Recall..
I run now the following task every day tar -cvzf
/rescue/website-$(date +%u).tgz /var/www/htdocs/*
I want now to move these files from the local server to a remote server via ftp.
any help.
Thanks
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:33 PM, wrote:
> madu...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Should I add to
On 03/20/2011 08:31 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Recall..
> I run now the following task every day tar -cvzf
> /rescue/website-$(date +%u).tgz /var/www/htdocs/*
> I want now to move these files from the local server to a remote server via
> ftp.
>
> any help.
>
> Thanks
man lftp
t
__
Hello,
yesterday night I had a problem with
my server located at a hoster (strato.de).
I couldn't ssh to it and over the remote serial console
I saw "out of memory" errors (sorry, don't have the text).
Then I had reinstall CentOS 5.5/64 bit + all my setup (2h work),
because I have a contract with
2011/3/20 Alexander Farber
> Hello,
>
> yesterday night I had a problem with
> my server located at a hoster (strato.de).
> I couldn't ssh to it and over the remote serial console
> I saw "out of memory" errors (sorry, don't have the text).
>
> Then I had reinstall CentOS 5.5/64 bit + all my setu
Thanks Kenni, could you advise any commands
for checking RAID status or health
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 20.3.2011 09:25, Alexander Farber wrote:
> but I'm worried about those /var/log/message:
>
> kernel: INFO: task md1_resync:9770 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573106#c31
--
Best Regards, Markus Falb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
Thank you, I've decreased
/proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
from 20 to 10.
I think I don't care about the sync speed,
but I'd like to avoid the OOM errors and
server lockup like I had yesterday
(still not sure if this will help here
or if it is just to get rid of the warning)
Regards
Al
On 20.3.2011 13:48, Alexander Farber wrote:
> Thank you, I've decreased
> /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
> from 20 to 10.
>
> I think I don't care about the sync speed,
> but I'd like to avoid the OOM errors and
> server lockup like I had yesterday
So you think the OOM was related to
Hello,
the "man syslog.conf" explains how to filter syslog messages
by facility (auth, authpriv, cron, daemon, kern, ... ) or
by priority (debug, info, notice, warning, ...).
But how could I redirect messages by a program name, like
"drupal" or "php"? For example I have in /var/log/messages:
Mar
On 20.3.2011 14:55, Alexander Farber wrote:
> the "man syslog.conf" explains how to filter syslog messages
> by facility (auth, authpriv, cron, daemon, kern, ... ) or
> by priority (debug, info, notice, warning, ...).
>
> But how could I redirect messages by a program name, like
> "drupal" or "ph
rsyslog can do this as well and has a great filtering feature that is
available. rsyslog will (should) be the default logging daemon in CentOS 6 (as
it is for RHEL6).
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Markus Falb
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 10:00
2011/3/20 Alexander Farber
>
> Thank you, I've decreased
> /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
> from 20 to 10.
20 is just the theoretical maximum. If your discs max out at
8, you'll need to set it lower than that. While syncing, you can
check the current sync speed with:
cat /proc
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Damian Tommasino
wrote:
> rsyslog can do this as well and has a great filtering feature that is
> available. rsyslog will (should) be the default logging daemon in CentOS 6
> (as it is for RHEL6).
And if you've got a tweaked, older syslog.conf, you can usually j
There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are
stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated
in EPEL 5 components. In particular, the "php53" package is now
necessary for the "drupal6" EPEL components, due to the long out of
date PHP 5.1 in the defaul
On 20/03/11 15:23, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are
> stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated
> in EPEL 5 components. In particular, the "php53" package is now
> necessary for the "drupal6" EPEL component
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are
> stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated
> in EPEL 5 components.
Sad that -- that the dependent partial Red Hat adjunct project
is not compatible
> The unpleasantness of reading continual criticism, from those
> who will not do the minimal local rebuilds, to use the
> packages from a project not affiliated with the CentOS
> project, has pretty effectively driven the CentOS core
> developers away from this mailing list
...
> If a perso
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/columnist/abrams/2011-03-18-how-to-lose-a-client_N.htm
CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
wanted or needed, PLEASE
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Athmane Madjoudj
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 21:50
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] php53-5.3.3-1.el5_6.1
>
> On 03/20/2011 01:53 AM, William Warren wrote:
> > On
>>
http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/columnist/abrams/2011-03-18-how-to-lose-a-client_N.htm
>
> CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
> owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
> wanted or needed, PLEASE buy a contract from someone
>
> TANSTA
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:56 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are
>> stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated
>> in EPEL 5 components.
>
> Sad that -- that th
On Mar 20, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>>>
> http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/columnist/abrams/2011-03-18-how-to-lose-a-client_N.htm
>>
>> CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
>> owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
>> wan
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Athmane Madjoudj
>> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 21:50
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] php53-5.3.3-1.el5_6.
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>> TANSTAAFL
> ... long overdue "free lunch"
I get it -- you dont (or choose not to) understand the written
word
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/
>>> TANSTAAFL
>
>> ... long overdue "free lunch"
>
> I get it -- you dont (or choose not to) understand the written
> word
Yeah, the picture's pretty bleak. The world's climates are changing,
the mammals are taking over, and we all have a brain about the size of a
walnut.
>>> CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
>>> owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
>>> wanted or needed, PLEASE buy a contract from someone
>>>
>>> TANSTAAFL
>>
>> And yes I started looking elsewhere and with reasonably priced offer
>> from
>> Oracle
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 20:30 +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> The point is it's probably as easy to lose a "community" if this still
> matters to the core CentOS team.
Centos offers free and very reliable Linux with free and very reliable
updates.
The people providing this free service are vol
Is there a preferred way to maintain a local mirror of dev.centos.org?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant
.
> I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct competition with
> RH
> for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle offers installable
> binaries for free.
Yes, but patches (support) cost money, as you might know. Anyway, it
is better to pay for real
RH instead of oracle linux.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 08:30:41PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>
> And yes I started looking elsewhere and with reasonably priced offer from
> Oracle
> this project is probably dead in the water.
Hahahaha.
Thanks for the chuckle. Do you have an encore performance
pre
On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> .
>> I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct competition with
>> RH
>> for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle offers installable
>> binaries for free.
>
> Yes, but patches (support) cost money, as you might know. Anyway, it
>
Le 20/03/2011 19:36, Always Learning a écrit :
>
> On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 20:30 +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>
>> The point is it's probably as easy to lose a "community" if this still
>> matters to the core CentOS team.
>
> Centos offers free and very reliable Linux with free and very reliable
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:00:54PM +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
>
> But when the core team refuse to give any update (no news) at all (black
> out), since more than one week, I consider this as even less reliable...
Stop this nonsense, would you? We rehash this same crap every
few we
>> But when the core team refuse to give any update (no news) at all
(black
>> out), since more than one week, I consider this as even less
reliable...
>
> Stop this nonsense, would you? We rehash this same crap every
> few weeks and it's ridiculous.
And this same crap it is.
Александр Кириллов wrote:
CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
wanted or needed, PLEASE buy a contract from someone
TANSTAAFL
And yes I started looking elsewhere and with reasonably priced offer
from
On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> .
>>> I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct competition with
>>> RH
>>> for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle offers installable
>>> binaries for free.
>> Yes, but patches (suppo
Le 20/03/2011 21:00, Alain Péan a écrit :
> With no updates since more than three months (for 5.6)
Correction : more than two months...
Alain
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote:
> On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> .
I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct
competition with
RH
for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle o
On 3/20/2011 6:02 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote:
>
>> On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
.
> I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct
> competition with
> RH
>
>It'll be either Debian or Ubuntu from now on.
Ubuntu makes a great server. But because of recent news I tried opensuse for
the first time and I really like it.
I understand the need for stability, but for what I do, having the newest
(stable) kernel and packages has a greater benefit.
Kernel 2
On Mar 20, 2011, at 4:00 PM, compdoc wrote:
>> It'll be either Debian or Ubuntu from now on.
>
>
> Ubuntu makes a great server. But because of recent news I tried
> opensuse for
> the first time and I really like it.
Yes, PVOPS and over all better Xen tools is a great reason to use
OpenSuse.
On 3/20/2011 7:00 PM, compdoc wrote:
>> It'll be either Debian or Ubuntu from now on.
>
> Ubuntu makes a great server. But because of recent news I tried opensuse for
> the first time and I really like it.
>
> I understand the need for stability, but for what I do, having the newest
> (stable) kern
> to which news are you referring about ubuntu-wise?
I meant recent redhat news about the change in how it will deliver code to
the community. They mentioned opensuse as being a competitor, I believe.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://
On 3/20/2011 7:11 PM, compdoc wrote:
>> to which news are you referring about ubuntu-wise?
> I meant recent redhat news about the change in how it will deliver code to
> the community. They mentioned opensuse as being a competitor, I believe.
>
>
>
>
> __
> their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
Somehow a story led me to try opensuse. Sorry, don't know which it was that
I read.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 3/20/2011 7:29 PM, compdoc wrote:
>> their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
> Somehow a story led me to try opensuse. Sorry, don't know which it was that
> I read.
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://
On 3/20/11 6:59 PM, William Warren wrote:
>
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> oh they mentioned opensuse as part of the kernel patch obfuscation issue
> that was raised..that's probably where opensuse got your attention..but
> their mention of opensuse is jsut to hide the fact th
On Sun, March 20, 2011 7:29 pm, William Warren wrote:
> their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
> mirrors..:) oracle is basically(pardon me here) Centos with charges.
> That's basically all oracle is going with unbreakable Linux.
Not just Oracle. Novell is actively pursui
On 3/20/2011 10:44 PM, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
> On Sun, March 20, 2011 7:29 pm, William Warren wrote:
>> their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
>> mirrors..:) oracle is basically(pardon me here) Centos with charges.
>> That's basically all oracle is going with unbreakabl
I don't see the problem here. I just tested this and it works fine. The
drupal6 package only requires php 5.2 or greater.
This is out of the drupal6-date.spec file
Requires: drupal6 >= 6.0, drupal6-cck, php >= 5.2
You can get php52 or php53 from the IUS repository.
Install the IUS repo from htt
50 matches
Mail list logo
