2011/2/20 Sean
> James B. Byrne wrote:
> > But, our future financial support
> > for CentOS is contingent upon dealing with an independent legal
> > entity that conforms with national and international tax laws and
> > corporate reporting requirements.
> >
> >
> A new model (appropriate to OSS)
Eric Gerzon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to get some more information about the following issue:
>
> # strace -p 2256
> attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): Operation not permitted
>
> I am trying to trace an mdadm re-sync pid and I keep getting the above
> error.
I believe the MD re-sync pro
That works for me. Thanks James!
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:34 AM, James Pearson
wrote:
> Eric Gerzon wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to get some more information about the following issue:
> >
> > # strace -p 2256
> > attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): Operation not permitted
> >
> > I am
cornel panceac wrote:
> in (my) ideal world. money are not necessary. you give me centos, i
> give you electricity, or hardware, or an office, etc . since we still
> live in money-lenders ruled world, is there a way to contribute
> (money) to centos but not directly? like, instead giving money,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:19:23PM -0500, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> I am getting an error that I am not familiar with when I restart ssh.
> [root@virtcent01:~] #service sshd restart
> Stopping sshd: [ OK ]
> Starting sshd:WARNING: initlog is deprecated and
Hello Centos,
I am getting an error that I am not familiar with when I restart ssh.
[root@virtcent01:~] #service sshd restart
Stopping sshd: [ OK ]
Starting sshd:WARNING: initlog is deprecated and will be removed in a
future release
On 02/20/2011 03:22 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:19:23PM -0500, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>> I am getting an error that I am not familiar with when I restart ssh.
>
>> [root@virtcent01:~] #service sshd restart
>> Stopping sshd: [ OK
On 02/20/11 2:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Also the following will help determine if you have normal centos
> packages or "something else":
>
> rpm -q initscripts openssh-server
>
> The result should look this for CentOS-5:
>
> initscripts-8.45.30-3.el5.centos
> openssh-server-4.3p2-41.el5_5.1
I
Hey guys,
good call! yes this is a custom ssh. It's a version that has LPK
capabilities (LDAP public keys) included. It is the product of an rpm
built from a spec file and tarball that was patched with LPK.
[root@LCENT01:~] #rpm -qa | grep ssh
openssh-askpass-gnome-5.6p1-7.el5.em2
openssh-askp
On 02/20/2011 04:58 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> good call! yes this is a custom ssh. It's a version that has LPK
> capabilities (LDAP public keys) included. It is the product of an rpm
> built from a spec file and tarball that was patched with LPK.
>
> [root@LCENT01:~] #rpm -qa | gre
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 05:16:47PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> If you take a look at man sshd, there may be a switch you can pass in to
No. This has nothing to do with sshd configuration.
As I previously said, the problem is purely 100% in the init script.
The "generic" script from OpenSSH th
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> good call! yes this is a custom ssh. It's a version that has LPK
> capabilities (LDAP public keys) included. It is the product of an rpm
> built from a spec file and tarball that was patched with LPK.
>
> [root@LCENT01:~] #rpm -
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:09 -0500, Michael B Allen wrote:
> Are you talking about the SAQC? I run all CC transactions through one
> CentOS VPS webserver (actually I have two servers that I periodically
> wipe out and alternate between every year or two). So I don't have POS
> terminals or any Windo
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:51 -0500, John Hinton wrote:
> Very good information, Ed. And yes, you will almost certainly be
> fighting with the compliance company, as I have not yet seen any who
> recognized CentOS. RHEL, yes. CentOS however does not hold the same
> 'trusted standard' or clout as t
2011/2/18 Larry Vaden :
> That just in from chunkhost.com, where you help them beta test Xen for $FREE
> :)
Wow, I'm really impressed with the professionalism of that site :-P
Quotes from their FAQ:
"Currently, our physical servers are ... ... with RAID 1 (mirroring)
10K SATA drives. The mirrori
Hello,
I have a problem configuring the timezone on a CentOS 5.5 server.
I would like the timezone to be Europe/Paris.
I have followed the steps described here:
http://www.wikihow.com/Change-the-Timezone-in-Linux
I think I have changed the appropriate configuration files ( /etc/localtime,
/e
On 02/20/2011 07:41 PM, John Nash wrote:
> Am I missing something important ?
Is your /usr a separate partition? If so try to copy
/usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Paris to /etc/localtime (instead of it being
a symbolic link). See if that works.
--
Jorge
___
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 00:41 +0100, John Nash wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem configuring the timezone on a CentOS 5.5 server.
> I would like the timezone to be Europe/Paris.
>
> I have followed the steps described here:
> http://www.wikihow.com/Change-the-Timezone-in-Linux
>
> I t
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 04:31 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> On 15/02/11 17:25, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
>>> Let's see. 7 weeks after a RHEL release, we have:
>>
>> For RHEL6, lets make that 14 weeks. And RHEL5.6 got released 9 weeks after
>> RHEL6.
>
> The FIRST
Hallo Dag,
> CentOS 4.0 was released 23 days after RHEL4.0
> CentOS 5.0 was released 29 days after RHEL5.0
> CentOS 6.0 is *not* released 103 days after RHEL6.0
en ?
This is not a problem for me. I am contented to wait - en jij?
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
__
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Always Learning wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> The FIRST build of a distribution (the .0 of 4.0 or 5.0) takes MUCH
>>> longer than the subsequent rebuilds. This is because you have NOTHING
>>> to start from
Hoi Dag,
> This was in a direct response to Johnny ;-) No worries, I put the context
> back so it's clear *why* I replied this. It's not that I am impatient for
> CentOS 6.0. In fact I switched to RHEL6.
>
> Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0.
> As there
Dag Wieers wrote:
> Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0.
> As there is a direct security impact to users.
Could you explain that more fully, please?
I've actually been puzzled why the developers are bothering with 5.6,
if 6.0 very shortly.
--
Timothy Murphy
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0.
As there is a direct security impact to users.
Could you explain that more fully, please?
I've actually been puzzled why the developers are bothering with 5.6,
if 6.0 very
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> I admire very much what you and the others have done to provide builds
> and a very large repository for the benefit of millions - not only of
> Centos users. The public spirited nature of your (plural, d.w.z. jullie)
> endeavours, includi
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 02:04 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Dag Wieers wrote:
>
> > Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0.
> > As there is a direct security impact to users.
>
> Could you explain that more fully, please?
> I've actually been puzzled why the dev
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 18:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> > I admire very much what you and the others have done to provide builds
> > and a very large repository for the benefit of millions - not only of
> > Centos users. The public spir
On 02/20/2011 07:30 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 02/16/2011 04:31 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>> On 15/02/11 17:25, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Let's see. 7 weeks after a RHEL release, we have:
>>>
>>> For RHEL6, lets make that 14 weeks. And RHEL5.6
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Ian Forde wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:09 -0500, Michael B Allen wrote:
>> Are you talking about the SAQC? I run all CC transactions through one
>> CentOS VPS webserver (actually I have two servers that I periodically
>> wipe out and alternate between every ye
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> On the initial pass through builder for C4, maybe 30 packages needed to
> be fixed because the links were bad.
>
> On the initial pass through builder for c5, maybe 20 packages needed to
> be fixed.
>
> On the initial pass through builder f
30 matches
Mail list logo
