Re: [CentOS] how to separate individual logs?

2010-12-04 Thread hadi motamedi
On 12/1/10, John Doe wrote: > I copy/pasted the code above and it works fine... > If I indent it like mine, they are identical. > Check that ftp does not add control chars. > You run it with bash, right? > Ask your sysadmin/colegue to help you. > > JD > Sorry to forget to mention that your code wa

[CentOS] yum-complete-transaction

2010-12-04 Thread Johan Scheepers
Good day, Some yum instructions I do not know. Kindly some pointers please. There are unfinished transactions remaining. You might consider running yum-complete-transaction first to finish them. The program yum-complete-transaction is found in the yum-utils package. This is where I am lost Tha

[CentOS] Fwd: Linux, Windows AD domain, and IDs

2010-12-04 Thread Scott Ehrlich
You have a CentOS (for example) workstation that is a member of a Windows AD domain courtesy of modified smb.conf and krb5.conf files. There are, thus, no local user accounts on the linux workstation. There is a network application that benefits most (maybe even requires) the user's numerical port

Re: [CentOS] (SOLVED) yum-complete-transaction

2010-12-04 Thread Johan Scheepers
Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > > Some yum instructions I do not know. > Kindly some pointers please. > > There are unfinished transactions remaining. You might consider running > yum-complete-transaction first to finish them. > The program yum-complete-transaction is found in the yum-utils

Re: [CentOS] # chkconfig: kill at run level 3

2010-12-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote: > In the control script of my daemon in /etc/init.d?, I have >   # chkconfig: 35 97 3 > > The result of this is that I have links: >   /etc/rc.d/rc1.d/K03... >   /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S97... >   /etc/rc.d/rc5.d/S97... > > As mentioned in a previou

Re: [CentOS] LVM change disk

2010-12-04 Thread Jim Wildman
1) Plan better next time 2) Use a USB drive as a temporary disk > Dear all, > I have a 4,1TB Logical volume consist of four disks with size of 2TB, > 1TB, 1TB, and 500GB. The LV currently full. I plan to change the 1Tb > disks and 500Gb disks. I plan to remove one 1TB disk or the 500GB so > that I

Re: [CentOS] LVM change disk

2010-12-04 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On Saturday 04 December 2010 02:47:15 muhammad panji wrote: > The problem is that I have no SATA port left so that I can't move PE to the > new disk. I don't see how you can solve your problem with the current setup (you need to free up space and put it somewhere but you don't have any more disks

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Linux, Windows AD domain, and IDs

2010-12-04 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > You have a CentOS (for example) workstation that is a member of a > Windows AD domain courtesy of modified smb.conf and krb5.conf files. > There are, thus, no local user accounts on the linux workstation. > > There is a network application tha

Re: [CentOS] LVM change disk

2010-12-04 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:47 AM, muhammad panji wrote: > Dear all, > I have a 4,1TB Logical volume consist of four disks with size of 2TB, > 1TB, 1TB, and 500GB. The LV currently full. I plan to change the 1Tb > disks and 500Gb disks. I plan to remove one 1TB disk or the 500GB so > that I can repla

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Linux, Windows AD domain, and IDs

2010-12-04 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
On 4 December 2010 14:34, Ryan Wagoner wrote: > You need to use IDMAP to do this. Have a look at the below link, > specially the IDMAP storage in LDAP section. Alternatively, install Windows Services for UNIX on the Active Directory box, and define each user's UID within AD. Useful if you have l

Re: [CentOS] # chkconfig: kill at run level 3

2010-12-04 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Michael D. Berger wrote: > To: centos@centos.org > From: Michael D. Berger > Subject: [CentOS] # chkconfig: kill at run level 3 > > In the control script of my daemon in /etc/init.d?, I have > # chkconfig: 35 97 3 > > The result of this is that I have links: > /etc/rc.d/r

[CentOS] Inside the Linux boot process

2010-12-04 Thread Keith Roberts
Interesting article from IBM on how Linux boots, with some nice graphics. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-linuxboot/index.html Inside the Linux boot process Take a guided tour from the Master Boot Record to the first user-space application Kind Regards, Keith Roberts -- In theo

Re: [CentOS] yum-complete-transaction

2010-12-04 Thread Les Mikesell
On 12/4/10 4:20 AM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > > Some yum instructions I do not know. > Kindly some pointers please. > > There are unfinished transactions remaining. You might consider running > yum-complete-transaction first to finish them. > The program yum-complete-transaction is found

Re: [CentOS] yum-complete-transaction

2010-12-04 Thread Johan Scheepers
Les Mikesell wrote: > On 12/4/10 4:20 AM, Johan Scheepers wrote: >> Good day, >> >> Some yum instructions I do not know. >> Kindly some pointers please. >> >> There are unfinished transactions remaining. You might consider running >> yum-complete-transaction first to finish them. >> The program yum

[CentOS] Fiddling with software RAID1 : continue working with one of two disks failing?

2010-12-04 Thread Niki Kovacs
Hi, I'm currently experimenting with software RAID1 on a spare PC with two 40 GB hard disks. Normally, on a desktop PC with only one hard disk, I have a very simple partitioning scheme like this : /dev/hda1 80 MB/boot ext2 /dev/hda2 1 GBswap /dev/hda3 39 GB/ ext3 Here's

Re: [CentOS] Fiddling with software RAID1 : continue working with one of two disks failing?

2010-12-04 Thread Les Mikesell
On 12/4/10 11:34 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > > I wasn't sure where to install GRUB, so I chose /dev/md0. Grub doesn't know anything about raid. It only works because each component of a RAID1 looks just like a non-raid filesystem. You should install grub on the master boot partition of both membe

Re: [CentOS] yum-complete-transaction

2010-12-04 Thread RedShift
On 12/04/10 18:00, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 12/4/10 4:20 AM, Johan Scheepers wrote: >>> Good day, >>> >>> Some yum instructions I do not know. >>> Kindly some pointers please. >>> >>> There are unfinished transactions remaining. You might consider running >>> yum-complete-

Re: [CentOS] LVM change disk

2010-12-04 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/03/10 10:47 PM, muhammad panji wrote: > Dear all, > I have a 4,1TB Logical volume consist of four disks with size of 2TB, > 1TB, 1TB, and 500GB. The LV currently full. I plan to change the 1Tb > disks and 500Gb disks. I plan to remove one 1TB disk or the 500GB so > that I can replace it with

Re: [CentOS] Fiddling with software RAID1 : continue working with one of two disks failing?

2010-12-04 Thread Niki Kovacs
Les Mikesell a écrit : > On 12/4/10 11:34 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: >> I wasn't sure where to install GRUB, so I chose /dev/md0. > > Grub doesn't know anything about raid. It only works because each component > of > a RAID1 looks just like a non-raid filesystem. You should install grub on > the

Re: [CentOS] Fiddling with software RAID1 : continue working with one of two disks failing?

2010-12-04 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:34:26 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm currently experimenting with software RAID1 on a spare PC with two > 40 GB hard disks. Normally, on a desktop PC with only one hard disk, I > have a very simple partitioning scheme like this : > > /dev/hda1 80 MB

Re: [CentOS] Fiddling with software RAID1 : continue working with one of two disks failing?

2010-12-04 Thread Niki Kovacs
Robert Heller a écrit : > > Minor performance nit: Doing RAID with two IDE disks on the *same* > controller is not going to buy you anything in terms of performance. I > suspect this is just experimental, mostly to get the feel for how to set > things up, so this is not a major issue. > Yes, th

Re: [CentOS] # chkconfig: kill at run level 3

2010-12-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:25:47 +, Keith Roberts wrote: [...] > > Please see this old SuSE documentation for a good description of the > Linux boot process: > > http://linuxmafia.com/linux/suse-linux-internals/part2.html > [...] Will this SuSE documentation be correct for CentOS, which is Red

Re: [CentOS] # chkconfig: kill at run level 3

2010-12-04 Thread RedShift
On 12/04/10 21:42, Michael D. Berger wrote: > On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:25:47 +, Keith Roberts wrote: > > [...] >> >> Please see this old SuSE documentation for a good description of the >> Linux boot process: >> >> http://linuxmafia.com/linux/suse-linux-internals/part2.html >> > [...] > > Will th

Re: [CentOS] # chkconfig: kill at run level 3

2010-12-04 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Michael D. Berger wrote: > To: centos@centos.org > From: Michael D. Berger > Subject: Re: [CentOS] # chkconfig: kill at run level 3 > > On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:25:47 +, Keith Roberts wrote: > > [...] >> >> Please see this old SuSE documentation for a good description of th

Re: [CentOS] linux boot process (was# chkconfig: kill at run level 3)

2010-12-04 Thread Cia Watson
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:42:02 + (UTC) "Michael D. Berger" wrote: > On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:25:47 +, Keith Roberts wrote: > > [...] > > > > Please see this old SuSE documentation for a good description of the > > Linux boot process: > > > > http://linuxmafia.com/linux/suse-linux-internals/

Re: [CentOS] linux boot process (was# chkconfig: kill at run level 3)

2010-12-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:58:10 +, Cia Watson wrote: [...] 04 Dec 2010 15:25:47 +, Keith Roberts wrote: >> [...] > > I'm not a boot-loader expert, but CentOS uses grub and the first thing I > notice about the attached article is that it talks about LILO. From what > I've gathered LILO is a

Re: [CentOS] linux boot process (was# chkconfig: kill at run level 3)

2010-12-04 Thread Cia Watson
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 03:41:45 + (UTC) "Michael D. Berger" wrote: > On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:58:10 +, Cia Watson wrote: > [...] > 04 Dec 2010 15:25:47 +, Keith Roberts wrote: > >> > [...] > > > > I'm not a boot-loader expert, but CentOS uses grub and the first > > thing I notice about t

Re: [CentOS] linux boot process (was# chkconfig: kill at run level 3)

2010-12-04 Thread John R Pierce
> I'm not a boot-loader expert, but CentOS uses grub and the first thing > I notice about the attached article is that it talks about LILO. From > what I've gathered LILO is a different animal than grub, so as far as > the documentation is specific to lilo processes, I'd say no it wouldn't > be co