Re: [CentOS] Any chance to get a working, current openldap srpm/rpm for centos 5.5

Am 30.11.10 19:40, schrieb Pasi Kärkkäinen: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 03:07:49PM +0100, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator > wrote: >> Am 29.11.10 13:43, schrieb Eero Volotinen: >>> 2010/11/29 Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator : Hello, is there anyone out there, who has a current 2.4.23 sr

Re: [CentOS] Yum Updates dependencies missing (rpmforge)

From: Lanny Marcus > There are updates available, for the below multimedia packages (CentOS > 5.5, 32 bit), but I'm getting missing dependency errors from yum > update for these. > ---> Package directfb.i386 0:1.2.10-1.el5.rf set to be updated > ---> Package ffmpeg.i386 0:0.6.1-1.el5.rf set to

[CentOS] Centos DS and user password change

[s...@ds ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.5 (Final) [s...@ds ~]$ rpm -qa | grep centos-ds centos-ds-admin-8.1.0-9.el5.centos.1 centos-ds-8.1.0-1.el5.centos.2 centos-ds-base-8.1.0-0.14.el5.centos.2 centos-ds-console-8.1.0-5.el5.centos.2 ds installed for: 1) linux workstations authenti

Re: [CentOS] DVD drive ownership/permissions group ownership = mail?

From: Dave > I can change the group ownershipp of the DVD drive, but if I log out & > in again it changes back. Is there a way to make a change permanent? > How could I figure out what process is changing this back? > ls -la /dev/scd0 > brw-rw 1 root mail 11, 0 Nov 12 15:17 /dev/scd0 Hum

Re: [CentOS] networking printer

From: ann kok > I would like to ask linux can do the networking printer as window > Share it to office environment > If yes, any brand name and concern > Any documentation also Most entry level business printers are ethernet (standalone). Our 2 years old 200€ color laser printer does TCP/IP, A

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote: >> On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: >>> >>> (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm), >> >> Haven't switched yet, I have IPv6 at home using sixxs. >> >> I can't even fi

Re: [CentOS] DVD drive ownership/permissions group ownership = mail?

Nope this is wrong. You are supposed to add the relevant users to the group (in /etc/group) instead of changing the group ownership on the device file. That makes it persistent too.. Regards, Jorgen Maas On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:46 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: Dave > >> I can change the group

Re: [CentOS] Centos DS and user password change

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 15:44 +0500, Stanislav Vlasov wrote: > [s...@ds ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS release 5.5 (Final) > > [s...@ds ~]$ rpm -qa | grep centos-ds > centos-ds-admin-8.1.0-9.el5.centos.1 > centos-ds-8.1.0-1.el5.centos.2 > centos-ds-base-8.1.0-0.14.el5.centos.2 > centos-ds-con

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 13:50 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Seeing as IPV4 is near it's end of life > (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm), > I'm curios as who know whether everyone is ready for the changeover to > IPV6? > Is anyone using it in production

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 12/06/2010 01:22 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> I'm curios as who know whether everyone is ready for the changeover to >> IPV6? >> Is anyone using it in production already, and what are your experiences with >> it? generic questions like that are more suited to ipv6 centric lists. if you

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 14:13 +0100, RedShift wrote: > On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > Seeing as IPV4 is near it's end of life > > (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm), > > I'm curios as who know whether everyone is ready for the changeover to

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/02/2010 06:34 PM, Jerry Franz wrote: > On 11/28/2010 09:31 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: >> [...] >> And then, one day, it won't work. Worse - it doesn't always *log* what >> it is doing in a way that you can figure out. Occasionally not at all. >> S

Re: [CentOS] LVM change disk

On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 10:29 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/03/10 10:47 PM, muhammad panji wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have a 4,1TB Logical volume consist of four disks with size of 2TB, > > 1TB, 1TB, and 500GB. The LV currently full. I plan to change the 1Tb > > disks and 500Gb disks. I plan t

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote: >>> On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm), >>> >>> Haven't swit

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 08:29 -0600, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: > > On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote: > >>> On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

On 12/06/2010 06:06 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > Did you take a look at the AVC messages? Are you running setroubleshoot? Yes to both. > Usually running something like restorecon -R -v /var/ftp would have > cleaned this up, if it is a simple mislabel in /var directory. The point is *I shouldn't

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/06/2010 09:45 AM, Jerry Franz wrote: > On 12/06/2010 06:06 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> >> Did you take a look at the AVC messages? Are you running setroubleshoot? > > Yes to both. >> Usually running something like restorecon -R -v /var/ftp wou

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > NO NO NO NO NO NO NO and NO! (*...@!^&*...@$ &@*^*&$@ &*...@^*&@ How many > times does this have to be explained??? NAT *IS* *NOT* a @*(&^*(^@(*@ > security tool. It isn't. Stop saying it is. You use *firewalls* for > security. Just

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 06/12/10 15:29, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: > >> On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote: On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IP

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 05/12/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Seeing as IPV4 is near it's end of life > (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm), > I'm curios as who know whether everyone is ready for the changeover to > IPV6? > > Is anyone using it in production already, and

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 16:12 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 05/12/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > There are some security considerations though, related to stateless auto > configuration. Currently whichever client on a local network may start > a radvd process which will announce where the de

[CentOS] 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 NFS4 race conditions?

Are there any known race conditions with 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 x86_64 and NFS4? Today a user managed to shut down two identical Intel servers by copying a simple text file via NFS4. Reverting back to 17.1 made the error disappear. On other non-identical hardware the error was not reproducible (so

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 06/12/10 15:53, Ross Walker wrote: > On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Adam Tauno Williams > wrote: > >> NO NO NO NO NO NO NO and NO! (*...@!^&*...@$ &@*^*&$@ &*...@^*&@ How many >> times does this have to be explained??? NAT *IS* *NOT* a @*(&^*(^@(*@ >> security tool. It isn't. Stop saying i

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote: >>> On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm), >>> >>> Haven't swi

Re: [CentOS] # chkconfig: kill at run level 3

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert Spangler > Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 10:51 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] # chkconfig: kill at run level 3 > > On Friday 03 December 2010 19:30, M

Re: [CentOS] ntfs

On Sunday, December 05, 2010 04:29:47 pm Niki Kovacs wrote: > I've been following this thread, and I'm wondering: why bother with NTFS > in the first place? It's also useful for MAC OS X and Linux data interchange. While there is a ext2 module for OS X, and there is HFS+ filesystem support for

[CentOS] CentOS 5.5 with MediaWiki

Hi, How do I install php-xml 5.2.10 on CentOS 5.5? I'm trying to install MediaWiki, and asks that package as a dependency. Cheers, Clóvis -- Clovis Tristao - UNICAMP/Faculdade de Engenharia Agricola Administrador de Redes - Secao de Informatica (SINFO) E-mail: clo...@feagri.unicamp.br http://

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 with MediaWiki

> I'm trying to install MediaWiki, and asks that package as a dependency. Which version of MediaWiki are you trying to install? I could recently repackage a Fedora RPM of v1.15.4, using dependencies provided by the RPMForge repo. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 with MediaWiki

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:31:32PM +0100, Mathieu Baudier wrote: > > I'm trying to install MediaWiki, and asks that package as a dependency. > > Which version of MediaWiki are you trying to install? > > I could recently repackage a Fedora RPM of v1.15.4, using dependencies > provided by the RPMFo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 with MediaWiki

Em 06-12-2010 15:31, Mathieu Baudier escreveu: >> I'm trying to install MediaWiki, and asks that package as a dependency. > Which version of MediaWiki are you trying to install? > > I could recently repackage a Fedora RPM of v1.15.4, using dependencies > provided by the RPMForge repo. > ___

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 with MediaWiki

Em 06-12-2010 15:34, Ray Van Dolson escreveu: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:31:32PM +0100, Mathieu Baudier wrote: >>> I'm trying to install MediaWiki, and asks that package as a dependency. >> Which version of MediaWiki are you trying to install? >> >> I could recently repackage a Fedora RPM of v1.1

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 with MediaWiki

> Also, there will soon be a MediaWiki 1.16 package in EPEL[1].  There is Good news! Actually my dependencies were probably from EPEL in that case, not RPMForge. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 6 December 2010 15:40, Tom H wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:27 AM, David Sommerseth > wrote: >> On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote: On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/

Re: [CentOS] # chkconfig: kill at run level 3

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 01:30:12 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Michael D. Berger > wrote: >> On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:50:53 -0500, Robert Spangler wrote: >> >>> On Friday 03 December 2010 19:30, Michael D. Berger wrote: >>> >> [...] >>> >>> Check /etc/rc.d/rc6.d and

Re: [CentOS] # chkconfig: kill at run level 3

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:38:49 -0500, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: [... > The number after the S and K determine the order in which they're run. > S01 starts things which S02-S99 might require; S02 might depend on S01 > and provide service the S03-S99 stuff requires. And, so on. The K > scripts *gener

[CentOS] http request, which command is good for testing

Hi all I just know there are curl / lwp-request, lynx and elinks Which command is good for http testing? Thank you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] http request, which command is good for testing

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:52 PM, adrian kok wrote: > Hi all > > I just know there are curl / lwp-request, lynx and elinks > > Which command is good for http testing? I've had good luck with both curl and wget. There are other tools like smokeping and httping that ca test a site, but I've had great

Re: [CentOS] http request, which command is good for testing

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:52 PM, adrian kok wrote: > Hi all > > I just know there are curl / lwp-request, lynx and elinks > > Which command is good for http testing? > > Thank you > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.o

Re: [CentOS] ntfs

On 12/06/10 8:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > It's also useful for MAC OS X and Linux data interchange. ugh. disk file systems were really not intended for data interchange, especially not NTFS. use the network. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.or

Re: [CentOS] ntfs

On Monday, December 06, 2010 02:02:20 pm John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/06/10 8:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > It's also useful for MAC OS X and Linux data interchange. > ugh. disk file systems were really not intended for data interchange, > especially not NTFS. use the network. In a dual-boot s

[CentOS] Problem starting PostgreSQL-8.4 with SSL

I installed PG-8.4 for Redhat from the PG84 repo. Everythign works save only that when I try to enable ssl connections then I get this error: Auto configuration failed 16276:error:0E065068:configuration file routines:STR_COPY:variable has no value:conf_def.c:629:line 207 I have verified that the

Re: [CentOS] ntfs

At Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:02:20 -0800 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On 12/06/10 8:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > It's also useful for MAC OS X and Linux data interchange. > > > ugh. disk file systems were really not intended for data interchange, > especially not NTFS. use the network. That

[CentOS] CentOS 6: what's the status?

Hello listmates, So, what's the story with CentOS 6? It is supposed to be out by now, or coming out soon, or so I heard - but yet there seems to be no mention of it at http://centos.org/ . Does anybody know what's up with that? Thanks. Boris. ___ CentO

Re: [CentOS] http request, which command is good for testing

On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:52 PM, adrian kok wrote: >> Which command is good for http testing? > > links > lynx > telnet > wget > etc I like curl because it defaults to printing to standard output. (You can do it with wget too, of course, it's just not sta

Re: [CentOS] ntfs

On 12/06/10 11:12 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > In a dual-boot scenario? ugh. dual booting is a pain in the derriere. use a VM if its for software testing or whatever. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: what's the status?

Well I'm sure there are a lot of folks eagerly waiting..this is the latest I have seen which sums it up the best http://planet.centos.org/ e.g. it will be here when it is ready, I for one am hoping for an early christmas present;) On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: what's the status?

On Dec 6, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello listmates, > > So, what's the story with CentOS 6? It is supposed to be out by now, > or coming out soon, or so I heard - but yet there seems to be no > mention of it at http://centos.org/ . Does anybody know what's up with > that? > > Thank

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: what's the status?

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello listmates, > > So, what's the story with CentOS 6? It is supposed to be out by now, > or coming out soon, or so I heard - but yet there seems to be no > mention of it at http://centos.org/ . Does anybody know what's up with > that? > > T

Re: [CentOS] ntfs

On Monday, December 06, 2010 02:41:46 pm John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/06/10 11:12 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > In a dual-boot scenario? > > ugh. dual booting is a pain in the derriere. use a VM if its for > software testing or whatever. Some of us really do need to dual-boot, for whatever reason

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: what's the status?

On Monday, December 06, 2010 02:31:23 pm Boris Epstein wrote: > So, what's the story with CentOS 6? It is supposed to be out by now, > or coming out soon, or so I heard - but yet there seems to be no > mention of it at http://centos.org/ . Does anybody know what's up with > that? Karanbir has soli

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: what's the status?

2010/12/6 Lamar Owen : > On Monday, December 06, 2010 02:31:23 pm Boris Epstein wrote: >> So, what's the story with CentOS 6? It is supposed to be out by now, >> or coming out soon, or so I heard - but yet there seems to be no >> mention of it at http://centos.org/ . Does anybody know what's up wit

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: what's the status?

On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Monday, December 06, 2010 02:31:23 pm Boris Epstein wrote: >> So, what's the story with CentOS 6? It is supposed to be out by now, >> or coming out soon, or so I heard - but yet there seems to be no >> mention of it at http://centos.org/ . Does anybody kn

Re: [CentOS] http request, which command is good for testing

On 12/6/10 12:52 PM, adrian kok wrote: > Hi all > > I just know there are curl / lwp-request, lynx and elinks > > Which command is good for http testing? jmeter is pretty good for load testing if you don't mind running java. http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/ -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gm

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: what's the status?

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > Having said that, if you just absolutely must run an EL6, Scientific Linux 6 > is available in an early alpha (and I do mean early alpha); it may very well > be that might fit your bill for something to 'try out'. > Or grab a RHEL6 lice

Re: [CentOS] ntfs

On 12/6/10 1:57 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Monday, December 06, 2010 02:41:46 pm John R Pierce wrote: >> On 12/06/10 11:12 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: >>> In a dual-boot scenario? >> >> ugh. dual booting is a pain in the derriere. use a VM if its for >> software testing or whatever. > > Some of us rea

[CentOS] CentOS 5.5 on a new Mac Mini? no CD Driver?

Hi All, I am attempting to install CentOS 5.5 64 bit on my new Mac Mini. I boot to the CD and when I get to selecting where I am installing from (local cd, hard disk, ftp, etc) I select Local CD and it cannot find a driver and wants me to manually specify or use a driver disk. I ave no idea wh

Re: [CentOS] ntfs

On Monday, December 06, 2010 03:50:49 pm Les Mikesell wrote: > But you could easily run Linux under Virtualbox or vmware. While still > running OS X. I'd rather not do that, as performance does suffer to a degree, and Linux is my primary environment, not my secondary one. Further, you then add

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: what's the status?

On Monday, December 06, 2010 03:14:44 pm Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2010/12/6 Lamar Owen : > > Karanbir has solicited help on the -devel list; I'm sure there are things > > that need doing that perhaps you could help with.. > Can you point to the direct message? I might have some time to donate

[CentOS] pam_time.so and /etc/security/time.conf

I am investigating how to limit user logins via sshd to specific times of day. I have the basic syntax but what I want to know is how does pam_time.so process time.conf. Say I have a clutch of users that should login between 07:00 and 18:00 Monday to Friday. I infer that the following will handl

[CentOS] Coolkey and esc and "SmartCard"s, oh, my

What's happening: I put my "SmartCard" in the reader, and the Coolkey phone home window pops up. I close it, and the SmartCard manager window pops up, saying it's not initialized. Neither of these should be happening with these cards (US federal gov't issue, not DoD). Googling, I find

[CentOS] pam_time.so and /etc/security/time.conf

I have done a bit of experimenting and I am confused respecting the evident behaviour of this module. If I do this: sshd;*;*;Wk0700-1500 Then all user ids fail to log in (at the present time). However, if I add this: sshd;*;user01;Al-24000 sshd:*:*:Wk0700-1500 Then I get the same result f

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

David Sommerseth wrote: > On 06/12/10 15:29, Todd Rinaldo wrote: >> On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: >> >>> On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote: On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote: > On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Bob McConnell wrote: > David Sommerseth wrote: >> On 06/12/10 15:29, Todd Rinaldo wrote: >>> On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: >>> On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote: >> On 12/05/10 12:50,

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 12/6/10 4:40 PM, Ryan Wagoner wrote: > IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to extend the time > until IPv4 exhaustion. A side effect was hiding the internal IPv4 > address, which complicates a number of protocols like FTP and SIP. The > only downside I see is ISPs could try and ch

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 on a new Mac Mini? no CD Driver?

OK, my problems get worse. I connected an external USB DVD Drive and that worked. Now, however, no hard disks are recognized I was really hoping to run CentOS on this machine, but I guess back to Snow Leopard Server I go On Dec 6, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: > Hi

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

Ryan Wagoner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Bob McConnell wrote: >> David Sommerseth wrote: >>> On 06/12/10 15:29, Todd Rinaldo wrote: On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrot

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Sunday, December 05, 2010 06:50:44 am Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Seeing as IPV4 is near it's end of life > (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm), > I'm curios as who know whether everyone is ready for the changeover to > IPV6? > > Is anyone using it in pr

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 on a new Mac Mini? no CD Driver?

On Monday, December 06, 2010 03:54:15 pm Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: > Hi All, > > I am attempting to install CentOS 5.5 64 bit on my new Mac Mini. I boot to > the CD and when I get to selecting where I am installing from (local cd, hard > disk, ftp, etc) I select Local CD and it cannot find a

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Bob McConnell wrote: > Ryan Wagoner wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Bob McConnell wrote: >>> David Sommerseth wrote: On 06/12/10 15:29, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: > >> On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 on a new Mac Mini? no CD Driver?

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:43:38PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Monday, December 06, 2010 03:54:15 pm Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: > > > > I am attempting to install CentOS 5.5 64 bit on my new Mac Mini. I boot to > > the CD and when I get to selecting where I am installing from (local cd, > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 on a new Mac Mini? no CD Driver?

Hi Keith, > As a test, you might consider getting a Fedora 14 live CD and see if it > can find the drives. If so, it may be the same issue. It's possible > that the release version of RHEL 6 supports it, if you can get hold of > it to test it, or you may just want to put Fedora 14 on it if the

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Bob McConnell wrote: > No, the downside is that each address used will be exposed to the world. > I consider that a serious security flaw. Having my ISP know how many > computers I have is a minor issue covered by the contract I have with > them. But having all of t

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 12/06/10 4:27 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Bob McConnell wrote: >> No, the downside is that each address used will be exposed to the world. >> I consider that a serious security flaw. ... > What you are talking about is a FIREWALL, which is NOT THE SAME THING > as a

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 6/12/10 4:34 PM, "John R Pierce" wrote: > On 12/06/10 4:27 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Bob McConnell wrote: >>> No, the downside is that each address used will be exposed to the world. >>> I consider that a serious security flaw. ... >> What you are talking about

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

Folks I have been following the IPV6 comments. What concerns me with the loss of NAT are the following issues: 1) My friend from half-way around the world comes to visit. He turns on his IPV6 enabled device (think Ipad), and wants to use my ISP's connection. What IP address does he get? If i

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On 12/6/10 6:27 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > You are enjoying a side-effect of NAT by thinking it > is a firewall. The other nice side-effect of NAT is that you get an effectively infinite number of addresses behind it without any pre-arrangement with anyone else. Even if ISPs hand out what they

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 08:57 AM, David wrote: > Folks > > I have been following the IPV6 comments. > > What concerns me with the loss of NAT are the following issues: > > 1) My friend from half-way around the world comes to visit. He turns > on his IPV6 enabled device (think Ipad), and want

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

David wrote: > Folks > > I have been following the IPV6 comments. > > What concerns me with the loss of NAT are the following issues: > 3) When I connect my IPV6 refrigerator with its automatic inventory > system tracking every RFID-enabled carrot I use, won't I be making my > shopping habits

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 on a new Mac Mini? no CD Driver?

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 04:19:43PM -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: > > I just know CentOS really. Can I adapt easily? I assume things like yum and > apache conf, etc are the same? You know just as much about Fedora as I do! ;-) If I'm able to make time to install it to my MBP, it'll be my

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 08:57 AM, David wrote: >> Folks >> >> I have been following the IPV6 comments. >> >> What concerns me with the loss of NAT are the following issues: >> >> 1) My friend from half-way around the world comes to vi

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:57 PM, David wrote: > 3) When I connect my IPV6 refrigerator with its automatic inventory > system tracking every RFID-enabled carrot I use, won't I be making my > shopping habits visible to all those annoying advertisers? Or, in > other words, am I compromising my privac