Re: [CentOS] since CentOS 5.6 upgrade, squid crashes

On Monday, May 09, 2011 10:28 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Laurent CREPET wrote: >> On Mon, 9 May 2011 05:20:48 -0700 (PDT) >> John Doe wrote: >> >>> From: Laurent CREPET >>> Today, squid crashed again. >>> Maybe ask on the squid mailing list, they might have more insight... >>> >>> JD >

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

Le 09/05/2011 18:36, Benjamin Smith a écrit : On Saturday, May 07, 2011 11:52:21 AM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > in-place upgrade of C5 to C6 will be most likely impossible. To many > changes of how thing work. Thankfully, the only in-place upgrades I'll really consider is to cross-grade SL

Re: [CentOS] since CentOS 5.6 upgrade, squid crashes

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Christopher Chan < christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk> wrote: > On Monday, May 09, 2011 10:28 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > Laurent CREPET wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 May 2011 05:20:48 -0700 (PDT) > >> John Doe wrote: > >> > >>> From: Laurent CREPET > >>> > Toda

Re: [CentOS] since CentOS 5.6 upgrade, squid crashes

On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 04:51 PM, Brandon Ooi wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Christopher Chan > > wrote: > > On Monday, May 09, 2011 10:28 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > Laurent CREPET wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 May 2011 05:20:48 -0

Re: [CentOS] since CentOS 5.6 upgrade, squid crashes

On Tue, 10 May 2011 01:51:18 -0700 Brandon Ooi wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Christopher Chan < > christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk> wrote: > > > On Monday, May 09, 2011 10:28 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > > Laurent CREPET wrote: > > >> On Mon, 9 May 2011 05:20:48 -0700 (PDT) > >

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

Alain Péan wrote: > The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL > 6.1 will be already released. So there will be no security updates for > C6.0, and it will be better to stay under SL6, until the release of > C6.1. I already installed three machines under SL6, and it

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Hello, Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the VIA Eden Processor? cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : CentaurHauls cpu family : 6 model : 13 model name : VIA Eden Processor 500MHz I am testin

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

If I had to guess, it would be that the OS is considered an "enterprise" OS, and that the CPU is too low end, now, to be considered that. It is kind of low end now for even personal use. Not that people only use the OS for high end server hardware :) At work, we still have to support 500MHz Pe

[CentOS] Changing default paper size to A4 on CentOS 5 (Kyocera FS1920 printer)

Hello, I have a Kyocera FS1920 network printer, and I run an up-to-date CentOS 5.6 x86_64 workstation. When I try to print with evince or Firefox the default paper size is always set to US Letter whereas the printer use A4. I have searched and other people seem to have the problem, but the only

[CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

Hi all, Centos 5.6 doesn't detect any disks connected to an Adaptec 6405 RAID Controller. The hardware isn't brand new to the market, so what might be the issue here? It seems, that the driver is missing for that particular card. All best, mjb ___ Ce

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

On 5/10/2011 9:53 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: > Hi all, > > Centos 5.6 doesn't detect any disks connected to an Adaptec 6405 RAID > Controller. The hardware isn't brand new to the market, so what might be the > issue here? It seems, that the driver is missing for that particular card. > I don

Re: [CentOS] Changing default paper size to A4 on CentOS 5 (Kyocera FS1920 printer)

Mathieu Baudier wrote: > Hello, > > I have a Kyocera FS1920 network printer, and I run an up-to-date > CentOS 5.6 x86_64 workstation. > > When I try to print with evince or Firefox the default paper size is > always set to US Letter whereas the printer use A4. > > I have searched and other people s

[CentOS] ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel private replies requested

Hello, Is anyone using an ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel? I've got one through Hurricane Electric and am having an extremely difficult time getting it to work. If anyone has this going i'd appreciate hearing from you offlist and please have Ubuntu experience if possible. Thanks.

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

Wiadomość napisana przez Les Mikesell w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:07: > On 5/10/2011 9:53 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Centos 5.6 doesn't detect any disks connected to an Adaptec 6405 RAID >> Controller. The hardware isn't brand new to the market, so what might be the >> i

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

From: Maciej Jan Broniarz > Centos 5.6 seems not to have any drivers for Adaptec 6405. Maybe try Adaptec drivers? http://www.adaptec.com/en-us/downloads/rh/rhel_5/productid=sas-6405&dn=adaptec+raid+6405.html JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos

Re: [CentOS] Changing default paper size to A4 on CentOS 5 (Kyocera FS1920 printer)

Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Mathieu Baudier wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a Kyocera FS1920 network printer, and I run an up-to-date CentOS 5.6 x86_64 workstation. >> >> When I try to print with evince or Firefox the default paper size is always set to US Letter whereas the printer use A4. What a

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

On 5/10/2011 10:17 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: > > Wiadomość napisana przez Les Mikesell w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:07: > >> On 5/10/2011 9:53 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Centos 5.6 doesn't detect any disks connected to an Adaptec 6405 RAID >>> Controller. The hardware

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/10/2011 10:17 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: >> >> Wiadomo¶æ napisana przez Les Mikesell w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:07: >> >>> On 5/10/2011 9:53 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: Hi all, Centos 5.6 doesn't detect any disks connected to an Adaptec 6405 RAID

Re: [CentOS] Changing default paper size to A4 on CentOS 5 (Kyocera FS1920 printer)

> # en_GB should print in A4 by default > export LC_PAPER="en_GB.UTF_8" That did the trick! (evince + Firefox) Merci beaucoup, Mathieu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel private replies requested

Yes, We are using one to HE and one to SIXXS. We don't rely on any of the standard redhat config stuff - we do it all thru our own configs. Been working great. On 05/10/2011 11:17 AM, David Mehler wrote: Hello, Is anyone using an ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel? I've got one through Hurricane Electric

[CentOS] Drive recovery?

I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1 ... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the weekend and it's gone. Up till the reboot, the drive was fine, I was writing to it without a

Re: [CentOS] Drive recovery?

On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1 ... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the weekend and it's gone. Up till the reboot, th

Re: [CentOS] Drive recovery?

Or ddrecovery to another disk? On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > > I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some > reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1 > ... No errors

Re: [CentOS] Drive recovery?

> I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some > reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically > /dev/hde1 > ... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the > weekend and > it's gone. Up till the reboot, the drive was fine, I was > writing t

Re: [CentOS] Drive recovery?

On 05/10/2011 02:28 PM, Steve Clark wrote: On 05/10/2011 02:24 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: I have a CentOS 5.6 system (recently installed) that, for some reason, has decided to mangle one of its drives, specifically /dev/hde1 ... No errors anywhere, just rebooted the machine over the we

Re: [CentOS] Drive recovery?

On 5/10/2011 12:30 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > mke2fs -n /dev/hde1 should list you the block addresses where copies of > the superblock would be found. > > Set ASB=any one of the alternate blocks listed. > Then, try mount -t ext3 -o sb=$ASB /dev/hda2 /mnt Thanks! I will try that as soon a

Re: [CentOS] Drive recovery?

Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > On 5/10/2011 12:30 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> mke2fs -n /dev/hde1 should list you the block addresses where copies of >> the superblock would be found. >> >> Set ASB=any one of the alternate blocks listed. >> Then, try mount -t ext3 -o sb=$ASB /dev/hda2 /mnt > >

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

Wiadomość napisana przez m.r...@5-cent.us w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:54: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 5/10/2011 10:17 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: >>> >>> Wiadomo¶æ napisana przez Les Mikesell w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:07: >>> On 5/10/2011 9:53 AM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] Drive recovery?

On 5/10/2011 2:00 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > I will byte and actually say it: Use Backups for important data you can > not afford to lose. rsync or similar tool can be used via cron to make > sure important files are saved. And this is normally done, except I was in the middle of working

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

Wiadomość napisana przez John Doe w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:28: > From: Maciej Jan Broniarz > >> Centos 5.6 seems not to have any drivers for Adaptec 6405. > > Maybe try Adaptec drivers? > http://www.adaptec.com/en-us/downloads/rh/rhel_5/productid=sas-6405&dn=adaptec+raid+6405.html I ha

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

On 5/10/2011 5:17 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: > > Wiadomość napisana przez John Doe w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:28: > >> From: Maciej Jan Broniarz >> >>> Centos 5.6 seems not to have any drivers for Adaptec 6405. >> >> Maybe try Adaptec drivers? >> http://www.adaptec.com/en-us/downloads/rh/r

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

Wiadomość napisana przez Les Mikesell w dniu 2011-05-11, o godz. 00:22: > On 5/10/2011 5:17 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: >> >> Wiadomość napisana przez John Doe w dniu 2011-05-10, o godz. 17:28: >> >>> From: Maciej Jan Broniarz >>> Centos 5.6 seems not to have any drivers for Adaptec

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel private replies requested

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:17 PM, David Mehler wrote: > appreciate hearing from you offlist and please have Ubuntu experience No wonder you can't manage to get it working, you couldn't even post to the right list. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.o

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

On 05/10/11 3:46 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: > I am sure it doesn't. I have booted 5.5 and 5.6 in linux dd mode. Then I have > loaded the drivers from: aacraid-driverdisk-CentOS.iso . Still, the installer > sees no hard disk. I have read somewhere, that the adaptec driver to that > controller

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel private replies requested

Hello, I am afraid a comment in my last message was misinterpreted. I previously had this configuration, linux and ipv6 tunnel through a tunnel broker. It was on a Ubuntu 9.10 box that a friend of mine set up. That box has been retired and replaced with CentOS 5.6. I am now trying to get the tunnel

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Tue, 10 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Alain Péan wrote: > The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL 6.1 will be already released. So there will be no security updates for C6.0, and it will be better to stay under SL6, until the release of C6.1. I already

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:13 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Alain Péan wrote: > > The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL > > 6.1 will be already released. So there will be no security updates for > > C6.0, and it will be better to stay under SL6, until the rel

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 03:12 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > > Alain Péan wrote: > > > The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL > >> 6.1 will be already released. So there will be no security updates for > >> C6.0, and it

Re: [CentOS] Drive recovery?

On Tue, 10 May 2011, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > On 5/10/2011 2:00 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> I will byte and actually say it: Use Backups for important data you can >> not afford to lose. rsync or similar tool can be used via cron to make >> sure important files are saved. > > And th

Re: [CentOS] Adaptec 6405 and Centos 5.6

Wiadomość napisana przez John R Pierce w dniu 2011-05-11, o godz. 01:51: > On 05/10/11 3:46 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: >> I am sure it doesn't. I have booted 5.5 and 5.6 in linux dd mode. Then I >> have loaded the drivers from: aacraid-driverdisk-CentOS.iso . Still, the >> installer sees no

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel private replies requested

Dne 11.5.2011 2:15, David Mehler napsal(a): > Hello, > I am afraid a comment in my last message was misinterpreted. I > previously had this configuration, linux and ipv6 tunnel through a > tunnel broker. It was on a Ubuntu 9.10 box that a friend of mine set > up. That box has been retired and repla