thus Peter Peltonen spake:
> I have now partially solved my problem:
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Peter Peltonen
> wrote:
>> I need to do a new CentOS net install on a new server having the
>> Supermicro X7DVL-3 motherboard:
>
> [...]
>
>> So I assume the controller is not supported and
From: Joseph L. Casale
> To: "centos@centos.org"
> Sent: Wed, March 16, 2011 8:56:41 PM
> Subject: [CentOS] perl one-liner issue
>
> I am trying to deduce the one liner for an rpm I am packaging to edit a php
> configuration file from within my spec. The line I am editing looks like:
> $conf[
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:58 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Asya,
>>>
>>> You must set the servicePrincipalName attribute on the service account
>>> (MYSERVER$ in this case) to include all of the hostn
Hi , all :
There is a problem on executing awk command to remote servers;
The shell test script is like this :
1. #!/bin/sh
2.
3. _CMD="ssh root@localhost"
4.
5. cpu_num="$($_CMD awk '/processor/{count["proc"]++}; END{print
count["proc"]}' /proc/cpuinfo)“
6.
7. echo $c
From: sync
>There is a problem on executing awk command to remote servers;
>1. #!/bin/sh
>2.
>3. _CMD="ssh root@localhost"
>4.
>5. cpu_num="$($_CMD awk '/processor/{count["proc"]++}; END{print
>count["proc"]}' /proc/cpuinfo)“
>6.
>7. echo $cpu_num
Quote the whole c
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 03:36 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/15/2011 08:17 PM, David McGuffey wrote:
> >
...
>
> Did you verify that this was working before applying those settings in
> the NSA guide?
>
No...the prototype worked A-OK on another machine with the same CentOS
5.5 DVD, so I focu
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:58 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: sync
>>There is a problem on executing awk command to remote servers;
>> 1. #!/bin/sh
>> 2.
>> 3. _CMD="ssh root@localhost"
>> 4.
>> 5. cpu_num="$($_CMD awk '/processor/{count["proc"]++}; END{print
>>count["proc"]}' /proc/cpu
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:58 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> From: sync
>>>There is a problem on executing awk command to remote servers;
>>> 1. #!/bin/sh
>>> 2.
>>> 3. _CMD="ssh root@localhost"
>>> 4.
>>> 5. cpu_num="$($_CMD awk
On 3/17/2011 8:31 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> Quote the whole command and backslash the command quotes...
>> ssh root@localhost "awk '/processor/{count[\"proc\"]++}; END{print
>> count[\"proc\"] } ' /proc/cpuinfo"
>>
>> JD
>
> Or do the processing locally and stay away from proc nuttiness,
>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/17/2011 8:31 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>>> Quote the whole command and backslash the command quotes...
>>> ssh root@localhost "awk '/processor/{count[\"proc\"]++}; END{print
>>> count[\"proc\"] } ' /proc/cpuinfo"
>>
>> Or do the processing locally and stay away from
Rainer Traut wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia:
> > Rainer Traut wrote:
> >> Hi List,
> >>
> >> hope this is not too offtopic, but this bothers me and my backup.
> >>
> >> My backups are tar jobs in cron, eg:
> >>
> >> 20 23 * * * tar -zcf /mnt/backupInternalHosts/backup/backup.tar.gz
> >> /etc /root
Hello,
There are several important security updates available:
Critical: firefox security and bug fix update
Important: tomcat5 security update
Important: vsftpd security update
Moderate: subversion security and bug fix update
Important: logwatch security update
Important: libtiff security update
On 3/17/2011 9:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>>
>>>ssh -l $TARGETUSER $TARGETHOST "[ -e /proc/cpuinfo ] -a grep
>>> ^processor | wc -l"
>>
>> Or, more extremely - if you are doing much of this kind of remote
>> inventory checking, you might consider running ocsinventory-ng with
>> agent
Le 17/03/2011 16:02, Hendrik a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> There are several important security updates available:
>
> Critical: firefox security and bug fix update
> Important: tomcat5 security update
> Important: vsftpd security update
> Moderate: subversion security and bug fix update
> Important: logw
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Alain Péan
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:09 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>May I ask the develloppers if we can have some update about the statu
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf
>>Of Alain Péan
>>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:09 PM
>>To: CentOS mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>>
>>May I ask the develloppers if we can hav
Le 17/03/2011 16:25, m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>>> Behalf
>>> Of Alain Péan
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:09 PM
>>> To: CentOS mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS]
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:25 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>You beat me to it: *PLEASE* don't start this up again
I go
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Alain Péan
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:34 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
> With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
> and planned for the end of the week. One week later, I don't see
> anything. I think having some news once a week is something feasible,
> and I don' want to start a da
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
>>
>> With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
>> and planned for the end of the week. One week later, I don't see
>> anything. I think having some news once
Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
>>> With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
>>> and planned for the end of the week. One week later, I don't see
>>>
Le 17/03/2011 17:23, Alain Péan a écrit :
> Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
and planned for the
Le 17/03/2011 17:25, Alain Péan a écrit :
Le 17/03/2011 17:23, Alain Péan a écrit :
Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglienowrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready l
Alain Péan wrote:
> Le 17/03/2011 17:25, Alain Péan a écrit :
>> Le 17/03/2011 17:23, Alain Péan a écrit :
>>> Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
>> With all due respect
--- On Thu, 3/17/11, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 11:35 AM
> Alain Péan wrote:
> > Le 17/03/2011 17:25, Alain Péan a écrit :
> >> Le 17/03/2011 17:23, Alain Péan a écrit
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Jason Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>
>> Would anyone have thoughts?
>
> don't reinvent the wheel
>
> inotify builds and works fine on CentOS 5
And it should be available by default in CentOS 6.
-Connie Sieh
>
> -- Russ herrold
>
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Jason Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>>
>>> Would anyone have thoughts?
>>
>> don't reinvent the wheel
>>
>> inotify builds and works fine on CentOS 5
>
> And it should be available by default in CentOS 6.
>
> -Connie Sieh
(sorry, I don't h
Hi
I have a centos instance on a host where uname -a shows:
Linux cl28810.com 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5.028stab079.2PAE #1 SMP Fri Dec 17
19:34:22 MSK 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Periodically my ssh access and http access slow dramatically and I get out of
memory when trying to do rudimentary stu
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> One site hosted, running drupal 7, 1.5G RAM lots of disk
> spece, two cores, Xeon based host.
> I don't know if this is an apache issue or
> CentOS related or
> what.
My first recommendation: You could double (or quadruple) that RAM far
cheaper than talking abo
2011/3/17 Brunner, Brian T. :
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>
>> One site hosted, running drupal 7, 1.5G RAM lots of disk
>> spece, two cores, Xeon based host.
>> I don't know if this is an apache issue or
>> CentOS related or
>> what.
>
> My first recommendation: You could double (or quadrupl
Dave Stevens wrote:
>
> Periodically my ssh access and http access slow dramatically and I get out
> of memory when trying to do rudimentary stuff like ls. I've been advised by
> is fine. It takes several minutes before the site is really usable. I now
> have 22 apache instances out of 66 total pr
2011/3/17 :
> Dave Stevens wrote:
>>
>> Periodically my ssh access and http access slow dramatically and I get out
>> of memory when trying to do rudimentary stuff like ls. I've been advised by
>
>> is fine. It takes several minutes before the site is really usable. I now
>> have 22 apache instan
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Chris Weisiger wrote:
> I really appreciate all the people involved with the building and rebranding
> of redhat to create the centos distribution. If i had the time and
> dedication, I would definitely put forth the effort to help, but I cant, and
> therefore
This is not CentOS, it's a compilation by your host built from changed
CentOS sources. Your problem obviously is that you reach the limits of
your VM. 1.5 GB of RAM should be enough for your 22 apache processes, so
it is probably the CPU that is the bottleneck. Anyway, you have to talk to
your
Greetings,
On 3/18/11, Dave Stevens wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a centos instance on a host where uname -a shows:
>
> Linux cl28810.com 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5.028stab079.2PAE #1 SMP Fri Dec 17
> 19:34:22 MSK 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I would suggest you look into the swap settings on both the Cento
On Thursday, March 17, 2011 01:09:46 pm Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2011/3/17 Brunner, Brian T. :
> > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> >> One site hosted, running drupal 7, 1.5G RAM lots of disk
> >> spece, two cores, Xeon based host.
> >> I don't know if this is an apache issue or
> >> CentOS relate
On Thursday, March 17, 2011 01:09:48 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Dave Stevens wrote:
> > Periodically my ssh access and http access slow dramatically and I get
> > out of memory when trying to do rudimentary stuff like ls. I've been
> > advised by
>
>
>
> > is fine. It takes several minutes bef
On 3/17/2011 4:55 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
>
>>> Ideas? Debugging I can do?
>>
>> For one thing, I'd strongly urge you to add at least another .5G RAM, if
>> not 2.5G. Second, look at the apache configuration, and see how many
>> workers it can use - you might want to lower the limit.
>
> ok, I'll l
On Thursday, March 17, 2011 02:31:28 pm Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On 3/18/11, Dave Stevens wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have a centos instance on a host where uname -a shows:
> >
> > Linux cl28810.com 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5.028stab079.2PAE #1 SMP Fri Dec 17
> > 19:34:22 MSK 2010 i68
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> Can we please, please, pretty please with a cherry on top, not start this
> dance again?
Don't you think there is something slightly farcical
about posting messages suggesting people should stop posting messages?
> V5.6 will be done when it's done, okay?
I don't think the O
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>> V5.6 will be done when it's done, okay?
>
> I don't think the OP did ask when 5.6 would be ready.
> What he/she said, IIRC, was that Karanbir had suggested
> that 5.6 would be out last week,
> and he/she was asking if there had be
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
To: CentOS mailing list
Sent: Thu, March 17, 2011 6:31:15 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] ssh remote execute awk problem
>> grep ^processor /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l
>> Or:
>> ssh -l $TARGETUSER $TARGETHOST "[ -e /proc/cpuinfo ] -a gr
Greetings,
I am trying to wrap my head around on this topic.
Was wondering : Just as there is some scope for mapping ipv4 directly
into IPV6 space, Is there a MAC ID or some kind of WWID has also been
taken into consideration?
Regards,
Rajagopal
___
C
whitivery wrote:
>whitivery wrote:
>
>>Patrick Lists
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On 03/10/2011 08:14 AM, whitivery wrote:
# This does not work
%include /tmp/drvdisk
# This works
#driverdisk
--source=nfs:10.0.4.157:/srv/cobbler/RHEL5.5_x86_402_409_410_DD.img
%pack
45 matches
Mail list logo
