>
> Almost everyday around 3:30 AM the server completely locks up and has
> to be power cycled before it will come back online.
> (this means someone hat to wake up and reboot the server, oh how I
> love being an internet janitor! :)
>
> Smells like a hardware issue to me too, but I went through al
On 03/11/2011 04:06 PM, PJ wrote:
> Interesting entries in /var/log/cron:
>
> -snip-
> (this runs 24/7 every 5 minutes as normal...)
>
> Mar 11 02:20:01 web1 crond[12919]: (webuser) CMD (wget -q
> www.domain.com/cron.php >/dev/null 2>&1)
> (fast forward to 3 AM, the same cron job starts get
Hi
I need to store about 250.000.000 files. Files are less than 4k.
On a ext4 (fedora 14) the system crawl at 10.000.000 in the same directory.
I tried to create hash directories, two level of 4096 dir = 16.000.000
but I had to stop the script to create these dir after hours
and "rm -rf" would
As John says: from where did you get it? Or is this from CentOS-testing?
(I didn't follow testing or extras for versions.) I recommend ius for
those packages that replace base packages.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cento
>On the particular Supermicro motherboard I'm using, there is a very
>long delay (10 or 15 sec) between power-on and initiation of visible
>BIOS activity, so all disk drives have ample time to spin up and stabilize.
Yeah, I have used Supermicro in the past and they had the same long pause
when yo
I haven't tried it but could you possibly use a database to hold all
those files instead? At less than 4K per "row", performance from an
indexed database might be faster.
On 3/12/11, Alain Spineux wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need to store about 250.000.000 files. Files are less than 4k.
>
> On a ext4 (fed
> Hi
>
> I need to store about 250.000.000 files. Files are less than 4k.
>
> On a ext4 (fedora 14) the system crawl at 10.000.000 in the same
> directory.
>
> I tried to create hash directories, two level of 4096 dir = 16.000.000
> but I had to stop the script to create these dir after hours
> an
On 3/2/11, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> I'm very interested to find out what happened with this project and
> what you ended up doing?
There were delays after changes after delays for that project that was
meant to run on the VM setup. Spent more time hacking temporary
solutions to their problems with N
I was looking up on iSCSI in preparation and became aware that there
are different iSCSI software/drivers/whatever-is-the-correct-term
available. e.g.
IET http://iscsitarget.sourceforge.net/
SCST http://scst.sourceforge.net/
STGT http://stgt.berlios.de/
LIO http://linux-iscsi.org/
Based on wha
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 02:41:07AM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> I was looking up on iSCSI in preparation and became aware that there
> are different iSCSI software/drivers/whatever-is-the-correct-term
> available. e.g.
>
> IET http://iscsitarget.sourceforge.net/
>
> SCST http://scst.sourcef
Thanks for the confirmation and the note about LIO
On 3/13/11, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 02:41:07AM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>> I was looking up on iSCSI in preparation and became aware that there
>> are different iSCSI software/drivers/whatever-is-the-correct-term
>
On 03/12/2011 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote:
>> >On the particular Supermicro motherboard I'm using, there is a very
>> >long delay (10 or 15 sec) between power-on and initiation of visible
>> >BIOS activity, so all disk drives have ample time to spin up and stabilize.
>
> Yeah, I have used Supermicro
Thanks to everybody for answering.
I thing >250E6 is a lot and keep decent read and write access speed is unreal
using mutli-purpose filesystems like ext? and other ?FS.
I would need a dedicated filesystem for that.
This problem was only a possible solution to another problem.
I will solve the or
rehello centos list
after some modifications rpm fedora core 14 of bind-9.7.3 and patching.
diff -u unpatched/configure.in patched/configure.in
--- unpatched/configure.in 2010-07-05 14:02:20.0 +0200
+++ patched/configure.in 2010-07-05 14:03:48.0 +0200
@@ -282,7 +282,8 @@
AC_C_INLI
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Alain Spineux wrote:
> Thanks to everybody for answering.
>
> I thing >250E6 is a lot and keep decent read and write access speed is unreal
> using mutli-purpose filesystems like ext? and other ?FS.
> I would need a dedicated filesystem for that.
>
> This problem w
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
>
>>> Anyone here using Nginx as alternative to apache in conjunction to php
>>> scripts?
>>> Care to share thoughts and caveats?
>
> Yes, we use nginx + PHP and also apache + nginx + PHP extensively and it
> works well.
>
> You can also look at
--On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:56 PM -0800 Todd Cary
wrote:
> I have some photographs on my Centos 4 server that I want to copy
> to a USB drive. However, I want to be able to access the files
> from Windows or Mac OS's. Where should I look for instructions
> on how to mount and format the U
I was unable to build the whole Mumble system on CentOS but it's available
for Fedora Development. I just wanted the server part on my headless
server, and a static build is available from the Mumble project on
Sourceforge. So I grabbed the Mumble SRPM from Fedora Development, the
static build
Hi,
Yes Centos-Testing.
I've been using for a while (1 year) with no problems.
The last ius package that I've used (5.2.15?) kept aborting without any good
reason.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> As John says: from where did you get it? Or is this from CentOS-testing?
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
