[CentOS] samba3x troubles

2010-12-02 Thread Galia Lisovskaya
Hi all, I get troubles with samba3x server: samba3x-winbind-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 samba3x-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 samba3x-common-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 Some times, users call and ask of any folder in any share sleep. Locked not _all_ share, only one of it's folder. In logs i don't see any errors(for time o

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Veiko Kukk
On 01/12/10 21:12, Boris Epstein wrote: > So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s Ethernet adapters should I > use under CentOS? If you have had a consistent positive experience > with any particular chipset/brand please speak up. Use Intel NIC-s and you don't have to worry. -- Veiko __

Re: [CentOS] x86_64 and Thunderbird Trash folder.

2010-12-02 Thread John Doe
From: Jerry Geis > I just ran into something odd, > I have x86_64 5.5 running with Thunderbird. > I am getting a message about can delete the email as Trash is FULL. > The file size is 4G. Whats up with that > I have the 64 bit executable running. > file /usr/lib64/thunderbird-2.0.0.24/th

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Wednesday 01 December 2010 20:12:18 Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello listmates, > > As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with > Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details: > > http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224 > > So now my ques

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: > For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't > use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500 > frames. Seriously? What switches? ___

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:22:38 Christopher Chan wrote: > On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: > > For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we > > don't use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with > > normal 1500 fram

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Bent Terp
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler wrote: > You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the > whole life. Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for :-D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://l

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 08:28 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: > On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:22:38 Christopher Chan wrote: > > > On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: > > > > For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we > > > > don't use

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread m . roth
Bent Terp wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler > wrote: >> You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the >> whole life. > > Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for :-D Hah - I was thinking of another angle: so, Timo, you pay for love?

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Timo Schoeler
On 12/02/2010 04:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Bent Terp wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler >> wrote: >>> You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the >>> whole life. >> >> Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for :-D > > Hah - I

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread m . roth
Timo Schoeler wrote: > On 12/02/2010 04:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Bent Terp wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler >>> wrote: You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. >>> >>> Except with CentOS - we get SO much m

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread miguelmedalha
> For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't > use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500 > frames. > Jumbo frames have advantages other than "reaching wirespeed". Its use produces less overhead and in general less CPU utiliza

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 70, Issue 2

2010-12-02 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

[CentOS] debuginfo and debuginfo-common for PAE with systemtap

2010-12-02 Thread Alice Anderson
I want to use systemtap on a 5.3 system but cannot find supporting kernel-PAE-debuginfo or kernel-debuginfo-common packages. Am I being a noob, or do these not exist for the PAE kernel? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/m

Re: [CentOS] debuginfo and debuginfo-common for PAE with systemtap

2010-12-02 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Thursday 02 December 2010 18:24:12 Alice Anderson wrote: > I want to use systemtap on a 5.3 system but cannot find supporting > kernel-PAE-debuginfo or kernel-debuginfo-common packages. Am I being a > noob, or do these not exist for the PAE kernel? Sometimes a specific package is missing but

Re: [CentOS] debuginfo and debuginfo-common for PAE with systemtap

2010-12-02 Thread Akemi Yagi
2010/12/2 Peter Kjellström : > On Thursday 02 December 2010 18:24:12 Alice Anderson wrote: > Sometimes a specific package is missing but for 5.3 PAE it seems quite good: > This from our mirror (mirror.nsc.liu.se) but I assume they're available > upstreams in vault too. Note that there's no repo f

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

2010-12-02 Thread Jerry Franz
On 11/28/2010 09:31 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > [...] > And then, one day, it won't work. Worse - it doesn't always *log* what > it is doing in a way that you can figure out. Occasionally not at all. > So you spend a few hours poking at the system until you try the magic of > turning off SELinux. A

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:34 AM, wrote: > Bent Terp wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler >> wrote: >>> You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the >>> whole life. >> >> Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for :-D > > Hah - I was th

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3

2010-12-02 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, cybernet wrote: > centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, please get use to that > use another distribution like ... a very popular one for desktops Or just install the multimedia add-ons and use it as your desktop. For MP3s, I just install XMMS and the MP3

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3

2010-12-02 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > > Been googling about this matter. > Afraid I am now confused. > Too many options..: for/against/whatever. > Some is years ago. > > Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3 > please. > Thanks > Joha