Hi
replying to myself as I figured it (ouch!)
I had the correct stuff in the saslauth file:
# this is VIA IMAP
MECH=rimap
FLAGS="-O localhost -r"
but I forgot to exclude the FLAGS line which was at the end of that file:
# Additional flags to pass to saslauthd on the command line. See
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:06 AM, yonatan pingle
wrote:
> you should have a look at your I/O disk status.
>
> try with iostat -dx 5 to see the disk utilization info over time.
> when it comes to slowdown on a virtual environment on a Desktop grade
> machine, i suspect disk I/O latency and bottlene
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 18:04 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> TCP/IP cameras would work with any OS, most just FTP or whatever the
>> pictures to a webserver you provide, or they run their own server and
>> you can wget the pics off them.
Check bluecherry.net
I've have for Topica cameras running for over three years. No problems and
good people to deal with.
Eddie
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 201
On Feb 22, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
> Only joking. I take your point, but the critical fixes being held up for a
> dot
> release isn't really very Enterprise friendly either. I think it fair to say
> that CentOS is not suitable for the enterprise unless the servers are
> non-public
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Always Learning
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 18:04 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>>> TCP/IP cameras would work with any OS, most just FTP or whatever the
>>> pictures to a webserver you provide, or they run their own server and
>
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:12 PM, wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Always Learning
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 18:04 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>>>
TCP/IP cameras would work with any OS, most just FTP or whatever the
pictures to a webser
On Feb 23, 2011, at 3:42 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:06 AM, yonatan pingle
> wrote:
>> you should have a look at your I/O disk status.
>>
>> try with iostat -dx 5 to see the disk utilization info over time.
>> when it comes to slowdown on a virtual environment on a Deskto
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, ken wrote:
> I heard about some inexpensive security cameras which get their power
> through the same cat5 cable which delivers the data/pictures (which
> would simplify wiring tremendously). Does anyone know about these? Do
> they work with Linux, particularly CentOS?
>
>
>
> I heard about some inexpensive security cameras which get their power
> through the same cat5 cable which delivers the data/pictures (which would
> simplify wiring tremendously). Does anyone know about these? Do they
> work with Linux, particularly CentOS?
I have a security camera, though not
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:51:38 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Michael D. Berger
> wrote:
>> On my CentOS box, in C++ programs, is there a way to print Unicode
>> characters?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike.
>
> Why do you want to?
Off topic.
> And what sort of monitor o
Hello all,
I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my
own on a Debian box he colo'd running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom
built httpd/mysql/etc (I was young). It worked ok but time to move on a
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:53:20 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> On my CentOS box, in C++ programs, is there a way to print Unicode
>> characters?
>
> google knows...
I haven't found it. Please see the other response I just sent
for clarification of what I need.
Th
Hello listmates,
I am running mksquashfs trying to archive a 400GB+ directory. It has already
taken about a day and the resultant archive is only about 40GB thus far and
the command is not done yet. Has anyone made a squashfs that size? Is it
normal for the process to take this long? If it is not
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
>
> I was leaning towards webmin/virtualmin but thought I'd check with this list
> for any suggestions. Had bad experiences with Plesk from a while
> ago so leaving that off the table. We have experience with cPanel
> through another fail h
On 02/22/2011 09:02 PM B.J. McClure wrote:
> Not sure it will answer your question but there was an article in
> December 2010 issue of Linux Magazine re surveillance cameras and linux.
>
> HTH.
>
> B.J.
>
>
BJ, I looked around Linux Mag's site for quite a while, did a couple
searches, and
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:44:11PM +, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:51:38 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Michael D. Berger
> > wrote:
> >> On my CentOS box, in C++ programs, is there a way to print Unicode
> >> characters?
> >>
> > A
Wed Feb 23 10:49:46 EST 2011, RHEL 6, Linux 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 athlon
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 10:30 -0500, ken wrote:
> On 02/22/2011 09:02 PM B.J. McClure wrote:
> > Not sure it will answer your question but there was an article in
> > December 2010 issue of Linux Magazine re surveillance camera
> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:56 -0500
> From: geb...@mousecar.com
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] security cameras
>
> On 02/22/2011 09:02 PM B.J. McClure wrote:
> > Not sure it will answer your question but there was an article in
> > December 2010 issue of Linux Magazine re
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:46:24PM +, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:53:20 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
> > Michael D. Berger wrote:
> >> On my CentOS box, in C++ programs, is there a way to print Unicode
> >> characters?
> >
> > google knows...
>
> I haven't foun
Hello,
I have a weird problem after adding new PV do LMV volume group.
It seems the error comes out only during boot time. Please read the story.
I have couple of 1U machines. They all have two, four or more Fujitsu-Siemens
SAS 2,5" disks, which are bounded in Raid1 pairs with Linux mdadm.
First p
I forgot to mention that after creation of md2 I've added a new line to
/etc/mdadm.conf:
# cat /etc/mdadm.conf
DEVICE partitions
MAILADDR root
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2
UUID=91518bd3:79953138:f203f159:f2795fde
ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devices=2
UUID=5b6722ca:b325344b:4ab40f
On 23/02/11 16:24, Lucian wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> +1 for Virtualmin.
> People will brag that it's insecure etc, but it has always done the
> job for me and I have more than 100 installations of it. I never had
> security problems because of it.
That one
US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
> wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my
> own on a Debian box he colo’d running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom
>
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Larry Vaden
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:27 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject:
> [CentOS]http://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-bind-vulnera
> bility-advisory-issued
Larry Vaden wrote:
> US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
> versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
>
> Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
Larry, go away. You don't seem to contribute anything at all to the list,
other than your obnoxiousness, and your desire to s
On 11-02-23 09:49 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP
of my
own on a Debian box he colo'd running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and
custom
built httpd/mysql/etc
On 23.2.2011 18:27, Larry Vaden wrote:
> US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
> versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
>
> Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
Ahhh!
Have a look at the relevant bugzilla ticket at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679496
On 02/23/2011 12:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Larry Vaden wrote:
>> US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
>> versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
>>
>> Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
>
> Larry, go away. You don't seem to contribute anything at all to the
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, ken wrote:
> To: CentOS Mailing List
> From: ken
> Subject: [CentOS] security cameras
>
> I heard about some inexpensive security cameras which get their power
> through the same cat5 cable which delivers the data/pictures (which
> would simplify wiring tremendously). Does
On 02/23/11 10:16 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> I think you will get far better video quality using CCTV
> cameras than a webcam on a USB port.
you may think that, but those solutions you mentioned are all NTSC
composite video, while even a $30 USB webcam now days is 2 megapixels or
higher.
anyway
On 2/23/2011 9:49 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
I was leaning towards webmin/virtualmin but thought I'd check with
this list
for any suggestions. Had bad experiences with Plesk from a while
ago so leaving that off the table. We have experience with cPanel
through another fail host, it's ok but
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:18 PM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> That one user with more than 100 installations haven't experienced security
> issues with a product doesn't mean that there is no security issues.
I absolutely agree. Didn't want to imply Webmin is "unhackable"; it's
just not that bad as
On 2/23/2011 12:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 02/23/11 10:16 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> I think you will get far better video quality using CCTV
>> cameras than a webcam on a USB port.
>
> you may think that, but those solutions you mentioned are all NTSC
> composite video, while even a $30 USB
> I don't want to raise the drama, so please don't take this wrong. In
> this case though, I do think that a warning on the ML about a security
> issue is justified. You can't be too careful.
>
Except that this issue does not affect BIND in rhel and thus CentOS
therefore making it yet more pointl
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 6:47 PM, John Hinton wrote:
>The Webmin project is very active. If you have
> a problem or perceived bug, and no one else gets around to answering, you
> will normally hear back from Jamie Cameron the man behind it all, within
> hours of making a post. That is very rare the
> +1 for Virtualmin.
> People will brag that it's insecure etc, but it has always done the job for me
> and I have more than 100 installations of it. I never had security problems
> because of it.
Thanks for all the posts.
Curious about the "people will brag that it's insecure" - is there a poor
On 2/23/2011 12:18 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>
> That one user with more than 100 installations haven't experienced security
> issues with a product doesn't mean that there is no security issues.
>
> It can just as much mean nobody tried to hack any of those installations,
> or that they have tri
On 2/23/2011 2:04 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
>> +1 for Virtualmin.
>> People will brag that it's insecure etc, but it has always done the job for
>> me
>> and I have more than 100 installations of it. I never had security problems
>> because of it.
> Thanks for all the posts.
>
> Curious about the
Many thanks to Markus Falb for publishing his excellent research - the
same research that Larry could also have done.
"This issue did not affect the versions of bind as shipped with
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4, 5, or 6."
James Hogarth wrote:
> He obviously has a fascination with
The same as on any other Linux box.
Some important tips for beginners:
* Don't forget to set your locale appropriately at the beginning of
your program.
* Use ONE encoding CONSISTENTLY (utf-8 or utf-16) inside your program,
and trans-code appropriately to/from outer encodings
> > I certainly don't plan to allow access to webmin save for a couple selected
> > IP's and I'm not surprised to see any web application have security
> > vulnerabilities. But if it's on par with something like phpbb as far as
> > security
> > problems go, I'll probably look elsewhere.
> No whe
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:03 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> Except that this issue does not affect BIND in rhel and thus CentOS
> therefore making it yet more pointless drivel from the OP.
Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some
x% of a million or more) on this list w
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Many thanks to Markus Falb for publishing his excellent research - the
> same research that Larry could also have done.
>
> "This issue did not affect the versions of bind as shipped with
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4, 5, or
2011/2/23 Larry Vaden :
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:03 PM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
>>
>> Except that this issue does not affect BIND in rhel and thus CentOS
>> therefore making it yet more pointless drivel from the OP.
>
> Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some
> x%
> Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some x% of a
> million or more) on this list who compile from current source in order to
> minimize their risks and are therefore the subject audience.
>
> On the one hand, you have Paul Vixie and crew (authors of BIND) and
> US_C
On 2/23/2011 1:21 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:03 PM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
>>
>> Except that this issue does not affect BIND in rhel and thus CentOS
>> therefore making it yet more pointless drivel from the OP.
>
> Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> It is not wise to install packages from sources because it messes the package
> management.
Agreed; that is why folks like Jeff Johnson and John Stanley share
their knowledge about how to do it such that your outcome doesn't
occur.
__
I'm trying to ...
yum groupinstall "Development Tools" on a reasonably current 5.5 system
and getting massive mirror failures... is there a problem, or is this
my employer's network messing up?
(45/74):
rpm-build-4.4.2.3-20.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
On 02/23/11 11:53 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> I'm trying to ...
>
> yum groupinstall "Development Tools" on a reasonably current 5.5 system
> and getting massive mirror failures... is there a problem, or is this
> my employer's network messing up?
fyi, yum clean all seems to have fixed it. fast
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:23 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > Many thanks to Markus Falb for publishing his excellent research - the
> > same research that Larry could also have done.
> >
> >"This issue did not affect the versions
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:28:15PM +, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
[ > Larry Vaden wrote: (please don't snip attributions)]
> > Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some x%
> > of a
> > million or more) on this list who compile from current source in order to
> > minim
On 23.02.2011 00:49, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I am running an openldap 2.4 server under FreeBSD that was working
> well until the config was tweaked by someone on the team without
> properly documenting their work
>
> # /usr/local/etc/ldap.con on ldap server (FreeBSD 8.1)
>
> host LBSD.s
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote:
> Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some
> x% of a million or more) on this list who compile from current source
> in order to minimize their risks and are therefore the subject
> audience.
and it is on topic in this venue, j
R P Herrold wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote:
>
>> Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some
>> x% of a million or more) on this list who compile from current source
>> in order to minimize their risks and are therefore the subject
>> audience.
>
> and it
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
> versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
>
> Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
This message is RECALLED even though:
1) US-CERT used the word "affected."
2) the "option
On 23.2.2011 21:47, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Larry Vaden
> wrote:
>> US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
>> versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
>>
>> Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
>
> This message is RECALLED even though:
Can an admin please moderate ALL posts from Larry Vaden, or remove him
from the list?
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
___
CentOS mailing
On 2/23/2011 2:23 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>> Many thanks to Markus Falb for publishing his excellent research - the
>> same research that Larry could also have done.
>>
>> "This issue did not affect the versions of bind as shipped wi
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:43 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> - Never use an ISP that requires provising sufficient personal
> information as needed to facilitate identity theft [1]; and
> solicts credit card information without any indication of PCI/CISP
> controls or privacy policy [2]
Thanks for the
On Feb 22, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/22/2011 02:35 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>>
>>
>> I did think about that when when I made my earlier comment. The trouble is
>> is
>> that it obviously isn't working because we have these list flame-ups.
>
> I think 8 million unique machines
Larry Vaden wrote on Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:21:23 -0600:
> Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some
> x% of a million or more) on this list who compile from current source
> in order to minimize their risks and are therefore the subject
> audience.
Nonsense, there is no
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
> wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my
> own on a Debian box he colo’d running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom
>
Larry Vaden wrote on Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:47:13 -0600:
> This message is RECALLED
Please stop this! Please understand that there is a reply button on your
mail client, use it!
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mail
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 00:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Larry Vaden wrote on Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:47:13 -0600:
>
> > This message is RECALLED
>
> Please stop this! Please understand that there is a reply button on your
> mail client, use it!
I thought 'recall' was a Micro$oft facility. Centos
On Feb 23, 2011, at 2:04 PM, "Trutwin, Joshua" wrote:
>> +1 for Virtualmin.
>> People will brag that it's insecure etc, but it has always done the job for
>> me
>> and I have more than 100 installations of it. I never had security problems
>> because of it.
>
> Thanks for all the posts.
>
> Cu
>From Larry's web site: http://www.texoma.net/it/contact_us.html
>ab...@texoma.net to report violations of netiquette
To quote Rodney King.."Can't we all just get along?"
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf
On Feb 23, 2011, at 3:42 PM, David Brian Chait wrote:
>
>> From Larry's web site: http://www.texoma.net/it/contact_us.html
>
>> ab...@texoma.net to report violations of netiquette
>
> To quote Rodney King.."Can't we all just get along?"
Yea its like Dork Wars 2011.
___
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:12 AM, wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Always Learning
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 18:04 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>>>
TCP/IP cameras would work with any OS, most just FTP or whatever the
pictures to a webser
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Michael D. Berger
wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:51:38 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Michael D. Berger
>> wrote:
>>> On my CentOS box, in C++ programs, is there a way to print Unicode
>>> characters?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mik
Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> Hello all,
Hi, Josh. The CentOS lists are really not the appropriate place for this
thread. No doubt there are many members of the CentOS community who can
and will help. However, I'm quite certain that CentOS is wholly separate
from the other, so threads on the CentOS
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
"bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3" when the latest release that has many
security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I understand that its to maintain a known
stable platform by
Would appreciate some suggestions for ecommerce hosting. Been using, cough,
cough, godaddy, for about 5 or 6 yrs but in the last year or so, they really
suck. Did the hosting myself for a while prior to going with godaddy but I
don't have time to babysit. Seems godaddy would rather spend millions
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Machin, Greg
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know
> why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
> “bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has many
> security fixes is on 9.7.
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:08 +1300, Machin, Greg wrote:
> I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
> know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
> “bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has many
> security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I
On 02/24/2011 01:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
"bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3" when the latest release that has many
security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I understa
If you want a full virtual host I'm running on Linode without an issues
so far. Been with them for a year and a half. www.linode.com
Greg Machin
Systems Administrator - Linux
Infrastructure Group, Information Services
Open Polytechnic | Kuratini Tuwhera
Phone +64 4 914 5254 or 0508 650200 ext 52
On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:08 PM, "Machin, Greg"
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know why
> CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
> “bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has many
> security fixes is on
Thank you all for helping to clarify this.
Thanks
Greg Machin
Systems Administrator - Linux
Infrastructure Group, Information Services
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Ross Walker
Sent: Thursday, 24 February 2011 3:51 p.m.
To: CentOS mail
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:01:37 +0100, Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote:
[...]
Thanks, I did a slightly different search and I didn't get
such good results.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
> know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
> “bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has many
> security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I un
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:18:59 -0500
Thomas Dukes wrote:
> Would appreciate some suggestions for ecommerce hosting.
Depends on what you want. I use beanstream for the bit of stuff that I do.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of P
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
>> know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
>> “bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the la
Howdy,
I am getting some errors with find and ls command - such that find is
able to see a file whereas ls says the file doesn't exist. Initially I
was trying find and ls together as:
# find ./ -type f -mtime +15 | xargs ls
Similar behavior is seen even when I execute both commands separately.
An
On 24/02/11 15:54, neubyr wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I am getting some errors with find and ls command - such that find is
> able to see a file whereas ls says the file doesn't exist. Initially I
> was trying find and ls together as:
> # find ./ -type f -mtime +15 | xargs ls
>
> Similar behavior is seen
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:54 PM, neubyr wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I am getting some errors with find and ls command - such that find is
> able to see a file whereas ls says the file doesn't exist. Initially I
> was trying find and ls together as:
> # find ./ -type f -mtime +15 | xargs ls
>
Instead of p
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 01:22:41AM -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> Instead of piping to xargs, try:
> find . -type f -mtime +15 -exec ls {} \;
Or get rid of child processes entirely:
find . -type f -mtime +15 -ls
John
--
What
On 02/23/2011 01:36 PM John R Pierce wrote:
> On 02/23/11 10:16 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> I think you will get far better video quality using CCTV
>> cameras than a webcam on a USB port.
>
> you may think that, but those solutions you mentioned are all NTSC
> composite video, while even a $30
You are correct, I used section 6.1.
Its working now
thanks
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:49:08PM +0100, Giles Coochey (gi...@coochey.net)
wrote:
> On 31/01/2011 13:46, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> >Hi.
> >
> >I have two internet connections, the ADSL2+ is very
> >very cheap (but fast 10mb) and
90 matches
Mail list logo
