Re: [CentOS] how to move forward/undo/revert/fix re: a failed CentOS 5.5 to SL 5.5 migration ... [SOLVED?]

2011-02-02 Thread Lorenzo Quatrini
Larry Vaden ha scritto: > > AFAIK, that's the status of the clones at this time. Still unexplained is why > > 'host www.yahoo.com 208.67.220.220' and 'host www.yahoo.com 8.8.8.8' > got completely different answers. > For what I know OpenDNS (208.67.222.222, 208.67.220.220) does some more "cachi

Re: [CentOS] limiting yum url question

2011-02-02 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Xinhuan Zheng wrote on Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:33:17 -0500: > That's what I thought. Is there a good resource that I can take a look > for how to setting up a local repository server? The wiki on centos.org explains that if you want to setup your own repository with your own packages. If you just wan

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Kai Schaetzl
looking for smarter questions on this list. This list is not a "where is" list. Thanks. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 07:08 AM, Hal Davison wrote: > Looking for glibc++6.2 and higher. Are you sure you have your version numbers right ? glibc lives in the 2.x version-space these days ( and has for many years now ) - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos

Re: [CentOS] ~/.forward file?

2011-02-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Spook ZA wrote: > On 2 February 2011 05:41, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> >> >Any idea what it might be for? >> >> Procmail... >> > > If a mail message gets sent to the user with a .forward file, the > message will be forwarded to all email addresses in the .forward

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Hal Davison wrote: > Greetings ALL... > > V 5.5 > Gnome. Desktop > > Looking for glibc++6.2 and higher. When looking for RPM's from CentOS and similar distributions, or for RPM's that can be ported to CentOS and RHEL, http://rpm.pbone.net/ is your dear, dar friend.

[CentOS] Significant speedup of package building with mock from EPEL for RHEL 6, should definitely go in CentOS 5

2011-02-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
The speedups in building RPM's with "mock" from the EPEL packages for RHEL 6 are *profound*, especially if your environment is like mine and you have thousands of user id's. The issue seems to be the handling of "/var/log/lastlog" and similar files, which are otherwise quite large and take signific

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 01:52:37 pm Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Hal Davison wrote: > > Greetings ALL... > > > > V 5.5 > > Gnome. Desktop > > > > Looking for glibc++6.2 and higher. The signal to noise ratio of this list is getting quite horrible. From the

Re: [CentOS] Significant speedup of package building with mock from EPEL for RHEL 6, should definitely go in CentOS 5

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 01:01 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Karabhir, what are the odds of encouragng a switch to > http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora-epel/6/mock-1.1.8-1.el6.src.rpm, and > backporting it to centos/5/5/extras ? It's working very well for me, > and I think it would be a helpful improvement in

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Drew
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- Drew "Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood." --Marie Curie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Drew
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- Drew "Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood." --Marie Curie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] how to move forward/undo/revert/fix re: a failed CentOS 5.5 to SL 5.5 migration ... [SOLVED?]

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > Larry Vaden ha scritto: >> >> AFAIK, that's the status of the clones at this time.  Still unexplained is >> why >> >> 'host www.yahoo.com 208.67.220.220' and 'host www.yahoo.com 8.8.8.8' >> got completely different answers. >> > For what I

[CentOS] Lost root access

2011-02-02 Thread James Bensley
So on a virtual server the root password was no longer working (as in I couldn't ssh in anymore). Only I and one other know it and neither of us have changed it. No other account had the correct privileges to correct this so I'm wondering, if I had mounted that vdi as a secondary device on another

Re: [CentOS] Lost root access

2011-02-02 Thread Giles Coochey
On 02/02/2011 15:44, James Bensley wrote: So on a virtual server the root password was no longer working (as in I couldn't ssh in anymore). Only I and one other know it and neither of us have changed it. No other account had the correct privileges to correct this so I'm wondering, if I had mounte

Re: [CentOS] Lost root access

2011-02-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:44:01 + CentOS mailing list wrote: > > So on a virtual server the root password was no longer working (as in > I couldn't ssh in anymore). Only I and one other know it and neither > of us have changed it. No other account had the correct privileges to > correct this so

Re: [CentOS] Lost root access

2011-02-02 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:44 AM, James Bensley wrote: > So on a virtual server the root password was no longer working (as in > I couldn't ssh in anymore). Only I and one other know it and neither > of us have changed it. No other account had the correct privileges to > correct this so I'm wonderin

Re: [CentOS] Setting up persistent LUNs

2011-02-02 Thread Dvorkin, Asya
Thank you, Alexander! I am not sure why it said /b/sde1 because I copy/pasted it... Thank you again, Asya On Feb 1, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 01.02.2011 18:38, schrieb Dvorkin, Asya: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I am trying to setup persistent LUNs and having problems. >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 alpha testers

2011-02-02 Thread Cia Watson
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:24:34 +0100 "valent.turko...@gmail.com" wrote: > Hi guys, > who do I need to contact to become CentOS tester? When is first alpha > due for release and testing? >From what I've been able to gather from the list, as I'm not part of the dev testing team; there won't be an 'al

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Hal Davison
On 2/2/2011 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > looking for smarter questions on this list. This list is not a "where is" > list. Thanks. > > Kai > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > Could

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 alpha testers

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 04:00 PM, Cia Watson wrote: >> From what I've been able to gather from the list, as I'm not part of the > dev testing team; there won't be an 'alpha' or 'beta', there will just be > a final release 'when it's ready'. We aren't sure when that will be, but > it will probably be within a

Re: [CentOS] RHEL-6 vs. CentOS-5.5 (was: Static assignment of, SCSI device names?)

2011-02-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 02:06:15 am Chuck Munro wrote: > The real key is to carefully label each SATA cable and its associated > drive. Then the little mapping script can be used to identify the > faulty drive which mdadm reports by its device name. It just occurred > to me that whenev

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 alpha testers

2011-02-02 Thread Matt
>>> From what I've been able to gather from the list, as I'm not part of the >> dev testing team; there won't be an 'alpha' or 'beta', there will just be >> a final release 'when it's ready'. We aren't sure when that will be, but >> it will probably be within a few weeks after CentOS 5.6 is > > Tha

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 alpha testers

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 04:20 PM, Matt wrote: > I am excited about CentOS 6.x though. Aren't there supposed to be > some neat new features etc for virtualization and cloud computing? this could be the start of a dangerously long thread nonrelated to OP. Why not start a new thread with 'CentOS-6 interestin

[CentOS] yum confusion...

2011-02-02 Thread John Doe
Hi, I just installed a new server and my final yum update fails... I have rpmforge and rpmforge-extras, but with yum priorities... # grep enabled /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf enabled = 1 # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo | grep "priority\|^\[" [base] priority=1 [updates] priority=

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 new virtualization features?

2011-02-02 Thread Matt
>> I am excited about CentOS 6.x though.  Aren't there supposed to be >> some neat new features etc for virtualization and cloud computing? > > this could be the start of a dangerously long thread nonrelated to OP. > Why not start a new thread with 'CentOS-6 interesting upcoming features' :) Your

Re: [CentOS] Lost root access

2011-02-02 Thread m . roth
Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:44 AM, James Bensley wrote: >> So on a virtual server the root password was no longer working (as in >> I couldn't ssh in anymore). Only I and one other know it and neither >> of us have changed it. No other account had the correct privileges to > Anyho

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 new virtualization features?

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 04:33 PM, Matt wrote: >>> I am excited about CentOS 6.x though. Aren't there supposed to be >>> some neat new features etc for virtualization and cloud computing? There is a distinct shift towards KVM as the virt-platform of choice, but I still feel the management tools around it a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 new virtualization features?

2011-02-02 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Matt wrote: >>> I am excited about CentOS 6.x though.  Aren't there supposed to be >>> some neat new features etc for virtualization and cloud computing? >> >> this could be the start of a dangerously long thread nonrelated to OP. >> Why not start a new thread with

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 new virtualization features?

2011-02-02 Thread Tom Bishop
Spot on KB, I like KVM but the management tools are just not quite there, unless your a big installation and can run RHEV on a windoze server. I know they are moving towards an open source RHEV implementation but it appears that it will take awhile to get there. I still plan to use KVM but will j

[CentOS] Was, Re: CentOS 6.0 alpha testers, is features (actually syslogd)

2011-02-02 Thread m . roth
Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 02/02/2011 04:20 PM, Matt wrote: >> I am excited about CentOS 6.x though. Aren't there supposed to be >> some neat new features etc for virtualization and cloud computing? > > this could be the start of a dangerously long thread nonrelated to OP. > Why not start a new th

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 new virtualization features?

2011-02-02 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Tom Bishop wrote: > Spot on KB, I like KVM but the management tools are just not quite there, > unless your a big installation and can run RHEV on a windoze server.  I know > they are moving towards an open source RHEV implementation but it appears > that it will ta

Re: [CentOS] yum confusion...

2011-02-02 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
John Doe wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed a new server and my final yum update fails... > I have rpmforge and rpmforge-extras, but with yum priorities... > > # grep enabled /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf > enabled = 1 > > # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo | grep "priority\|^\[" > [bas

Re: [CentOS] yum confusion...

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 04:29 PM, John Doe wrote: > # yum list | grep "tcp_wrappers\|nfs-utils" > nfs-utils.x86_64 1:1.0.9-47.el5_5 installed > nfs-utils-lib.x86_64 1.0.8-7.6.el5 installed > tcp_wrappers.i386 7.6-40.7.el5 installed > tcp_wrappers.

[CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
Hello CentOS Community Members, What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient code base for such important programs as BIND et al? A similar problem (to BZ561299) was first reported five (5) years ago on the isc.org mailing list. Is there any support among the CentOS comm

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 05:22 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: > What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient > code base for such important programs as BIND et al? Did you ask them ? what did they say ? > Is there any support among the CentOS community for a REPO of current > vintage for su

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread David Brian Chait
It takes fewer resources to back-port for and support a single suite of software over the lifespan of a major revision than would be needed to fix issues introduced by the major evolution of a large number of packages over the course of a 5-7 year product cycle. -Original Message- From:

Re: [CentOS] glibc++6.2?

2011-02-02 Thread Gordon Messmer
If you have an RPM package with unmet dependencies, the way to install it is: yum localinstall Yum will resolve the dependencies using the available repositories. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cento

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/02/2011 09:22 AM, Larry Vaden wrote: > What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient > code base for such important programs as BIND et al? Directives in the configuration files have changed. Users of RHEL expect to be able to update their systems without anything b

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > you mean like the bind97 available in c5-testing right now, that should > be in 5.6 soon ? Karanbir, WIth a lot of due respect, no, not exactly, since 9.7.0-P2 (if I'm reading it correctly) was released almost a year ago by isc.org. I w

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Alan Hodgson
On February 2, 2011 10:02:03 am Larry Vaden wrote: > Is there that much distrust of the current output of leading authors > that we need to "wait a long while"? You don't need to wait at all. Build your own packages or install from source. ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 06:02 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: > I was thinking more along the lines of /isc/bind9/9.7.2-P3/, released > 2 months ago. If you feel that its the version you need or want, CentOS wont mind if you were to build it and run it yourself. > > Is there that much distrust of the current outpu

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 06:10 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > If you feel that its the version you need or want, CentOS wont mind if > you were to build it and run it yourself. > btw, if you were to go down that route, the CentOSPlus repo would be a great place to host such a package :) One of the best advant

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > [1]: I say that with a pinch of salt though - EL6 is a tad overdue. A > lot of new projects and services need a codebase newer than whats on > offer in C5. I agree with you 100%+. ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 02/02/2011 06:10 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> If you feel that its the version you need or want, CentOS wont mind if >> you were to build it and run it yourself. >> > > btw, if you were to go down that route, the CentOSPlus repo would be

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> >> you mean like the bind97 available in c5-testing right now, that should >> be in 5.6 soon ? > > Karanbir, > > WIth a lot of due respect, no, not exactly, since 9.7.0-P2 (if I'm > read

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:22:12 -0600 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hello CentOS Community Members, > > What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient > code base for such important programs as BIND et al? > > A similar problem (to BZ561299) was first reported five (5) year

Re: [CentOS] Squid and SELinux

2011-02-02 Thread Marcos Lois Bermúdez
Thks, It's clear now for me, i have a lot of figths with SELinux, but i need to learn more, so i don't want deactivate it, allow squit to search home_root_t seems to be good, so i try to make the correct thinks and prepare a partition outside the home dir for squid. A lot of thks for your fast

Re: [CentOS] how to move forward/undo/revert/fix re: a failed CentOS 5.5 to SL 5.5 migration ... [SOLVED?]

2011-02-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 09:31:43 am Larry Vaden wrote: > "* The host/dig/nslookup utilities queried only servers from > resolv.conf. With this update, the utilities query the servers > specified on command line instead of in resolv.conf and the issue is > resolved. ( BZ#561299)" > > The of

Re: [CentOS] what pkg contains libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3

2011-02-02 Thread Don Krause
It's a symlink to /usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so, from compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-138 -- Don Krause Head Systems Geek, Waver of Deceased Chickens. Optivus Proton Therapy, Inc. P.O. Box 608 Loma Linda, California 92354 90

[CentOS] Centos + python + sqlalchemy + mysql

2011-02-02 Thread przemolicc
I am trying to use the following set (all from standard repositories): centos (5.5) + python 2.6 + sqlalchemy + mysql. However while running my script I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "./oraping2.py", line 43, in main() File "./oraping2.py", line 23, in main db = creat

Re: [CentOS] how to move forward/undo/revert/fix re: a failed CentOS 5.5 to SL 5.5 migration ... [SOLVED?]

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 09:31:43 am Larry Vaden wrote: >> "* The host/dig/nslookup utilities queried only servers from >> resolv.conf. With this update, the utilities query the servers >> specified on command line instead of in resolv.con

Re: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

2011-02-02 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > btw, if you were to go down that route, the CentOSPlus repo would be a > great place to host such a package :) > > One of the best advantages of CentOS is that we're not tied down to the > EL codebase in any repo outside the [os] and [upda

[CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread mcclnx mcc
We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only have one application running and few people use it. Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me say: Message=Memory Utilization is 92.02%, crossed warning (80) or critical (90) threshold

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Sean Hart
On 2/2/11 1:58 PM, mcclnx mcc wrote: > We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only > have one application running and few people use it. > > Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me > say: > > Message=Memory Utilization is 92.0

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Scott Silva
on 2/2/2011 1:58 PM mcclnx mcc spake the following: > We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only > have one application running and few people use it. > > Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me > say: > > Message=Memory Util

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Stephen Harris
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:58:19AM +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote: > We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only > have one application running and few people use it. > > Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me > say: > > Message=Mem

[CentOS] [OT] Best way to get dhcpd messages piped to a web service.

2011-02-02 Thread Jason Pyeron
Starting off, it is important not to loose any dhcp messages, especially during log rotation. My first thought on this would be to add a fifo to syslog.conf and slup from it, like: # perl -ne 'm/.../ && WWW::Curl ...' < /var/log/messages.fifo Does anyone see a more proper way? tail -F / -f co

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Dr. Ed Morbius
on 05:58 Thu 03 Feb, mcclnx mcc (mcc...@yahoo.com.tw) wrote: > We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This > server only have one application running and few people use it. > > Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail > to me say: > > Message=Memo

Re: [CentOS] RHEL-6 vs. CentOS-5.5 (was: Static assignment of SCSI device names?)

2011-02-02 Thread Chuck Munro
On 02/02/2011 09:00 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 02:06:15 am Chuck Munro wrote: >> > The real key is to carefully label each SATA cable and its associated >> > drive. Then the little mapping script can be used to identify the >> > faulty drive which mdadm reports

Re: [CentOS] Centos + python + sqlalchemy + mysql

2011-02-02 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/02/2011 08:32 PM, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote: > I am trying to use the following set (all from standard repositories): > centos (5.5) + python 2.6 + sqlalchemy + mysql. However while running my > script I get: > I would recommend you use the python 2.6 from EPEL, and the setuptools / pip f

[CentOS] kernel errors

2011-02-02 Thread Michel Donais
For monday this week I began to receive these advice by email from the server; Wht's the meaning? Disk read problem or else? - Kernel Begin WARNING: Kernel Errors Present I/O error: dev 08:02, sect...: 4Time(s) Additional sense indicates

Re: [CentOS] kernel errors

2011-02-02 Thread John R Pierce
On 02/02/11 4:42 PM, Michel Donais wrote: > For monday this week I began to receive these advice by email from the > server; > Wht's the meaning? > Disk read problem or else? yes, disk IO errors of the bad sector type, on device 08:02, whatever that is in your system. appears to be on differen

Re: [CentOS] kernel errors

2011-02-02 Thread Michel Donais
Thank's for the answer, That's what I was expecting.for the worst. I will replace it tomorrow morning. --- Michel Donais - Original Message - From: "John R Pierce" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 7:53 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] kernel errors > On 02/02/11 4:42 PM, Michel Donais

Re: [CentOS] RHEL-6 vs. CentOS-5.5

2011-02-02 Thread Les Mikesell
On 2/2/11 5:57 PM, Chuck Munro wrote: > > The use of the new RHEL-6/CentOS-6 'udevadm' command nicely maps out the > hardware path no matter the order the drives are detected/named, and > since hardware paths are fixed, I just have to attach a little tag to > each SATA cable with that path number o

Re: [CentOS] ~/.forward file?

2011-02-02 Thread Spiro Harvey
> I'm just poking thru our previous sysadmin's user adding script and > saw reference to a ~/.forward file containing the users email > address. Any idea what it might be for? It's a tricky one to > Google ;-) The ancient art of Google-fu takes many years to perfect. But sometimes the most mundan

Re: [CentOS] Centos + python + sqlalchemy + mysql

2011-02-02 Thread Michael Semcheski
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:32 PM, wrote: > I am trying to use the following set (all from standard repositories): > centos (5.5) + python 2.6 + sqlalchemy + mysql. However while running my > script I get: I can't comment on the error you're getting specifically, but you might look at Fedora for t

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Best way to get dhcpd messages piped to a web service.

2011-02-02 Thread Cameron Kerr
On 03/02/11 12:45, Jason Pyeron wrote: [snip] > Does anyone see a more proper way? That depends. What are you really wanting to achieve? Might your problem be better solved by looking at the dhcp leases file instead, or are you really just interested in the logs? search.cpan.org reveals Net::IS

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Cameron Kerr
On 03/02/11 10:58, mcclnx mcc wrote: > We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only > have one application running and few people use it. > > Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me > say: > > Message=Memory Utilization is 92.0

Re: [CentOS] yum confusion...

2011-02-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 02/02/2011 04:29 PM, John Doe wrote: >> # yum list | grep "tcp_wrappers\|nfs-utils" >> nfs-utils.x86_64               1:1.0.9-47.el5_5       installed >> nfs-utils-lib.x86_64           1.0.8-7.6.el5          installed >> tcp_wrappers.i386

Re: [CentOS] RHEL-6 vs. CentOS-5.5

2011-02-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 08:04:43 pm Les Mikesell wrote: > I think there are ways that drives can fail that would make them not be > detected > at all - and for an autodetected raid member in a system that has been > rebooted, > not leave much evidence of where it was when it worked. If

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:58 PM, mcclnx mcc wrote: > We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it.  This server only > have one application running and few people use it. > > Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me > say: > > Message=Memory Utiliza

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???

2011-02-02 Thread John R Pierce
On 02/02/11 1:58 PM, mcclnx mcc wrote: > Since server have 128 GB RAM and only 1 application. I really don't belive > that. Does there has some way can check memory utilitation ? while your app is running, $ top as everyone has said, remember to add the 'cached' and 'buffered' to the 'f