On 02/19/2011 01:13 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> Just for the record ... we (the CentOS Project) do not recommend this
>> site. They are using our name without permission.
>
> Attribution goes to EliteMoly:
> CentALT repository not ready fo
>
> Johnny has remarked on the importance of trust.
>
> My trust in RedHat went down when I learned they are not shipping all
> the SRPMs. Some say it is due to human error. If that is the case,
> why should I think they are better at backporting security fixes than
> at making sure a manifest of
> My trust in RedHat went down when I learned they are not shipping all
> the SRPMs. Some say it is due to human error. If that is the case,
> why should I think they are better at backporting security fixes than
> at making sure a manifest of SRPMs is complete and correct?
Centos, SL and oracle
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:58 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> For the record an archive of all mails sent to the mailing list
> appears here... in this case in date order.
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-January/date.html
>
> To give you the benefit of the doubt I search there for yo
On Saturday, February 19, 2011 12:57:40 am Larry Vaden wrote:
> Through this experience,
> starting with a hacked or poisoned name server, or, quite frankly, the
> perception of one, I have learned what people really see.
Having a server hacked is one of the worst things that can happen in IT; no
On Saturday, February 19, 2011 01:51:55 am Larry Vaden wrote:
> My trust in RedHat went down when I learned they are not shipping all
> the SRPMs. Some say it is due to human error. If that is the case,
> why should I think they are better at backporting security fixes than
> at making sure a man
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
>On 18/02/2011, at 2:29 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
>> Everyone,
>>
>> I am trying to print some *.doc files from the command line with
>> openoffice on centos 5.5 with using cups as the print server.
>>
>> I can open the file from the command lin
Great article to enlighten us all on why this round seems to be taking
longer then the previous versions. And why in general this is a tremendous
undertaking.
http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7952/
You'll need to log in to read the entire article but its worth it.
- aurf
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:41:04 -0600
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Is there a way to request that CentOS maintainers or rpmforge to upgrade
> the rpm to 3.3.0?
Is there any reason not to simply install the openoffice or libreoffice rpms
from their respective websites? I've been doing that for some year
On 02/17/2011 06:08 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> yum install qt-devel
root@sevcenco: ~ # rpm -qa | grep qt | grep devel
qt-devel-3.3.6-23.el5
qt-devel-docs-3.3.6-23.el5
qt4-devel-4.2.1-1
Thanks,
Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Hello,
I am trying to get some more information about the following issue:
# strace -p 2256
attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): Operation not permitted
I am trying to trace an mdadm re-sync pid and I keep getting the above
error.
I have done some digging on google and forums, but have not had m
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> If your server was really hacked, I'd start from scratch, and set the new one
> up more defensively.
THANKS for your input; there exists a consensus, so that's what will
be done (replace 4.8 with 5.x). Troy says Fermi (a great target for
t
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 04:37:57PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
>
> THANKS for your input; there exists a consensus, so that's what will
> be done (replace 4.8 with 5.x). Troy says Fermi (a great target for
> the miscreants/actors) runs stock BIND as it appears in
> RHEL/CentOS/SL, so, to be redund
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:07 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity, have you ever thought about hiring a
> competent admin?
Yes.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on 13:29 Sat 19 Feb, Eric Gerzon (ericger...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to get some more information about the following issue:
>
> # strace -p 2256
> attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): Operation not permitted
As root? (Prompt suggests yes).
Is another strace attached to the p
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:41:04 -0600
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Is there a way to request that CentOS maintainers or rpmforge to upgrade
> the rpm to 3.3.0?
Is there any reason not to simply install the openoffice or libreoffice rpms
from their respective websites? I've been doing that for some year
I'm happy to report that, as of (at least) the last Flash update, full
screen Flash (on Hulu and Youtube) is again working on my machine. I
know some folks weren't updating Flash because of this so it might be
time to update.
--
RonB -- Using CentOS 5.5
___
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:44:42 -0600
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, I have had difficulty stepping out of the
> CentOS rpm barrier in the past so I did not try. Knowing you have
> succeeded gives me some confidence to proceed. Does OpenOffice have yum
> repository or do you r
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:44:42 -0600
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, I have had difficulty stepping out of the
> CentOS rpm barrier in the past so I did not try. Knowing you have
> succeeded gives me some confidence to proceed. Does OpenOffice have yum
> repository or do you r
James B. Byrne wrote:
> But, our future financial support
> for CentOS is contingent upon dealing with an independent legal
> entity that conforms with national and international tax laws and
> corporate reporting requirements.
>
>
A new model (appropriate to OSS) is being worked on here:
http
20 matches
Mail list logo
