Re: [CentOS] bizzare performance problem

Mag Gam writes: > ... > It turned out I had an NMI related issue on the processor. I figured > this out by checking the /var/log/messages but it was a real mystery > for be at first. My question, is there a way to detect or benchmark a > system and all of its processors to make sure I don't bypa

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote: >> >> > >> > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less >> > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? >> > >> > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would >> > take no more than 1 mont

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:05:57AM -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote: > > But at that time there should only be one point release on the table, > instead of two point releases and one major release. Is everyone > forgetting that 4.9, 5.6 and 6.0 were all out at the same time? Amnesia of opportunity, perh

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thursday, May 12, 2011 01:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/11/2011 8:53 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: >> >> In my case, I have essentially three choices: >> 1.) Use SL 6; >> 2.) Wait on C6; >> 3.) Buy RHEL6. >> >> All of the three have costs, visible and hidden. 3 obviously has monetary >> costs, but

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thursday, May 12, 2011 04:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > One upgrade I did from C4 to C5 (with upgradeany) was smoother than the last > LTS upgrade I tried. I liken the C5 -> C6 upgrade path as trying to take a > Ubuntu LTS 6.06 to a 10.04; which path I tried, and failed, to get working. > In

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

Wiadomość napisana przez Akemi Yagi w dniu 2011-05-12, o godz. 02:29: > 2011/5/11 Rainer Traut : > >> You could also ask on the elrepo mailinglist. >> There was a request not too long ago. >> >> http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2011-April/000637.html >> >> So maybe you can install cent

[CentOS] Recent kmod-kvm update errors

This morning I applied the recent updates to CentOS-5.6 on a test and development host and observed this: Updating : kmod-kvm 4/20 WARNING: Can't read module /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.32.1.el5/weak-updates/kmod-kvm/kvm.ko: No such file or direct

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote: > > > > > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? > > > > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 > would > > take no mo

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On 05/10/2011 08:19 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 03:12 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: >> On Tue, 10 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> >>> Alain Péan wrote: >>> > The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL 6.1 will be already released. So there wil

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote: > > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? > > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would >

Re: [CentOS] Recent kmod-kvm update errors

On 05/12/2011 08:32 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > This morning I applied the recent updates to CentOS-5.6 on a test > and development host and observed this: > > Updating : kmod-kvm > 4/20 > WARNING: Can't read module > /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.3

Re: [CentOS] Recent kmod-kvm update errors

James B. Byrne wrote: > This morning I applied the recent updates to CentOS-5.6 on a test > and development host and observed this: > >Updating : kmod-kvm >4/20 > WARNING: Can't read module > /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.32.1.el5/weak-updates/kmod-kvm/kvm.ko: No > such file or director

Re: [CentOS] Recent kmod-kvm update errors

On 05/12/2011 08:54 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/12/2011 08:32 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> This morning I applied the recent updates to CentOS-5.6 on a test >> and development host and observed this: >> >> Updating : kmod-kvm >> 4/20 >> WA

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

On 05/09/2011 06:53 PM, Brandon Ooi wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV > Crane mailto:todd.dennis...@navy.mil>> wrote: > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On 05/12/2011 09:49 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote: > > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? > > And given that C5.6 took 3 mont

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

>> It does not seem to matter what we try to do, what we get is petty >> comments about how nothing changes. Nothing could be further from the >> truth. > Please note there is a largely silent majority that appreciates very > much what the team does, is doing to improve and listening to suggestio

Re: [CentOS] kswapd taking 100% cpu with no swap on system

I Spoke too early its not fixed.Any one have other options On 05/09/2011 11:37 PM, Ali Ahsan wrote: > Things i have done to solve this issue is > > set swappiness to 0 and i have changed scheduler to anticipatory for > better performance .I don't see kswpad process taking 100% CPU now. > -- S.A

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury > wrote: >>> Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are th

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thursday, May 12, 2011 06:23:52 AM Christopher Chan wrote: > 6.04->10.04? Nah, you are supposed to jump to 8.04 and then to 10.04. I did 6.06 -> 8.04 -> 10.04, and it broke. Badly. > > Upgrades are difficult problems to solve, and at the moment I don't know of > > any distribution (that clai

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 09:12:59 PM Dag Wieers wrote: > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would > take no more than 1 month ? I can easily think of a few. 4.9 and 6.0 are two of those few. Again, I'll note that SL is just now releasing the second beta of 5.6 thi

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

Craig White wrote: > On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury >> wrote: > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? > > And given that C5.6 took

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 75, Issue 6

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>  • 2011-01-13: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.6 >>  • 2010-11-10: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 >> >> 2 months elapsed from release of 6.0 before 5.6 and more than another month >> before 4.9 >> >

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

On 5/12/2011 8:07 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: > >>> So maybe you can install centos 5.4, then install their newer aacraid >>> driver and then you can update the kernel as well... >> >> As Rainer said, this is best discussed on the ELRepo mailing list, but ... >> >> There is a good chance that km

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

Steve Clark wrote on 05/12/2011 10:15 AM: >> Please note there is a largely silent majority that appreciates very >> much what the team does, is doing to improve and listening to suggestions >> Keep up the great work - Thanks > +1 ++1 Please trim your posts. 60+ included lines and >> 2k character

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On 05/12/2011 10:09 AM, Craig White wrote: > > On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury >> wrote: > > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ?

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On 05/12/2011 10:09 AM, Craig White wrote: > > On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury >> wrote: > > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ?

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

> On 05/09/2011 06:53 PM, Brandon Ooi wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV >> Crane mailto:todd.dennis...@navy.mil>> wrote: >> >> >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org >> [

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On 5/12/2011 8:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > It does not seem to matter what we try to do, what we get is petty > comments about how nothing changes. I think that will change to the extent that the project changes are visible. Thank you for posting all the links. -- Les Mikesell lesm

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On 05/12/2011 05:49 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/12/2011 10:09 AM, Craig White wrote: >> >> On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury >>> wrote: > > This is NOT the case with 6.0. First off, we can not use any of the > existin

Re: [CentOS] kswapd taking 100% cpu with no swap on system

> I Spoke too early its not fixed.Any one have other options > > On 05/09/2011 11:37 PM, Ali Ahsan wrote: >> Things i have done to solve this issue is >> >> set swappiness to 0 and i have changed scheduler to anticipatory for >> better performance .I don't see kswpad process taking 100% CPU now. W

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 09:49 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: > > It does not seem to matter what we try to do, what we get is petty > > comments about how nothing changes. Nothing could be further from the > > truth. > > Johnny, don't let this type of comment upset you as: > > Please note there is a

Re: [CentOS] Recent kmod-kvm update errors

On Thu, May 12, 2011 10:06, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/12/2011 08:54 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 05/12/2011 08:32 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> This morning I applied the recent updates to CentOS-5.6 on a test >>> and development host and observed this: >>> >>> Updating : kmod-kvm >>>

[CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

Hi all, Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS? We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while its basically working pretty well in a master/slave relationship, ApacheDS claims more robust replication, etc... Granted I am working with the version

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

On 05/12/11 1:07 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS? > > We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while its > basically working pretty well in a master/slave relationship, ApacheDS > claims more robust rep

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

> Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS? Since we develop mostly Java application we use it for development and testing: developers don't have to install an OS dependent LDAP implementation (especially the poor souls working on Windows). In production we use openldap fro

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Co-location center in Holland

On May 11, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Patrick Lists wrote: > On 05/12/2011 12:48 AM, Craig White wrote: >> Anyone have recommendations for a highly reliable datacenter located in >> Holland? > > Global Switch is a good one. Lots of carriers too. Contact info here: > http://www.globalswitch.com/en/locati

[CentOS] [OT] Co-location center in Singapore or Hong Kong

Apparently my company will potentially need to put in some servers for Asia and is hoping to find a highly reliable data center in either Singapore or Hong Kong if anyone has recommendations. Thanks -- Craig White ~~ craig.wh...@ttiltd.com 1.800.869.6908 ~~

[CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote: > But, yes, there are a few missing srpms even as of now ... bug number please -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Craig White wrote: > > On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury >> wrote: > > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 diff

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:41 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote: > >> But, yes, there are a few missing srpms even as of now ... > > bug number please Jeff_S knows. He filed a bunch at upstream bugzilla requesting the release of missing srpms. Akemi __

[CentOS] Obscure behavior with filesystem update

I've been getting weird results with the recent filesystem update. It appears to be hanging at the transaction test stage endlessly. I can close the ssh connection and the update still goes on. When I use screen I cannot reattach after logout because the screen still shows as attached and I hav

[CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:41 PM, R P Herrold wrote: >> On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >>> But, yes, there are a few missing srpms even as of now ... >> >> bug number please > > Jeff_S knows. He filed a bunch at upstream bugzilla requesting the >

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On May 12, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > CentOS chose another. Personally I happen to > agree with CentOS' choice here. +1 - aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thursday, May 12, 2011 11:34 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thursday, May 12, 2011 06:23:52 AM Christopher Chan wrote: >> 6.04->10.04? Nah, you are supposed to jump to 8.04 and then to 10.04. > > I did 6.06 -> 8.04 -> 10.04, and it broke. Badly. Ahem. With apt-get dist-upgrade or do-release-upgr

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:31 PM, wrote: > On May 12, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > >> CentOS chose another. Personally I happen to >> agree with CentOS' choice here. > > +1 I think *both* distros made the right choice. :) CentOS and SL handle security updates differently. CentOS's ch

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Co-location center in Singapore or Hong Kong

Hi Craig, Highly reliable in what sense? network connectivity? bandwidth? datacentre personnel? Christopher On Friday, May 13, 2011 05:31 AM, Craig White wrote: > Apparently my company will potentially need to put in some servers for Asia > and is hoping to find a highly reliable data center

Re: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP

On Friday, May 13, 2011 04:07 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS? > > We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while its > basically working pretty well in a master/slave relationship, ApacheDS > claims mo

[CentOS] Modify Parameters at system boot

Hi all. i'm trying to modify some parameters but when system reboots it doesn't load. For the sysctl if I run sysctl -p then it changes /etc/sysctl.conf net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 1048576 /etc/modprobe.conf options ip_conntrack hashsize=131072 after reboot results cat /pr

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On 5/12/11, Phil Schaffner wrote: >> Apparently they did admit and it does change: >> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=31347&forum=53 > > Late breaking news: > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/67 > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/69 This is really nice and it's g

Re: [CentOS] dovecot sieve rpm?

Hello, Thank you everyone for your replies. I would definitely like to stick with postfix as it's what i'm most comfortable with. The problem is dovecot. I believe it's extras there's the 1.0.7 dovecot, I'd like to be running the 2.0.x dovecot prefered or the 1.2.x version if not, the problem is t

Re: [CentOS] dovecot sieve rpm?

Dne 13.5.2011 6:58, David Mehler napsal(a): > Hello, > > Thank you everyone for your replies. I would definitely like to stick > with postfix as it's what i'm most comfortable with. The problem is > dovecot. I believe it's extras there's the 1.0.7 dovecot, I'd like to > be running the 2.0.x dovecot