Hi,
I missed the most posts of the thread so let me say those few words.
First of all I use Java or OpenOffice.org from producers' websites.
They are always "fresh" and installable in RHEL.
I assume too, that the i386 and amd64 versions work the same way, only
the lib names can be different.
Th
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:18:24 +0100
Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I missed the most posts of the thread so let me say those few words.
>
> First of all I use Java or OpenOffice.org from producers' websites.
> They are always "fresh" and installable in RHEL.
>
> I assume too, that the i3
I use fedora i386. After i link the jre plugin file to user's
~/.mozilla/plugins directory, they both work very well.
2010/11/14 Przemysław Pawełczyk
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:18:24 +0100
> Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I missed the most posts of the thread so let me say those f
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:03:16 +0800
topeak wrote:
> I use fedora i386. After i link the jre plugin file to user's
> ~/.mozilla/plugins directory, they both work very well.
Hi,
Of course, I only wanted to point to another directories where one
would be able to place JRE and other plugins.
Regard
topeak writes:
> yesterday, i resolved the issue.
>
> type about:plugins in url box, then there is a link to firefox plugin
> document.
These links haven't been updated in long time, it seems. Come on,
flash player version 9?
How to pick the correct java plugin on firefox:
http://support.m
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 00:08, Lamar Owen wrote:
> Well, this runs afoul of one of the annoyances with IP. That is, IP
> addresses don't belong to the host; they belong to the interface. Even on a
> cisco router, to assign the router itself an interface requires a loopback
> interface be crea
On Sunday, November 14, 2010 08:28:40 am Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 00:08, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > I'll have to admit to some curiosity in how to do this myself; I might lab
> > it up one day and see, when I have more time to spend on it.
> Thank you Lamar, I have spent some time
On 11/13/2010 05:25 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> But people are sometimes frustrated with having their last name
> truncated and I wonder if limiting the user name to 8 characters is
> not a kind of superstition coming from some old times...
CentOS5 supports 31 characters for user names (I tested
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 07:54:10AM -0800, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> CentOS5 supports 31 characters for user names (I tested it). 8 character
> limits for user names was a holdover from some truly ancient Unix
> systems and has been pretty much irrelevant to Linux for more than ten
> years.
There
信已收到,谢谢!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my
servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the mdadm raid device I see
this:
mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 0.90
Creation Time : Mon Sep 27 22:47:44 2010
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size :
NEVERMINDsomehow my fstab mount is not right.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my
> servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the mdadm raid device I see
> this:
>
> mdadm --detail /dev/md0
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> NEVERMINDsomehow my fstab mount is not right.
>
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
>>
>> So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my
>> servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> NEVERMINDsomehow my fstab mount is not right.
>
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
>>
>> So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my
>> servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the
Hi all,
Any know the best way to up gtk+ on Centos 5.5 to something being at
least 2.0 or greater?
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 14/11/10 22:33, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Any know the best way to up gtk+ on Centos 5.5 to something being at
> least 2.0 or greater?
>
yum install gtk2
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf
Rob Kampen wrote:
> Dick Roth wrote:
>> I'm looking into backing up my CentOS 5.5 system using an external USB
>> 2.0 hard drive. Anyone with experience with Toshiba Canvio USB 750 GB
>> unit? I'm backing up to DVDs now and would like to streamline the
>> process.
>>
>> Any advice is welcome with t
On Nov 14, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 14/11/10 22:33, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Any know the best way to up gtk+ on Centos 5.5 to something being at
>> least 2.0 or greater?
>>
>
> yum install gtk2
Not so fast.
gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5 is whats installed.
I've an app
On 11/14/2010 11:52 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> yum install gtk2
> Not so fast.
> gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5 is whats installed.
>
> I've an app that requires 2 or greater to compile and therefore fails.
try that command Ned recommended, really. If you want to look before
doing : yum list gtk\*;
-
On Nov 14, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 11/14/2010 11:52 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> yum install gtk2
>> Not so fast.
>> gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5 is whats installed.
>>
>> I've an app that requires 2 or greater to compile and therefore
>> fails.
>
> try that command Ned recomme
topeak wrote:
> yesterday, i resolved the issue.
>
> type about:plugins in url box, then there is a link to firefox plugin
> document.
>
> at first, i used firefix-3.6. the java plugin always did not work.
> later, i changed the jdk version. it still not work.
> last, i changed to used firefox-3
On 11/14/2010 03:52 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Ned Slider wrote:>
>>
>> yum install gtk2
>
> Not so fast.
> gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5 is whats installed.
> I've an app that requires 2 or greater to compile and therefore fails.
In that case:
yum install gtk2 gtk2-devel
On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 11/14/2010 03:52 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Nov 14, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Ned Slider wrote:>
>>>
>>> yum install gtk2
>>
>> Not so fast.
>> gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5 is whats installed.
>> I've an app that requires 2 or greater to compile and
Ok I try that, but the thing is:
* motherboards not that old
* its exactly 11 hours (+/- a couple of seconds) each time
Jobst
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:31:55AM -0500, Brunner, Brian T.
(bbrun...@gai-tronics.com) wrote:
>
> > and off course dovecot falls over too "Time just moved
> > bac
On Thursday 11 November 2010 20:41:45 Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> Now I had to reboot a couple of them two days ago and to my surprise
> all had problems with the time upon booting.
Hi,
Are you 100% sure that your timezone file (/etc/localtime) corresponds to the
one Australia/Melbourne? Try th
On Thursday 11 November 2010 20:41:45 Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> Nov 10 08:08:52 XX ntpdate[2464]: step time server 192.168.1.1 offset
> -39599.950905 sec
Also, try to disable ntpdate with "chkconfig ntpdate off" and reboot the
machine
and see if that solves the problem. If it does, then yo
On 11/14/10 5:38 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> Ok I try that, but the thing is:
>
> * motherboards not that old
> * its exactly 11 hours (+/- a couple of seconds) each time
sounds like a conflict between time zones.a PC hardware clock could
be set to UTC or local time. I always set my
Hi list.
Does "yum update tzdata" update /etc/localtime or does this need
to be done manually?
[this is part of the hwclock problem, a guy from sage-au has given me a hint]
Jobst
--
Keyboard not found - please clean up desktop!
| |0| | Jobst Schmalenbach, jo...@barrett.com.au, General
Hi,
(2010/11/13 6:25), My LinuxHAList wrote:
> I saw in the logs:
> kernel: INFO: task sadc:23936 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> kernel: "echo 0> /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables
> this message.
This message is useless to solve problem without Linux developer.
Every high loa
aurfal...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> Funny thing is those are already installed.
>
> However I require a later version of gtk+.
>
[kikino...@babasse:~] $ rpm -qa | grep ^gtk
...
gtk2-2.10.4-20.el5
gtk2-engines-2.8.0-3.el5
gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5
...
GTK (Gimp Tool Kit) is a graphic library originally
30 matches
Mail list logo
