can you please tell what that command does ?:))
From: hadi motamedi
To: CentOS mailing list
Sent: Tue, November 30, 2010 6:52:30 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] how to separate individual logs?
On 11/29/10, John Doe wrote:
> Here is "The Power of CentOS"!!! (in app
On 11/30/10, cybernet wrote:
> can you please tell what that command does ?:))
>
>
Sorry. Which command do you mean?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> cat edit.txt | while read LINE; do
> echo "$LINE" | grep -q '>\.\.'
> if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
>LOGFILE=`echo $LINE | cut -d' ' -f1`.log
> else
>echo "$LINE" >> $LOGFILE
> fi
> done
From: hadi motamedi
To: CentOS mailing list
Sent: Tue, November 30,
On 11/30/10, cybernet wrote:
>> cat edit.txt | while read LINE; do
>> echo "$LINE" | grep -q '>\.\.'
>> if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
>>LOGFILE=`echo $LINE | cut -d' ' -f1`.log
>> else
>>echo "$LINE" >> $LOGFILE
>> fi
>> done
>
As you see in the original text file, each module's log is starte
Hi,
We have a cluster with CentOS 5.5 installed with oscar. The firm which
has pre-installed the cluster has done strange things...and now I get
problems:
- if I understand correctly what was done, several infiniband CentOS
packages were installed (compat-dapl, compat-dapl-devel,
compat-dapl-uti
From: hadi motamedi
> On 11/29/10, John Doe wrote:
> > cat edit.txt | while read LINE; do
> > echo "$LINE" | grep -q '>\.\.'
> > if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
> > LOGFILE=`echo $LINE | cut -d' ' -f1`.log
> > else
> > echo "$LINE" >> $LOGFILE
> > fi
> > done
> Thank you very much for
From: Les Mikesell
> why are you putting blind faith in the SELinux code?
Because it comes from the NSA!
The backdoor experts... ;P
JD
PS: joking of course, the NSA would never do anything bad...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ht
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:41 AM, John Doe wrote:
> > From: bluethundr
> >> I am attempting to manage my key logins with ssh-agent. However EVERY
> >> time I try to ssh I have to go through the same exact routing and it's
> >> getting a little old...
> >> Does an
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Johan Scheepers
> wrote:
>> Good day,
>>
>> Gparted is not available on my installation.
>>
>> Which patition tool is available in centos 5.5 please.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Johan
>
> gparted is just the "Gnome" GUI for parted. "parted" works v
Hello Les,
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:35 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> If you don't trust your software, run it under a uid that doesn't have
> write access to anything important - or in a VM or a different machine
> for that matter. X has no problem displaying programs running with
> different u
Good day,
Some time ago I asked some assistance for the long hostname in the
terminals.
Editing .bashrc in user and root by adding PS1=xxx did make the
difference.
Here is something I picked up on another list that make editing .bashrc
not necessary.
as root..gedit /etc/sysconfig/netw
On 11/30/10, John Doe wrote:
> The trick is that your original file has '\r' chars lurking around...
> Forgot I did removed them manualy when I saw them...
>
> cat Edit3 | tr -d "\r" | while read LINE; do
>
> Instead of just copy/pasting, try to understand what it does.
> Here is how it works:
>
Hello John,
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 02:12 -0800, John Doe wrote:
> From: Les Mikesell
> > why are you putting blind faith in the SELinux code?
The SELinux restrictions are a much bigger hurdle to take for a buffer
overflow exploit than setting a "safe" uid.
> Because it comes from the NSA!
> The
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 07:45 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Les,
>
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:35 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> If you don't trust your software, run it under a uid that doesn't have
>> write access to anything important - or in a VM or a different machine
>> for th
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:19 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
>
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:41 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> > From: bluethundr
>> >> I am attempting to manage my key logins with ssh-agent. However EVERY
>> >> time I try to ssh I have to go through the same exact rout
From: hadi motamedi
> On 11/30/10, John Doe wrote:
> > The trick is that your original file has '\r' chars lurking around...
> > Forgot I did removed them manualy when I saw them...
> > cat Edit3 | tr -d "\r" | while read LINE; do
> > Instead of just copy/pasting, try to understand what it
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:44 AM, giggzounet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a cluster with CentOS 5.5 installed with oscar. The firm which
> has pre-installed the cluster has done strange things...and now I get
> problems:
>
> - if I understand correctly what was done, several infiniband CentOS
> packag
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
> If it works in your small environment, fine, but I wouldn't publish it
> for general use without more thought. The "keychain" perl script is
> actually pretty good.
I am not going to pit 5 lines of shell against a 1500+ lines perl script...
It was just a suggestion,
On 30/11/10 10:54 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 02:12 -0800, John Doe wrote:
>
>> Because it comes from the NSA!
>> The backdoor experts... ;P
>
>> PS: joking of course, the NSA would never do anything bad...
>
> This of course was a serious concern by any of the earl
Hi all,
I have 8G -CF cards that I have been putting linux on.
Everything was working fine till yesterday when I got a new batch of CF
cards.
The size has changed. The original CF card was 7637M (255 heads/63
sectors/928 cylinders)
The new CF card is 8019M (255 heads/63 sectors/974 cylinders)
On 25/11/10 4:07 AM, tony.chamberl...@lemko.com wrote:
>
>
> I am looking for the optimal VPN. Well it doens't have to be that elaborate.
> Just the best VPN. We currently have some customers using PPTP, some using
> openvpn, some using Cisco Any Connect and there are a few others.
Be careful wi
On Nov 30, 2010, at 4:07 AM, hadi motamedi wrote:
> On 11/30/10, cybernet wrote:
>>> cat edit.txt | while read LINE; do
>>> echo "$LINE" | grep -q '>\.\.'
>>> if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
>>> LOGFILE=`echo $LINE | cut -d' ' -f1`.log
>>> else
>>> echo "$LINE" >> $LOGFILE
>>> fi
>>> done
>>
>
> As yo
Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 30/11/10 10:54 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 02:12 -0800, John Doe wrote:
>>
> As you say, it was eventually determined that the NSA did not insert
> anything dodgy in the code to give them access. They only did two
I dunno, selinux is pretty
On 1/12/10 2:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ben McGinnes wrote:
>>
>> The reason for the second one is pretty obvious, though, they know
>> that SELinux would be (and is) used by non-Americans and they don't
>> want to protect foreign secrets, they want to discover them.
>
> Um, not quite: there
On Monday, November 29, 2010 12:38:20 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> [Most thrid party apps qualify as]
> Pretty much anything that needs to write files outside of the home
> directory of the owning user. Certainly anything that uses apache with
> its own data store.
Which is the prime target for SEL
On Monday, November 29, 2010 02:24:14 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > My opinion is that I'm not going to run third party apps that break in that
> > way, and I'm going to let the developers know why.
>
> That's fine for you. When you're running in a larger environment, as many
On Monday, November 29, 2010 11:02:59 pm cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
> Your enthusiasm for SELinux seems tied conceptually to a workstation
> running the set of applications that come with the distribution.
> Nothing wrong with that.
I have used a Linux as my primary desktop for 13 years; so, yeah
On 11/30/2010 9:51 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> If a particular app is so recalcitrant that SELinux needs to be turned off,
> that's when I'd be doing some drastic things, much like windows lab
> environments need done. Things like automatic revert to known-good snapshot
> on the production boxes
On Monday, November 29, 2010 09:35:44 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> Not so much a problem - I'm just saying that you should do the simple things
> that have always worked first, then add SELinux if you want.
First, I hope everyone else is enjoying the thread as much as I; I always like
to see diverge
I'll add to the large (often interesting, but large nonetheless) pile
of messages in this thread by remarking that even in permissive mode,
SELinux can be very useful as an audit tool.
Those AVC messages folks love to hate show deviations from expected
behavior. Sometimes those deviations are f
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, November 29, 2010 09:35:44 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Not so much a problem - I'm just saying that you should do the simple
>> things that have always worked first, then add SELinux if you want.
> Now, I want to ask, given the two alternatives:
> 1.) Set up another ui
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 05:12:17 am John Doe wrote:
> From: Les Mikesell
> > why are you putting blind faith in the SELinux code?
> Because it comes from the NSA!
> The backdoor experts... ;P
Also the SCIF experts.
SCIFs are used by people other than intelligence agencies and in areas ot
Have a CentOS 4.x 32 bit server running on a single 500M SATA drive.
What is easiest way to convert too RAID 1 on it? Anyone have a link?
Would be open to hardware or software just do not want to reinstall
the entire mess.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:21:46 am Les Mikesell wrote:
> I'm not talking about a particular app. The thing I want quantified is
> what it will cost to train some number of people to be able to
> troubleshoot any problem that SELinux might cause with any app, given
> potential changes in
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:59, Matt wrote:
> Have a CentOS 4.x 32 bit server running on a single 500M SATA drive.
> What is easiest way to convert too RAID 1 on it? Anyone have a link?
> Would be open to hardware or software just do not want to reinstall
> the entire mess.
>
On 11/30/2010 11:04 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:21:46 am Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I'm not talking about a particular app. The thing I want quantified is
>> what it will cost to train some number of people to be able to
>> troubleshoot any problem that SELinux might cause
At Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:46:03 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have 8G -CF cards that I have been putting linux on.
> Everything was working fine till yesterday when I got a new batch of CF
> cards.
>
> The size has changed. The original CF card was 7637M (255 heads/63
> se
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:38:24 am m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > 2.) Be able to tell my os 'PDF reader can only do X to these files, and no
> > others. Browser cannot read ~/Documents, and can only write in
> > ~/.mozilla. Flash plugin cannot write anywhere without specif
> > The size has changed. The original CF card was 7637M (255 heads/63
> > sectors/928 cylinders)
> > The new CF card is 8019M (255 heads/63 sectors/974 cylinders)
> >
> > I simply do "dd if=cf.img of=/dev/sde" to copy the images to CF.
>
> ARG!!! Don't do this! You really, really don't want t
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 09:46:03 am Jerry Geis wrote:
> However its not. centos boots but there are journal issues and
> everything is mounted read-only.
Can you get log snippets showing why the journal had issues?
> Any ideas why this doesnt work or how I can keep my smaller image and
>
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:38:24 am m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Lamar Owen wrote:
>> > 2.) Be able to tell my os 'PDF reader can only do X to these files,
>> > and no others. Browser cannot read ~/Documents, and can only write in
>> > ~/.mozilla. Flash plugin cannot write
On 11/30/2010 12:10 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>
>>> The size has changed. The original CF card was 7637M (255 heads/63
>>> sectors/928 cylinders)
>>> The new CF card is 8019M (255 heads/63 sectors/974 cylinders)
>>>
>>> I simply do "dd if=cf.img of=/dev/sde" to copy the images to CF.
>>
>> ARG!!
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 03:07:49PM +0100, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
> Am 29.11.10 13:43, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
> > 2010/11/29 Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator :
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> is there anyone out there, who has a current 2.4.23 srpm or good how to
> >> compile it from src with su
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:18:26 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> But [what it will cost to train some number of people to be able to
> troubleshoot any problem that SELinux might cause with any app, given
> potential changes in updates to both the distribution provided stuff and
> the 3rd party cod
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:18:26 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> > But [what it will cost to train some number of people to be able to
>> troubleshoot any problem that SELinux might cause with any app, given
>> potential changes in updates to both the distribution provided stuff
On 11/30/2010 10:42 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> It boils down to balancing 'it breaks my app that I can't or won't fix'
> against 'you've been pwned!'
Actually, it boils down to 'what causes more total costs to the
business'. Right now, in my experience, that is SELinux. Break ins to my
servers a
Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 11/30/2010 10:42 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>>
>> It boils down to balancing 'it breaks my app that I can't or won't fix'
>> against 'you've been pwned!'
>
> Actually, it boils down to 'what causes more total costs to the
> business'. Right now, in my experience, that is SELin
At Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:26:04 -0600 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 11/30/2010 12:10 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> >
> >>> The size has changed. The original CF card was 7637M (255 heads/63
> >>> sectors/928 cylinders)
> >>> The new CF card is 8019M (255 heads/63 sectors/974 cylinders)
> >>>
On 11/30/2010 1:13 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:26:04 -0600 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11/30/2010 12:10 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>>>
> The size has changed. The original CF card was 7637M (255 heads/63
> sectors/928 cylinders)
> The new CF card is
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> ... troubleshoot any problem that SELinux might cause with
> any app, ...
would you like a fixed price on that quote as well?
- R
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list
We have to rebuild our kernel to add support for a Mainpine fax board on a
CentOS 5.5 board:
http://www.hylafax.org/content/Handbook:Basic_Server_Configuration:Modem-specific_Guidance#Mainpine_IQ_Express
We followed all steps, but when calling rpmbuild, we are getting:
[r...@hylafax SPECS]# r
2010/11/30 Pascal Robert :
> We have to rebuild our kernel to add support for a Mainpine fax board on a
> CentOS 5.5 board:
>
> http://www.hylafax.org/content/Handbook:Basic_Server_Configuration:Modem-specific_Guidance#Mainpine_IQ_Express
>
> We followed all steps, but when calling rpmbuild, we a
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 02:04:12 pm Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 11/30/2010 10:42 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >
> > It boils down to balancing 'it breaks my app that I can't or won't fix'
> > against 'you've been pwned!'
>
> Actually, it boils down to 'what causes more total costs to the
> busin
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 01:55:11 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Reality check time: selinux is a *tiny* portion of the entire Linux
> market, though growing.
Reality check: IDC analysts have estimated Red Hat's share of the paid
commercial Linux market as 62%[1], [2], with Red Hat estimating
Le 2010-11-30 à 14:58, Eero Volotinen a écrit :
> 2010/11/30 Pascal Robert :
>> We have to rebuild our kernel to add support for a Mainpine fax board on a
>> CentOS 5.5 board:
>>
>>
>> http://www.hylafax.org/content/Handbook:Basic_Server_Configuration:Modem-specific_Guidance#Mainpine_IQ_Expre
2010/11/30 Pascal Robert :
>
> Le 2010-11-30 à 14:58, Eero Volotinen a écrit :
>
>> 2010/11/30 Pascal Robert :
>>> We have to rebuild our kernel to add support for a Mainpine fax board on a
>>> CentOS 5.5 board:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.hylafax.org/content/Handbook:Basic_Server_Configuration:Modem
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 02:13:17 pm Robert Heller wrote:
> Right. clonezilla is much more than dd. I would suspect that
> clonezilla is a bundling of sfdisk, dump/restore, and grub-install, or
> something link that.
According to the clonezilla website, dd is one of the supported methods:
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 01:10:14 pm Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> Even if the two disks have the same manufacturer and manufacturer part
> number, different firmware revisions can fail to boot after
> dd if=/dev/spinpoint.partnumber.fwrev1 of=/dev/spinpoint.partnumber.fwrev2
> Been there, done
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>>> [r...@hylafax SPECS]# rpmbuild -ba --target x86_64 kernel-2.6.spec
You are building as root. This is a bad practice. When building a
CentOS custom kernel, please try following the instructions in:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 01:55:11 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> However, there are a ton of apps out there, and
>> almost no developers who have been earning their living as programmers,
>> who have any knowledge of selinux. Case in point: something here,
>> developed in-h
I am trying to install Ruby-1.8.7p302 on a CentOS-5.5 server in
preparation for a Rails-3 application deployment. I have downloaded
the source from Rubyforge.org, unpacked it, and ran ./config and
make. Everything built without error. I then ran checkinstall to
create an rpm package. That too com
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:11:24PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
> Reality check: IDC analysts have estimated Red Hat's share of the paid
> commercial Linux market as 62%[1], [2], with Red Hat estimating higher
> [3]. That's RHEL: which ships SELinux enabled, enforcing, targeted,
> by default. And, th
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 01:10:14 pm Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> > Even if the two disks have the same manufacturer and
> > manufacturer part number, different firmware revisions can fail to
boot after
> > dd if=/dev/spinpoint.partnumber.fwrev1
of=/dev/spinpoint.partnumber.fwrev2
>
> > Be
Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:11:24PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> Reality check: IDC analysts have estimated Red Hat's share of the paid
>> commercial Linux market as 62%[1], [2], with Red Hat estimating higher
>> [3]. That's RHEL: which ships SELinux enabled, enforcing, targe
On Tuesday 30 November 2010 11:59, Matt wrote:
> Have a CentOS 4.x 32 bit server running on a single 500M SATA drive.
> What is easiest way to convert too RAID 1 on it? Anyone have a link?
> Would be open to hardware or software just do not want to reinstall
> the entire mess.
http://tinyurl
2010/11/30 Akemi Yagi :
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
[r...@hylafax SPECS]# rpmbuild -ba --target x86_64 kernel-2.6.spec
>
> You are building as root. This is a bad practice. When building a
> CentOS custom kernel, please try following the instructions in:
>
> h
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 03:49:57 pm Stephen Harris wrote:
> Reality check: how many of those installs are RedHat OOB installs with
> default options?
No idea. How many aren't default OOB?
For that matter, how many CentOS installs are out there are set:
1.) OOB, SELinux enforcing/targeted;
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 03:49:57 pm Stephen Harris wrote:
>> Reality check: how many of those installs are RedHat OOB installs with
>> default options?
>
> No idea. How many aren't default OOB?
>
> For that matter, how many CentOS installs are out there are set:
> 1.) OOB
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 03:31:44 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > CA should know better, and if they are targeting RHEL commercially they
> > should be supporting the default RHEL configuration.
> Right. So, hey, do you have the rights to call CA and lean on them?
Nope, s
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 03:31:44 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Lamar Owen wrote:
>> > CA should know better, and if they are targeting RHEL commercially
>> > they should be supporting the default RHEL configuration.
>
>> Right. So, hey, do you have the rights to call CA an
On 11/30/2010 3:13 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> P.S. I am just waiting for the day when SELinux is going to become locked in
> enforcing mode by the kernel developers, much as the traditional permissions
> system is a mandatory thing right now. :-D
I thought there was a security API in the kerne
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> With the ever increasing complexity of software is there any software
> you trust? I know I don't. Are you running your Flash plugin in Mozilla
> as a different user than the one you logged into under X? Care to
> elaborate how to accomplish such a feat? Or can you p
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, James B. Byrne wrote:
> make. Everything built without error. I then ran
> checkinstall ...
checkinstall is a third party solution and does not keep up
too well
> Running Transaction
> Installing : ruby-1.8.7
> 1/1
> Error unpacking rpm package ruby-1.8.7-p302-
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 01:22:53 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Right - change *local* policy for every iteration.
On the servers I would of course put policy into revision control and build it
into our customization package (I've built RPM's for a long time). Then
consistent contexts can g
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 01:22:53 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I'm talking about the real, outside world, *not* my own personal system.
>> ..
>> As I said, I work in the real world with all this, and you seem to be
>> arguing, based on your own personal experience tha
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 04:52:42 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> I thought there was a security API in the kernel that was designed
> specifically _not_ to lock it to an implementation.
Yes; Linux Security Modules (LSM). According to the wikipedia.org page on said
subject, the current 'officia
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 04:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And about apache... most of those attacks are preventable through
> defensive configuration and coding for httpd itself. Looking to selinux to
> protect you is very sloppy.
The key word is most. If one bothered to go through all
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 04:53:38 pm Bob McConnell wrote:
> That one's easy, don't ever install the plugin, or anything else from
> Adobe. Second step, set NoScript to block everything and everyone. If
> any site has content that requires either of those, I will never see it.
> That's their
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 04:53:38 pm Bob McConnell wrote:
>> That one's easy, don't ever install the plugin, or anything else from
>> Adobe. Second step, set NoScript to block everything and everyone. If
>> any site has content that requires either of those, I will never se
On 11/30/10 12:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And I notice that you don't address the other point, all the in-house
> apps, and if you think management will say "sure, spend whatever it takes
> to rewrite that so it conforms to selinux...", you're living in somewhere
> I don't. And just about eve
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 06:04:56 pm John R Pierce wrote:
> for instance, all our java-ware can run just fine in
> /home/$APPUSER/$APPNAME and run as a regular user. if we want to put
> it in /opt/$COMPANY/$APP then we might have to play with selinux
> defaults some, since /opt isn't par
Since the "SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!" thread is deep
in heated discussion, I decided not to derail to ask a simple question.
I found this guide for SELinux: http://www.linux-books.us/centos_0005.php and
it looks like it's straight out of RedHat.
However, it's dated 2005. W
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:19 PM, wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 03:49:57 pm Stephen Harris wrote:
>>> Reality check: how many of those installs are RedHat OOB installs with
>>> default options?
>>
>> No idea. How many aren't default OOB?
>>
>> For that matter, how ma
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 04:53:38 pm Bob McConnell wrote:
>> That one's easy, don't ever install the plugin, or anything else from
>> Adobe. Second step, set NoScript to block everything and everyone. If
>> any site has content that require
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:48 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I am trying to install Ruby-1.8.7p302 on a CentOS-5.5 server in
> preparation for a Rails-3 application deployment. I have downloaded
> the source from Rubyforge.org, unpacked it, and ran ./config and
> make. Everything built without error
fred smith wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:50:45PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Anyone got this working over a LAN under CentOS?
>> The instructions claim it is easy to connect
>> after pressing the WPS button on printer and router.
>>
>> Sadly, I don't see a WPS button on my Linksys WRT54
John R Pierce wrote:
>> The instructions claim it is easy to connect
>> after pressing the WPS button on printer and router.
>>
>> Sadly, I don't see a WPS button on my Linksys WRT54GL router.
> does this printer have any other connectivity options?
It does; I have set it up using an Ethernet co
Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> Anyone got this working over a LAN under CentOS?
> http://www.openprinting.org/printer/Samsung/Samsung-CLP-325w
>
> at least printer is supported.
I did read this web-page.
Unfortunately the author does not say whether he/she
configured the printer to work through WiFi.
On 11/30/10 6:26 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>> You should configure wlan by hand..
> How, exactly?
probably by hooking the printer up to ethernet, finding its IP address
(maybe on a self-test printout?) then connecting to its IP with
whatever configuration management they offer (my Brother ha
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:19:21AM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:50:45PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >> Anyone got this working over a LAN under CentOS?
> >> The instructions claim it is easy to connect
> >> after pressing the WPS button on pr
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 November 2010 20:54:37 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> And about apache... most of those attacks are preventable through
>> defensive configuration and coding for httpd itself. Looking to selinux to
>> protect you is very sloppy.
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:37 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> On Tuesday 30 November 2010 20:54:37 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> And about apache... most of those attacks are preventable through
>>> defensive configuration and coding
On 11/30/10 9:28 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 November 2010 20:54:37 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> And about apache... most of those attacks are preventable through
>> defensive configuration and coding for httpd itself. Looking to selinux to
>> protect you is very sloppy.
>
> So a guy i
On 11/30/10, Tony Schreiner wrote:
> That error would happen if you did not have a space between [ and $?
>
> Tony Schreiner
>
Thank you very much for your help. Actually, I didn't have got a clear
understanding of your code. Sorry for my mis-understanding. At now, I
analyzed the code and totally
Good day,
By accident booted with dsl internet not connected.
When reconnecting dsl - centos did not detect it.
Is there a way to make it trigger detection rather then rebooting Please.
Thanks
Regards
Johan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ht
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:34:19 +0200
Johan Scheepers wrote:
> By accident booted with dsl internet not connected.
> When reconnecting dsl - centos did not detect it.
> Is there a way to make it trigger detection rather then rebooting Please.
If you're using DHCP and not using Network Manager then
>>> I would guess no one knows. But all of my CentOS installs are OOB as
>>> concerning SELinux, except the two scalix installs, which have some
>>> custom
>>> 'stuff' thanks to the scalix instance naming.
>>
>> All I know is at the last two companies I worked at - AT&T, a small team
>> building
2010/12/1 Rob Del Vecchio :
> Since the "SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!" thread is deep
> in heated discussion, I decided not to derail to ask a simple question.
> I found this guide for
> SELinux: http://www.linux-books.us/centos_0005.php and it looks like it's
> straight out of
On 11/30/10, John Doe wrote:
>
> My pseudo-code does exactly what you described (re-read it)...
>
> And it creates .log files...
> $ ll -n
> total 36
> -rw-r--r-- 1 2000 500 4678 nov 30 10:49 Edit3
> -rw-r--r-- 1 2000 500 39 nov 30 10:54 HLR.log
> -rw-r--r-- 1 2000 500 2320 nov 30 10:54 IPTR.log
99 matches
Mail list logo
