Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Christopher Chan
> wrote:
>> On Saturday, May 14, 2011 01:30 AM, Craig White wrote:
>>
>>> CentOS has always been a take it or leave it proposition and thus nothing
>>> has really changed
>>> except that many businesses have become reliant upon it a
Not sure where to start on this. I went to examine a log file today and noticed
a password protected internal file was being accessed from 16.0.0.0. Upon
further review every log entry has the same IP. Accessing apache from localhost
also reports 16.0.0.0.
Google is not being my friend right now,
On Saturday 14 May 2011 20:50:54 Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Not sure where to start on this. I went to examine a log file today and
> noticed a password protected internal file was being accessed from
> 16.0.0.0. Upon further review every log entry has the same IP. Accessing
> apache from localhost also
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Marian Marinov
> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 16:06
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Apache in chroot reporting every client
> is 16.0.0.0
>
> On Saturday 14 May 2011
At Sat, 14 May 2011 18:45:32 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Marian Marinov
> > Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 16:06
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Apa
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert Heller
> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 19:02
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Cc: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Apache in chroot reporting every client
> is 16.0.0.0
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
