Hello Jerry,
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 15:34 -0800, Jerry Franz wrote:
> And in an exact example of this, today I needed to update some WordPress
> (WP) installations. Only, for "some reason" the FTP based autoupdater
> didn't work today.
Do you feel comfortable letting a web application update its
I can confirm the socket/cpu limitation is at least 8, at least on
ESXi 3.x. I have an 8 core IBM x445 running on a free license. :-)
--
Drew
On 12/19/2010, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/19/10 8:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> But the ESXi version isn't exactly fair to someone who would deploy
Please turn off troll detectors. Especially those with big automatic
hammers.
http://thecloudmarket.com/stats#/by_platform_definition
Anybody 'extra' bandwidth from the 'Cloud'? Ubuntu installations
currently trumps the combined numbers of Centos, Fedora and RHEL (not
that using Centos/Fedora/
Christopher Chan wrote:
> Please turn off troll detectors. Especially those with big automatic
> hammers.
>
> http://thecloudmarket.com/stats#/by_platform_definition
Not sure I understand it... esp. since it lists "linux" as less than
ubuntu, and more than CentOS
mark
_
On 20.12.2010 21:35, m.r...@5-cent.us sent:
> *sigh*
> I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to
> when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting
> close?
Just follow kbsingh and/or centos on Twitter and you'll know if its
done. I'd also exp
Daniel Heitmann wrote:
> On 20.12.2010 21:35, m.r...@5-cent.us sent:
>> *sigh*
>> I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as
>> to when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we
getting
>> close?
> Just follow kbsingh and/or centos on Twitter and you'll
I check system load like so:
[r...@server cron.daily]# w
10:07:33 up 4 days, 15:01, 2 users, load average: 4.22, 3.17, 3.09
I would like to to graph the 3.17 5 minute average with MRTG. Anyone
know of some examples of doing this?
___
CentOS mailing
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Daniel Heitmann wrote:
>
>> On 20.12.2010 21:35, m.r...@5-cent.us sent:
>>
>>> *sigh*
>>> I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as
>>> to when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we
>>>
> getting
>
>>> cl
On 12/21/2010 10:09 AM, Matt wrote:
> I check system load like so:
>
> [r...@server cron.daily]# w
> 10:07:33 up 4 days, 15:01, 2 users, load average: 4.22, 3.17, 3.09
>
> I would like to to graph the 3.17 5 minute average with MRTG. Anyone
> know of some examples of doing this?
Where you sho
>> I check system load like so:
>>
>> [r...@server cron.daily]# w
>> 10:07:33 up 4 days, 15:01, 2 users, load average: 4.22, 3.17, 3.09
>>
>> I would like to to graph the 3.17 5 minute average with MRTG. Anyone
>> know of some examples of doing this?
>
> Where you should start depends on how m
On 12/21/2010 10:28 AM, Chris Geldenhuis wrote:
> >>> Just follow kbsingh and/or centos on Twitter and you'll know if its
>>> done. I'd also expect info on early testing-releases there.
>>>
>>
>> Ah, no. I'm not a twit, so I'll just check the CentOS.org website, and here.
>>
>>mark, who
>> http://thecloudmarket.com/stats#/by_platform_definition
>
> Not sure I understand it... esp. since it lists "linux" as less than
> ubuntu, and more than CentOS
>
> mark
I'm guessing "linux" is an average of all of the flavors there so you
can compare "linux" with something like win
On 12/21/2010 10:25 AM, Matt wrote:
>>> I check system load like so:
>>>
>>> [r...@server cron.daily]# w
>>>10:07:33 up 4 days, 15:01, 2 users, load average: 4.22, 3.17, 3.09
>>>
>>> I would like to to graph the 3.17 5 minute average with MRTG. Anyone
>>> know of some examples of doing this?
On 21 December 2010 16:32, Rob Del Vecchio wrote:
>>> http://thecloudmarket.com/stats#/by_platform_definition
>>
>> Not sure I understand it... esp. since it lists "linux" as less than
>> ubuntu, and more than CentOS
> I'm guessing "linux" is an average of all of the flavors there so you
> ca
Matt writes:
> I check system load like so:
>
> [r...@server cron.daily]# w
> 10:07:33 up 4 days, 15:01, 2 users, load average: 4.22, 3.17, 3.09
>
> I would like to to graph the 3.17 5 minute average with MRTG. Anyone
> know of some examples of doing this?
$ uptime
16:40:45 up 7 days, 54 mi
> I check system load like so:
>
> [r...@server cron.daily]# w
> 10:07:33 up 4 days, 15:01, 2 users, load average: 4.22, 3.17, 3.09
>
> I would like to to graph the 3.17 5 minute average with MRTG. Anyone
> know of some examples of doing this?
Wrote this simple perl script:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 10:28 AM, Chris Geldenhuis wrote:
>> >>> Just follow kbsingh and/or centos on Twitter and you'll know if its
done. I'd also expect info on early testing-releases there.
>>>
>>> Ah, no. I'm not a twit, so I'll just check the CentOS.org website, and
>>> here.
On 12/21/2010 11:05 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Just follow kbsingh and/or centos on Twitter and you'll know if its
> done. I'd also expect info on early testing-releases there.
Ah, no. I'm not a twit, so I'll just check the CentOS.org website, and
here.
m
Hello,
I have a log file with the following input:
X , ID , Date, Time, Y
01,01368,2010-12-02,09:07:00,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-02,10:54:00,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-02,13:07:04,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-02,18:54:01,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-03,09:02:00,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-03,13:53:00,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-03
> sort -t ','? -k 3,3 -k 4,4? file.log? # this will sort the file according to
> the DATE field as well as the Time fileld.
> I'm stuck for the last 30 min to find a way to get the first line of each day
> (logically it'll be the earliest as i've sorted by date/time previously) once
> i know ho
Am 21.12.2010 18:05, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
> I have no intention of following someone who can say everything they know
> in 140 chars or less.
This is ridiculous. Just bookmark/take a look twitter.com/$user and
you're fine. No reason to sign up, no reason to follow anyone.
If you at least had
Rob Del Vecchio wrote:
>>> http://thecloudmarket.com/stats#/by_platform_definition
>>
>> Not sure I understand it... esp. since it lists "linux" as less than
>> ubuntu, and more than CentOS
>>
> I'm guessing "linux" is an average of all of the flavors there so you
> can compare "linux" with so
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:33 PM, wrote:
> If you're not afraid of perl, the Date-Manip module allows comparing time
> and date, among other things.
A dirtier take could be
perl -ne '/,(\d+),(.*),(\d\d):.*/ && ($3>=9) and $s->{$1,$2}++ ; END
{use Data::Dumper; print Dumper($s)}' < data
$VAR1 =
Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
> I have a log file with the following input:
> X , ID , Date, Time, Y
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,09:07:00,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,10:54:00,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,13:07:04,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,18:54:01,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-03,09:02:00,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-03,13:
First of all i'd like to appologize for those who helped me by giving an advice
using "perl" i'm ashamed to say that i have no experience with it.
Mark, thanks for your effort in writing the below though could you help me
understand how it goes ? the best way to do thigns, is to learn them for
>> I check system load like so:
>>
>> [r...@server cron.daily]# w
>> 10:07:33 up 4 days, 15:01, 2 users, load average: 4.22, 3.17, 3.09
>>
>> I would like to to graph the 3.17 5 minute average with MRTG. Anyone
>> know of some examples of doing this?
>
> Wrote this simple perl script:
>
> #!/us
On 12/21/2010 11:09 AM, Matt wrote:
> I check system load like so:
>
> [r...@server cron.daily]# w
> 10:07:33 up 4 days, 15:01, 2 users, load average: 4.22, 3.17, 3.09
>
> I would like to to graph the 3.17 5 minute average with MRTG. Anyone
> know of some examples of doing this?
The easy way
> >>> Ah, no. I'm not a twit, so I'll just check the CentOS.org
> >>> website, and here.
> >>> mark, who remembers too bloody well wearing a pager
> >>> 24x7x365.25, except when he was wearing *two* of the damn
> >>> things, so screw Twitter
> >
> >> +1
> >
> > Twitter
On 12/21/2010 11:30 AM, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a log file with the following input:
> X , ID , Date, Time, Y
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,09:07:00,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,10:54:00,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,13:07:04,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,18:54:01,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-03,09:0
On 12/17/2010 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Not with PIV-II cards
Why? Do they use a non-standard SSH agent?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/17/2010 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Not with PIV-II cards
>
> Why? Do they use a non-standard SSH agent?
pkcs11. opensc. NOT COOLKEY. Trying to use a current version of openssh,
opensc, and openct that my manager built it 100% repeatably tries to use
On 12/21/2010 12:41 PM, John Jasen wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 11:09 AM, Matt wrote:
>> I check system load like so:
>>
>> [r...@server cron.daily]# w
>> 10:07:33 up 4 days, 15:01, 2 users, load average: 4.22, 3.17, 3.09
>>
>> I would like to to graph the 3.17 5 minute average with MRTG. Anyone
>>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> If you can treat something as a black box and trust it, the size of
> the component isn't that important.
"If" or "IFF" ..(IF AND ONLY IF)..? A deep scepticism forces me to
treat all boxes as grey no matter how long since last visited...
(including my own, which are a
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:30:43PM +0200, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
(chuckle) That's a bit more verbose than necessary. As a one-liner:
awk -F, '($4>"09:00:00"){c[$2 "," $3]++};END{for (i in c){print i "," c[i]}}'
$filename
01368,2010-12-02,4
01368,2010-12-03,3
(You might check if you want >="09:00
On 12/21/2010 1:06 PM, Sean wrote:
>
>>If you can treat something as a black box and trust it, the size of
>> the component isn't that important.
> "If" or "IFF" ..(IF AND ONLY IF)..? A deep scepticism forces me to
> treat all boxes as grey no matter how long since last visited...
> (including
John Lundin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:30:43PM +0200, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
> (chuckle) That's a bit more verbose than necessary. As a one-liner:
>
> awk -F, '($4>"09:00:00"){c[$2 "," $3]++};END{for (i in c){print i ","
> c[i]}}' $filename
>
Well, yes, but he also wanted a count
Thanks to your help i've reached this step:
original data:
01,01368,2010-12-02,09:07:00,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-02,10:54:00,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-02,13:07:04,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-02,18:54:01,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-03,09:02:00,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-03,13:53:00,Pass
01,01368,2010-12-03,16:07:00,Pass
On 12/21/2010 1:40 PM, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
>
>
> awk -F , '{if ($4> "09:10:00") print $2 " was late on", $3 " by coming at
> ",$4}' test | tee DaysLate ; wc -l DaysLate
>
> 01368 was late on 2010-12-02 by coming at 10:54:00
>
> 01368 was late on 2010-12-02 by coming at 13:07:04
>
> 01368 wa
Exactly, hence:
[quote]
the only thing missing is to find a way to just take the earliest time of each
day.
in other words the above output should be:
0 DaysLate
[/quote]
> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:54:41 -0600
> From: lesmikes...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:40:42PM +0200, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
> original data:
>
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,09:07:00,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,10:54:00,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,13:07:04,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-02,18:54:01,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-03,09:02:00,Pass
> 01,01368,2010-12-03,13:53:00,Pass
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 01:11:49 +0800, Guenther Boelter wrote:
> On 12/18/2010 01:04 AM, Beartooth wrote:
>>
>> I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's -- and
>> I'm the nearest (distant) thing there is to tech support.
>
> What's wrong with Fedora in that case, what do you th
Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
ext3 for it?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 12/21/2010 1:58 PM, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
> the only thing missing is to find a way to just take the earliest time of
> each day.
>
> in other words the above output should be:
>
>
>0 DaysLate
>
That means my perl script was wrong... This looks more like what you
want, except for you
Yes, We use it for 4 months on our backup server, we no issue at the
moment. We have a lot of files, ext4 increase the backup speed. The
backup time is now 3hours, and was 5 hours with ext3.
Le 21/12/2010 21:22, Matt a écrit :
> Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
>
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 02:35:13PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John Lundin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:30:43PM +0200, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
[...]
> Well, yes, but he also wanted a count
Oh, lord, it's worse than that. I was solving the wrong problem. (And
still am if he really wa
John Lundin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 02:35:13PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> John Lundin wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:30:43PM +0200, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
> [...]
>> Well, yes, but he also wanted a count
>
> Oh, lord, it's worse than that. I was solving the wrong problem.
Hello
I have read that under Solaris one can use DTrace to get I/O request
size distribution on a global scale (also on a per process/pid basis).
See for example
http://prefetch.net/articles/observeiodtk.html
Can anyone recommend an alternative to get similar information under
CentOS? I looked i
hi all,
I will be migrating my mail server from centos 4.8 to 6 when its released.
Basically its just a number of users with their passwords. Their mail is
downloaded to their clients
and not stored on the server.
What is the most sensible or correct way to migrate ALL the users to the
new syst
2010/12/22 Jerry Geis :
> hi all,
>
> I will be migrating my mail server from centos 4.8 to 6 when its released.
> Basically its just a number of users with their passwords. Their mail is
> downloaded to their clients
> and not stored on the server.
>
> What is the most sensible or correct way to m
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Antonello Piemonte wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: Antonello Piemonte
Subject: [CentOS] I/O size distribution?
Hello
I have read that under Solaris one can use DTrace to get I/O request
size distribution on a global scale (also on a per process/pid basis).
See for exam
> Cacti is in the epel repository, so if you have that configured it is
> just 'yum install cacti' and you are pretty much done.
This box is CentOS 4 and has some web hosting software on it. Due to
exclusions its not that easy. ;-(
I manged to make this work with just plain MRTG which was on it
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 23:01 +0100, Antonello Piemonte wrote:
> Hello
>
IOTOP from here [1]. From a very quick glance of the Specfile it should
build with no problems under EL5.
John
[1] http://guichaz.free.fr/iotop/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
On 12/21/2010 4:55 PM, Matt wrote:
>> Cacti is in the epel repository, so if you have that configured it is
>> just 'yum install cacti' and you are pretty much done.
>
> This box is CentOS 4 and has some web hosting software on it. Due to
> exclusions its not that easy. ;-(
Typically what you do
On 12/21/2010 05:01 PM, Antonello Piemonte wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have read that under Solaris one can use DTrace to get I/O request
> size distribution on a global scale (also on a per process/pid basis).
> See for example
>
> http://prefetch.net/articles/observeiodtk.html
>
> Can anyone recommend
> a bug in bdb made them regularly overwrite random adjacent data,
> including other people's accounts. It was not a fun experience.
ouch! I wonder if a Perl 'tied-hash' interface was being implemented
along with BDB 'duplicate keys'? A definite no no. You would certainly
get overwrites, tho
On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Drew wrote:
>
>
> On 12/19/2010, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 12/19/10 8:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>>
>>> But the ESXi version isn't exactly fair to someone who would deploy on the
>>> hardware intended. Also, the restriction to 1 CPU isn't built-in -
>>> there's
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 1:06 PM, Sean wrote:
>>
>>> If you can treat something as a black box and trust it, the size of
>>> the component isn't that important.
>> "If" or "IFF" ..(IF AND ONLY IF)..? A deep scepticism forces me to
>> treat all boxes
Greetings
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Beartooth wrote:
>
> I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's -- and
> I'm the nearest (distant) thing there is to tech support.
>
I totally can identify the horror
>
> She's far more likely to outlive me than I her; so
Good day,
Seen when googled that *prozilla* seem to be very good down loader.
Googled but could not find a version for my centos.
Found one GUI for Fedora 14 x86_64.
Would that install on my system without breaking it.
or
Maybe one for my system that I missed?
Some advice would be appreciated.
Greetings,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> hi all,
>
hmm..
scp :/etc/passwd :/etc/passwd
ditto /etc/gshadow,/etc/groups, /etc/gshadow
YMMV
Regards
Rajagopal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mai
Greetings,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Antonello Piemonte
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have read that under Solaris one can use DTrace to get I/O request
I have heard that Dag or rf has it?
No guarantees!
Regards
Rajagopal
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
..
>
> I have read that under Solaris one can use DTrace to get I/O request
> size distribution on a global scale (also on a per process/pid basis).
> See for example
>
> http://prefetch.net/articles/observeiodtk.html
>
> Can anyone recommend an alternative to get similar information under
> Ce
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
"# Set up SSL protection on your website."
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address, when
i want to use ssl on my domain?
thank you
happy Christmas! :)
___
CentOS mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/22/2010 12:53 AM, S Mathias wrote:
> http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
>
> "# Set up SSL protection on your website."
>
> is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address,
> when i want to use ssl on my domain?
>
64 matches
Mail list logo
