Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:27:16PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > Maybe having it said so publicly and be such a respected Linux community > member may help certain people wake up and smell the coffee. Respected? I can't recall a single article of his that mentioned CentOS that wasn't disparagin

Re: [CentOS] Cant find out MCE reason (CPU 35 BANK 8)

On 03/22/11 19:00, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Vladimir Budnev wrote: > >> 2011/3/22 >> > > > So with 2 4-core Xeons, I don't understand how you can get 3x and 5x. > Could you post some raw messages, either from /var/log/message or > from /var/log/mcelog? > >

[CentOS] Named, logging of requests

This is not really CentOS-specific - sorry. On a name server, I would like to log ns queries (specifically, queries which result with no answer) regarding one domain (for which my ns is authoritative). Is this possible? I know you can turn on logging "globally" using the logging section of nam

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

> > Respected? I can't recall a single article of his that mentioned CentOS > that wasn't disparaging. I find such one-sided and opinionated writings > hard to respect. > Okay, maybe that was an assumption too far in regards to "respect". Perhaps not so one-sided if he had received an ema

Re: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?

Many thanks for the rpm's. I had some evolution stored documents that I really needed. I've applied them to two systems. Is it possible that the gnome panel problem is only on CRT's and not LEDs? Seems like one of my systems fixed itself when I changed monitors. -- M Reynolds McClatchey Jr

[CentOS] is the list dead?

Is the list dead, or just quiet all of the sudden? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://list

Re: [CentOS] is the list dead?

> Is the list dead, or just quiet all of the sudden? I'm going to assume people have stopped whining now that their beloved 5.6 is out. :-) -- Drew "This started out as a hobby and spun horribly out of control." -Unknown ___ CentOS mailing list CentO

Re: [CentOS] is the list dead?

On 4/20/2011 9:06 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Is the list dead, or just quiet all of the sudden? > > -- > Kind Regards > Rudi Ahlers > SoftDux > > Website: http://www.SoftDux.com > Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com > Office: 087 805 9573 > Cell: 082 554 7532 I think they exhausted themselves -

Re: [CentOS] is the list dead?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Drew wrote: > > Is the list dead, or just quiet all of the sudden? > > I'm going to assume people have stopped whining now that their beloved > 5.6 is out. :-) > > > -- > > HAHAH! Ok, that makes sense. For a moment I thought we were all banned from the list, or

Re: [CentOS] is the list dead?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Is the list dead, or just quiet all of the sudden? Yep, it's dead, and you didn't read this, either. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Ian Murray wrote: > Okay, maybe that was an assumption too far in regards to "respect". > > Perhaps not so one-sided if he had received an email reply from the devs > assuming he did indeed send one to KB. To be fair, it does seem pretty lifted > from the list,

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote: Hi, I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right time on the machine. This is with / without nt

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 74, Issue 6

ists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20110420/c554842d/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:38:50 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2011:0408 CentOS 4 i386 x86_64 tzdata Update To: CentOS-Announce

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:06 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:27:16PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: >> >> Maybe having it said so publicly and be such a respected Linux community >> member may help certain people wake up and smell the coffee. > > Respected?  I can't recall a si

Re: [CentOS] Convert Filesystem to Ext4

On 19/04/2011 23:51, Kenni Lund wrote: > > Den 19/04/2011 19.42 skrev "Matt" >: >> >> On a running 64 bit CentOS 5.6 box is it possible to convert from Ext3 >> to Ext4 to improve performance? > > This is entirely from memory, so it might be incorrect and not relevant > a

[CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

Hello, 'yum update' runs into the following error message. Package libuser-devel-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm is not signed regards Olaf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

> > No. News reporting is about picking up and distilling the sentiment > of what's going on. The article has done that. It doesn't have to be > a complete factual research project with totally "fair and balanced" > chances for everyone to have their say. If the Devs had responded, > tha

[CentOS] yum update after fresh 5.6 install fails

Hi, I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the software patches. But I get the following error when I try to run 'yum update': Package libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm is not signed and yum update exits with

Re: [CentOS] yum update after fresh 5.6 install fails

centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > Hi, > I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first > thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the > software patches. > > But I get the following error when I try to run 'yum update': > > Package libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.x8

Re: [CentOS] yum update after fresh 5.6 install fails

Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > >> Hi, >> I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first >> thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the >> software patches. >> >> But I get the following error when I try to run 'yum update': >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

> The attitudes against any user who has a question about releases > significantly undermines the project and is a slap in the face to "any" user? Or users who keep repeating again and again the same boring old stuff? I think that we now all know what to expect and what not to expect from CentOS.

Re: [CentOS] yum update after fresh 5.6 install fails

On 04/20/2011 04:53 PM, Andre Charbonneau wrote: > Hi, > I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first > thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the software patches. > > But I get the following error when I try to run 'yum update': > > Package libuser-0.54.7-

Re: [CentOS] yum update after fresh 5.6 install fails

>    Package libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm is not signed You could use --nogpgcheck but this is really weird that some packages are not signed. It may mean that the package is not from the trusted source, so you should not use --nogpgcheck on a "serious" environment. __

Re: [CentOS] yum update after fresh 5.6 install fails

Mathieu Baudier wrote: >>Package libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm is not signed >> > > You could use --nogpgcheck but this is really weird that some packages > are not signed. > > It may mean that the package is not from the trusted source, so you > should not use --nogpgcheck on a

Re: [CentOS] SNMP monitoring options

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:37:28PM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > > Ummm, Cacti and I'm sure Opsview use rrdtool to generate there graphs. > > In fact, my post was to ask for a more friendly tool as Cacti graphs > get un ruley. 'Unruly' graphs? Not sure what you mean. The data presentatio

Re: [CentOS] yum update after fresh 5.6 install fails

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Filipe Rosset wrote: > On 04/20/2011 04:53 PM, Andre Charbonneau wrote: >> Hi, >> I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first >> thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the software patches. >> >> But I get the following error whe

Re: [CentOS] yum update after fresh 5.6 install fails

Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Filipe Rosset > wrote: > >> On 04/20/2011 04:53 PM, Andre Charbonneau wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first >>> thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the software patches.

Re: [CentOS] yum update after fresh 5.6 install fails

Another option is to exclude it on the command line yum -x libuser update /Marcel -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Andre Charbonneau Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:16 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS

Re: [CentOS] yum update after fresh 5.6 install fails

These packages are quite new (only a few hours old). They must have been accidentally not signed. Skip them for the time being. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] yum update after fresh 5.6 install fails

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Marcel Beerli wrote: > > Another option is to exclude it on the command line > > yum -x libuser update > > /Marcel Ah, yes. One note is that adding a * ( libuser* ) is recommended because libuser-devel is also not signed. :( Akemi

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 03:29:07 PM Ian Murray wrote: > My big beef has always been that the website and project name suggest one > thing > (i.e. enterprise ready), when the reality is quiet different. [sigh] CentOS is simply a community-available rebuild of the upstream Enterprise OS; s

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:06 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:27:16PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: >>> Maybe having it said so publicly and be such a respected Linux community >>> member may help certain people wake up and smell the coffee. >> Respected? I can

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 01:34:54PM -0400, Tom H wrote: > > I don't think that I've ever read an article of his before but respect > isn't earned by praising a distribution or criticizing another. I have read some of his articles in the past and I speak from the point of knowledge of his past writ

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

> On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used >> ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the >> network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right >> time on the machine. This is

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

> > Is there anything else relevant to add? > ___ Yeah, please can someone fix the front-page to better reflect the distribution for what it is, rather than the sales pitch that is there now. Not everyone has read about it ad nausem on this list.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 05:51:46 PM Ian Murray wrote: > > Is there anything else relevant to add? > Yeah, please can someone fix the front-page to better reflect the > distribution > for what it is, rather than the sales pitch that is there now. Not everyone > has > read about it ad nau

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

- Original Message > From: Lamar Owen > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Wed, 20 April, 2011 21:32:35 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update? > > On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 03:29:07 PM Ian Murray wrote: > > My big beef has always been that the website and project name suggest one

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 04/20/11 2:51 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > >> Is there anything else relevant to add? >> ___ > Yeah, please can someone fix the front-page to better reflect the distribution > for what it is, rather than the sales pitch that is there now. Not everyone > h

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

On 4/20/2011 5:45 PM, Rick Thomas wrote: Have you tried installing the adjtimex package? If your system clock is running reliably fast under the 5.6 kernel, maybe adjtimex can turn that reliability into reliable time sync for you? Rick No I haven't, I will look into it. Thank you for the

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

> But to allude to > him as a respected industry member is greatly stretching things when > every article that mentions CentOS is disparaging and I can't recall any > article even ending on a positive note. Try google: http://lwn.net/Articles/123934/ (For the record, I couldn't find any p

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

- Original Message > From: John R Pierce > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Wed, 20 April, 2011 23:04:50 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update? > > On 04/20/11 2:51 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > > > >> Is there anything else relevant to add? > >> _

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100 Karanbir Singh wrote: > Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start > going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ). The rest > I'll move in first thing on Wednesday morning. Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100 > Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start >> going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ). The rest >> I'll move in first thing on Wed

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:26:51 -0700 Don Krause wrote: > On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100 > > Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > >> Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start > >> going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( t

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Bob Hepple wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:26:51 -0700 > Don Krause wrote: > >> On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100 >>> Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, s

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

On 21/04/11 5:26 AM, Olaf Mueller wrote: > Hello, > > 'yum update' runs into the following error message. > > Package libuser-devel-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm is not signed I got this too, there's two ways around it: 1) Wait until the package is signed and then update. 2) Run: yum update --no

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:31:04PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > Seriously, just skip over my posts. I am not forcing you to read them. I'll > finish when I am good and ready... not when *you* decide. How about I write you a check to just go away?

Re: [CentOS] Convert Filesystem to Ext4

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:08 PM, John Beranek wrote: > That's not quite true, you can force files on a partition to be > re-created using extents with something like the below: > > find /home -xdev -type f -print0 | xargs -0 chattr +e > find /home -xdev -type d -print0 | xargs -0 chattr +e > > Che

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

(someone) wrote: > Why does the website say something so different, then? Seriously? Are people really this retarded? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > Seriously, just skip over my posts. I am not forcing you to read them. I'll > finish when I am good and ready... not when *you* decide. I'm trying to figure out why someone who, apparently, hates the CentOS distribution so much, spends so much

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Brian Mathis > It doesn't matter if you provide something "for free", because it's > not free.  Everyone who uses CentOS invests significant time and > energy into it. How so? By installing it? -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > My big beef has always been that the website and project name suggest one > thing > (i.e. enterprise ready), when the reality is quiet different. I think Zonker > got > that one spot on. My suggest to the devs is to change the name and update

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:18:21AM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote: > > No. News reporting is about picking up and distilling the sentiment > of what's going on. The article has done that. It doesn't have to be > a complete factual research project with totally "fair and balanced" > chances for every

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never give > me > sufficient information to start a competing rebuild. Information needed to rebuild is, and has been for quite some time, in the ar

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:25:06PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > Try google: http://lwn.net/Articles/123934/ I've read the articles; I've no need to re-read them. > (For the record, I couldn't find any previous disparaging comments from > him... I > stopped at page 6) You didn't look very hard

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:01:22PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:31:04PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > > > Seriously, just skip over my posts. I am not forcing you to read them. I'll > > finish when I am good and ready... not when *you* decide. > > How about I write

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 4/21/11, John R. Dennison wrote: > The only sentiment picked up on was that of a loud, minuscule and > irrelevant fraction of the user base from this and the -devel mailing > lists. He went with the loudest group of whiners he could find. Perhaps only a small handful keep "whining" about the

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 04/20/2011 09:18 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Ian Murray wrote: >> Okay, maybe that was an assumption too far in regards to "respect". >> >> Perhaps not so one-sided if he had received an email reply from the devs >> assuming he did indeed send one to KB. To be

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 04/20/2011 02:29 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > > I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never give > me > sufficient information to start a competing rebuild. Why would anyone give another entity all the things required to replace them? Red Hat does not give us nearly

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:19:12PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Perhaps only a small handful keep "whining" about the situation. > However, the same idea that 95% of CentOS users never post to the ML > is also applicable to the complainer population. For every complainer, > there are probably

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Perhaps only a small handful keep "whining" about the situation. > However, the same idea that 95% of CentOS users never post to the ML > is also applicable to the complainer population. For every complainer, > there are probably 9 oth

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 04/20/2011 11:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 04/20/2011 02:29 PM, Ian Murray wrote: >> >> I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never >> give me >> sufficient information to start a competing rebuild. > > Why would anyone give another entity all the things requi

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

> This begs the question: > > Why are you still here? No, really. Why? You've nothing good to say. > Ever. Do you honestly think that the continue crap spewing off your > fingers endears you to the CentOS team? Do you think they care? Do you > think you're important to them? Let me disabuse

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 4/20/11 8:53 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > The only sentiment picked up on was that of a loud, minuscule and > irrelevant fraction of the user base from this and the -devel mailing > lists. He went with the loudest group of whiners he could find. If he had wanted to be really critical he wou

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 and KVM failure

On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 03:47 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 04/09/2011 12:04 PM, compdoc wrote: > >> A similar incident was reported during the QA. Look at the .xml file. > >> If it says type='raw', change it to type='qcow2' and restart libvirtd. > >> Would that fix the problem ? > >> > >> Akemi >

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 4/20/11 11:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never >> give me >> sufficient information to start a competing rebuild. > > Why would anyone give another entity all the things required to replace > them? Why? Because nearly all t

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 23:25 +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > > But to allude to > > him as a respected industry member is greatly stretching things when > > every article that mentions CentOS is disparaging and I can't recall any > > article even ending on a positive note. > > Try google: http:

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/20/11 11:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never >>> give me >>> sufficient information to start a competing rebuild. >> >> Why would anyone give another entity all the

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Craig White wrote: > I think that the apologist point of view for is pretty much worthless > because the intent is to stifle those who are genuinely concerned about > the timeliness now. Yeah, "genuinely concerned." And that "concern" is supposedly best served b

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

>> 'yum update' runs into the following error message. >> >> Package libuser-devel-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm is not signed > > I got this too, there's two ways around it: > > 1) Wait until the package is signed and then update. > > 2) Run: yum update --nogpgcheck Other workarounds for this parti