On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/16/10 2:56 AM, sync wrote:
> > Hi , guys :
> >
> >
> > I have a problem about the sendmail replay . The following is my
> condition:
> >
> > I have installed the sendmail server on my laptop which installed CentOS
> 5.5
> > x86 64,
> >
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Sven Aluoor wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Lanny Marcus
> wrote:
>> I had installed Picasa,apparently properly, but am unable to launch
>> the application. In the GNOME Desktop menu, Applications > Graphics >
>> Picasa > Picasa it does not launch. Rein
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Dejan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:47, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> I had installed Picasa,apparently properly, but am unable to launch
>> the application. In the GNOME Desktop menu, Applications > Graphics >
>> Picasa > Picasa it does not launch. Reinstalled it
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 06:02 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Dejan wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:47, Lanny Marcus
> > wrote:
> >> I had installed Picasa,apparently properly, but am unable to launch
> >> the application. In the GNOME Desktop menu, Applicati
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:08 AM, B.J. McClure wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 06:02 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Dejan wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:47, Lanny Marcus
> > wrote:
> >> I had installed Picasa,apparently properly, but am unable to launch
> >>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> I had installed Picasa,apparently properly, but am unable to launch
> the application. In the GNOME Desktop menu, Applications > Graphics >
> Picasa > Picasa it does not launch. Reinstalled it and the same issue.
>
> Reinstalling:
> picasa
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 06:49 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:08 AM, B.J. McClure
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 06:02 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Dejan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:47, Lanny Marcus
> > > wrote:
> > >> I
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 06:49 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:08 AM, B.J. McClure
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 06:02 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Dejan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:47, Lanny Marcus
> > > wrote:
> > >> I
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:27 AM, sync wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> On 12/16/10 2:56 AM, sync wrote:
>> > Hi , guys :
>> >
>> >
>> > I have a problem about the sendmail replay . The following is my
>> > condition:
>> >
>> > I have installed the sendmail s
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Dejan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:47, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> I had installed Picasa,apparently properly, but am unable to launch
>> the application. In the GNOME Desktop menu, Applications > Graphics >
>> Picasa > Picasa it does not launch. Reinstalled it
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Hello Nico,
>
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 15:20 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
>> > /usr/src/redhat and sub dirs are owned root.root. If you want to build
>> > as a normal user
On 12/16/2010 09:36 AM Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, ken wrote:
>
>> To: CentOS Mailing List
>> From: ken
>> Subject: [CentOS] centos6 686 livecd iso
>>
>> Just did a few searches, trying to find a redhat or centos 6.x livecd
>> iso, preferably an i686... but no joy. Maybe google'
Hello Nico,
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 08:01 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> There are easily half a dozen reasons. The first one is that this is
> where root runs their builds: if you leave it with write permission
> for other users,
> Second, if you open the permissions there, multiple users can s
I have some CentOS 5 systems that are part of an Active Directory
Windows 2003 domain (using natively configured files - not likewise
open).
getent passwd my_account reveals uid and gid are both 1:1.
Thus, typing: % id
reveals a uid of 1.
/etc/passwd does NOT have my local account c
On Thursday, December 16, 2010 11:45:36 pm Sean wrote:
> Hello Producers
>
> "Longevity of Support" is an attractive drawcard for CentOS if it means
> the exact opposite of Fedora's "short support cycle" that does not
> provide updating of infrastructural libraries for very long, libraries
> which
On Friday, December 17, 2010 08:44:46 am Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> actual Intel Ethernet cards PCI-E
> - Are normal recognized by Centos 5.5 Live CD
> - Not recognized by 5.2
> Because of vmware, I will use 5.2
It's not recommended to run CentOS-5.2 (many serious secu
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Nico,
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 08:01 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> There are easily half a dozen reasons. The first one is that this is
>> where root runs their builds: if you leave it with write permission
>> for other users,
>
>> Second, if you open the p
From: Keith Roberts
> I find smplayer is more stable than the mplayer-gui, which
> is a little bit odd, as it's a third party app, whereas
> mplayer-gui is from the developers of mplayer itself.
I think I remember reading on their mailing list that smplayer was now the
"official" (maintained
On Friday, December 17, 2010 02:44:46 am Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> actual Intel Ethernet cards PCI-E
> - Are normal recognized by Centos 5.5 Live CD
> - Not recognized by 5.2
> Because of vmware, I will use 5.2
Why? Are you wanting it as a VMware host or guest? As
Thnks.
Can you tell me where is "RPMforge third-party repository"? I search whole
CENTOS 5.5 X86 installation DVD and can NOT find it.
--- 10/12/16 (四)，Lamar Owen 寫道：
> 寄件者: Lamar Owen
> 主旨: Re: [CentOS] use parted to create "raw paration"
> 收件者: "CentOS mailing list"
> 日期: 2010年12月1
On Thursday, December 16, 2010 05:45:36 pm Sean wrote:
> If so, the problem is in reconciling that meaning with the reputation of
> CentOS to only support older versions of applications (eg Firefox-1.5,
> Thunderbird-1.0 etc).
Where do people get this? On one of my up to date CentOS 5 VM's:
[r.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, John Doe wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: John Doe
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 x86_64 - mplayer install problems
>
> From: Keith Roberts
>
>> I find smplayer is more stable than the mplayer-gui, which
>> is a little bit odd, as it's a third party app, where
> Hi. Running CentOS 5 with the default GNOME desktop. Is it possible
> to configure xterm windows not to have title bars to get the most out of
> the available screenspace?
I don't know how to do it with Gnome but, with KDE 3, you can set up a
shortcut to remove the window decorations on a per
mcclnx mcc wrote:
> Thnks.
>
> Can you tell me where is "RPMforge third-party repository"? I search
> whole CENTOS 5.5 X86 installation DVD and can NOT find it.
>
Do you understand what a repository is? Hint: it's NOT ON A DVD.
mark
>
>
> --- 10/12/16 (å)ï¼Lamar Owen 寫éï¼
>
>> å¯
On 12/17/2010 9:48 AM, mcclnx mcc wrote:
> Thnks.
>
> Can you tell me where is "RPMforge third-party repository"? I search whole
> CENTOS 5.5 X86 installation DVD and can NOT find it.
That's because it is "third-party" -- meaning that it is not part of the
official CentOS distribution.
You can
So I need some opinions on which way to go, for my home network I am running
almost all linux, and I am starting to want to manage all of the users
accounts, uid/gids for all of the devices some of which are laptops...so
what is the best path going forward, on the server end I am running
Centos5.5
On 12/17/10 8:18 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
>
> Longevity (things continue to work without breakage for a long time):
> This kind of implies "don't keep stuff continously updated to recent
> versions" don't you think?
It could work that way if the upstream developers of the thousands of include
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I have some CentOS 5 systems that are part of an Active Directory
> Windows 2003 domain (using natively configured files - not likewise
> open).
>
> getent passwd my_account reveals uid and gid are both 1:1.
>
> Thus, typing: % id
>
> reveals a uid of 1.
>
> /
On 12/17/10 6:49 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:27 AM, sync wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/16/10 2:56 AM, sync wrote:
Hi , guys :
I have a problem about the sendmail replay . The following is my
- I'm using 5.2 or 5.3 as a host.
- my expierince: 5.4 is not stable with vmware as a host.
The hosts are completely behind firewall.
Vmware server 2.0.2-203138
With 5.3 my problem was solved.
Helmut
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@cento
On Friday, December 17, 2010 10:55:58 am Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/17/10 8:18 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> >
> > Longevity (things continue to work without breakage for a long time):
> > This kind of implies "don't keep stuff continously updated to recent
> > versions" don't you think?
>
> It
On Friday, December 17, 2010 11:21:29 am Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> Vmware server 2.0.2-203138
And that would be the most recent build.
> With 5.3 my problem was solved.
Have you tried 5.5 yet?
For grins and giggles I'm going to play with it on a box I have, but it will be
a little while before
I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's -- and
I'm the nearest (distant) thing there is to tech support.
She's far more likely to outlive me than I her; so I want to
install something requiring a lot less maintenance on her machine, so
that she'll have it and
On Friday, December 17, 2010 04:55:58 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/17/10 8:18 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > Longevity (things continue to work without breakage for a long time):
> > This kind of implies "don't keep stuff continously updated to recent
> >
> > versions" don't you think?
>
> I
On 12/17/10 10:21 AM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> - I'm using 5.2 or 5.3 as a host.
> - my expierince: 5.4 is not stable with vmware as a host.
>
> The hosts are completely behind firewall.
>
> Vmware server 2.0.2-203138
>
> With 5.3 my problem was solved.
The 2.x series of vmware server are badly b
On 12/18/2010 01:04 AM, Beartooth wrote:
>
> I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's -- and
> I'm the nearest (distant) thing there is to tech support.
What's wrong with Fedora in that case, what do you think is the benefit
of using CentOS instead?
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:11:49AM +0800, Guenther Boelter wrote:
> On 12/18/2010 01:04 AM, Beartooth wrote:
> >
> > I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's -- and
> > I'm the nearest (distant) thing there is to tech support.
>
> What's wrong with Fedora in that case, what do
On 12/17/10 10:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, December 17, 2010 10:55:58 am Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 12/17/10 8:18 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
>>>
>>> Longevity (things continue to work without breakage for a long time):
>>>This kind of implies "don't keep stuff continously updated to r
On 17/12/10 16:55, Tom Bishop wrote:
> So I need some opinions on which way to go, for my home network I am
> running almost all linux, and I am starting to want to manage all of the
> users accounts, uid/gids for all of the devices some of which are
> laptops...so what is the best path going forwa
On 12/17/10 11:11 AM, Guenther Boelter wrote:
> On 12/18/2010 01:04 AM, Beartooth wrote:
>>
>> I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's -- and
>> I'm the nearest (distant) thing there is to tech support.
>
> What's wrong with Fedora in that case, what do you think is the benef
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/17/10 11:11 AM, Guenther Boelter wrote:
>> On 12/18/2010 01:04 AM, Beartooth wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's --
>>> and I'm the nearest (distant) thing there is to tech support.
>>
>> What's wrong with F
On 12/17/10 11:11 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
>
>> It could work that way if the upstream developers of the thousands of
>> included projects understood the need for backwards compatibility to keep
>> things working. They don't.
>
> While fine in theory this wouldn't work in real life since they wo
On 17/12/10 18:24, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:11:49AM +0800, Guenther Boelter wrote:
>> On 12/18/2010 01:04 AM, Beartooth wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's -- and
>>> I'm the nearest (distant) thing there is to tech support.
>>
>> Wh
On 12/17/10 11:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 17/12/10 16:55, Tom Bishop wrote:
>> So I need some opinions on which way to go, for my home network I am
>> running almost all linux, and I am starting to want to manage all of the
>> users accounts, uid/gids for all of the devices some of which a
Google Chrome Terms of Service(Google Chrome executable), BSD (source code and
Chromium executable except chromium 5 beta),BSD License with proprietary parts
(source code and chromium 5 beta executable, as it integrates Adobe Flash
Player 10.1[1])[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chrome
in
On 12/18/2010 01:24 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:11:49AM +0800, Guenther Boelter wrote:
>> On 12/18/2010 01:04 AM, Beartooth wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's -- and
>>> I'm the nearest (distant) thing there is to tech support.
>>
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:27 PM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> Install the centos-ds suite. That'll give you a great directory server,
> accessible via LDAP. Then you can consider to setup a kerberos server
> as well, where you can easily do single sign-on between your hosts as well.
>
> centos-ds
David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 17/12/10 18:24, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:11:49AM +0800, Guenther Boelter wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2010 01:04 AM, Beartooth wrote:
I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's -- and
I'm the nearest (distant) thing ther
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin
wrote:
> Hi. Running CentOS 5 with the default GNOME desktop. Is it possible
> to configure xterm windows not to have title bars to get the most out of
> the available screenspace?
>
> I've tried to look this up but mostly find reference how t
Good day,
What will happen if on x86_64 some i386 rpms get installed, please.
Thanks
Johan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 11:11 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/17/10 10:21 AM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> The 2.x series of vmware server are badly broken with respect to RHEL/Centos
> -
> plus the change to the web based console is horrible.
Mine is not broken. The web Admin works like it sh
At Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:23:36 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Good day,
>
> What will happen if on x86_64 some i386 rpms get installed, please.
Depends. It is in fact *normal* for i[3456]86 *libraries* to be
installed on a CentOS/RHEL x86_64 system (many are installed by
default). It is
> Good day,
>
> What will happen if on x86_64 some i386 rpms get installed, please.
> Thanks
> Johan
You'll need some libraries, like libstdc++ in i686 version, but they'll be
installed and they'll run.
Regards,
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.
Ah, a reminder that it is always dangerous to unveil the vague? Sorry
... I should have pre-read 6000 pages from Redhat ... (but maybe I did!).
Sean
Michael R. Dilworth wrote:
> I'm sorry (I know don't feed the trolls), but recently
> there have been quite a few remarks resembling this.
> Also,
On 12/17/10 12:36 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 11:11 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 12/17/10 10:21 AM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
>> The 2.x series of vmware server are badly broken with respect to RHEL/Centos
>> -
>> plus the change to the web based console is horrible.
>
> Mine is n
On 12/17/2010 07:55 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> So I need some opinions on which way to go, for my home network I am
> running almost all linux, and I am starting to want to manage all of
> the users accounts, uid/gids for all of the devices some of which are
> laptops...so what is the best path goi
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> The man page for lastb says if you just complete delete /var/log/btmp
> the system shouldn't recreate it on its own.
>
> That is the simplest answer.
i have done this for now, but the initscripts rpm will recreate it for me
if it updates (how helpful
On 12/17/2010 10:11 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>FC14 *seems* to
> be a bit more stable, though right now, I'm fighting to try to get
> ssh-agent working correctly on it - just did a full update, and now it
> starts it on login... but doesn't stop it on logout, and doesn't pass the
> environment va
Interesting, and probably worth a play with indeed, although I tend to
steer clear of Bash (unhappy with) whenever possible to do the same in
Perl (happy with). I imagine there is machine level stuff involved that
would rule out a pure Perl version?
However, my difficulties for OS replacement ar
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 13:23 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/17/10 12:36 PM, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > Mine is not broken. The web Admin works like it should.
>
> Just to be clear - do you mean you are running vmware 2.x server under post
> 5.2
> Centos without the library issues that everyone el
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/17/2010 10:11 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>FC14 *seems* to
>> be a bit more stable, though right now, I'm fighting to try to get
>> ssh-agent working correctly on it - just did a full update, and now it
>> starts it on login... but doesn't stop it on logout, and doesn
On 12/17/10 2:12 PM, Sean wrote:
> Interesting, and probably worth a play with indeed, although I tend to
> steer clear of Bash (unhappy with) whenever possible to do the same in
> Perl (happy with). I imagine there is machine level stuff involved that
> would rule out a pure Perl version?
> Howeve
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, John Hodrien wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: John Hodrien
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Stripping silent periods from MP3s
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all the responses!
>>
>> I've read MaximumRPM from:
>>
>> http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-s
Hello,
I have a CentOS 5.5/64bit VM, where I only have sudo rights:
afarber ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
I'm trying to pass LD_LIBRARY_PATH
through sudo to install DBD::Oracle
( https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=63678 )
and have tried using "sudo -E" and also
changing these li
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Akemi Yagi
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Building packages using RPMBUILD
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>
>> I had already installed the packages mentioned in the Centos
>> wiki.
>
> I assume you ar
Alexander Farber wrote:
>
> Still my test call fails:
>
> afar...@vm:~> echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> /usr/lib/oracle/11.2/client64
> afar...@vm:~> sudo -E perl -e 'print $ENV{LD_LIBRARY_PATH}';
> afar...@vm:~>
> afar...@vm:~> sudo -E perl -e 'print $ENV{HOME}';
> /home/afarber
>
> Does anybody please
This one works, thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Dear centos community,
I was in the process of loading the latest 5.5 release of centos in a VMWARE
ESX 4.1 host as my first virtual machine, suddenly while booting I got a panic
error with the following on screen. Can someone point me in the right
direction. This machine has 24 cores and I allo
I have the CentOS 5.5 install DVD and trying to install with software
RAID1 on two 2TB SATA drives. The CentOS install only sees one drive.
This is a Supermicro motherboard with fakeraid turned off in bios.
I tried the trick like so:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512 count=64
dd if=/dev/zero o
When you boot does the OS see both drives, if so, why not configure using LVM.
>>> Matt 12/17/10 6:29 PM >>>
I have the CentOS 5.5 install DVD and trying to install with software
RAID1 on two 2TB SATA drives. The CentOS install only sees one drive.
This is a Supermicro motherboard with fakeraid
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Lisandro Grullon
wrote:
> Dear centos community,
> I was in the process of loading the latest 5.5 release of centos in a VMWARE
> ESX 4.1 host as my first virtual machine, suddenly while booting I got a
> panic error with the following on screen. Can someone point
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 06:23:52PM -0500, Lisandro Grullon wrote:
> Dear centos community,
> I was in the process of loading the latest 5.5 release of centos in a VMWARE
> ESX 4.1 host as my first virtual machine, suddenly while booting I got a
> panic error with the following on screen. Can some
Tru, you nailed it right. I will load Ubuntu and Debian and will report back,
this may be a bug in the loading process. I did install this system with Centos
by itself and it load ok, but the virtual machine its not loading and it just
keep crashing with the same error as the bug you provided/po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am looking to set up a CentOS server for hosting a high traffic PHP
site (specifically Drupal 6).
I am trying to figure out what's the best way of setting up PHP. The
standard mod_php seems to not be a good solution, as it requires apache
to be in
Tru, looks like a bug in centos, I just loaded RHEL 6 without any issues. I
dont think it has something to do with the actual image file, but in any case
maybe I should re-download the entire DVD again just to make sure. Thank you
Tru.
>>> Tru Huynh 12/17/10 6:47 PM >>>
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 18:38 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 17/12/10 18:24, Scott Robbins wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:11:49AM +0800, Guenther Boelter wrote:
> >> On 12/18/2010 01:04 AM, Beartooth wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's -- and
>
Am 18.12.2010 um 01:09 schrieb Ruslan Sivak:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I am looking to set up a CentOS server for hosting a high traffic PHP
> site (specifically Drupal 6).
>
AFAIK, the optimal solution is to run the latest php5.3-series as php-
fpm with NGINX.
It
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Lisandro Grullon
wrote:
> Tru, looks like a bug in centos, I just loaded RHEL 6 without any issues. I
> dont think it has something to do with the actual image file, but in any
> case maybe I should re-download the entire DVD again just to make sure.
> Thank you Tr
Akemi,
I went through the different mirrors and was unable to locate the ISO as it is
stated as deprecated or unsupported, is there any plans to fix this issue in
5.6 or rather 6.x release. It appears that the latest build from Centos was
built back in may, lots of bugs have emerge since them i
Is there a how-to somewhere on getting php running with nginx? I would love
to get that working.
I am already planning on using nginx as a front end to varnish for
compression, and varnish for caching and load balancing. I just really
want to get good performance out of the dynamic php part and
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Lisandro Grullon
wrote:
> Akemi,
> I went through the different mirrors and was unable to locate the ISO as it
> is stated as deprecated or unsupported, is there any plans to fix this issue
> in 5.6 or rather 6.x release. It appears that the latest build from Cent
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:09:44 -0500
Ruslan Sivak wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I am looking to set up a CentOS server for hosting a high traffic PHP
> site (specifically Drupal 6).
>
> I am trying to figure out what's the best way of setting up PHP. The
> standard
On 12/17/10 9:30 AM, Cia Watson wrote:
> I've never actually configured php, I just install the files (including
> php-mbstring), and create a user for mysql and extract the Drupal files
> to the docroot and I'm good to go. If it's a high-traffic site others
> may have more specifics about php to a
Akemi,
Why is the vault download like a snail, I usually download 2-3MB/s from the
mirrors, but this one your provide only getting 12-15Kbps. Is there anything
faster?
>>> Akemi Yagi 12/17/10 8:13 PM >>>
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Lisandro Grullon
wrote:
> Akemi,
> I went through the dif
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Lisandro Grullon
wrote:
> Akemi,
> Why is the vault download like a snail, I usually download 2-3MB/s from the
> mirrors, but this one your provide only getting 12-15Kbps. Is there anything
> faster?
> It's here:
>
> http://vault.centos.org/5.4/
How about this on
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin
wrote:
> Hi. Running CentOS 5 with the default GNOME desktop. Is it possible
> to configure xterm windows not to have title bars to get the most out of
> the available screenspace?
The presence and appearance of title bars (except for the tex
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:23:36 +0200 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>> Good day,
>>
>> What will happen if on x86_64 some i386 rpms get installed, please.
>
> Depends. It is in fact *normal* for i[3456]86 *libraries* to be
> installed on a CentOS/RHEL x86_64 system (many a
Nicolas Ross wrote:
>> Good day,
>>
>> What will happen if on x86_64 some i386 rpms get installed, please.
>> Thanks
>> Johan
>
> You'll need some libraries, like libstdc++ in i686 version, but they'll be
> installed and they'll run.
>
> Regards,
>
> ___
Les Mikesell wrote:
> To overgeneralize, that's one of the big differences between free and
> commercial software. Commercial software that has a customer base
> that they can't afford to lose will rarely break backwards
> compatibility, or if they do, they'll provide conversion tools to
> mana
Lamar Owen wrote:
> Where do people get this? On one of my up to date CentOS 5 VM's:
> [r...@zoneminder1 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
> [r...@zoneminder1 ~]# rpm -qi firefox
> Name: firefox Relocations: (not relocatable)
> Version : 3.6.
>>Is there a how-to somewhere on getting php running with nginx? I would love
>>to get that working.
http://wiki.nginx.org/PHPFcgiExample
We have around a dozen systems running in this configuration and it works well.
They are among our lowest maintenance and highest performing sites th
Good day,
What can I expect if I should install a server version of a distro on my
laptop, please.
Thanks
Johan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
92 matches
Mail list logo
