in-house developed software? I've got one team that's >> 10? 11? to 13 was a nightmare, and X wouldn't work until I got rid of gnome, and put KDE on I want solid and stable.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Devin Reade
>>> Smart folks will test 6.0 to see how apps perform/behave and then wait >>> till 6.1. >> >> I beg to differ. Smart folks will test 6.0 and deploy it if performance is >> acceptable. > > Guess you have never worked in an organization of any size where you worry > about reliability, patches, bug

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/14/2011 12:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > I'm an admin. I'm a contractor. Oh - OK. Then you aren't expected to care about the long term consequences. >> OK, but what was that about things like ruby and java? (Java being more >> or less OK now...). If you don't use/need software from th

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread Rob Kampen
Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hi guys, Sorry for the OT. For the last couple of weeks I notice that the static in my server room is worrisomely noticeable. I cannot see what may be causing it Care to share some of your experience what may be the cause and the remedy? Check the humidity - if it ge

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: > On 6/14/2011 12:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> I'm an admin. I'm a contractor. > > Oh - OK. Then you aren't expected to care about the long term > consequences. Yes, I bloody well am. I work for a federal contractor, and as long as they have the multi-year contract, an

[CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 6/14/2011 12:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: PLEASE ... let this thread die or take it to a bar somewhere ... it has NOTHING do do with the subject line -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread Robert Heller
At Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:31:02 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Sorry for the OT. > > For the last couple of weeks I notice that the static in my server > > room is worrisomely noticeable. > > I cannot see what may be ca

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread Kevin Thorpe
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: >> > Hi guys, >> > Sorry for the OT. >> > For the last couple of weeks I notice that the static in my server >> > room is worrisomely noticeable. >> > I cannot see what may be causing it >> > Care to share some of your experience what m

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread m . roth
Kevin Thorpe wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Fajar Priyanto >>> wrote: >>> > Hi guys, >>> > Sorry for the OT. >>> > For the last couple of weeks I notice that the static in my server >>> > room is worrisomely noticeable. >>> > I cannot see what may be causing it >>> > Care to share

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread Kevin Thorpe
>> I know that, you know that, but the powers that be insist on carpet on the >> raised floor tiles. > > Has anyone presented them with the problems with carpeting in the server > room? Doesn't have to be confrontational, just "we're having a problem > with static discharges in the server room, and

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread m . roth
Kevin Thorpe wrote: >>> I know that, you know that, but the powers that be insist on carpet on >>> the raised floor tiles. >> >> Has anyone presented them with the problems with carpeting in the server >> room? Doesn't have to be confrontational, just "we're having a problem >> with static discharg

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread John R Pierce
On 06/14/11 12:27 PM, Kevin Thorpe wrote: > I know that, you know that, but the powers that be insist on carpet on the > raised floor tiles. there are carpets that have conductive fibers woven into them specifically to combat static. carpet is usually banned from computer rooms because it encour

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread Kevin Thorpe
> carpet is usually banned from computer rooms because it encourages lint > and dust, which clogs fans and chassis and air filters.    most data > centers do NOT want the janitors in there doing weekly vacuuming and > banging into the servers!! This was a mainframe shop and we were the fishes swim

Re: [CentOS] Compiling PHP and MySQL

2011-06-14 Thread Dvorkin, Asya
On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:40 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: "Dvorkin, Asya" > >> Is there a way to find out what are the usual configure options that are >> used to >> compile binaries that are available through yum? > > php -i | grep configure > or check from the srpm... Thank you, John. This is

Re: [CentOS] Compiling PHP and MySQL

2011-06-14 Thread John R Pierce
On 06/14/11 1:10 PM, Dvorkin, Asya wrote: >>> Is there a way to find out what are the usual configure options that are >>> used to >>> >> compile binaries that are available through yum? >> > >> > php -i | grep configure >> > or check from the srpm... > Thank you, John. This is very useful t

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread aurfalien
On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Kevin Thorpe wrote: >> carpet is usually banned from computer rooms because it encourages >> lint >> and dust, which clogs fans and chassis and air filters.most data >> centers do NOT want the janitors in there doing weekly vacuuming and >> banging into the serv

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread gvim
On 14/06/2011 05:07, Mark Bradbury wrote: > On 13 June 2011 23:53, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> >> I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information >> given on this site: >> >> http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar >> >> > > It seems every time I look at that site the dates hav

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Scott Silva
on 6/14/2011 2:23 PM gvim spake the following: ,snip> > > Then 21st, now 24th. Scientific Linux doesn't seem to have these problems. > That's why I switched. Don't get it. > > gvim You forgot to switch lists... ;) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cento

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
gvim wrote: > > Then 21st, now 24th. Scientific Linux doesn't seem to have these problems. > That's why I switched. Don't get it. > What 24th are you talking about? QA site has 16th as pushing to internal mirrors. I was informed that all rpm's are OK, they are just fixing few distro/ISO bugs.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:48 AM, wrote: > Odd you should mention it - a friend on a techie mailing list just tried > to set up dual-boot XP w/ ubuntu, and had all *kinds* of grief, dunno if > she just restored XP. Wouldn't recognize her USB keyboard, didn't get the > graphics card and monitor r

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > By > the way, my install was originally a 9.x LTS, upgraded to a 10.x over > the network while running under vmware and I installed it in the first > place because Centos didn't include a driver for the wifi and ubuntu > 'just worked'. Oppo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/14/2011 4:54 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:48 AM, wrote: > >> Odd you should mention it - a friend on a techie mailing list just tried >> to set up dual-boot XP w/ ubuntu, and had all *kinds* of grief, dunno if >> she just restored XP. Wouldn't recognize her USB keyboar

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/14/2011 5:00 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> By >> the way, my install was originally a 9.x LTS, upgraded to a 10.x over >> the network while running under vmware and I installed it in the first >> place because Centos didn't include a driv

[CentOS] leaving ports open for tftp

2011-06-14 Thread Tim Dunphy
hey guys, I have a really silly question for you! I just built a cobbler server that I am using to bare metal some boxes. But I am a bit n00b and need to figure out which ports to open in iptables. Here's a start: xinetd 2031 root8u IPv4 94306 UD

[CentOS] OT: clear error from premature disk removal from LVM

2011-06-14 Thread Keith Keller
Hi all, This question is only slightly ontopic, in that the host system is a CentOS 5 box, but is otherwise a fairly generic question. I've looked in so many different places for an answer, but haven't had much luck, so I'm hoping someone here has some advice. (for the record: I posted this que

Re: [CentOS] leaving ports open for tftp

2011-06-14 Thread brian
On 06/14/2011 06:51 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > hey guys, > > I have a really silly question for you! I just built a cobbler server that > I am using to bare metal some boxes. But I am a bit n00b and need to figure > out which ports to open in iptables. > > Here's a start: > > xinetd 2031

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 12:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: By > the way, my install was originally a 9.x LTS, upgraded to a 10.x over > the network while running under vmware and I installed it in the first > place because Centos didn't include a driver for the wifi and ubuntu > 'just worked'. > Th

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread Fajar Priyanto
Thanks all for the reply. What is the worst thing can happen from excessive static? We have two corrupted UEFI when we reboot servers which now I suspect because of static. Yesterday I actually saw a spark when I put a memory module on motherboard even though I was careful like touching the metal c

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-14 Thread John R Pierce
On 06/14/11 5:04 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > What is the worst thing can happen from excessive static? fried electronics. or, imho worse than total failure, is downstream flakiness induced by partial gate failures from said static zaps. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:48 AM,   wrote: > >> Odd you should mention it - a friend on a techie mailing list just tried >> to set up dual-boot XP w/ ubuntu, and had all *kinds* of grief, dunno if >> she just restored XP. Wouldn't recognize he

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:41 AM, wrote: > > Yeah, but some people appear to think (or at least that was what I got > from the post of the guy I was replying to) that fedora is good enough for > production. That was me. Using fedora isn't my choice but it's been running fine for the purposes of

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread John R. Dennison
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:23:38PM +0100, gvim wrote: > > Then 21st, now 24th. Scientific Linux doesn't seem to have these > problems. That's why I switched. Don't get it. But yet you felt the need to comment. Bravo. You realize that SL has people PAID to work on the distro, right? As in the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 08:59 AM, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:48 AM, wrote: >> >>> Odd you should mention it - a friend on a techie mailing list just tried >>> to set up dual-boot XP w/ ubuntu, and had all *kinds* of grief,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/14/11 8:29 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > > > In any case, an LTS release for a server is a joke. How many PPA's have > you added for your servers? For what? Most of the stuff that you have to use 3rd party repos to get on CentOS is in the stock ubuntu repositories in usably recent versions.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > And by the way - if you need to run something yourself just to be able > to support someone else you can usually do it under vmware player, > virtualbox, etc.  It's easier than fighting with real hardware and > shutting down whatever else you

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Do you have something other than an intel wifi chip? No, not any more. I had a Broadcom card, but an older laptop we gave away needed a WiFi card, so I invested $12 into an Intel card on eBay and installed the Broadcom card in the "old" lapt

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

2011-06-14 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Tom H wrote: > I wouldn't generalize based on your experience because Mint hasn't > become a very popular distribution by being broken. Same goes for > Ubuntu. I don't have to generalize, I go to the forums and see all the issues -- often the same issues I'm havi