Re: [CentOS] the mirrors are still not updated

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of fakessh >Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 8:17 AM >To: centos@centos.org >Subject: [CentOS] the mirrors are still not updated > > >hello centos network > >ads on the list centos-annonces Thurs

Re: [CentOS] LDAPs causing System Message Bus to hang when there's no network

> > I use the following to prevent hanging at startup with LDAP. > > nss_initgroups_ignoreusers root,ldap,bacula,named > timelimit 30 > bind_timelimit 30 > bind_policy soft > > This is because some daemons start prior to the start of OpenLDAP > service. > > Obviously adding haldaemon, dbus,

[CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

Is it possible to assign multiple IP addresses to a bridge the same way ethernet devices can? The purpose is to accept incoming traffic for multiple public IP. 1 Physical NIC -> br0 (accepts incoming traffic for x.x.x.2 to x.x.x.5) Then 3 different virtual interfaces are connected to this bridge

Re: [CentOS] libvirt security update CVE-2011-1146

Hello, I ask here if CentOS has a xml oval repository. This is the reason of my question: Actually I have an automatic system to check CVE vulnerabilities report against RedHat OVAL resources, for example: https://www.redhat.com/security/data/oval/com.redhat.rhsa-2011.xml for 2011 CVEs and

Re: [CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Is it possible to assign multiple IP addresses to a bridge the same > way ethernet devices can? Yes, I think you can even define whole ranges of addresses. > > The purpose is to accept incoming traffic for multiple public IP. > 1 Phys

Re: [CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

On 4/29/11, Lucian wrote: > Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly > you are trying to achieve? > Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also on > eth0? This cannot work. Well, I have a physical connected to the ISP modem/router which assigned t

Re: [CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 4/29/11, Lucian wrote: >> Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly >> you are trying to achieve? >> Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also on >> eth0? This cannot work. > > Well

Re: [CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

Lucian wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin > wrote: >> On 4/29/11, Lucian wrote: >>> Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly >>> you are trying to achieve? >>> Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also on >>> eth0? Thi

Re: [CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:51:50 +0800 Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 4/29/11, Lucian wrote: > > Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly > > you are trying to achieve? > > Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also > > on eth0? This cannot work. >

Re: [CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

Benjamin Hackl wrote on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:51:13 +0200: > Just assign IP1 to eth0, IP2 to eth0:1, IP3 to eth0:2 and so on. and if you really need a bridge you attach those to the bridge: br0, br0:1, br0:2 etc. eth0 ist the *physical* interface for the bridge. Kai

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access

--- On Wed, 4/27/11, Les Mikesell wrote: > From: Les Mikesell > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access > To: centos@centos.org > Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 1:59 PM > On 4/27/2011 12:43 PM, Todd Cary > wrote: > > On 4/26/2011 9:25 AM, Todd Cary wrote: > >> Currently I have V

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access

On 4/29/2011 7:10 AM, Richard Mollel wrote: > > --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> From: Les Mikesell >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access >> To: centos@centos.org >> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 1:59 PM >> On 4/27/2011 12:43 PM, Todd Cary >> wrote: >>> On 4/26/20

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access

On 4/29/2011 9:10 AM, Richard Mollel wrote: > > I just tried FreeNX on server (centos), and NX Client from Nomachine. Setup > was not bad, though too many sources of info. Settled on centos wiki doc to > get me going. You shouldn't have to do anything but: yum install freenx and then get the con

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access

On 4/29/2011 9:41 AM, Todd Cary wrote: > > I have FreeNX on my server now and NX Client from Nomachine on my > XP desktop. However my ssh is configured for PW access; not Key > access. My ssh clients work - that is I have access to the > server. However I cannot gain access via the Nomachine cli

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access

On 4/29/2011 8:21 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: First, why would you disable key authentication? Or is it just failing because you don't have the right key? When I read the wiki (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX), it states Note: If you have disallowed ssh password authentication (which is a

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 74, Issue 10

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] libvirt security update CVE-2011-1146

On 04/29/2011 04:53 AM, Riccardo Veraldi wrote: > Hello, > I ask here if CentOS has a xml oval repository. This is the reason of my > question: > > Actually I have an automatic system to check CVE vulnerabilities report > against RedHat OVAL resources, for example: > https://www.redhat.com/securit

[CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6. I am not starting a flame ware, I hope. I'm just curious about what is minimally necessary go from RHel6 to another distribution. I suppose we could discuss

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Todd Cary wrote: > > > On 4/29/2011 8:21 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > > First, why would you disable key authentication? Or is it just failing > because you don't have the right key? > > When I read the wiki (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX), it states > > Note:

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

call redhat legal and/or please take this up with your own "paul" legal counsel this is not the place - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 04/29/2011 11:17 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually > legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6. > > I am not starting a flame ware, I hope. I'm just curious about what > is minimally necessary go from RHe

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 04/29/2011 11:17 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: >> The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually >> legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6. >> >> I am not starting a flame ware, I hope. I'm j

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 04/29/2011 01:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > I've always been surprised that CentOS ships /etc/redhat-release given > the above paragraph. Probably a programmatic requirement, if I was the betting type. -- Digimer E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: ht

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 04/29/11 10:26 AM, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > > I've always been surprised that CentOS ships /etc/redhat-release given > the above paragraph. I've always been annoyed that file isn't /etc/release like many other unix systems. or at least symlinked as such. ___

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 - Samba server + Windows error 233

Le 2011-04-27 13:44, Ryan Wagoner a écrit : > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Guy Boisvert > wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I have upgraded my servers yesterday to CentOS 5.6 via yum update. >> Everything went smoothly except that i have client workstations not part of >> the domain that are not able

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 4/29/2011 11:17 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Which of the RPM files in RH6 have "proprietary" software in them? > Those cannot be re-distributed as is? I figure there must be > something, because I installed the test version of SL6 back in January > and it locked up in disk recognition, whereas R

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 4/29/2011 1:46 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 04/29/2011 01:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote: >> I've always been surprised that CentOS ships /etc/redhat-release given >> the above paragraph. > Probably a programmatic requirement, if I was the betting type. > I could easily be confused as it has been so long

Re: [CentOS] LDAPs causing System Message Bus to hang when there's no network

--On Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:53:52 AM -0400 Scott Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:21:58PM +0200, Mattias Geniar wrote: >> I've tracked this down to the following known bug in Redhat, but >> it dates back to early 2010. >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182464#c46 >

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

Given the difficulty of getting Centos 6 released - maybe this is not the correct group to ask. Just saying. ;) -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Paul Johnson Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:17 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subj

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On top of that, it just seems logical granted the RHEL binary compatibility thing. It's used by many apps to detect the distro you're using, so... 2011/4/29 John Hinton > On 4/29/2011 1:46 PM, Digimer wrote: > > On 04/29/2011 01:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > >> I've always been surprised that Ce

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

John Hinton wrote: > On 4/29/2011 1:46 PM, Digimer wrote: >> On 04/29/2011 01:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote: >>> I've always been surprised that CentOS ships /etc/redhat-release given >>> the above paragraph. >> Probably a programmatic requirement, if I was the betting type. >> > I could easily be conf

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access

On 4/29/2011 10:57 AM, Todd Cary wrote: >> First, why would you disable key authentication? Or is it just failing >> because you don't have the right key? > When I read the wiki (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX), it states > > Note: If you have disallowed ssh password authentication (which i

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 4/29/2011 2:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> >> Am I required to remember everything I did from that long back? LOL >> There might be some stuff in the archives though... back in the early >> ver. 3 days. > > Actually, it annoys me - it *should* be LSB release, not redhat, I always > thought.

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > Given the difficulty of getting Centos 6 released - maybe > this is not the > correct group to ask. Just saying. ;) Actually, telling us just how hard and complex and detail-burdened it would be to kick off "BlueSox", a homolog to CentOS rebuilding of "RedHat", m

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 4/29/2011 2:16 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > > 3: Being so careful with the fine details that businesses world-wide > trust your statement "It's Done". Part of the "must-be-perfect" requirement for release seems to be imposed by the package name/version compatibility with upstream. There's n

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

[This reply isn't directed at John; his message just makes a good place to reply] On Friday, April 29, 2011 02:50:27 PM John Hinton wrote: > Am I required to remember everything I did from that long back? LOL > There might be some stuff in the archives though... back in the early > ver. 3 d

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 04/29/2011 12:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > > On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 04/29/2011 11:17 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: >>> The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually >>> legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6.

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

On 4/29/11, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Only problem is... networking still isn't working although brctl show > on the host shows that a vnet0 had been created and attached to the > bridge. Any pointers would be appreciated! Just to close off on this issue for the benefit of any future clueless

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

> > That "good faith effort" is required for all packages (GPL or not). > > And yes, it is legally necessary make that good faith effort not to > infringe upon someone else's trademarks. > > This is specifically called out here: > http://www.redhat.com/about/companyprofile/trademark/ > I've just r

Re: [CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

On 4/29/11, Lucian wrote > So .2 works as main IP and .3 does not? > Is your ISP doing any MAC address filtering? You may need to use a > routed bridge then.. It turns out that I was barking up the wrong tree and chasing red herrings. The virtualized guest definition was off by one item so its n

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On Friday, April 29, 2011 03:49:47 PM Paul Johnson wrote: > I've just read that document and it seems to say that you could take > all of the RPMs exactly as they are built by RedHat and include them > on a disk, and you can label the disk "Centos 6", and you are > completely within the guidelines.

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 04/29/2011 02:49 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: >> >> That "good faith effort" is required for all packages (GPL or not). >> >> And yes, it is legally necessary make that good faith effort not to >> infringe upon someone else's trademarks. >> >> This is specifically called out here: >> http://www.redha

[CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

Some interesting developments coming: ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 4/29/2011 3:08 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > But, legally, yes, someone COULD distribute some of the RH files. I thought these days you couldn't get the binaries in the first place without also getting a support contract where the terms you agree to say you can only install on the licensed mac

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 04/29/2011 03:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/29/2011 3:08 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> But, legally, yes, someone COULD distribute some of the RH files. > > I thought these days you couldn't get the binaries in the first place > without also getting a support contract where the terms you

[CentOS] qemu-kvm update from 0.12.5 to 0.14 on centos 5.6

Hi all I just update the package above. on 0.12 my qemu window opened on my X server as a window. Now it starting in a VNC session. How do I get it back to opening in a window on the X screen as the default? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list Cent

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access

Greetings, Just followw Akemi. :) Regarw, Rajagopal On 4/30/11, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/29/2011 10:57 AM, Todd Cary wrote: > >>> First, why would you disable key authentication? Or is it just failing >>> because you don't have the right key? >> When I read the wiki (http://wiki.centos.org/

Re: [CentOS] qemu-kvm update from 0.12.5 to 0.14 on centos 5.6

Plz rfr to othr lis t On 4/30/11, Jerry Geis wrote: > Hi all > > I just update the package above. on 0.12 my qemu window opened on my X > server as a window. > Now it starting in a VNC session. > > How do I get it back to opening in a window on the X screen as the default? > > Thanks, > > Jerry

[CentOS] how to access lvm inside lvm

I have a centos 5.6 server that has xen domUs installed on their on logical volumes. These logical volumes contain their own volume groups and again their own logical volumes. I want to access the domU logical volumes and tried this: [root@kr ~]# fdisk -l /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol02 Disk /dev/VolGro

Re: [CentOS] how to access lvm inside lvm

On Apr 29, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote: > I have a centos 5.6 server that has xen domUs installed on their on > logical volumes. These logical volumes contain their own volume groups > and again their own logical volumes. I want to access the domU logical > volumes and tried this: > >

Re: [CentOS] how to access lvm inside lvm

On 04/29/11 3:05 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote: > I have a centos 5.6 server that has xen domUs installed on their on > logical volumes. These logical volumes contain their own volume groups > and again their own logical volumes. I want to > ... ugh, and double ugh. this violates the KISS 'keep it s

[CentOS] mod_ssl?

I just noticed that the mod_ssl package was missing on a 5.x machine that I thought was approximately like several other that have it - and don't remember doing anything different. Is there some yum group that would install httpd without including it? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.

[CentOS] mod_ssl?

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > I just noticed that the mod_ssl package was missing on a 5.x machine > that I thought was approximately like several other that have it - and > don't remember doing anything different. Is there some yum group that > would install httpd without including

[CentOS] Switching to php53

I have a Centos 5.6 server which is using the default php packages. These currently contain PHP 5.1.6. My main use of PHP on the server is to support an installation of WordPress. I currently had WP 3.1.2 installed, but the WP developers have announced that from WP 3.2 they will only support PHP 5

Re: [CentOS] Switching to php53

2011/4/30 Dave Cross : > I have a Centos 5.6 server which is using the default php packages. > These currently contain PHP 5.1.6. > > My main use of PHP on the server is to support an installation of > WordPress. I currently had WP 3.1.2 installed, but the WP developers > have announced that from W