On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> You would not have to create "dummy" machine records. The
> servicePrincipalName attribute on an AD account is multi-valued and
> clients can request and get a ticket for ANY principal in that list.
> So you only need one account.
>
> And
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
>
>> Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
>> Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
>>
>
> Try this 8-port one from LevelOne:
>
> http://global.level1.com/Business-Products/KVM-Swi
2011/3/21
> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> > Hello community.
> >
> > We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel Xeon
> > E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
> >
> > For some time we have lots of MCE in mcelog and we cant find out the
> > reason.
>
> The only thing that show
> Which is about $400, not counting cables, which are expensive.
Well, you said "not thousands of dollars"... And I bought the cables for
about 20 dollars each.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Vladimir Budnev
wrote:
>
>
> 2011/3/21
>>
>> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> > Hello community.
>> >
>> > We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel Xeon
>> > E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
>> >
>> > For some time we have lots of MCE in
You can pick up a Dell/Avocent 2161DS on eBay for $400-500 USD.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Michael B Allen
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 11:16 PM
To: CentOS
Subject: [CentOS] Affordable KVM over IP switch
Hello,
Are t
Hi all
How can I know the refresh rate of the dns server?
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
What do you mean by refresh rate of the dns server? Like TTL length of records?
Or..?
Aly
--Original Message--
From: ann kok
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: centos@centos.org
ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] dns question
Sent: Mar 22, 2011 9:13 AM
Hi all
How can I k
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There were still several hundreds of duplicate mails awaiting delivery
> to this list.
It's an automated enhancement for our weekly re-hashing of why Centos
5.6 is late.
> The user reinjecting the mails has been identified and
> shot^Wbanned from
> the
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
> Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
>
> Mike
>
> --
> Michael B Allen
You could get a regular KVM, then connect a Lantroni
Hello everyone:
* DNS does not have a "refresh rate". In DNS, the person running the
domain determines what the "refresh rate" (it's called TTL in DNS) for
their records is; for example, Google has a TTL of "once per hour" and
my domains (maradns.org, etc.) have a TTL of one day.
* As mentioned
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> 2011/3/21
>> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> > Hello community.
>> >
>> > We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel
>> > Xeon E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
>> >
>> > For some time we have lots of MCE in mcelog and we cant find out the
>> > reas
Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>>
>> There were still several hundreds of duplicate mails awaiting delivery
>> to this list.
>
> It's an automated enhancement for our weekly re-hashing of why Centos
> 5.6 is late.
Hey, cool! Then you just save the last 100 or so emails
2011/3/22
> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> > 2011/3/21
> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> > Hello community.
> >> >
> >> > We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel
> >> > Xeon E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
> >> >
> >> > For some time we have lots of MCE in mcelog and
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> 2011/3/22
>> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> > 2011/3/21
>> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel
>> >> > Xeon E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
>> >> >
>> >> > For some time we have lots of MCE in mce
Digimer wrote:
> On 03/21/2011 08:13 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
>> How can I determine the device on which the mbr is placed? I tried the
>> following:
>>
>> # chroot /mnt/sysimage
>>
>> # grub-install /dev/hda
>
> Read further down, and read the grub man page (from a good system);
> 'grub-install'
2011/3/22
> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> > 2011/3/22
> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> > 2011/3/21
> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel
> >> >> > Xeon E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G
> >> >> >
> >> >> > For some
As was previously mentioned, you need to be more clear about what
you're asking. There are multiple related concepts. Look up a
description of the SOA record, in particular the refresh, retry,
expire, and minimum TTL fields. The first three affect how DNS
secondary servers behave. The last ca
Michael B Allen wrote:
> Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
> Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
I can attest that the Adderlink iPEPS and iPEPS-DA are excellent units.
They're both in the 500-1000 range. They're intended for a
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> 2011/3/22
>> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> > 2011/3/22
>> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> > 2011/3/21
>> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with
>> >> >> > 2xIntel Xeon E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
> Michael B Allen wrote:
>
>> Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
>> Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
>
> I can attest that the Adderlink iPEPS and iPEPS-DA are excellent units
2011/3/22
> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> > 2011/3/22
> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> > 2011/3/22
> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> > 2011/3/21
> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with
> >> >> >> > 2xIntel Xeon E56
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
>> Michael B Allen wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
>>> Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
>>
>> I can at
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
>>> Michael B Allen wrote:
>>>
Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
Ideally a 3-4 po
Hi :)
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Budnev
wrote:
[...]
> But... as i sad we have following slots
> CPU1 cpu1-a1 cpu1-a2 cpu1-a3 cpu1-b1 cpu1-b2 cpu1-b3
> CPU2 cpu2-a1 cpu2-a2 cpu2-a3 cpu2-b1 cpu2-b2 cpu2-b3
>
> We have modules placed in such way:
> ++---
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> 2011/3/22
>> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> > 2011/3/22
>> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> > 2011/3/22
>> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> >> > 2011/3/21
>> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF w
2011/3/22
> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> > 2011/3/22
> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> > 2011/3/22
> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> > 2011/3/22
> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> >> > 2011/3/21
> >> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > We are running, Centos
On 03/22/11 6:13 AM, ann kok wrote:
> Hi all
>
> How can I know the refresh rate of the dns server?
http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596001582
http://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.or
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
Michael B Allen wrote:
> Are there any KVM over IP swit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ann kok said the following on 22/03/11 14:13:
> How can I know the refresh rate of the dns server?
$ dig www.google.com
...
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.google.com. 515949 IN CNAME www.l.google.com.
www.l.google.com. 300 IN
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> 2011/3/22
>
>> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> > 2011/3/22
>> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> > 2011/3/22
>> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> >> > 2011/3/22
>> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> >> >> > 2011/3/21
>> >> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>>
2011/3/22
> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> > 2011/3/22
> >
> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> > 2011/3/22
> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> > 2011/3/22
> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> >> > 2011/3/22
> >> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > 2011/3/21
> >> >> >> >> >> Vladim
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> 2011/3/22
>> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> > 2011/3/22
>> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> > 2011/3/22
>> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> >> > 2011/3/22
>> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> >> >> > 2011/3/22
>> >> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > 2011
2011/3/22
> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> > 2011/3/22
> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> > 2011/3/22
> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> > 2011/3/22
> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> >> > 2011/3/22
> >> >> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > 2011/3/22
> >> >> >> >> >> Vladimir B
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> 2011/3/22
>> >> So with 2 4-core Xeons, I don't understand how you can get 3x and 5x.
>> >> Could you post some raw messages, either from /var/log/message or
>> >> from /var/log/mcelog?
>> >>
>> > sure here they are before "night party":
>> > MCE 24
>> > CPU 52 BANK 8 TSC
Hi,
Normally daylight date change last sunday march for Turkey but this year
daylight saving time will change for Turkey at 28 March 2011 at 03.00 AM so
how can i change daylight save time setting for this year on CentOS servers
?
I wrote rule file like below and compile it with zic but when I co
Semih Gokalp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Normally daylight date change last sunday march for Turkey but this year
> daylight saving time will change for Turkey at 28 March 2011 at 03.00 AM
> so how can i change daylight save time setting for this year on CentOS
> servers
> ?
Are you sure that's not in the di
Yes.
Only Ubuntu distro update tzdata and i updated my ubuntu laptop and copy
"Turkey" and "Istanbul" file to CentOS server and then change manually OS
time to 28 Mar 2011 02:59:50 and i waited 10 second.
When the time is 02:59:59 , date was changed to 04.00.It seems work.I will
replace this two
Now that we've got the thing, does anyone know what ppd I can use for it?
I've seen someone recommending:
- the generic postscript ppd;
- the hplips driver.
I also see ppd's for a DesignJet 800ps, and ones for the 5000ps and
5500ps. Has anyone had any experience with any of these?
On 22.3.2011 18:19, Semih Gokalp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Normally daylight date change last sunday march for Turkey but this year
> daylight saving time will change for Turkey at 28 March 2011 at 03.00 AM
> so how can i change daylight save time setting for this year on CentOS
> servers ?
Upstream Vendo
On 03/20/2011 05:02 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote:
>
>> On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
.
> I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct
> competition with
>>
On 03/21/2011 07:08 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Matthew Feinberg wrote:
>> I don't see the problem here. I just tested this and it works fine. The
>> drupal6 package only requires php 5.2 or greater.
>
> Right. The php53 package is in the upstream vendor's upd
On Mar 22, 2011, at 3:49 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/20/2011 05:02 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> .
>> I hope the situation may ch
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Devin Reade wrote:
> Michael B Allen wrote:
>
>> Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars?
>> Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me.
>
> I can attest that the Adderlink iPEPS and iPEPS-DA are excellent unit
On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
> production OS, he mentioned switching to Ubuntu which is nothing like
> RHEL.
>
> So I thought instead of going with such a diff paradigm, that using SL
> might be more similar in too
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:55 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> You would not have to create "dummy" machine records. The
>> servicePrincipalName attribute on an AD account is multi-valued and
>> clients can request and get a ticket for ANY pr
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> > 2011/3/22
> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >> > 2011/3/21
> >> >> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
> >>
> >> > Now we are just waiting will there be errors again.
> >>
> >> I'm sure there will. Reseating the memory may have done something, but
> >> there w
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
>> production OS, he mentioned switching to Ubuntu which is nothing like
>> RHEL.
>>
>> So I thought instead of going with such
On 3/22/11 8:07 PM, William Hooper wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
>>> production OS, he mentioned switching to Ubuntu which is nothing like
>>> RH
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:18:31PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> Building the kernel shouldn't be an issue - but look at the SL notes
> on the srpms that don't build with the listed dependencies as shipped
> - and they aren't being picky about the library linkages matching the
> RH binaries like
On 03/22/2011 08:18 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/22/11 8:07 PM, William Hooper wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
production OS, he mention
Michael B Allen wrote:
> This is interesting. But can you switch consoles remotely using
> special keystokes? Or do you need to physically walk over and switch
> the conventional non-IP unit?
It wouldn't be much good for remote access if you had to walk there :)
That part isn't a function of th
On 3/22/11 8:23 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:18:31PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> Building the kernel shouldn't be an issue - but look at the SL notes
>> on the srpms that don't build with the listed dependencies as shipped
>> - and they aren't being picky about the
> That part isn't a function of the iPEPS, it's a function of your
> KVM switch. So yes, I was thinking about models that do it with
> a particular key stroke. I've used the D-Link DKVM-8E as a decent
> low cost unit, although it has the tendancy to get confused during
> a full power outage of y
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> SL did indeed release a 6.0 before CentOS. For all of the other 25
> possible releases, SL released before CentOS on 5 of the 25 times.
Right, but as these numbers reveal, since June 2008 Scientific Linux is
closing the gap with CentOS (or rather, Ce
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
> CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst
> delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past
> 133 days delay, an all time record (not counting CentOS 2 :-)).
You kee
> Not that it matters, but the last time I checked, SL had not released
> their 4.9 or 5.6 releases either.
On the other hand, unlike CentOS, Scientific Linux (SL) is backporting
5.6 security fixes. Indeed, all of the security issues CentOS 5.5 has
right now aren't in SL.
> SL is a fine product
On 23/03/11 03:41, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>
>> CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst
>> delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past
>> 133 days delay, an all time record
58 matches
Mail list logo
