Re: [CentOS] SELinux : semodule_package, magic number does not match

2011-01-18 Thread Philippe Naudin
Le lun 17 jan 2011 14:32:22 CET, Daniel J Walsh a écrit: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/17/2011 08:25 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to create a custom policy, but with no succes : > > > > $ cat < foo.te > > module local 1.0; > > > > requ

Re: [CentOS] disk quotas + centos 5,5 +xfs

2011-01-18 Thread Philippe Naudin
Le lun 17 jan 2011 18:15:34 CET, aurfal...@gmail.com a écrit: > Hi all, > > is any one aware quotas not working in 5,5? > > I'm using XFS as a file system. > > My fstab has the appropriate usrquota,grpquota but when I try to run; > quotacheck -cug /foo > > I get; > > quotacheck: Can't find fi

[CentOS] [OT] As service network suggestion

2011-01-18 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, I tried to throw this idea open in the ILUG-BOM group. some discussion took place. I was wondering if Centos can have such support network that can take care of all the "Centos support for money".discussions/decisions. Thanks for current and further indulgence. With warm regards and

Re: [CentOS] disk quotas + centos 5,5 +xfs

2011-01-18 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
On 18 Jan 2011, at 02:16, "aurfal...@gmail.com" wrote: > is any one aware quotas not working in 5,5? I'm using XFS as a file system. They work just fine; first hit on Google, http://linux.die.net/man/8/xfs_quota Ben ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

Re: [CentOS] [OT] As service network suggestion

2011-01-18 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 01/18/2011 08:28 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > I was wondering if Centos can have such support network that can take > care of all the "Centos support for money".discussions/decisions. The CentOS Project has no commercial interest, specially not something along these lines. - KB

[CentOS] OT: Some examples about using auditd

2011-01-18 Thread carlopmart
Hi all, I need to do some tests about auditd funcionalities on two CentOS5.5 hosts. I need to audit when user executes sudo command, when system files are modified, when some process call to some system calls, when kernel semaphores are modified, etc. I see some examples on /usr/shae/doc/

Re: [CentOS] Xen; xm usb-add syntax - or - where is xm usb-attach

2011-01-18 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:46:49PM -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm running Centos 5.5 with Xen 4.0.1 > > Would like to use a USB key (not a block device) in my domU. > > Dom0 lsusb yields; > > Bus 002 Device 004: ID 064f:0bd8 ABC-Systems AB CDE/FG > > xm usb-add shows; > >

[CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Drew Weaver
Hello, We have built a couple of CentOS 5.5 systems on the Intel DH67BL (Sandy Bridge) motherboard and overall they work pretty well. I'm having one problem which keeps cropping up and that is an error message that says: IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) report bad irq

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Giles Coochey
On 18/01/2011 15:22, Drew Weaver wrote: Hello, We have built a couple of CentOS 5.5 systems on the Intel DH67BL (Sandy Bridge) motherboard and overall they work pretty well. I'm having one problem which keeps cropping up and that is an error message that says: IRQ 177 nobody cared (try bo

Re: [CentOS] SELinux : semodule_package, magic number does not match

2011-01-18 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/18/2011 03:13 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote: > Le lun 17 jan 2011 14:32:22 CET, Daniel J Walsh a écrit: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 01/17/2011 08:25 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am trying to crea

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Drew Weaver
Ah, it is a PCI card and there is only one PCI slot.. -Drew -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Giles Coochey Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:24 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Giles Coochey
On 18/01/2011 15:34, Drew Weaver wrote: Ah, it is a PCI card and there is only one PCI slot.. -Drew -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Giles Coochey Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:24 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: R

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Luis Trindade
Hi Drew, Why don't you use the mother board incorporated NIC? it does have one right? Best Regards, and sorry for my english... :) -- Luís Trindade nfsi telecom, lda. - Original Message - From: "Drew Weaver" To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Tuesday, 18 January, 2011 2:22:04 PM

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Drew Weaver
Why don't you use the mother board incorporated NIC? it does have one right? --- Because the installer doesn't have drivers for the onboard and all of our installs are PXE and in general it removes a lot of confusion by just disabling the onboard NIC and having one single NIC for everything.

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Drew Weaver
Hi, It doesn't appear to, it simply shows a little ASCII diagram of what is set for each slot. thanks, -Drew -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Giles Coochey Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:39 AM To: centos@centos.org S

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Giles Coochey
On 18/01/2011 16:12, Drew Weaver wrote: Hi, It doesn't appear to, it simply shows a little ASCII diagram of what is set for each slot. thanks, -Drew Have you tried putting one of the cards in a different slot? Hi, Sometimes that is only editable after you disable an option resembling "Plu

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Radu Radutiu
> > IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) > Have you tried what the error message suggests (add irqpool to the kernel line in grub.conf) ? Regards, Radu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Giles Coochey
On 18/01/2011 16:43, Radu Radutiu wrote: IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) Have you tried what the error message suggests (add irqpool to the kernel line in grub.conf) ? It may get it working, but I've heard it seriously affect performance... http://www.lindevdoc.or

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread compdoc
>IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) >report bad irq, references CPU idle >I'm assuming what is happening here is the USB controller and the add-on E1000 controller we put in are having an old school IRQ conflict, the question is why and how can I avoid it? IRQ177 mean

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Drew Weaver
Hi, There does not appear to be a 'Plug and Play OS' option in the BIOS like on previous Intel motherboards. I have disabled all of the USB ports except for the rear panel ones and so far it has been running for awhile. I will see what happens. thanks, -Drew From: centos-boun...@centos.org

[CentOS] i386 packages on fresh x86_64 system

2011-01-18 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Even a minimal install with nobase installs about 40-50 i386 packages on a 64bit-System. I know this has come up before and thought it might be an FAQ, but I can't find it on the wiki. Some questions are answered here: http://www.goitworld.com/rhelcentos-x86_64-and-i386-packages-mess/ but I have

Re: [CentOS] replace x86 with x64 system and reuse existing LVM

2011-01-18 Thread Kai Schaetzl
I've done this now and the procedure is fairly easy and very safe. I did a test run with VMs first, of course. You don't need to vgchange/vgexport etc. These changes do not carry over, anyway. A new system will find all volumes and make them active. But this doesn't matter. For a kickstart ins

Re: [CentOS] i386 packages on fresh x86_64 system

2011-01-18 Thread Markus Falb
On 18.1.2011 18:07, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Even a minimal install with nobase installs about 40-50 i386 packages on a > 64bit-System. I know this has come up before and thought it might be an > FAQ, but I can't find it on the wiki. ... > - is it safe to rpm -e remove all i386 packages? (assuming I

Re: [CentOS] i386 packages on fresh x86_64 system

2011-01-18 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Even a minimal install with nobase installs about 40-50 i386 packages on a > 64bit-System. I know this has come up before and thought it might be an > FAQ, but I can't find it on the wiki. The FAQ is here: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#

Re: [CentOS] i386 packages on fresh x86_64 system

2011-01-18 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Thank you both for the replies. In the meantime I've also found info on removing that at kickstart time: http://blog.vodkamelone.de/archives/151- Red-Hat-Enterprise-LinuxCentOS-5-minimal-installation.html Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com __

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Drew Weaver
Issue still persists, anyway I thought I'd let you guys know in case someone is thinking about getting one or more of these boards. -Drew From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Drew Weaver Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:42 AM To: 'CentOS mailing lis

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Drew Weaver
Btw, this is the complete error. Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: irq 177: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x69 Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [] note_interrupt+0x1af/0x1e8 Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [] handle_IRQ_e

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread m . roth
Drew Weaver wrote: > Btw, this is the complete error. > Hmmm... here's a thought: do you have anything plugged into a USB port? If so, try booting with it out; if not, try booting with one in. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread Drew Weaver
The keyboard that I use to ctrl-alt-del it is USB, but there was no keyboard connected until after it locked up, so it's a chicken and egg thing. -Drew -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us Sent: Tuesday, Jan

Re: [CentOS] Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared

2011-01-18 Thread m . roth
Drew Weaver wrote: >> Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us ><< Drew Weaver wrote: >>> Btw, this is the complete error. >> > >> Hmmm... here's a thought: do you have anything plugged into a USB port? If >> so, try booting with it out; if not, try booting with one in. > The keyboard that I use to ctrl-alt-de

[CentOS] KVM host question about host firewall

2011-01-18 Thread Kwan Lowe
Hello All: I'll ask this in the virt list later if this is not the appropriate forum... Yesterday I was troubleshooting an issue with a KVM host. I was unable to access the DNS service on a KVM virtual machine. After verifying that the vm allowed through the DNS ports (53 on UDP/TCP) and sti

Re: [CentOS] KVM host question about host firewall

2011-01-18 Thread Cameron Kerr
On 19/01/11 11:21, Kwan Lowe wrote: > Hello All: >I'll ask this in the virt list later if this is not the appropriate > forum... > >Yesterday I was troubleshooting an issue with a KVM host. I was > unable to access the DNS service on a KVM virtual machine. >From where? Another VM, the ho

Re: [CentOS] Troubles for an non-IT beginner

2011-01-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > >> > i386 is for older technology PCs. The x86_64 is for newer PCs > > How can I know that I have to use i386 or x86_64, my machine is not very new > though. > > >> >> The x86_64 rele

Re: [CentOS] Troubles for an non-IT beginner

2011-01-18 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/18/11 6:59 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > There are other architectures, which a home PC is unlikely to have. > These include ARM (common in some fascinating netbooks and > smartphones) and sparc (no longer in production, Sun computers got > bought). Wrong on the demise of the Sparc. Ora

Re: [CentOS] KVM host question about host firewall

2011-01-18 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 01/18/2011 02:21 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > > Yesterday I was troubleshooting an issue with a KVM host. I was > unable to access the DNS service on a KVM virtual machine. After > verifying that the vm allowed through the DNS ports (53 on UDP/TCP) > and still being unable to access, I was able to

[CentOS] not able to check in all code into svn which creates problem in deployment

2011-01-18 Thread Agnello George
HI i have currently started to deploy code into our production environment from the the dev environment, we deploy code on to the production from the svn , ( i do a svn export ) , some times not code is checked into the svn and it does not throw me a error . is there a way i can verify or writ

Re: [CentOS] KVM host question about host firewall

2011-01-18 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Cameron Kerr wrote: > On 19/01/11 11:21, Kwan Lowe wrote: >> Hello All: >>    I'll ask this in the virt list later if this is not the appropriate >> forum... >> >>    Yesterday I was troubleshooting an issue with a KVM host. I was >> unable to access the DNS servi

Re: [CentOS] KVM host question about host firewall

2011-01-18 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/18/2011 02:21 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: >> >>     Yesterday I was troubleshooting an issue with a KVM host. I was >> unable to access the DNS service on a KVM virtual machine. After >> verifying that the vm allowed through the DNS ports (5

Re: [CentOS] Troubles for an non-IT beginner

2011-01-18 Thread Geoff Galitz
> Wrong on the demise of the Sparc. Oracle just posted a massively > record breaking TPC-C benchmark using their new Sparc T3 servers, > something like 30 MILLION TPM. Oracle has very publically committed to keeping SPARC strong, which is good news for those of us believe in diversity in th

[CentOS] Printer Configuration Centos 5

2011-01-18 Thread Im Corp - Xcelris
As i am having Windows/Linux(Centos) enviorment at my premisise. I am facing problem to install windows sharing printer on centos. kindly please give me some solution for the same. Error : "Printer is not accessible" Regards, Alpesh Patel "Please don't print t

Re: [CentOS] Troubles for an non-IT beginner

2011-01-18 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/18/11 10:51 PM, Geoff Galitz wrote: > >> Wrong on the demise of the Sparc. Oracle just posted a massively >> record breaking TPC-C benchmark using their new Sparc T3 servers, >> something like 30 MILLION TPM. > Oracle has very publically committed to keeping SPARC strong, which is good >