Try
Yum install xen
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Dirk H. Schulz
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 2:16 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Xen3.3 rpm for 32Bit?
Hi folks,
I would like to test Xen3.3 on CentOS
just me who have slow network with qemu without hardware virtualization
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 10/9/10 2:41 PM, John Hinton wrote:
>> Aside from this, Microsoft seems to love to make changes that break
>> other vendor's software. I can't imagine the frustrations they must feel
>> living in this world. WordPerfect, Adobe and just about everyone has had
>> problems due
On 10/10/10 10:16 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
> Go OpenSolaris then. Also OpenOffice and maybe LibreOffice can open docx
> files...not sure about those from MSO 2010 though...
Except OpenSolaris has already been killed by Oracle. There is a fork
called Illumos, though.
Regards,
Ben
signa
Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 10/10/10 10:16 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> Go OpenSolaris then. Also OpenOffice and maybe LibreOffice can open docx
>> files...not sure about those from MSO 2010 though...
>
> Except OpenSolaris has already been killed by Oracle. There is a fork
> called Illumos, thou
On 10/10/10 11:31 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
> /me shrugs. Yeah, maybe I better start saying Illumos and yelling use
> OpenIndiana, a distro which uses Illumos.
It'll only be an option for x86/x86-64 and with the move to using
Fujitsu UltraSPARC chips that contain patented technology which ca
toward the end of a class on friday, just for fun, i showed the
students how to install git, clone the latest kernel source, and build
and install a new kernel. since it was getting close to end of day, i
wanted to keep it simple and directed them to just "make defconfig" to
see what would happ
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> toward the end of a class on friday, just for fun, i showed the
> students how to install git, clone the latest kernel source, and build
> and install a new kernel. since it was getting close to end of day, i
> wanted to keep it simple
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> You can find the answer here :-)
>
> http://blog.toracat.org/2010/03/want-a-custom-kernel-on-centos-noo-really/
that's it? enabling deprecated sysfs? cool, i'll check that later
and report back, thanks.
rday
--
=
mp;search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20101010/9f439202/attachment-0001.bin
--
On 10/10/10 16:09, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> You can find the answer here :-)
>
> http://blog.toracat.org/2010/03/want-a-custom-kernel-on-centos-noo-really/
>
> Akemi
Quoted from the above link:
As always, Alan and Ned engaged their brains and we tried several things
to find a solution. We were
On 10/10/10 17:05, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 10/10/10 16:09, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> You can find the answer here :-)
>>
>> http://blog.toracat.org/2010/03/want-a-custom-kernel-on-centos-noo-really/
>>
>> Akemi
>
>
> Quoted from the above link:
>
> As always, Alan and Ned engaged their brains and
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 10/10/10 17:05, Ned Slider wrote:
>> On 10/10/10 16:09, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>> http://blog.toracat.org/2010/03/want-a-custom-kernel-on-centos-noo-really/
>> Just thought I'd mention, although not grammatically incorrect, the
>> phrase is
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:05:35PM +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 10/10/10 16:09, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> As always, Alan and Ned engaged their brains and we tried several things
> to find a solution. We were not going anywhere when vanecka posted a fix
> in this forum thread.
>
> Just thought I'd
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> You can find the answer here :-)
>
> http://blog.toracat.org/2010/03/want-a-custom-kernel-on-centos-noo-really/
>
> Akemi
and that did it, thanks. so now i'm curious -- do you know what
specifically requires the deprecated sysfs format during boot?
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:51:39 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
[]
Redhat does not discuss release dates []
Well, the beta is up :
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/beta/
so the corporate experience on this list may be able now to make an
educated guess (still an unofficial guess,
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, BeartoothHOS wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:51:39 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> []
> Redhat does not discuss release dates []
>
> Well, the beta is up :
>
> http://www.redhat.com/rhel/beta/
that is already the *second* beta of RHEL 6, so it's not rea
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 07:08:30PM +, BeartoothHOS wrote:
>
> Well, the beta is up :
>
> http://www.redhat.com/rhel/beta/
It's been up for many months; in fact this is the second beta
cut.
> so the corporate experience on this list may be able now to make an
> educated
yes, i've read the online docs and followed a link or two to find a
simple way to do this, such as:
http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/SystemTapOnCentOS
so, these days, is that the canonical way to download source rpms?
now, note that i'm not arguing about whether this is a good idea. in
my
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> so, these days, is that the canonical way to download source rpms?
I am substantially certain we have a wiki article on
mirroring, and certainly I've written about mirroring over and
over again from many approaches [my most recent blog post,
aggre
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, R P Herrold wrote:
> WHAT? you don't want to handle that load RIGHT NOT and for
s/OT/OW/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:56 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> so, is that reasonable? to just manually add an extra repo file
> according to that link above (which appears to work perfectly well).
In my opinion, in most cases there is no particularly good reason to
bother compiling a source rpm
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:56 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> so they can examine the source of some packages. is the approach i'm
> suggesting reasonable? thanks.
>
> rday
---
All on Debian ?
John
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:56:47PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> my plan is to install yum-utils to get yumdownloader, add the repo
> file suggested above, then have students:
Are these students paying for whatever training you are
supplying?
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:56 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > so, is that reasonable? to just manually add an extra repo file
> > according to that link above (which appears to work perfectly
> > well).
>
> In my opinion, in most cases there is no partic
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:56:47PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > my plan is to install yum-utils to get yumdownloader, add the repo
> > file suggested above, then have students:
>
> Are these students paying for whatever training you
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 18:58 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> but it's a little high-handed to not
> explain how to do something because you've decided it's not something
> you want *others* to know.
There is very little to explain, if all you want to do is examine the
source.
Install rpmdevtools
Before yum and when I used to have time for it, I compiled from source
everything on my machine. It wasn't that big of a deal. Just took some
time. The pay-off was significant in performance and speed... reason
being that, if you configure gcc for your particular cpu, the code is
able to take ad
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:36 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 18:58 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > but it's a little high-handed to not
> > explain how to do something because you've decided it's not something
> > you want *others* to know.
>
> There is very little to explain, i
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 8:23 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:36 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 18:58 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > but it's a little high-handed to not
> > > explain how to do something because you've decided it's not something
> > > you wan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shaun Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 8:23 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
>> Warning: No matches found for: rpmdevtools
>> No Matches found
>>
>> John
>>
Rpmdevtools for CentOS is available from EPEL.
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Reposi
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, JohnS wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:36 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>> There is very little to explain, if all you want to do is examine the
>> source.
>>
>> Install rpmdevtools. Run rpmdev-setuptree
> Warning: No matches found for: rpmdevtools
> No Matches found
As I recal
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 21:35 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, JohnS wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:36 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> >> There is very little to explain, if all you want to do is examine the
> >> source.
> >>
> >> Install rpmdevtools. Run rpmdev-setuptree
>
>
someone reminded me that i was missing the posix account information I
needed i LDAP.
I have added the corresponding posix accounts in LDAP I wish to use:
12 uid=bluethundr,ou=summitnjops,ou=staff,dc=summitnjhome,dc=com
ou: summitnjops
ou: staff
cn: Tim
objectClass: top
objectClass: organization
> More people should be doing this kind of stuff. The world needs more
> open source developers. Looking at existing code is a great tool for
> learning.
+1
As Karanbir put it in his interview in Distrowatch a few months ago,
CentOS is not only great as a stable and predictable server distrib,
On 11/10/10 10:44 AM, ken wrote:
>
> Alternatively, you could also check out Slackware.
In my opinion Slackware is still the best distribution for actually
learning about GNU/Linux. I'm a little biased, though, I've been
running it since 4.0 (and had accounts on other systems running it prior
t
> I have added the corresponding posix accounts in LDAP I wish to use:
Here is a LDIF snippet that works for users authenticated via LDAP:
dn: uid=myuser,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: person
objectClass: organizationalPerson
objectClass: inetOrgPerson
objectClass: posixAccount
objectCl
I'm in yum dependency hell using epel, rpmforge and rpmfusion repos to
install vlc on 32 bit Centos 5.5. Anyone have a better idea? Doesn't
really have to be vlc I just want to be able to play a dvd and Movie
Player complains about missing plugins without saying what they are.
Dave
--
"It
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:36:19PM -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
> I'm in yum dependency hell using epel, rpmforge and rpmfusion repos to
> install vlc on 32 bit Centos 5.5. Anyone have a better idea? Doesn't
> really have to be vlc I just want to be able to play a dvd and Movie
> Player complai
Quoting Scott Robbins :
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:36:19PM -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
>> I'm in yum dependency hell using epel, rpmforge and rpmfusion repos to
>> install vlc on 32 bit Centos 5.5. Anyone have a better idea? Doesn't
>> really have to be vlc I just want to be able to play a dvd an
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:58:51PM -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
> Quoting Scott Robbins :
>
>>>
>> Is movieplayer mplayer?
>
> I don't think so I think it's Totem
Totem often seems to have problems, even in more up to date
distributions such as Fedora and Ubuntu.
If that's the case, it's worth tr
41 matches
Mail list logo
