Dne 23.12.2010 1:08, Les Mikesell napsal(a):
> The issue is that the server needs to know the hostname given to the
> browser to find the matching certificate, and the only way to do that
> and stay on the standard port 443 with the apache version on centos is
> to bind each virtual host to a di
@ Charles Polisher
yes, seems that avgrq-sz does provide the info I needed, thanks for
pointing that out!
@ Keith
I am not sure if blktrace can monitor which files being written to
disk or if it is the best tool for that.
But you could check out the inotify-tools (iwatch and related) which
go on
Hallo, *<:-)
may be I'm to tired to see the solution, maybe someone can give me a hint?
I do have a couple of servers, sending the daily logwatch report to a
central support email account.
Some servers do have DNS A and CNAME records. On my mailserver relaying
for the servers is allowed.
Only o
unedited error messages and sendmail config from both servers is needed.
eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 19:35:33 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 December 2010 16:51:02 Paul Heinlein wrote:
> >> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote:
> >> >> I became suspicious that I should
On 12/23/10 3:44 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
> Hallo, *<:-)
>
> may be I'm to tired to see the solution, maybe someone can give me a hint?
>
> I do have a couple of servers, sending the daily logwatch report to a
> central support email account.
>
> Some servers do have DNS A and CNAM
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 8:30
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] sendmail / logwatch relaying issue -
> driving me crazy
>
> On 12/23/10 3:44 AM,
On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:12 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
> Matt wrote:
>> Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
>> great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
>> ext3 for it?
>
> Before committing to ext4 on a production server, it
> would be
On Dec 23, 2010, at 3:03 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
> Dne 23.12.2010 1:08, Les Mikesell napsal(a):
>> The issue is that the server needs to know the hostname given to the
>> browser to find the matching certificate, and the only way to do that
>> and stay on the standard port 443 with the apache ve
>> I can confirm the socket/cpu limitation is at least 8, at least on
>> ESXi 3.x. I have an 8 core IBM x445 running on a free license. :-)
>
> The free and essentials licensing is restricted to max 2 sockets, max 6 cores
> a socket.
The vSphere Essentials license is limited to 3 servers of 2 soc
On 12/23/2010 8:01 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>>
>> On 12/23/10 3:44 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
>>> Hallo, *<:-)
>>>
>>> may be I'm to tired to see the solution, maybe someone can
>> give me a hint?
>>>
>>> I do have a couple of servers, sending the daily logwatch
>> report to a
>>> ce
>>> I can confirm the socket/cpu limitation is at least 8, at least on
>>> ESXi 3.x. I have an 8 core IBM x445 running on a free license. :-)
>>
>> The free and essentials licensing is restricted to max 2 sockets, max 6
>> cores a socket.
>
> The vSphere Essentials license is limited to 3 servers o
On 12/23/2010 9:08 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:12 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
>
>> Matt wrote:
>>> Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
>>> great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
>>> ext3 for it?
>>
>> Before commit
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 10:57
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] sendmail / logwatch relaying issue -
> driving me crazy
>
> On 12/23/2010 8:01 A
On Thursday, December 23, 2010 11:08 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:12 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
>
>> Matt wrote:
>>> Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
>>> great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
>>> ext3 for it?
>
On 12/23/2010 10:02 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
>> The ESX/ESXi host is limited to a maximum of 32 logical (sockets x
>> cores x hyperthreading) CPUs. The free license only allows access
>> through the vSphere client and all other features such as
>> vMotion/vStorage/HA are disabled. Otherwise th
On Friday, December 24, 2010 12:02 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/23/2010 9:08 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:12 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
>>
>>> Matt wrote:
Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
great deal of disk i/o and was wandering
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Beartooth wrote:
She's far more likely to outlive me than I her; so I want to
install something requiring a lot less maintenance on her machine,
so that she'll have it and be used to it, years ahead of need.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> All the recipes work perfectly - it's just those that fall off the end. For
> some reason it overrides the DEFAULT setting in procmailrc.
I'm seeing messages from you about this on the procmail list as well
so pardon me if I've got my thread
On 12/23/2010 10:28 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
Matt wrote:
> Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
> great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
> ext3 for it?
Before committing to ext4 on a production server, it
>
On Thursday 23 December 2010 16:53:22 Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Anne Wilson
wrote:
> > All the recipes work perfectly - it's just those that fall off the end.
> > For some reason it overrides the DEFAULT setting in procmailrc.
>
> I'm seeing messages from you about
I have big problems with this card not working on Centos 5.5
If I run Parted Magic (kernel 2.6.32.11) from CD, then the
IT8212F IDE PCI controller is detected OK, and I can access
the WD hard drive on the controller, in r/w mode.
Running Centos 5.5 I get lots of I/O errors at boot time,
and ca
I'm running centos 5.5 - 64 on Nvidia hardware.
I am getting video from totem mixed in with my background image when I
stop totem.
If I change the background back to the default it does not seem to happen.
However, as soon as I change the background to something else like
ladybug.jpg
and run tot
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 23 December 2010 16:53:22 Bart Schaefer wrote:
>> LASTFOLDER is informational, procmail sets it immediately before
>> delivering to that folder; if you see LASTFOLDER in your logs, the
>> only way the message should fail to arrive i
We just upgraded Cent from 5.3 to 5.5 on a bunch of servers with
little to no issues (kudos to you guys) except on a few servers where
it appears we are having a problem w/ the Tomcat upgrade. Previously
our application server was working fine under 5.3 with Tomcat/Java
installed as such:
java-1.
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On
> 12/21/2010 1:06 PM, Sean wrote:
>>
>>>If you can treat something as a black box and trust it, the size of
>>> the component isn't that important.
>> "If" or "IFF" ..(IF AND ONLY IF)..? A deep scepticism forces me to
>> treat all boxes as grey no matter how long si
On 12/23/2010 2:23 PM, Sean wrote:
>
>> Java stuff seems to be more self-contained so there is a little more
>> freedom to mix component versions between applications and you aren't
>> completely tied to someone else's update schedule.
>>
> Yes, superior exploitation must be granted Java (over say
On Dec 23, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
> On Thursday, December 23, 2010 11:08 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:12 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
>>
>>> Matt wrote:
Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
great deal of disk i/o
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Keith Roberts
> Subject: [CentOS] IT8218 PCI IDE RAID CARD
>
> I have big problems with this card not working on Centos 5.5
>
> If I run Parted Magic (kernel 2.6.32.11) from CD, then the
> IT8212F IDE PCI controller is
On Dec 23, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Christopher Chan
> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, December 23, 2010 11:08 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
>>> On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:12 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
>>>
Matt wrote:
> Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit
On Friday, December 24, 2010 05:25 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> I'd stick with ext3 + data=journal with the journal either on some uber
>> fast and large external BBU nvram block device (you can get up to 1TB
>> with speeds of 750MiB/sec+ if you have a fat enough bus) or on hardware
>> raid with suff
On Friday, December 24, 2010 01:03 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/23/2010 10:28 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>
> Matt wrote:
>> Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
>> great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
>> ext3 for it
Greetings,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/23/2010 10:02 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> The licensed vCenter stuff refers to a single app that is
> simultaneously aware of all of your ESXi servers and their guests and
> can move/fail resources across servers - concepts
33 matches
Mail list logo
