[CentOS] Desktopsearch "Recoll" for CentOS 5.5 64bit

2011-05-26 Thread Timothy Kesten
Hi Folks, is there a rpm-package for desktopsearch "recoll" for CentOS 5.5 64bit If yes - where is it? I've tried fedora-packages from http://www.lesbonscomptes.com/recoll/download.html#rpms but got much dependencies-errors Thx Timothy ___ C

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/26/11, Kevin K wrote: > Though thumb drives are flash, they tend to use a slower flash than what is > used in hard drive replacement units. No actual industry facts for this, but I think the Flash used in thumb drives are not really any slower by nature/design. This is because I see that the

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread John Hodrien
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote: > But I'm generally puzzled by the emphasis many people put on speed. > Unless one is a gamer, it doesn't seem to me to make much difference > if it takes 13 second or 30 seconds to boot up. > Either way it is going to take the same time to get to an URL.

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/26/11, John Hodrien wrote: > Spinning disks seem an awful lot like victorian technology taken too far. > In > the long term, what's *not* to like about the idea of fully solid state > storage? Personally, I'm averse to using SSD with any important long term data is the nightmare that I could

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Simon Matter
> On 5/26/11, Kevin K wrote: >> Though thumb drives are flash, they tend to use a slower flash than what >> is >> used in hard drive replacement units. > > No actual industry facts for this, but I think the Flash used in thumb > drives are not really any slower by nature/design. This is because I

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread John Hodrien
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Personally, I'm averse to using SSD with any important long term data > is the nightmare that I could one day wake up to find everything gone > without any means of recovery. Compared that to a hard disk, which > barring catastrophic physical damage

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2011, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > >> Personally, I'm averse to using SSD with any important long term data >> is the nightmare that I could one day wake up to find everything gone >> without any means of recovery. Compared that to a hard disk, which >> barring

Re: [CentOS] Initial 6.0 trees in QA

2011-05-26 Thread Mark Bradbury
On 25 May 2011 01:03, Paul Heinlein wrote: > In case you didn't see it, the initial CentOS 6 trees have been > released to QA: > > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/node/81 > > Where can I get these ISO's I have a couple of Dell R710's with Broadcom 10Gb nic's, a R610 and and a ESX4.1 environment tha

Re: [CentOS] yum check-updates script not working correctly

2011-05-26 Thread Daniel De Marco
Brian, you have a syntax error in the second if. The yum update is being executed every time. Move the fi just before the else to the end. Daniel. * brian [05/24/2011 18:53]: > if [ -f /var/lock/subsys/yum ]; then > > if [ ${CHECKONLY} = "yes" ];then > > /usr/bin/yu

Re: [CentOS] Initial 6.0 trees in QA

2011-05-26 Thread Drew
> Where can I get these ISO's I have a couple of Dell R710's with Broadcom > 10Gb nic's, a R610 and and a ESX4.1 environment that I can QA on. I don't believe you can. My understanding is that CentOS' QA builds are internal to the team and those aren't released to the general public. The only rea

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread John Hodrien
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Unless you are away on important business trip and you loose your system > just minutes before the meeting. Yes, it can happen to regular HDD, it's > much lesser probability for now. If I'm going to a meeting where I've got documents I need, they'

Re: [CentOS] yum check-updates script not working correctly

2011-05-26 Thread Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Daniel De Marco > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 8:42 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] yum check-updates script not working correctly > > Brian, > > you have a syntax er

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 75, Issue 9

2011-05-26 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] yum check-updates script not working correctly

2011-05-26 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Brian, On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 18:52 -0400, brian wrote: > if [ -f /var/lock/subsys/yum ]; then > > if [ ${CHECKONLY} = "yes" ];then > > /usr/bin/yum-check > fi > else > /usr/bin/yum -R 10 -e 0 -d 0 -y update yum >

Re: [CentOS] yum check-updates script not working correctly

2011-05-26 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Tod, On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 10:53 -0400, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: > The single '=' sign does assignment, a double '==' does string compare. No, with the spaces around the '=' and the dollar before the variable name this actually is a test not an assignment. But usi

[CentOS] Good network printer/scanner for Centos/Linux

2011-05-26 Thread Eero Volotinen
Hi List, I am looking for good multifunction (fax, scanner, ..) color network laser printer for Linux, any ideas? specs: - Linux, Windows and OSX support on printer and also on scanner. - A4 papersize http://multi.gnt.lt/Pages/brochures/HP/CM2320MFP-ENG.pdf ? thanks, -- Eero _

Re: [CentOS] Good network printer/scanner for Centos/Linux

2011-05-26 Thread Dotan Cohen
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 19:43, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Hi List, > > I am looking for good multifunction (fax, scanner, ..)  color network > laser printer for Linux, any ideas? > specs: > > - Linux, Windows and OSX support on printer and also on scanner. > - A4 papersize > > http://multi.gnt.lt/Pag

Re: [CentOS] Good network printer/scanner for Centos/Linux

2011-05-26 Thread Digimer
On 05/26/2011 12:43 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Hi List, > > I am looking for good multifunction (fax, scanner, ..) color network > laser printer for Linux, any ideas? > specs: > > - Linux, Windows and OSX support on printer and also on scanner. > - A4 papersize > > http://multi.gnt.lt/Pages/br

Re: [CentOS] Good network printer/scanner for Centos/Linux

2011-05-26 Thread Eero Volotinen
2011/5/26 Digimer : > On 05/26/2011 12:43 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: >> Hi List, >> >> I am looking for good multifunction (fax, scanner, ..)  color network >> laser printer for Linux, any ideas? >> specs: >> >> - Linux, Windows and OSX support on printer and also on scanner. >> - A4 papersize >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Good network printer/scanner for Centos/Linux

2011-05-26 Thread Wade Hampton
HP 6150C scanner/printer. Works well with hplip and cups. Remote scanning works better on Linux than Windows. -- Wade Hampton ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] yum check-updates script not working correctly

2011-05-26 Thread Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Leonard den Ottolander > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 12:23 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] yum check-updates script not working correctly > > Hello Tod, > > On Thu,

Re: [CentOS] yum check-updates script not working correctly

2011-05-26 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/26/2011 11:22 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > if [ $C="yes" ]; then > echo "2: $C" > fi > > This will return: > 2: no > > Bash is very peculiar ;) No, it should tokenize this into fields, breaking on the elements in $IFS (normally white space). So you end up with one field and ac

Re: [CentOS] Initial 6.0 trees in QA

2011-05-26 Thread Steven Crothers
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Drew wrote: > I don't believe you can. My understanding is that CentOS' QA builds > are internal to the team and those aren't released to the general > public. > > The only reason we know about them is because of changes made by TPTB > to improve transparency & ope

Re: [CentOS] Good network printer/scanner for Centos/Linux

2011-05-26 Thread Kenneth Porter
On Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:43 PM +0300 Eero Volotinen wrote: > - Linux, Windows and OSX support on printer and also on scanner. The scanner part is tough. I'd love to see some good support for Epson. I've got a Perfection 4180 connected by USB and an 11x17 network scanner, but currently I do

Re: [CentOS] Good network printer/scanner for Centos/Linux

2011-05-26 Thread cornel panceac
2011/5/26 Kenneth Porter > On Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:43 PM +0300 Eero Volotinen > wrote: > > > - Linux, Windows and OSX support on printer and also on scanner. > > The scanner part is tough. I'd love to see some good support for Epson. > I've got a Perfection 4180 connected by USB and an 11x17

Re: [CentOS] Initial 6.0 trees in QA

2011-05-26 Thread aurfalien
On May 26, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Steven Crothers wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Drew wrote: >> I don't believe you can. My understanding is that CentOS' QA builds >> are internal to the team and those aren't released to the general >> public. >> >> The only reason we know about them is be

Re: [CentOS] Good network printer/scanner for Centos/Linux

2011-05-26 Thread m . roth
Kenneth Porter wrote: > On Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:43 PM +0300 Eero Volotinen > wrote: > >> - Linux, Windows and OSX support on printer and also on scanner. > > The scanner part is tough. I'd love to see some good support for Epson. > I've got a Perfection 4180 connected by USB and an 11x17 netwo

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> Unless you are away on important business trip and you loose your system >> just minutes before the meeting. Yes, it can happen to regular HDD, it's >> much lesser probability for now. > > If I'm going to a meeting where I

Re: [CentOS] Initial 6.0 trees in QA

2011-05-26 Thread Steven Crothers
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:06 PM, wrote: > Me thinks its awesome for the updates, you have no idea how many times > I've had to defend Centos on other lists. > > Kooks saying the project is dead, Dags departure from the dev list is > the end, blah blah blah.  Just shear nonsense. Please don't rea

[CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread m . roth
Folks, My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't look like Lightening can, and from some googling, it appears that Evolution claims to, but It's got to be able to set dates, etc. Can Evol

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Digimer
On 05/26/2011 02:53 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Folks, > >My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes > that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't > look like Lightening can, and from some googling, it appears that > Evolution claims to,

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Eero Volotinen
2011/5/26 : > Folks, > >   My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes > that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't > look like Lightening can, and from some googling, it appears that > Evolution claims to, but It's got to be able to set d

Re: [CentOS] Initial 6.0 trees in QA

2011-05-26 Thread Scott Silva
on 5/26/2011 11:50 AM Steven Crothers spake the following: > Fedora and Debian in my opinion are both superior to the way CentOS > opens community development. Having one developer doing all the > packaging (Johnny) is a waste of resources and intelligence. A simple > repository where we can all

Re: [CentOS] Initial 6.0 trees in QA

2011-05-26 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Steven Crothers wrote: > opens community development. Having one developer doing all the > packaging (Johnny) is a waste of resources and intelligence. A simple oh no! please don't anybody reply, despite gross inaccuracies such as that quoted above, and turn this into another 100-post flamewar...

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Alexander Georgiev
>   My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes > that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't > look like Lightening can, and from some googling, it appears that > Evolution claims to, but It's got to be able to set dates, etc. > Exchange h

Re: [CentOS] Initial 6.0 trees in QA

2011-05-26 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Steven Crothers wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:06 PM, wrote: >> Me thinks its awesome for the updates, you have no idea how many times >> I've had to defend Centos on other lists. >> >> Kooks saying the project is dead, Dags departure from the dev list is >> the end, blah blah blah. Just she

Re: [CentOS] Initial 6.0 trees in QA

2011-05-26 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Steven Crothers wrote: >> opens community development. Having one developer doing all the >> packaging (Johnny) is a waste of resources and intelligence. A simple > > oh no! please don't anybody reply, despite gross inaccuracies such as > that quoted above, and turn

Re: [CentOS] yum check-updates script not working correctly

2011-05-26 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Brian, > > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 18:52 -0400, brian wrote: >> if [ -f /var/lock/subsys/yum ]; then >> >> if [ ${CHECKONLY} = "yes" ];then >> >> /usr/bin/yum-check >> fi >> else >> /usr/bin/yum -R

Re: [CentOS] Initial 6.0 trees in QA

2011-05-26 Thread aurfalien
On May 26, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: >> Steven Crothers wrote: >>> opens community development. Having one developer doing all the >>> packaging (Johnny) is a waste of resources and intelligence. A >>> simple >> >> oh no! please don't anybody re

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread m . roth
Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2011/5/26 : >> Folks, >> >>   My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes >> that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't >> look like Lightening can, and from some googling, it appears that >> Evolution claims to, but...

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread m . roth
Alexander Georgiev wrote: >>   My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes >> that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't >> look like Lightening can, and from some googling, it appears that >> Evolution claims to, but It's got to be able to

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread m . roth
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Eero Volotinen wrote: >> 2011/5/26 : >>> Folks, >>> >>>   My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS >>> boxes that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It >>> doesn't look like Lightening can, and from some googling, it appears >>>

[CentOS] PHP Source

2011-05-26 Thread Ron Young
I have a pressing need to compile a utility called odbtp into php on my new 64 bit machine with an AMD chip that is currently running CentOS 5.6. Where can I find the source files for the CentOS recommended versions of php. I have searched the CentOS and related repository sites and can find php

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread m . roth
Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2011/5/26 : >> Folks, >> >>   My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes >> that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't >> look like Lightening can, and from some googling, it appears that >> Evolution claims to, but...

Re: [CentOS] PHP Source

2011-05-26 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Ron Young wrote: > I have a pressing need to compile a utility called odbtp into php on my > new 64 bit machine with an AMD chip that is currently running CentOS 5.6. > > Where can I find the source files for the CentOS recommended versions of > php. I have searched the CentOS and related repos

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Jeff
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:30 PM, wrote: > Eero Volotinen wrote: >> 2011/5/26  : >>> Folks, >>> >>>   My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes >>> that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't >>> look like Lightening can, and from some googli

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread m . roth
Jeff wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:30 PM, wrote: >> Eero Volotinen wrote: >>> 2011/5/26  : Folks,   My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't look like Lightening

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Eero Volotinen wrote: >> 2011/5/26 : >>> Folks, >>> >>> My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes >>> that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't >>> look like Lightening can, and from some googling, it appears tha

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Jeff
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:21 PM, wrote: > Jeff wrote: >> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:30 PM,   wrote: >>> Eero Volotinen wrote: 2011/5/26  : > Folks, > >   My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS > boxes > that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange ser

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread m . roth
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Eero Volotinen wrote: >>> 2011/5/26 : Folks, My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS boxes that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It doesn't look like Lightening can, an

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread m . roth
Jeff wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:21 PM, wrote: >> Jeff wrote: >>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:30 PM,   wrote: Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2011/5/26  : Any clues as to how to get the damn thing? >>> Well, I don't run it on CentOS, but on Windows Thunderbird 3.1.10  go >>> to H

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Jeff wrote: > Well don't blame me if T-Bird is vastly different across platforms. > I'm just saying where to find it in Thunderbird. If those Mozilla > folks are doing their job right, then I would hope you would see the > same thing on CentOS. YMMV. Sorry for trying to be helpful. However I > can'

Re: [CentOS] hi CentOS

2011-05-26 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Am 25.05.11 17:54, schrieb John R Pierce: > On 05/25/11 8:52 AM, tro...@gmail.com wrote: >> Hello CentOS it took a ... (spamcrap deleted) > > geez, all my email lists are getting hit with this sort of spam. > becoming quite annoying, the way the list servers filter on the 'from' > address has b

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 16:43 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] calendar > > CentOS does what RHEL does, and RHEL 5.x *only* provides thunderbir

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread m . roth
Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: >> Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > >> CentOS does what RHEL does, and RHEL 5.x *only* provides thunderbird >> 2.x.Further, in Linux, they do build seperately for 64 bit vs. 32 bit. >> > I was going to suggest loading the 32bit version like you can do

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 26 May 2011 15:48:53 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Eero Volotinen wrote: > >> 2011/5/26 : > >>> Folks, > >>> > >>>   My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS > >>> boxes that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calend

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 17:21 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] calendar > > > Would be nice. Trouble is, we've got what, 60? 70? people in th

Re: [CentOS] PHP Source

2011-05-26 Thread Ron Young
Thanks Ljubomir, Just what I needed! I did not realize that source files would be in rpm files and named src instead of *source* or in a source directory. Regards, Ron Young 919-621-9015 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ronhyoung +++ Little tiny dreams require little tiny thoughts a

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Eero Volotinen wrote: 2011/5/26 : > Folks, > > My manager's asked me about something that can run on our CentOS > boxes that can connect to an (bleah!) Exchange server's calendar. It > do

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >> Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us >> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 17:21 >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] calendar >> >> >> Wo

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Devin Reade
If you're looking for an email *client* that does calendaring and runs on CentOS, I believe that Mulberry will talk calendaring to an exchange server and I know it runs on CentOS (as well as other Linux variants, Mac and Windows). Don't let the lack of recent up

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Devin Reade
--On Thursday, May 26, 2011 04:09:09 PM -0600 Devin Reade wrote: > If you're looking for an email *client* that does calendaring and > runs on CentOS, I believe that Mulberry will talk calendaring to > an exchange server and I know it runs on CentOS (as well as other > Linux variants, Mac and Wi

Re: [CentOS] yum check-updates script not working correctly

2011-05-26 Thread brian
On 05/26/2011 08:41 AM, Daniel De Marco wrote: > Brian, > > you have a syntax error in the second if. The yum update is being > executed every time. Move the fi just before the else to the end. > > Daniel. > > * brian [05/24/2011 18:53]: >> if [ -f /var/lock/subsys/yum ]; then >> >>if

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Kevin K
On May 26, 2011, at 3:36 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 5/26/11, Kevin K wrote: >> Though thumb drives are flash, they tend to use a slower flash than what is >> used in hard drive replacement units. > > No actual industry facts for this, but I think the Flash used in thumb > drives are not

Re: [CentOS] Good network printer/scanner for Centos/Linux

2011-05-26 Thread fred smith
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:57:36AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:43 PM +0300 Eero Volotinen > wrote: > > > - Linux, Windows and OSX support on printer and also on scanner. > > The scanner part is tough. I'd love to see some good support for Epson. > I've got a Perf

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Kevin K
On May 26, 2011, at 3:49 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 5/26/11, John Hodrien wrote: >> Spinning disks seem an awful lot like victorian technology taken too far. >> In >> the long term, what's *not* to like about the idea of fully solid state >> storage? > > Personally, I'm averse to using

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Kevin K
On May 26, 2011, at 8:12 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> Unless you are away on important business trip and you loose your system >> just minutes before the meeting. Yes, it can happen to regular HDD, it's >> much lesser probability for now. > > If

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread aurfalien
On May 26, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Kevin K wrote: > > On May 26, 2011, at 3:49 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > >> On 5/26/11, John Hodrien wrote: >>> Spinning disks seem an awful lot like victorian technology taken >>> too far. >>> In >>> the long term, what's *not* to like about the idea of fully so

Re: [CentOS] hi CentOS

2011-05-26 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:58 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >> Hello CentOS it took a few days before i got the hang of it >> http://email.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=emai >> l&zu=http://cnbc7.com ___

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread jleafey
I've been using a Java-based tool named DAVmail (davmail.sourceforge.net) to access my Exchange calendar from Thunderbird with the Lightning plug-in. It can basically proxy Exchange calendars (and e-mail for that matter) to protocols that Thunderbird and Lightning can understand. I've used it wit

Re: [CentOS] calendar

2011-05-26 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
jleafey wrote: > I've been using a Java-based tool named DAVmail (davmail.sourceforge.net) to > access my Exchange calendar from Thunderbird with the Lightning plug-in. It > can basically proxy Exchange calendars (and e-mail for that matter) to > protocols that Thunderbird and Lightning can unders

Re: [CentOS] securing ldap with tls and security

2011-05-26 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:52 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:49:09PM -0400, David Mehler wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to set up a centos 5.3 machine to do authentication via > > openldap. I've got it working, I'm not sure if I have it 100% right, > > but I can use ldapse

Re: [CentOS] PHP Source

2011-05-26 Thread Steven Crothers
Try pecl, if not and you have sources, you can implement a php wrapper relatively easily. I've done it before for small things. Assuming the API is light enough you're talking about a nights worth of Googling, trial and error. Some keywords to feed into Google: phpize, php extension skeleton, crea

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/26/11, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 5/26/11, Kevin K wrote: >>> Though thumb drives are flash, they tend to use a slower flash than what >>> is >>> used in hard drive replacement units. >> >> No actual industry facts for this, but I think the Flash used in thumb >> drives are not really any slo