Re: [CentOS] System Log Error

On 22/02/11 19:25, sync wrote: > Jan 11 07:56:00 kernel: [17179663.076000] atkbd.c: Unknown key released > (translated set 2, code 0x81 on isa0060/serio0). > Jan 11 07:56:00 kernel: [17179663.076000] atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes > e001 ' to make it known. > Jan 11 07:56:00 kernel: [17179663.084000]

Re: [CentOS] System Log Error

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Cameron Kerr wrote: > On 22/02/11 19:25, sync wrote: > > > Jan 11 07:56:00 kernel: [17179663.076000] atkbd.c: Unknown key released > > (translated set 2, code 0x81 on isa0060/serio0). > > Jan 11 07:56:00 kernel: [17179663.076000] atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes > > e001

[CentOS] problems with createrepo

I run a local repo for our company's packages. Since yesterday we have problems with creating the repo files. When i run "createrepo --update -s sha rpmdir" i get the folowing error: File "/usr/share/createrepo/genpkgmetadata.py", line 249, in ? main(sys.argv[1:]) File "/usr/share/createrepo

Re: [CentOS] problems with createrepo

SOLVED. While uddating a package i accidentally put a "¸" in the package version in the spec file. And createrepo doesn't like this. On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Janez Kosmrlj wrote: > I run a local repo for our company's packages. Since yesterday we have > problems with creating the repo fi

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > SHUT UP Where are you, Evolution? CentOS needs you once again. You can come out now from your hiding place [1]. Akemi [1] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-February/033406.html ___ C

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > This is the last post I am making to this thread ... and maybe to this > list in general.  During the build processes, here are the files that we > have had to add (at various times) to get packages to build.  I have no > idea if this list

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Akemi Yagi > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:03 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6? > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Johnny Hughes > w

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 22, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Larry Vaden wrote: > > A California saying is that "you are only as good as your last load.". > > That was a VERY GOOD LOAD, Johnny. The community thanks you. The metaphor is "Only as good as your last game." What pa

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:25:45 am Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > We strive to present to the world a BUG-FOR-BUG-IDENTICAL distribution > of the corresponding RHEL release. That's pretty well covered by the line on that page saying: "Under normal circumstances CentOS will NOT add patches to o

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Corey Quinn wrote: > > The metaphor is "Only as good as your last game." > > What part of California are YOU from? :-) An OKie by birth, this CentOS community member of lowest possible rank lived at least five years each in West Germany and SoCal :) _

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

Corey A Johnson wrote: > > John Hinton wrote: >> All, >> >> (and please do not turn this into the next long thread) >> >> > > > I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this > list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team > members immensely.

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

I understand how answering everyone's requests for progress updates can slow a development process, I've been on the development side of that before. I want a progress report as much as anyone I'm sure (and so does my boss), but, I'm not going to ask for it. I instead spend a little time, and d

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

> > No one is taking you wrong here; Did you check with everybody before you spoke for them all? > How about the project > renames the distribution to "IfYouDontLikeItYouAreNotForcedToUseItOS"? That is a fantastic idea because IMHO it would be a much fairer assessment of the

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

> > How about the project > > renames the distribution to > "IfYouDontLikeItYouAreNotForcedToUseItOS"? > > That is a fantastic idea because IMHO it would be a much > fairer assessment of > the distribution than alluding to the "Enterprise" aspect. Calling it Enterprise is important b

[CentOS] was: Re: Any update on 5.6 / 6?, is please kill for another month

Can we *please* kill this thread, which has run on *far* too long, till at least next month (that is, if one of the above isn't out yet)? mark "we now return you to your normal problem statements" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http:

Re: [CentOS] was: Any update on 5.6 / 6?, is please kill for another month

> Can we *please* kill this thread, Yeah, yeah, yeah, please! Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

> > Calling it Enterprise is important because doing so establishes the > *origin* and the *objective* of the work: a BUG-FOR-BUG-IDENTICAL > de-branding/re-branding of Red Hat ENTERPRISE Linux. How about BugforbugIdenticaldebreandingrebrandingofupstreamenterpriselinuxOS? Only joking. I t

Re: [CentOS] was: Re: Any update on 5.6 / 6?, is please kill for another month

- Original Message > From: "m.r...@5-cent.us" > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Tue, 22 February, 2011 20:08:21 > Subject: [CentOS] was: Re: Any update on 5.6 / 6?, is please kill for > another >month > > Can we *please* kill this thread, which has run on *far* too long, till at

Re: [CentOS] was: Re: Any update on 5.6 / 6?, is please kill for another month

Ian Murray wrote: >> From: "m.r...@5-cent.us" >> >> Can we *please* kill this thread, which has run on *far* too long, till >> at least next month (that is, if one of the above isn't out yet)? > > So we resume on Tuesday?!? > > I vote for kill because I got the last word in! Pardon my phrasing -

[CentOS] How much maximum memory will CentOS 5 support? I know it's not 16 GB!

How much maximum memory will CentOS 5 support, please? The product info page at http://www.centos.org/product.html says 16GB, but I am running 80 GB RAM right now and seeing 80 GB in top. I see the same 16 GB limit on the RHEL page: http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/#note_4 The server hardware

Re: [CentOS] How much maximum memory will CentOS 5 support? I know it's not 16 GB!

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote: > How much maximum memory will CentOS 5 support, please? > > The product info page at http://www.centos.org/product.html > says 16GB, but I am running 80 GB RAM right now and seeing > 80 GB in top. > > I see the same 16 GB limit on the R

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 07:54:58PM +, Ian Murray wrote: > > > > > > No one is taking you wrong here; > > Did you check with everybody before you spoke for them all? Pretty damned sure I made it explicitly clear in a post from Sunday that I speak only for myself and no

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

I really appreciate the availability of CentOS. Thank you to all the people who work on it and form part of this community!! Best, Aleksey ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] System Log Error

Oh, and I forgot to mention this one also: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=76271 (The problem also happens in Redhat-based systems, but there seems to be more resolution in Debian-based forums) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://l

Re: [CentOS] System Log Error

On 22/02/11 22:28, sync wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Cameron Kerr > wrote: > > On 22/02/11 19:25, sync wrote: > > > Jan 11 07:56:00 kernel: [17179663.076000] atkbd.c: Unknown key > released > > (translated set 2, code 0x81 on isa0

[CentOS] Unicode in C++

On my CentOS box, in C++ programs, is there a way to print Unicode characters? Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] openldap problems authenticating

Hello list, I am running an openldap 2.4 server under FreeBSD that was working well until the config was tweaked by someone on the team without properly documenting their work # /usr/local/etc/ldap.con on ldap server (FreeBSD 8.1) host LBSD.summitnjhome.com base dc=summitnjhome,dc=com sudoers_ba

Re: [CentOS] Unicode in C++

Michael D. Berger wrote: > On my CentOS box, in C++ programs, is there a way to print > Unicode characters? google knows... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Unicode in C++

On 02/22/11 2:37 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote: > On my CentOS box, in C++ programs, is there a way to print > Unicode characters? if you're running in an xterm that's configured for UTF8, or a ssh session to console that's configured for UTF8, then yes. if you're running on a textmode console i

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

On 02/22/2011 02:35 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > > > >> >> Calling it Enterprise is important because doing so establishes the >> *origin* and the *objective* of the work: a BUG-FOR-BUG-IDENTICAL >> de-branding/re-branding of Red Hat ENTERPRISE Linux. > > > How about BugforbugIdenticaldebreandin

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > I think 8 million unique machines disagree with you assessment. With 8 million unique machines running Centos and perhaps millions people more depending on them comes great responsability. I hope the Centos crew know what they're doing. C

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

> With 8 million unique machines running Centos and perhaps millions > people more depending on them comes great responsability. > I hope the Centos crew know what they're doing. Obviously they do, or they would not have come this far. ___ CentOS mailin

Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!

> I think 8 million unique machines disagree with you assessment. Who > knows, maybe all 8 million are wrong and the 10-20 people who are > discussing it on this list are right. Man, you could build a killer botnet if you wanted to!! (which strengthens your argument about the point about t

[CentOS] how to optimize CentOS XEN dom0?

Hi, I have a problematic CentOS XEN server and hope someone could point me in the right direction to optimize it a bit. The server runs on a Core2Quad 9300, with 8GB RAM (max motherboard can take, 1U chassis) on an Intel motherboard with a 1TB SATA HDD. dom0 is set to 512MB limit with a few smal

Re: [CentOS] how to optimize CentOS XEN dom0?

2011/2/23 Rudi Ahlers : > Hi, > > I have a problematic CentOS XEN server and hope someone could point me > in the right direction to optimize it a bit. (SNIP) > the server itself seems to eat up a lot of resources: > > > root@zaxen01:[~]$ free -m >             total       used       free     shar

Re: [CentOS] how to optimize CentOS XEN dom0?

On 23/02/11 12:29, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi, > > I have a problematic CentOS XEN server and hope someone could point me > in the right direction to optimize it a bit. > > The server runs on a Core2Quad 9300, with 8GB RAM (max motherboard can > take, 1U chassis) on an Intel motherboard with a 1TB S

Re: [CentOS] how to optimize CentOS XEN dom0?

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Kenni Lund wrote: > 2011/2/23 Rudi Ahlers : >> Hi, >> >> I have a problematic CentOS XEN server and hope someone could point me >> in the right direction to optimize it a bit. > > (SNIP) > >> the server itself seems to eat up a lot of resources: >> >> >> root@zaxen

Re: [CentOS] how to optimize CentOS XEN dom0?

Are they paravirt of HVM guests? qemu might have something to do with it if HVM guests are involved. - Original Message > From: Rudi Ahlers > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Tue, 22 February, 2011 23:29:29 > Subject: [CentOS] how to optimize CentOS XEN dom0? > > Hi, > > I have a p

Re: [CentOS] how to optimize CentOS XEN dom0?

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Ian Murray wrote: > Are they paravirt of HVM guests? qemu might have something to do with it if > HVM > guests are involved. > Uhm, I know that I should know this, but how do I tell from a quick glance? It's almost 2am in the morning here, and I'm a bit too tire

Re: [CentOS] Unicode in C++

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote: > On my CentOS box, in C++ programs, is there a way to print > Unicode characters? > > Thanks, > Mike. Why do you want to? And what sort of monitor or client are you using? Xterm, Putty, NX, SSH, And what do you mean by "print"? Do you me

[CentOS] security cameras

I heard about some inexpensive security cameras which get their power through the same cat5 cable which delivers the data/pictures (which would simplify wiring tremendously). Does anyone know about these? Do they work with Linux, particularly CentOS? tnx 4 tips.

Re: [CentOS] security cameras

Not sure it will answer your question but there was an article in December 2010 issue of Linux Magazine re surveillance cameras and linux. HTH. B.J. Tue Feb 22 21:00:42 EST 2011, RHEL 6, Linux 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 athlon On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 20:27 -0500, ken wrote: > I heard about some inexpe

Re: [CentOS] security cameras

On 02/22/11 5:27 PM, ken wrote: > I heard about some inexpensive security cameras which get their power > through the same cat5 cable which delivers the data/pictures (which > would simplify wiring tremendously). Does anyone know about these? Do > they work with Linux, particularly CentOS? > TCP

Re: [CentOS] security cameras

On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 18:04 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > TCP/IP cameras would work with any OS, most just FTP or whatever the > pictures to a webserver you provide, or they run their own server and > you can wget the pics off them. but I've never seen any IP cameras I'd > call really cheap.

[CentOS] asd

Hi. I am trying to configure sendmail that is looks up the users credentials to allow them to send email via that server via an imap server on the same machine when sending email while on the road. I can send email when specifying a user that is stored in the servers /etc/shadow ... no problem b

Re: [CentOS] how to optimize CentOS XEN dom0?

you should have a look at your I/O disk status. try with iostat -dx 5 to see the disk utilization info over time. when it comes to slowdown on a virtual environment on a Desktop grade machine, i suspect disk I/O latency and bottleneck as a cause. check that your disk is running at its optimal st

[CentOS] sendmail, port 465/587, auth and imap

Hi. Apologies to the list for sending this twice as I forgot to enter a proper subject line, I wanted to write the content first and then make up the subject line ;-) I am trying to configure sendmail that is looks up the users

Re: [CentOS] how to optimize CentOS XEN dom0?

> > The server runs on a Core2Quad 9300, with 8GB RAM (max motherboard can > take, 1U chassis) on an Intel motherboard with a 1TB SATA HDD. > > dom0 is set to 512MB limit with a few small XEM VM's running: > > > root@zaxen01:[~]$ xm list > Name ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs