On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:32:34 +
Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 04:12 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> > Those of us who've used older mainframes (such as the PDP-10) remember
> > "byte" being a synonym for "bit field" and a byte could be any number of
> > bits, typically
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 14:36 +0100, Bob Marcan wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:32:34 +
> Always Learning wrote:
>
> > PDP being a 'main franme'? Baby mainframe perhaps when compared to
> > Honeywell's (later Bull's) Level 66? Level 66 had 36 bit words which
> > could be used as 6 BCD chara
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:33:10PM -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> > IBM Power servers since the Power4+ CPU (they are up to Power7 now) have
> > hardware partitioning support, commonly known as LPAR. LPAR can be
> > divided in units of 1/10th o
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:33:10PM -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>> > IBM Power servers since the Power4+ CPU (they are up to Power7 now) have
>> > hardware partitioning support, commonly
We are a data shop.
nfs v4 support
native XFS support
ext4
Hopefully by 6.4 they will have native brtfs :-)
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:33:10PM -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote:
>>> On Fr
On 03/06/2011 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote:
>
>> >Regarding the Marvell drivers, I had good luck with the 'sata_mv' driver
>> >in Scientific Linux 6 just yesterday, running a pair of 4-port PCIe-x4
>> >Tempo 'Sonnet' controller cards.
> Are those the Mac/Windows Sonnet cards that go for less than $200?
I have a question on burning dvd iso's, using k3b.
I have a sony dvd rw, and I've burned cd's with now problem, including
iso's. The problem I'm having is, when I burn a dvd iso, k3b says it's a
success, but then when I re-insert the disk, the drive tries to read the
disk, but the read/write
--On Friday, March 04, 2011 3:04 PM -0500 "Denniston, Todd A CIV
NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane" wrote:
> Not if you are running ntp and it was able to sync, because ntpd
> activates a mode in the kernel that sets the hwclock every 11 minutes
> when ntp declares it got synced.
Thanks, this is the part
On 03/06/11 5:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> It's kind of funny since OracleVM*is* Xen, and it's counted as
> "hardware partitioning" :)
OracleVM(tm) is a brand name now, being used for anything that remotely
resembles virtualization, from Xen to Solaris Zones to hardware
partitioning on the M
On Sunday, March 06, 2011 05:28:13 pm John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/06/11 5:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > It's kind of funny since OracleVM*is* Xen, and it's counted as
> > "hardware partitioning" :)
>
> OracleVM(tm) is a brand name now, being used for anything that remotely
> resembles virtua
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Chuck Munro wrote:
>
> On 03/06/2011 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote:
>>
>>> >Regarding the Marvell drivers, I had good luck with the 'sata_mv' driver
>>> >in Scientific Linux 6 just yesterday, running a pair of 4-port PCIe-x4
>>> >Tempo 'Sonnet' controller cards.
>> Are th
>> The remote host's $TERM variable is in fact xterm. When I connect to
>> the screen session the $TERM variable is 'screen'.
>
> Are you running screen locally or remotely?
Remotely. My work machine is a laptop, which is not powered on all
the time. Hence I use a remote box as a jumping-off po
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> A warning: round robin can be problematical.
Amen. Consider what happens with round-robin DNS when one host
stops working. Round-robin DNS will hand out the address of the
failed host just as often as it did when it was all working.
Some clients (applications) will atte
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> I like Adaptec for price/performance, and good Linux overall
> compatibility (including CentOS). Just don't order those "fell off the
> truck" Taiwan specials that are clearly Adaptec chipsets, but have
> actually had the numbers filed off.
Adaptec is proud of their
Simon Matter wrote:
> > Sometimes my server network connection on Linux goes down with short
> > message in syslog saying: "[localhost kernel] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0:
> > transmit timed out" (or similar).
> >
> > By the way , I installed the CentOS 5.4 x86_64 bit and the kernel version
> > was 2.6
an interesting choice for low cost hardware load balancing appliances
is coyote point
http://www.coyotepoint.com/products/?gclid=CI6ri9jQu6cCFQbc4Aodmi1V4Q
however for my purpose open and free HAProxy remains best choice!!
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Charles Polisher wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> however for my purpose open and free HAProxy remains best choice!!
+1 for HAProxy; excellent piece of software.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> however for my purpose open and free HAProxy remains best choice!!
> +1 for HAProxy; excellent piece of software.
It really depends on your needs, if you are building a production ops
environment then the last thing that you would want woul
Hello,
Today my server stopped responding.
i went to the console and on the screen there were a continuous loop of the
following info shown on the screen:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959]
and alot of other information.
ii've took a screen shot of the info shown , you can fi
Am 07.03.2011 08:31, schrieb Roland RoLaNd:
>
> Hello,
>
> Today my server stopped responding.
> i went to the console and on the screen there were a continuous loop of the
> following info shown on the screen:
>
> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959]
>
> and alot of other info
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:31:42 +0200
Roland RoLaNd wrote:
> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959]
> i tried googling with no luck for direct relevant info.
The first google result for the above string takes me here:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3582
Which in turn contains a
Am 07.03.2011 08:46, schrieb Frank Cox:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:31:42 +0200
> Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
>> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959]
>
>> i tried googling with no luck for direct relevant info.
>
> The first google result for the above string takes me here:
>
> http://b
22 matches
Mail list logo
