Re: [CentOS] KVM vs ESXi

On 19 May 2011 05:39, Lucian wrote: > No and I don't think it's the hypervisor's job to do that. Even in > ESXi I don't think it's the "hypervisor" itself that does that. You > could try however to mess with Openvswitch if you insist on such > features, at least until someone decides to package a

Re: [CentOS] KVM vs ESXi

> KVM is meant to be much closer to bare metal performance but doesn't > have (at the moment) the all inclusive, easily managed from one > console, turnkey solution to massive virtual installs at the > datacentre level. If you need to be able to remotely provision VMs and > move them whilst live f

[CentOS] Centos 5.6 kernel errors

Hi guys, Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6? I cant get it stable on as a LAMP platform. Everything is up-to-date and yet I'm running into major problems. How do I make sense of these kernel errors? Any help will be greatly appreciated, as I'm now had to roll back to an old copy

Re: [CentOS] KVM vs ESXi

Le 19/05/2011 13:27, Lars Hecking a écrit : >> KVM is meant to be much closer to bare metal performance but doesn't >> have (at the moment) the all inclusive, easily managed from one >> console, turnkey solution to massive virtual installs at the >> datacentre level. If you need to be able to remot

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Mon, 16 May 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: > It will be released when it is released, if you don't like it then leave. Before I leave this list let me take you back about 7 years to the Whitebox mailinglist. You may not remember that Whitebox had a list of issues of its own, no timely updates, n

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:54 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > It will be released when it is released, if you don't like it then leave. > > Before I leave this list let me take you back about 7 years to the > Whitebox mailinglist. You may not remember tha

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.6 kernel errors

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:45:23PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote: > Hi guys, > > Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6? > I cant get it stable on as a LAMP platform. ... > While serving httpd pages: ... > May 19 12:19:19 ip-10-234-90-180 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.16-xenU > #1) ...

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.6 kernel errors

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:45:23PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6? > > I cant get it stable on as a LAMP platform. > ... > > While serving httpd pages: > ... > > May 19 12:19:1

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.6 kernel errors

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:46:10PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:45:23PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6? > > > I cant get it stable on as a

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:54 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > It will be released when it is released, if you don't like it then leave. > > Before I leave this list let me take you back about 7 years to the > Whitebox mailinglist. You may not remember tha

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

only FYI: http://osnews.com/story/24760/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_1_Released -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

On Thu, 19 May 2011, carlopmart wrote: > Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_1_Released and look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that should have been in a dot zero release ... gee -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://

Re: [CentOS] OT: Video Surveillance SW on CentOS

Hi Again: >> (b) Motion >> http://www.lavrsen.dk/foswiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome >> > We use this at work. It comes std. with the last few fedoras, so it should > be coming in CentOS soon. I forgot to mention that motion is available in the RPMForge repository. yum install motion That's as easy

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2011, carlopmart wrote: > >> Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_1_Released > > and look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that > should have been in a dot zero release ... gee > > -- Russ herrold Which means, that RHEL6.0 should have just no

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

On Thu, 19 May 2011, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> herrold earlier: >> and look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that >> should have been in a dot zero release ... gee > Which means, that RHEL6.0 should have just now come out today; the > release called 6.0 was a teaser and a beta of t

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >> On Thu, 19 May 2011, carlopmart wrote: >> >>> Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_1_Released >> >> and look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that >> should have been in a dot zero release ... gee > > Which means, that RHEL6.0 should

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

On 19.5.2011 15:56, R P Herrold wrote: > There is an old piece of wisdom in IT to avoid the public 'dot > zero' products so that some-one else gets to be the advance > guard scout (you know, the one who staggers back to base camp, > festooned wth arrows in him) Oh Lord! If everyone would avoid

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

(possible duplicate -- the first post had some mal-formed headers that the MailMan should have rejected) On Thu, 19 May 2011, Markus Falb wrote: > Oh Lord! If everyone would avoid 'dot.zero' products then no > bugs would be discovered and no 'dot.one' product would be > released. You basically

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

On 5/19/2011 9:40 AM, Markus Falb wrote: > >> There is an old piece of wisdom in IT to avoid the public 'dot >> zero' products so that some-one else gets to be the advance >> guard scout (you know, the one who staggers back to base camp, >> festooned wth arrows in him) > > Oh Lord! If everyone woul

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

Dag wrote: > Before I leave this list let me take you back about 7 years > to the Whitebox mailinglist. You may not remember that > Whitebox had a list of issues of its own, no timely updates, > no community effort, lack of good communication. It was > mostly a one-man-effort. bummer to see

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

no, the saying is... if it aint broken, dont fix it ! especially on weekends, monday, or friday ;-> that is why everyone should have a small or large lab for testing and rollout... - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cento

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

On Thu, 19 May 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > Everyone expected this from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions when > publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA was done. (And if > you've forgotten, go dig through some changelogs of that era to see just > how bad things were and how much we g

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

Les wrote: > Everyone expected this from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions > when publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA > was done. (And if you've forgotten, go dig through some > changelogs of that era to see just how bad things were and > how much we gained from that proces

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

On Thursday, May 19, 2011 10:59:45 AM Les Mikesell wrote: > Everyone expected [dot-zero bugfest] from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions > when > publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA was done. (And if > you've forgotten, go dig through some changelogs of that era to see just > h

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/19/2011 9:40 AM, Markus Falb wrote: >>> There is an old piece of wisdom in IT to avoid the public 'dot >>> zero' products so that some-one else gets to be the advance >>> guard scout (you know, the one who staggers back to base camp, >>> festooned wth arrows in him) >> Oh

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

On Thu, 19 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > started holding my breath when RHEL 6 Beta was released, and my face is > not blue any more but totally black :-) Yowzer -- Zombies!!! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/ma

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

On 5/19/2011 10:15 AM, R - elists wrote: > > > Les wrote: >> Everyone expected this from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions >> when publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA >> was done. (And if you've forgotten, go dig through some >> changelogs of that era to see just how bad things we

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 75, Issue 8

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

R P Herrold wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> started holding my breath when RHEL 6 Beta was released, and my face is >> not blue any more but totally black :-) > > Yowzer -- Zombies!!! The CDC can help with that