On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
> Thanks for the link. It makes interesting listening because there are claims
> that they tried to engage with the CentOS devs to offer support and
> resourcing,
> but that relationship was not forthcoming... so they intend to build (as I see
> i
RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
> I did that. It didn't help. :(
>
>
> On Jun 2, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:01 PM, RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
>>> On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Tom H wrote:
I was asking about "Domain" in "idmapd.conf" because there might be a
differen
> If you want to get into the nitty gritty of it, the ONLY group of
> people who deserve ANY credit at all are the Redhat folks. So saying a
> product that is released off Redhat's coattails is competing with
> another product that is ALSO running off Redhat's coattails is absurd.
Maybe a little t
Hello,some of youare familiar withtherevisor,andcanhelp me withit?
I wonderif therevisorishowtopick,withtheCentOSinstalledonlyintext
modealsoworks, andalsoI'm having someproblems withpackagedependenciesare
missing somepackagesto installtherevisorbut stillcan not find...
Error:MissingDependenc
On 06/02/2011 04:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/2/2011 3:04 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
I know. But you need to setup sudo for users, I never bothered so far.
It is one of the *first* things I do when I freshly install Linux (*ANY*
distro, both on my machines and anyone else's I set up).
And the
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:52:30AM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 04:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >And the first thing I do when I need to change something on a system set
> >up like that is 'sudo su -'... Too lazy to type it more than once.
> >
> I just learned about su -i, does the s
Steve Clark wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 04:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 6/2/2011 3:04 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
I know. But you need to setup sudo for users, I never bothered so far.
>>> It is one of the *first* things I do when I freshly install Linux (*ANY*
>>> distro, both on my machines an
On 06/03/2011 06:56 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:52:30AM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
And the first thing I do when I need to change something on a system set
up like that is 'sudo su -'... Too lazy to type it more than once.
I
On 6/3/11 5:56 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:52:30AM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>> On 06/02/2011 04:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>>> And the first thing I do when I need to change something on a system set
>>> up like that is 'sudo su -'... Too lazy to type it more than onc
On 6/3/11 2:41 AM, Steven Crothers wrote:
>
> If you want to get into the nitty gritty of it, the ONLY group of
> people who deserve ANY credit at all are the Redhat folks. So saying a
> product that is released off Redhat's coattails is competing with
> another product that is ALSO running off Red
> Yes, RedHat deserves the credit for denying access to the binaries of open
> source work, even to the community responsible for it even existing.
Since I just made a point about the upstream projects, let me
respectfully disagree with your statement : free software is about
freedom not free lunc
On Friday, June 03, 2011 09:06:28 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
> Yes, RedHat deserves the credit for denying access to the binaries of open
> source work, even to the community responsible for it even existing.
[snip]
> But when you say that, keep in mind that the 'original packages' part is the
> pack
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 08:03:34 PM Rob Kampen wrote:
> My look at the website shows only i386 versions - this is a long way
> away from a replacement or alternative to CentOS.
Also, it likely would be a subset, and not the full distribution. This has
already been done, and released, as Fram
From: Todd Cary
> Now, when I turn on the USB drive (it is self-mounted in 5.5),
> the USB drive has been assigned "disk-1" -- understood. What I
> am missing is the "table" that contains the information pointing
> to USB drive, disk-1. I would like to reset the table so that
> "disk" is th
From: Deivison Moraes
>I wonder if therevisoris how to pick, with the CentOS installed only in text
>mode alsoworks, and also I'm having some problems
>with package dependencies are missing some packages to install the revisorbut
>still can not find ...
>Error: Missing Dependency: python (abi)>
On 6/3/2011 8:57 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, June 03, 2011 09:06:28 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Yes, RedHat deserves the credit for denying access to the binaries of open
>> source work, even to the community responsible for it even existing.
> [snip]
>> But when you say that, keep in mind tha
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 6/2/2011 4:18 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> The things I always look for and almost never find are
>
> (a) A split between tutorial (step-by-step for common uses) and
> reference sections (that have all the options). Once you've followed the
> tutorial you won't want to wade through that again
Hello,
I run CentOS 5.6 on a Dell PowerEdge R815 with 256 GB of RAM.
We use Sun Grid Engine to schedule jobs on this node.
I want to limit the memory usage about 150 GB per process.
So i use the /etc/security/limits.conf configuration file. I test this
configuration with some tools with a lowe
On 6/3/2011 11:54 AM, Thomas Harold wrote:
>> The things I always look for and almost never find are
>>
>> (a) A split between tutorial (step-by-step for common uses) and
>> reference sections (that have all the options). Once you've followed the
>> tutorial you won't want to wade through that aga
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I'm not sure how someone starting today would find the core tool set
> (which is almost unchanged today except for the GNU options on some
> commands and the addition of perl) or where to start with
> man/google. Or if these even matter any more now th
Christophe Caron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I run CentOS 5.6 on a Dell PowerEdge R815 with 256 GB of RAM.
> We use Sun Grid Engine to schedule jobs on this node.
>
>
> I want to limit the memory usage about 150 GB per process.
> But, at least one process (oases - a bioinformatics tool) bypass this
> limi
On 6/3/2011 12:32 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure how someone starting today would find the core tool set
>> (which is almost unchanged today except for the GNU options on some
>> commands and the addition of perl) or where to start with
>> man/g
On Friday 03 June 2011 16:21:35 Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 6/3/2011 8:57 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >
> > Red Hat deserves credit for still provided the source RPM's in buildable
> > form even for those parts of the distribution that are not GPL licensed.
> > They are not required by license to do tha
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> [Upstream] didn't restrict access, it was only rebranded as
> another project
oh horse puckety
The binaries (base and updates) formerly freely available in
RHL disappeared behind a license paywall; a new brand that was
'enforceable' emerged [RHL wa
On Friday, June 03, 2011 11:21:35 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
> I'm talking about what would be
> more in the best interest of the community that they attracted by
> permitting redistribution of the collated works - and then cut off.
It's in the best interest of the community to have Red Hat in a fin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/02/2011 07:47 PM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Hi. I'm trying to get OTRS running on CentOS 5.5 with SELinux enabled,
> and audit.log / audit2allow tell me I need to add the local policy:
>
>
> #= httpd_t ==
> allow htt
Hi Aleksey,
On 06/03/2011 01:47 AM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Hi. I'm trying to get OTRS running on CentOS 5.5 with SELinux enabled,
> and audit.log / audit2allow tell me I need to add the local policy:
>
>
> #= httpd_t ==
> allow httpd_t unconfined_t:shm { unix_read
On 6/3/2011 1:17 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
>> I'm not really talking about what Red Hat does - and I'm not against
>> selling restricted software in general. I'm talking about what would be
>> more in the best interest of the community that they attracted by
>> permitting redistribution of the
On 06/03/2011 08:41 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
[snip]
> Not sure what OTRS is but it looks like you are running it as a user?
> (unconfined_t), Does this usually run as a service started at boot time?
It is Help Desk/Ticket software similar to Bugzilla. http://otrs.org/
It is started at boot throug
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2011 16:21:35 Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 6/3/2011 8:57 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> So what? Red Hat created a community by beeing free in both senses, and
then decided to go commercial at some point. And that hurt the feelings
of some minor number of hard-nose
On 6/3/2011 1:28 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, June 03, 2011 11:21:35 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I'm talking about what would be
>> more in the best interest of the community that they attracted by
>> permitting redistribution of the collated works - and then cut off.
>
> It's in the best inter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2011 03:05 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
>
> Hi Aleksey,
>
>
> On 06/03/2011 01:47 AM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
>> Hi. I'm trying to get OTRS running on CentOS 5.5 with SELinux enabled,
>> and audit.log / audit2allow tell me I need to add the
On 6/3/2011 2:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> So what? Red Hat created a community by beeing free in both senses, and
> then decided to go commercial at some point. And that hurt the feelings
> of some minor number of hard-nosed community members. Is that what you
> are talking about?
>>
>> I w
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Got back and look at the changelogs of the PostgreSQL packages.
>
> Give me a hint about what to look for.
$ rpm -q --changelog postgresql-libs | grep -i owen
Lamar was, during the time of RHL, postgresql's maintainer as
to RPM based packaging, and as
On Friday, June 03, 2011 03:49:00 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 6/3/2011 1:28 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > Go back and look at the changelogs of the PostgreSQL packages.
> Give me a hint about what to look for. As I recall I always installed
> postgresql from source in those days because the disto pa
On 6/3/2011 3:53 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, June 03, 2011 03:49:00 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 6/3/2011 1:28 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>>> Go back and look at the changelogs of the PostgreSQL packages.
>
>> Give me a hint about what to look for. As I recall I always installed
>> postgresql fr
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> That's not what I said. I said Red Hat's redistribution restriction
> created the need for Ubunutu. And that the community that is now
> dependent on RH-rebuilds might be better served by a distribution that
> does not restrict redistribution
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:15 PM, wrote:
> I'm having some problems with the way the conversation is going. RedHat
> *was* a company; to me, the RHEL was aimed as a wedge, to get into
> corporate America. For that matter, who started offering their distro of
> RHEL around then? Why, the same compa
On 6/3/2011 10:12 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> That's not what I said. I said Red Hat's redistribution restriction
>> created the need for Ubunutu. And that the community that is now
>> dependent on RH-rebuilds might be better served by a dist
Okay, it took a few minutes, but I figure it out. Seems that Scientific Linux
eems to regress a bit in this area.
With Centos, you need to bind like so:
/home/share /exports/share nonebind0 0
/home/vhosts/exports/vhosts nonebind0 0
And
41 matches
Mail list logo
