On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:55:08PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:40 PM, Brandon Ooi wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> > >
> > > One was a hardware raid over fibre channel, which silently corrupted
> > > itself. System checked out fine, raid ar
On 04/16/11 9:47 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> 16 Apr 19:46:13 ntpdate[1968]: step time server 204.235.61.9 offset
> 14408.651330 sec
14400 seconds is 4 hours. not sure the significance of that, but...
the commonest issue with messed up time zones is whether the BIOS CMOS
clock is set to UTC or lo
I don't think it's a "distro related" issue, so i'm posting it here too:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/11289/how-to-install-fedoraubuntu-with-encrypted-vgs-on-one-disk
what am i missing?
why doesn't GRUB offer the 2 distros@boot, why is it only offering only 1?? why
doesn't it sees th
On 03/31/2011 02:50 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> For such leading edge features not yet integrated into typical kernel
> and system support, you'll have far more success advancing and getting
> it tested than working inside the fundamentlaly 4 year old
> architecture of the available CentOS 5.5.
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:16AM -0700, johhny_at_poland77 wrote:
> I don't think it's a "distro related" issue, so i'm posting it here too:
>
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/11289/how-to-install-fedoraubuntu-with-encrypted-vgs-on-one-disk
>
> what am i missing?
>
> why doesn't GRUB
Hi Akemi,
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> See also:
>
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37
Please don't take this the wrong way, but not everybody reads the
forums. Perhaps it is possible to give a heads up about such breakage
via the
Hi,
Reading
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37 I
noticed a warning about an upcoming bugged update
xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.1
I would advise everyone to add
exclude=xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.1
to their updates repo config.
Regards,
Leonar
2011/4/17 Leonard den Ottolander :
> Hi Akemi,
>
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> See also:
>>
>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37
>
> Please don't take this the wrong way, but not everybody reads the
> forums. Perhaps it is possible
Hello Eero,
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 18:27 +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Does this also affects grub? if so, then this is very critical, it can
> trash my rhel installations :/
Well I am not sure, it could be a coincidence, but on my Sempron (i686)
system I had to fix a broken grub (hanging at "GRU
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Hi Akemi,
>
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> See also:
>>
>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37
>
> Please don't take this the wrong way, but not everybody reads the
> f
Am 17.04.2011 16:52, schrieb Leonard den Ottolander:
> Hi Akemi,
>
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> See also:
>>
>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37
>
> Please don't take this the wrong way, but not everybody reads the
> forums. Perh
- Original Message -
> From: "Eero Volotinen"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 8:27:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
>
> 2011/4/17 Leonard den Ottolander :
> > Hi Akemi,
> >
> > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Hello Rainer,
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 19:08 +0200, Rainer Traut wrote:
> Please don't take it wrong but Akemi gave you the link because not
> everyone reads the forums and the issue was discussed there.
Which is highly appreciated, but it happened *after* I reported these
issues, so it hardly coun
Steven Vishoot writes:
>
> Sorry, hopefully fixed account and computer that started this.
> Damn
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Sent: Sun, April 10, 2011 6:29:15 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] (no subject)
> >
> > Steven Vishoo
Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:54:23PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 04/15/11 2:38 PM, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
>>> Hi there --
>>>
>>> I am running a server with the 5.6 64-bit distribution, and I am
>>> looking for an unrar rpm package.
>>> I have several repositories set
Mark Baumwell wrote:
>
> Steven Vishoot writes:
>
>> Sorry, hopefully fixed account and computer that started this.
>> Damn
>>
>> - Original Message
>>> From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic
>>> To: CentOS mailing list
>>> Sent: Sun, April 10, 2011 6:29:15 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] (no subje
Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Lars Hecking
> wrote:
>>> I realize it's not a huge deal, but it's an irritant. Why does Gnome
>>> want to limit the ability to customize?
>> Check out Gnome3 then. And weep.
>
> Hopefully Red Hat (and CentOS) will continue using Gnome 2.x.x
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Most likely because of the increasing number of noobs that delete/remove
> parts of the panels and then whine helplessly for someone to help them
> revert it back to default state.
Yeah, but I wish that wouldn't result in penalizing those that
actually have a clu
Leonard den Ottolander wrote on 04/17/2011 01:37 PM:
>...It's a general request that if people are aware of
> breakage in upcoming updates to report it to this list.
Agree. I would advocate posting it to this list and making it part of
the Announcement post as well. This issue was discussed on
I have a script I put in /etc/cron.fiveminutes
graphs.sh
#!/bin/sh
env LANG=C mrtg
/home/admin/domains/my---server.com/public_html/traffic/load/mrtg.cfg
--logging /dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1
env LANG=C mrtg
/home/admin/domains/my---server.com/public_html/traffic/eth0/mrtg.cfg
--logging /dev/null >/
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:07:39 -0700
Florin Andrei wrote:
> I'm a Thunderbird user almost since day one, but now I'm looking for
> something else.
A hearty vote for sylpheed from me - http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/en/ ...
or anything else that uses MH-style mailboxes instead of the monolithic
mbox o
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:06:59 -0500
Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Patrick Lists
> wrote:
> > On 04/16/2011 06:34 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> without success. Is there a configuration file I can change or a
> >> configuration program I can run to customize this
- Original Message
> From: Mark Baumwell
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Sun, April 17, 2011 12:30:31 PM
> Subject: [CentOS] Did you ID this spam? what does it do? Does it have a name?
>
>
>
> Steven Vishoot writes:
>
> >
> > Sorry, hopefully fixed account and computer that sta
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Please don't take this the wrong way, but not everybody reads the
> forums. Perhaps it is possible to give a heads up about such breakage
> via the CentOS general or announce mailing list before such a broken
> package is released i
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Most likely because of the increasing number of noobs that delete/remove
> parts of the panels and then whine helplessly for someone to help them
> revert it back to default state.
But there's nothing to keep them removing the Notifi
25 matches
Mail list logo
