The logs do not contain hostnames like this. This was a request for
http://your.example.com/http://www.cablecarmuseum.org/Car42.jpg
or something similar.
In addition to Eero's explanation it could be a wrong link in one of your
pages. Scan your logs "manually".
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactiv
Kai,
There is nothing deployed on this server as of yet. It simply serves the
default apache page when you hit it at this point. So it does seem weird to me
to have that show up.
I will examine the log manually and see what that yields.
-Jason
On Dec 20, 2010, at 2:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
*sigh*
I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to
when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting
close?
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listin
On 12/20/2010 3:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> *sigh*
> I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to
> when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting
> close?
>
> mark
>
> ___
> CentOS maili
>> I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to
>> when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting
>> close?
> this happens every release. there's no set date. it'll be done when it
> is completed.
Is there a roadmap or expected feature se
On 12/20/10 12:50 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Is there a roadmap or expected feature set that we can look at?
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/details/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:50:50PM -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>
> >> I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to
> >> when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting
> >> close?
>
> > this happens every release. there's no set date
Andrej Moravcik escribió:
Hello Jose,
from the picture you provided the situation looks pretty simple.
- you have enabled IP forwarding on router, I recommend you to put it
into /etc/sysctl.conf for persistence.
- you have configured firewall rules on router to allow forwarding
traffic from
On 12/20/10 2:55 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:50:50PM -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>>
I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to
when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting
close?
>>
>>> t
Les Mikesell escribió:
On 12/19/10 1:45 PM, Jose Maria Terry Jimenez wrote:
I wanted the reverse path. Traceroute from the 192.168.236.80 box back to the
fedora address. It doesn't make sense that it can return packets without a
route going through the Centos box.
Hello
This arrive
Does SATA Native Command Queueing and Linux software RAID1 play well
together or is it better to turn off NCQ when doing software RAID?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 12/20/2010 5:40 PM, Matt wrote:
> Does SATA Native Command Queueing and Linux software RAID1 play well
> together or is it better to turn off NCQ when doing software RAID?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailma
> And there are IDEs like eclipse that do a lot of the grunge work
> boilerplate for you, and maven to manage components as you scale up.
eclipse froze my first FC4 tryout ... is for me what BerkeleyDB is for you.
>
> I do agree personally - I can't think in java and do much better when
> you c
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:56:26AM +1300, Sean wrote:
>
> CentOS is beginning to look more & more like my cup of tea, and since I
> gather that a new major is immanent maybe it will support the new Google
> Chrome (along with Seamonkey, Opera-11+)?
Just for the record, someone just made a very
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:56:26AM +1300, Sean wrote:
>>
>> CentOS is beginning to look more & more like my cup of tea, and since I
>> gather that a new major is immanent maybe it will support the new Google
>> Chrome (along with Seamonkey, O
On 12/20/10 4:56 PM, Sean wrote:
>
> By 'size' I was actually referring to 'source size' : (1) you say it
> above "..[all micro] logic..[on] one page ..".(2) the same idea but
> in a project-macro-logic sense viz a viz sheer quantity of code lines to
> manage overall.
Agreed, but long term th
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 03:12:46PM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> What do you mean you cannot find it :-P
>
> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=23746&forum=38&post_id=121629#forumpost121629
>
I didn't look at that time, I was multi-tasking. :)
However, thank you as alw
17 matches
Mail list logo
