Les,
On 11/22/2010 06:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
> 'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding
> company controlled by Microsoft?
Did you really struggle to find a more appropriate place to discuss
someth
Rob Kampen wrote:
> Toralf Lund wrote:
> I'm trying to install CentOS 5.5 on a couple of servers of type IBM
> System x3550 M3, but it's not going too well. Actually, the install
> setup phase runs as expected, and the actual installation also appears
> to be success
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Robert Heller wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Robert Heller
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Novell sale news?
>
> At Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:10:41 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 14:42 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wr
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 22:09 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/22/10 9:57 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:29:12PM -0500, Michael Semcheski wrote:
> >> Windows only, unfortunately.
> > When did they stop publishing *nix versions? I worked
> > extensively with tha
On 11/23/10 5:56 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>
>>> I should perhaps mention that I found a solution, sort of: It seems like
>>> the problem is that the system simply won't boot from a single hard disk
>>> set up as just that - a single, separate drive. I suspect this has
>>> something to do with the dis
On 11/23/10 4:42 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Les,
>
> On 11/22/2010 06:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
>> 'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding
>> company controlled by Microsoft?
>
> Did you really strugg
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 09:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/23/10 4:42 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Les,
>>
>> On 11/22/2010 06:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
>>> 'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a ho
> XHTML is supposed to be semantic, e. g. it indicates clearly that "this
> is a quotation", "this is an abbreviation", etc. The only thing
> Dreamweaver can do is put cleanly indented brackets around
> everything, to make sure no search engine leafing through the page will
> ever have the slighte
Hi,
am trying to pipe output from time command and output from a shell
script to the mail program.
So far it's not working as expected...
# time echo "test" 2>&1 | mail -s "timetest" m...@mail.com
real0m0.126s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
The time command writes to stderror, but here
Hi again !
I am begining to play with my new servers. I got for starter 2 nodes (1u
intel server platform, with a LSI Logic FC949ES FC card). I am like a child
playing with his new toys at christmas... I can't wait for CentOS 6 to come
out.
I do not want to clutter the list about requests for Ce
At Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:02:35 + (GMT) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > From: Robert Heller
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Novell sale news?
> >
> > At Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:10:41 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >
Rainer Traut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> am trying to pipe output from time command and output from a shell
> script to the mail program.
> So far it's not working as expected...
>
> # time echo "test" 2>&1 | mail -s "timetest" m...@mail.com
>
> real0m0.126s
> user0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.000s
>
> The t
Am 23.11.2010 15:30, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
> Rainer Traut wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> am trying to pipe output from time command and output from a shell
>> script to the mail program.
>> So far it's not working as expected...
>>
>> # time echo "test" 2>&1 | mail -s "timetest" m...@mail.com
>>
>> real
On 11/16/2010 10:22 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> Will (does) Centos 6 require 512Mb of memory for the GUI install like
>> FC14 or the lower requirement of FC13?
>>
>> My ASUS EE 700 has ~490Mb of memory (vidoe steals some from the 512Mb
>> base) and FC14 switches t
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:04:09PM +0100, Rainer Traut wrote:
> Am 23.11.2010 15:30, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
> > Rainer Traut wrote:
> >> am trying to pipe output from time command and output from a shell
> >> script to the mail program.
> >> So far it's not working as expected...
> >>
> >> # tim
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Robert Heller wrote:
160 lines of largely untrimmed quoted cr*p
You know better, Robert and by your action you say you just
don't care. This kind of behaviour is the best way I can
think of to drive people away from reading the list
My prior working rule on this list (and
There was an article about a kernel patch to improve performance.
www.webupd8.org/2010/11/alternative-to-200-lines-kernel-patch.html
it involves adding this to ~/.bashrc
| if [ "$PS1" ] ; then
mkdir -m 0700 /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/user/$$
echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/user/$$/
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:26:34PM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
> My machine Centos 5.5 does not have a /sys/fs/cgroup
>
> Is there anything else to do instead?
Wait for CentOS 6, which will have it ;-)
--
rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cent
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 22:09 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 11/22/10 9:57 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:29:12PM -0500, Michael Semcheski wrote:
>> >> Windows only, unfortunately.
>> >When did they stop publishing
Does Automount/autofs automagically run e2fsck? If so, how does one
disable this?
We have an external USB connected 2TB hard drive setup to automount.
Sometimes e2fsck gets fired up, I think from Automount. I have this
line in the automount config:
/backupdisk -fstype=ext3,nocheck:LABE
On 11/23/2010 9:18 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
> Hi again !
>
> I am begining to play with my new servers. I got for starter 2 nodes (1u
> intel server platform, with a LSI Logic FC949ES FC card). I am like a child
> playing with his new toys at christmas... I can't wait for CentOS 6 to come
> out.
>
>
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, David G. Mackay wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: David G. Mackay
> Subject: [CentOS] Grub, pata, and sata
>
> I've just filed bug 0004634. Grub won't install onto my pata drive now
> that I have a sata drive installed. This is grub 0.97 on CentOS5.5.
> Has anyone els
On 11/23/2010 12:49 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
> WP users *LOVED* reveal codes as it allows people to see exactly
> what's going on under the hood, and even fix some things when the
> files get out of whack. I answered the phone one time, and the
> opening from the caller was ``I want Reveal Codes''
Just a quick note to say that I have moved all my websites
to a cloud platform with 99.99% uptime.
So I apologise if anyone has been trying to get to the
Kickstart User Guide and other Centos bits on my website.
My home server is being worked on, and I'll just use
that for development purposes
Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>>On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 22:09 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 11/22/10 9:57 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:29:12PM -0500, Michael Semcheski wrote:
>>> >> Windows only, unfortunately.
>>> > When
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:12 +, Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, David G. Mackay wrote:
>
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > From: David G. Mackay
> > Subject: [CentOS] Grub, pata, and sata
> >
> > I've just filed bug 0004634. Grub won't install onto my pata drive now
> > that I have
John Hinton wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 12:49 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
>> WP users *LOVED* reveal codes as it allows people to see exactly
>> what's going on under the hood, and even fix some things when the
>> files get out of whack. I answered the phone one time, and the
>> opening from the caller wa
On Sunday, November 21, 2010 05:49:25 pm Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
> 2010/11/22 Dave Stevens :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using CentOS on a box that, among other things, offers mailman
> > mailing lists, currently mailman 2.1.9. Version 2.1.14 is avilable
> > from the developers but integrating it into
Hello to all,
I have been battling this situation now for 3 days and still have not
found a resolution. I appeal to any and all for help.
Here are the facts as far as I can tell.
1) I moved a 66 node rocks based cluster to a diskless cluster using
the latest version of Centos and all update
On 11/23/2010 12:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> I have never used word processing programs for much of anything
>> serious, using vim and groff or docbook xml for most things.
>
> I've done lots of documents, documentation, and even some published
> articles in SysAdmin (before it sadly went u
> Then I hope to finish my tutorial on installing Eclipse
> Helios for Centos 5.5
Is there anything special to be done?
I just unzipped the SR1 distribution for RCP/RAP developers
linux-gtk-x86_64 and it works without problem on an up to date CentOS
5.5 x86_64.
(to be more precise: I install it a
> break out your wallet, blow the dust out, and spend a few bucks on some RAM
Sometimes the hardware is so old, that it is not as easy as that to
find the right RAM for it...
I have some very old IBM PoS cashier machines (sic! got them for 30
EUR each, plenty of connectors, very well built) based
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 12:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> I have never used word processing programs for much of anything
>>> serious, using vim and groff or docbook xml for most things.
>>
>> I've done lots of documents, documentation, and even some published
>> articles in SysA
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>> break out your wallet, blow the dust out, and spend a few bucks on some
RAM
>
> Sometimes the hardware is so old, that it is not as easy as that to find
the right RAM for it...
>
> I have some very old IBM PoS cashier machines (sic! got them for 30 EUR
each, plenty of conn
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 02:05:58PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Oh, yes: in '95, PC Magazine ran a review of word processors, and noted
> that 90% of the people IN 1995 using word processors only used 10% of the
> features that were available then, and of the other 10% of the folks who
> did
Joseph Norris ha scritto:
> Hello to all,
>
> I have been battling this situation now for 3 days and still have not
> found a resolution. I appeal to any and all for help.
>
> Here are the facts as far as I can tell.
>
> 1) I moved a 66 node rocks based cluster to a diskless cluster using
>
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 12:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I have never used word processing programs for much of anything
>>> serious, using vim and groff or docbook xml for most things.
>> I've done lots of documents, documentation, and even some published
>> a
> it, turn it off, and maybe uninstall. If these are PoS boxen, do you need
> X windows? Do you need Gnome or KDE as windonw managers (look at smaller
> ones - I use IceWM at home, < 600k, yes, k, not M; the other admin here
> likes xfce)?
I have the CentOS Extras XFCE on one of them (for which I
Keith Keller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 02:05:58PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Oh, yes: in '95, PC Magazine ran a review of word processors, and noted
>> that 90% of the people IN 1995 using word processors only used 10% of
>> the features that were available then, and of the other 1
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> I don't use them as cashier machines, just got them second hand.
> They were so cheap that I bought one just to try, and then found it so
> good that I bought the other three...
> (I'm probably not the only one on this list who has computers all over
> the place, and a wif
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Mathieu Baudier
> Subject: [CentOS] Eclipse Helios on CentOS 5.5 (was Websites Up!)
>
>> Then I hope to finish my tutorial on installing Eclipse
>> Helios for Centos 5.5
>
> Is there anything special to be done?
>
>
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Mathieu Baudier
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 installation memory requirements
>
>> break out your wallet, blow the dust out, and spend a few bucks on some RAM
>
> Sometimes the hardware is so old, that it is not a
On 11/23/2010 1:50 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> On 11/23/2010 12:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
I have never used word processing programs for much of anything
serious, using vim and groff or docbook xml for most things.
>>>
>>> I've done lots of documents, documentation, and even
That's a very good idea - I will give it a try.
On 11/23/2010 12:12 PM, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> Joseph Norris ha scritto:
>> Hello to all,
>>
>> I have been battling this situation now for 3 days and still have not
>> found a resolution. I appeal to any and all for help.
>>
>> Here are the facts
> What type of RAM modules are you looking for?
I'm never quite sure how to find out.
I know that there was a pretty descriptive label on one of them (with
200 MHz or something) and that's how I could find a similar one.
Let me open them and find out and I'll contact you offlist.
They would be mu
On 11/23/2010 2:12 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
> Well, if you know what a "style" is you are closer to being a word
> processing "expert" than many - because what you describe is the proper
> way to use a Word Processor and has been since far back into the hey
> day of products like WP.
>
> It
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 01:04:03PM -0600, David G. Mackay wrote:
>
> (parted) print
> all
>
> Model: Hitachi HDT725032VLAT80 (ide)
> Disk /dev/hda: 320GB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: msdos
>
> Number Start
Bit of info on WordPerfect and Linux. WP was ported to
SCO Xenix by SDC of Utah in the early 90's. Several of us
figured out how to get it running on Linux (1.0 or 1.2 series
kernels, libc5) using the SCO libs and iBCS2 the old Intel
binary compatible interface (I wrote the Linux WP mini-howto
abo
Wade Hampton wrote:
> Bit of info on WordPerfect and Linux. WP was ported to
> SCO Xenix by SDC of Utah in the early 90's. Several of us
> figured out how to get it running on Linux (1.0 or 1.2 series
> kernels, libc5) using the SCO libs and iBCS2 the old Intel
> binary compatible interface (I wro
Hi
I am having real trouble with a new batch of Intel NIC's - We were
using another type of 10gig card and they were fine but got EOL'd from
Intel and are now using something subtly different.
I dont have all the details yet on the issue but basically there is a
major delay in when the link comes
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Wade Hampton wrote:
> The SDC version was WP 6 or 7. They later made native
> Linux versions of WP 7 and 8.
I still have a copy of WP 8; I haven't used it in years. The tar file is
28 MB in size. The Runme script says:
Available Platforms:
decalph
hp9000
linux
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Tom Brown wrote:
> Has anyone got any clues as to what causes link delays?
The only time I have seen such a delay in the past was because of OSPF on
the Cisco switch it was connected to.
Steve
Stev
>
> The only time I have seen such a delay in the past was because of OSPF on
> the Cisco switch it was connected to.
these are Arista DCS-7148SX's so i'll have to chat to the network
guys. On the kernel line can you state delay=x so that it waits for a
link ??
thanks
On 11/24/2010 09:52 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
>> The only time I have seen such a delay in the past was because of OSPF on
>> the Cisco switch it was connected to.
> these are Arista DCS-7148SX's so i'll have to chat to the network
> guys. On the kernel line can you state delay=x so that it waits for a
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 22:17 +0100, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 01:04:03PM -0600, David G. Mackay wrote:
> >
> > (parted) print
> > all
> >
> > Model: Hitachi HDT725032VLAT80 (ide)
> > Disk /dev/hda: 320GB
> > Sector size (log
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Java has always been a challenge. I run x86_64 workstations with CentOS
> current releases of firefox. I have had some luck with 64 bit firefox and
> various plugins but found adobe flash is pretty poor for 64 bit thus if flash
> is needed
2010/11/23 David G. Mackay
> I've just filed bug 0004634. Grub won't install onto my pata drive now
> that I have a sata drive installed. This is grub 0.97 on CentOS5.5.
> Has anyone else encountered this? I'm guessing that I can always
> install Fedora on hda, which should give me a working g
would like some input on this one please.
Two CentOS 5.5 XEN servers, with 1GB NIC's, connected to a 1GB switch
transfer files to each other at about 30MB/s between each other.
Both servers have the following setup:
CentOS 5.5 x64
XEN
1GB NIC's
7200rpm SATA HDD's
The hardware configuration can't
58 matches
Mail list logo
