Hi,
Am 11.05.2011 08:32, schrieb Maciej Jan Broniarz:
>
> Wiadomość napisana przez John R Pierce w dniu 2011-05-11, o godz. 01:51:
>
>> On 05/10/11 3:46 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
>>> I am sure it doesn't. I have booted 5.5 and 5.6 in linux dd mode. Then I
>>> have loaded the drivers from: aa
On 11/05/11 02:52, Dag Wieers wrote:
> If you finished your dd_rescue/ddrescue copy, you may want to look into
> the testdisk utility to see if somehow the partition-table was not
> tampered with. testdisk can provide you with different layouts based on
> filesystem patterns.
I've had good luck wit
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
>> VIA Eden Processor?
>>
>> cat /proc/cpuinfo
>> processor : 0
>> vendor_id : CentaurHauls
>> cpu family : 6
>> model
> If you take a look on google for "CentaurHauls i686" you will see that
> this CPU/chipset SAYS it fully supports i686 but it really does not.
> All of EL6 is i686 and not i586 (which CentaurHauls really
> fully supports).
>
> I think you are going to have issues with this CPU and EL6 forever.
>
On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu fami
On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu fami
Steve Clark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like
> to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets
> hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes.
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
check out the elrepo-kernel repo:
http://elrepo.org/
On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like
to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets
hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
check out
Steve Clark wrote:
>On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> Steve Clark wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like
>>> to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets
>>> hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes.
>>>
>>> http
On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 09:17:39 PM Craig White wrote:
> Upstream released exactly 6 months ago and still
> nothing and apparently today's target date has slipped, and 2) until
> CentOS admits that there is a problem, nothing will actually change.
Please read the CentOS-devel list and IRC channe
At 01:35 PM 5/7/2011, you wrote:
>On 07/05/11 20:32, David wrote:
> >
> > I got two recommendations:
> > a) Used 'alsamixer' to unmute all channels. The were, as a responder
> > suggested, muted.
> > b) Installed kmod-alsa from elrepo. It produced a bunch of warnings
> > which I ignored.
> > c) I
At Wed, 11 May 2011 07:31:37 -0700 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> At 01:35 PM 5/7/2011, you wrote:
> >On 07/05/11 20:32, David wrote:
> > >
> > > I got two recommendations:
> > > a) Used 'alsamixer' to unmute all channels. The were, as a responder
> > > suggested, muted.
> > > b) Installed kmo
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hello,
I'm running fail2ban on my centos machine. It's handling sshd and
postfix, and is working quite well. From the reports I'm seeing all
the atempts are from a certain registrar's region, I won't name it,
and was wondering instead of blocking individual ip's if there was a
way I could block wit
Hello Steve,
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>
> Just checking now and still don't see any. Am I missing something?
The fact that 6.0 hasn't been released ye
On 5/11/2011 8:53 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> In my case, I have essentially three choices:
> 1.) Use SL 6;
> 2.) Wait on C6;
> 3.) Buy RHEL6.
>
> All of the three have costs, visible and hidden. 3 obviously has monetary
> costs, but both 1 and 2 have time and risk costs, since neither SL nor CentO
On 5/11/2011 12:32 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>>
>> Just checking now and still don't see any. Am I
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12:58, the following was written:
> I'm running fail2ban on my centos machine. It's handling sshd and
> postfix, and is working quite well. From the reports I'm seeing all
> the atempts are from a certain registrar's region, I won't name it,
> and was wondering instead
Dne 11.5.2011 18:58, David Mehler napsal(a):
> With regards blocking ip's and fail2ban, which method is better in
> terms of system resources, blocking via iptables as in the case of
> sshd or blocking via hosts.deny as in the case of postfix?
>
http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/HOWTO_use_geo
Robert Spangler wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12:58, the following was written:
>> the atempts are from a certain registrar's region, I won't name it,
>
> iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -s x.x.x.x/24 -j DROP
I do not consider /24 subnet a "region subnet". You would need to use
something like sop
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>>
>> Just checking now and still don't see any. Am I missing something?
>
On 05/11/2011 04:01 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello Steve,
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
Just checking now and still don'
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 01:51:08 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> I've always been a fan of the
> coordination they have among the additional repositories that is lacking
> in yum/rpm equivalents and was impressed when my 9.0.4 installs
> painlessly upgraded themselves to 10.0.4.
You must not have
Hello Everyone,
Thanks for all your suggestions. I have gone with iptables and blocked
off the necessary region ip blocks in my firewall. If anyone is
interested i'll send the list.
Thanks again.
Dave.
On 5/11/11, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Robert Spangler wrote:
>> On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12
On 5/11/2011 3:18 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 01:51:08 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I've always been a fan of the
>> coordination they have among the additional repositories that is lacking
>> in yum/rpm equivalents and was impressed when my 9.0.4 installs
>> painlessly upgraded
[drifting farther off-topic]
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 04:34:49 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 3:18 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > And you must not use PostgreSQL, which won't painlessly upgrade on
> > anything.
>
> Automatically doing the dump/load (and magically finding the space f
> nothing and apparently today's target date has slipped, and 2) until
> CentOS admits that there is a problem, nothing will actually change.
Apparently they did admit and it does change:
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=31347&forum=53
___
On 11/05/11 19:01, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 12:32 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>> Hello Steve,
>>
>> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>>I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>>>
>>>
I had a rather strange problem last week with one of our 8 core
servers. The users complained the performance was "slow" so I checked
the basic things, processes on top, vmstat for memory and context
switching, i/o stats for internal disk I/O, netstat for any network
issues and other things like ne
Anyone have recommendations for a highly reliable datacenter located in Holland?
Thanks
--
Craig White ~~ craig.wh...@ttiltd.com
1.800.869.6908 ~~~ www.ttiassessments.com
Need help communicating between generations at work to achieve your de
On 05/12/2011 12:48 AM, Craig White wrote:
> Anyone have recommendations for a highly reliable datacenter located in
> Holland?
Global Switch is a good one. Lots of carriers too. Contact info here:
http://www.globalswitch.com/en/locations/amsterdam-data-center
If you need "100% uptime" and got t
On 5/11/2011 2:08 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12:58, the following was written:
I'm running fail2ban on my centos machine. It's handling sshd and
postfix, and is working quite well. From the reports I'm seeing all
the atempts are from a certain registrar's region,
2011/5/11 Rainer Traut :
> You could also ask on the elrepo mailinglist.
> There was a request not too long ago.
>
> http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2011-April/000637.html
>
> So maybe you can install centos 5.4, then install their newer aacraid
> driver and then you can update the kernel
Steve Clark wrote on 05/11/2011 04:12 PM:
...
> Thanks, but I am already using that kernel. I want to get a vanilla
> kernel.org 2.6.32.xx kernel running
> on 6.0.
>
> In fact following AY directions I was able to rebuild the srpms for
> kernel-2.6.32-71.29.2, but again that
> is not the generic ke
Mathieu Baudier wrote on 05/11/2011 04:59 PM:
>> nothing and apparently today's target date has slipped, and 2) until
>> CentOS admits that there is a problem, nothing will actually change.
>
> Apparently they did admit and it does change:
> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_
On 05/10/2011 08:12 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> Alain Péan wrote:
>> > The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL
>>> 6.1 will be already released. So there will be no security updates for
>>> C6.0, and it will be better
>
>
> >
> > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
> > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ?
> >
> > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would
> > take no more than 1 month ?
>
> Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake.
>
>
>
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
