For some reason all the perl man pages cause yum errors like
-
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of
perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.i386
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Timothy Murphy spake:
> For some reason all the perl man pages cause yum errors like
> -
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of
> perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64 conflic
I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
need to have a security update?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Ritika Garg spake:
> I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
> need to have a security update?
YMMD.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFMswD6fg746kcGBOwRAtvVAJ9HWjA7ZOMw2TdtFE
On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote:
> I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
> need to have a security update?
> ___
What is your IP? :-D
___
CentOS mailing li
I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Am 11.10.10 14:30, schrieb sync:
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
Okay, I'll bite.
>From time to time there are bugs found in the software which CentOS
ships. These bugs can lead your code to crash, your machine to be denied
of service as the process which has the bug
On 11/10/10 11:30 PM, sync wrote:
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
*Sigh*
If you don't update it then it won't remain so. It's like buying a
brand new deadlock for the door to your house and then leaving the door
wide open when you go out. Chances are that sooner or
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:30:04 +0800 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
If you apply ALL of the security updates as they become available. ALL
O/Ss have security updates from time-to-time (what do you think those
MS-Windows 'Service
From: Timothy Murphy
> For some reason all the perl man pages cause yum errors like
> -
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of
>perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
>perl-5.8.8-32.el5
From: Giles Coochey
> On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote:
> > I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
> > need to have a security update?
> What is your IP? :-D
Keep this information secret, but I think his IP is 127.0.0.1 ...
And there's no fi
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, sync wrote:
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
CentOS (RHEL 5) is one of the most secure operating systems worldwide.
Best regards,
Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lis
On 10/11/2010 07:10 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
[snip]
> - install 'mock' (IMPORTANT: install the one from CentOS, exclude the
> one from EPEL in your repo file)
Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL?
Afaict the mock version in the CentOS repo is 0.6.13 which was relea
> Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL?
Because the one in CentOS will, out of the box, pull out and properly
configure the CentOS buildsys package, which itself is a meta-package
whose dependencies are the minimal set required to create a chroot
build environment:
ht
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Patrick Lists wrote:
> Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL?
> Afaict the mock version in the CentOS repo is 0.6.13 which was released
> years ago and the one in EPEL is 1.0.7 which is current.
ehh??
mock-1.1.5-1orc.src.rpm from upstream Raw Hid
Robert P. J. Day wrote on 10/10/2010 05:56 PM:
...
> http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/SourceInstalls
>
> seems just a touch on the hysterical side. i don't disagree that
> installing packages from the source rpm is probably a questionable
> idea. but that doesn't justify simply not expla
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Sunday, October 10, 2010 05:56:47 pm Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> frankly, the wiki page on downloading from source:
> http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/SourceInstalls
> seems just a touch on the hysterical side.
For certain uses and certain software stacks from source is the only sane
On 10/11/2010 05:12 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Patrick Lists wrote:
>
>> Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL?
>> Afaict the mock version in the CentOS repo is 0.6.13 which was released
>> years ago and the one in EPEL is 1.0.7 which is current.
>
>
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
>>> A few weeks ago I asked about firewalls and family filters. Lanny
>>> Marcus, I believe, suggested OpenDNS. Just wanted to thank him (and
>>> everyone here) for their suggestions.
>>
>> Ron: My pleasure. Usually, I am the one receiving help
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 05:12 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>> The mock inplementaion is a moving target --- I do not
>> know the particulars of why the other party recommmended
>> using THE ONE CENTOS BUILT ON for CentOS, but ...
> Sorry but I don't get it. Are you say
Abwesenheitsnotiz:
Vielen Dank für Ihre Nachricht. Ich bin ab dem 22.10. wieder im Büro erreichbar.
In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Ostermann,
Email .
Vielen Dank!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
I have two CentOS servers running SSH on two different non-standard
ports. So far as I can tell, they have identical /etc/ssh/sshd_config
files with the exception of the different port (both are 22xx).
However, when running nmap on them, one betrays the port that SSH is
running on, and the other do
On 10/11/2010 04:21 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> However, when running nmap on them, one betrays the port that SSH is
> running on, and the other does not. I have shut down iptables on both
> machines and the behaviour remains this way. What could be the cause?
You're probably not running a full port
>However, when running nmap on them, one betrays the port that SSH is running
>on, and the other does not.
What does betray mean?
>I have shut down iptables on both machines and the behaviour remains this way.
>What could be the cause?
Public facing machines w/ iptables off?
>Specifically, ho
On a semi-related subtopic,
Why do I want WoL? What concrete examples are there where it's useful?
I understand what it is and how it works but the "why" has eluded me.
--
Drew
"Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood."
--Marie Curie
__
On 10/11/2010 7:44 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
>> Specifically, how can I hide the port that SSH is running on?
>> I'm sorry that I cannot provide the IP addresses, the owner of the servers
>> doesn't want that! I also know how silly it is to do "stealth"
>> ports but I'm not the one making the
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Drew wrote:
> On a semi-related subtopic,
>
> Why do I want WoL? What concrete examples are there where it's useful?
>
> I understand what it is and how it works but the "why" has eluded me.
You want to VNC or SSH into a remote workstation that happens to be aslee
>I understand what it is and how it works but the "why" has eluded me.
You need to do maintenance on hardware and you don't want it running
wasting power or it happen to be off such as the case with many client boxes?
You need to start a node and you don't want it running wasting power while
you
Hi, all :
I have a thought of writing the script to implement the LDAP mail
noticerecently.
That's to say , after creating the new account and his passwd , then how to
send an E-mail to notice him?
By the way , I used the LDAP tool called 389 LDAP or openldap recently .
Could someon
A while back I posted about my new HP J3600 scan/fax/copy/print-er and how
it was visible to the root but not me as an ordinary user. I had no trouble
configuring it as a printer, but the scanner was invisible to xsane until I
added my user id to the lp group.
Now it's gone again, except that it
>
> I have a thought of writing the script to implement the LDAP mail
> noticerecently.
>
> That's to say , after creating the new account and his passwd , then
> how to send an E-mail to notice him?
>
> By the way , I used the LDAP tool called 389 LDAP or openldap recently .
>
>
>
> C
2010/10/12 Ryan Manikowski :
> On 10/11/2010 7:44 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>
>>> Specifically, how can I hide the port that SSH is running on?
>>> I'm sorry that I cannot provide the IP addresses, the owner of the servers
>>> doesn't want that! I also know how silly it is to do "stealth"
>>>
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Sean Hart wrote:
>
> >
> > I have a thought of writing the script to implement the LDAP mail
> > noticerecently.
> >
> > That's to say , after creating the new account and his passwd , then
> > how to send an E-mail to notice him?
> >
> > By the way , I u
On 10/11/10 10:34 PM, sync wrote:
> What you said is right . I'm trying to write a script to create the
> new account and his password and then can email them .
>
> By the way , My Mail server is not the Linux Server(CentOS) , it is
> the Windows 2003 Server . So how can I do that ?
hire a wi
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:56 PM, sync wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/10 10:34 PM, sync wrote:
>>
>>> What you said is right . I'm trying to write a script to create the new
>>> account and his password and then can email them .
>>>
>>> By the wa
After system update yesterday, Openwebmail now gives an error:
> Undefined subroutine &Compress::Zlib::memGzip called at
> /var/www/cgi-bin/openwebmail/shares/ow-shared.pl line 1175.
I tried to do
perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Compress::Zlib
But it says Compress::Zlib is up-to-date. What do to?
Maybe what i said is not clear, because my English is too pool .
Please forgive me if my expression is not precise.
Doesn't matter what mail server you use, email is email.
The following is my environment :
Workspace Environment : CentOS 5.5 64bits , Using Openldap
Ok, more information. I have Openwebmail 2.52. I tried to install 2.53
with yum, and get the following. This points to what the conflict is
about. But I still don't know how to fix this.
- Jussi
Installing:
openwebmail i386 2.53-3
openwebmail 2.
> Just disable password authentication on ssh and use only keyfiles ..
>
> --
My initial thought exactly. Keys, and require passwords on the keys
too. Although if you want to be wicked paranoid, knocking + keys would
work too.
~Sean
___
CentOS maili
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Compress/Zlib.pm from install
> of perl-Compress-Zlib-2.015-1.el5.rf.noarch conflicts with file from
> package perl-IO-Compress-2.030-2.el5.rf.noarch
> file /usr/share/man/man3/Compress::Zlib.3pm.gz from install of
> perl-C
It seems Openwebmail is using Perl-Compress-Zlib from rpmforce, but in
Centos this is obsoleted by Perl-IO-Compress, and there is a conflict.
This I got when I tried to install the rpmforce package:
[r...@mail log]# yum install perl-Compress-Zlib
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, installonlyn
Loadi
42 matches
Mail list logo
