I can say
The qemu from rpmforge.net contains the --curses options but not the
one in the centos repo
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of John Doe
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:04 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re:
On 29.9.2010 8.29, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
> Hello Jussi,
>
> If searching on a local archive on your host consider grepmail.
Hei,
There should be a web interface - sorry for not saying this before. I am
looking for a web app where people can search the archive (which is in
mbox format), an
No i can start qemu but no network
I have a bridge br0 with ta0 on it
My start line
qemu debian.5-0.x86.20100901.qcow --curses -net nic -net
tap,ifname=tap0,script=no
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen
Ross Walker wrote:
> Which version of MSM?
>
> Is the Framework service running?
>
> I have it running on a headless server and run the GUI from a management
> station and can log in without a problem.
I've worked out what the problem was - I didn't have shadow passwords
enabled ... once I'd
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:39 AM, mattias wrote:
> No i can start qemu but no network
> I have a bridge br0 with ta0 on it
> My start line
> qemu debian.5-0.x86.20100901.qcow --curses -net nic -net
> tap,ifname=tap0,script=no
I have something running along these lines, maybe it can help -
There ar
I have it work now a ip from my isps dhcp server
But verry slow
Xen are much faster
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Eduardo Grosclaude
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:20 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [Cent
> On 9/28/2010 11:30 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>> Opinions? Maybe there are better software solutions for this - I hope.
On 29.9.2010 3.49, M. Milanuk wrote:
> markmail.org works pretty well for searching, as does gmane.org... with
> gmane having the added benefit of providing a bi-directional mail2n
Hello all,
I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS
filesystem as specified in the subject line. The filesystem will be used to
store an extremely large number of files (in the tens of millions). Due to
its extremely large size, would there be any non-standard XFS
build
LostSon wrote:
> Yes I did run newaliases and still no joy
>
> Mark Van Bogart wrote:
>
>> Did you run 'newaliases' after editing /etc/aliases?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:27 AM, lostson wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>> A few weeks ago I started having problems with my system
Hello,
I'm using the latest CentOS with phpBB 3.0.x + postgreSQL + sendmail
(relayed through gmail.com) - all those programs working fine,
with no big modifications of the CentOS defaults (i.e. SELinux is on).
Now I'm struggling with the seemingly simple problem, that when
I put an .html file int
> Now I'm struggling with the seemingly simple problem
Sometimes simple problems have simple solutions!
For example:
> # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php
> -r--r--r-- 1 rootroot 599 Sep 29 15:49 Alex.html
> -rw-r--r-- 1 afarber afarber 33 Jul 29 11:32 hello-world.php
> -rw-r--
hi Boris,
On 09/29/2010 02:00 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS
I dont have any specific hints for you - but when you are done, a page
in the centos wiki would be nice to have, with challenges and options
you had to work through alon
Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello,
I'm using the latest CentOS with phpBB 3.0.x + postgreSQL + sendmail
(relayed through gmail.com) - all those programs working fine,
with no big modifications of the CentOS defaults (i.e. SELinux is on).
Now I'm struggling with the seemingly simple problem, that wh
Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html
and vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio
wrote:
>> # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 599 Sep 29 15:49 Alex.html
>> -rw-r--
Alexander Farber wrote:
> Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html
> and vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files.
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio
> wrote:
>>> # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php
>>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 59
On Thursday, September 16, 2010 01:43:19 pm Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > When a server simply has to have minimal downtime, LVM is worth its LoC in
> > gold for this use.
> What do you mean by "no downtime"?
> What exactly do you do?
> Is it documented anywhere?
Sorry for the del
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS
> filesystem as specified in the subject line. The filesystem will be used to
> store an extremely large number of files (in the tens of millions). Due to
> its
Alexander Farber sent a missive on 2010-09-29:
> Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html and
> vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files.
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio
> wrote:
>>> # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php
>>> -r--r-
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Jay Leafey wrote:
> Fixing it is easy, just run restorecon:
>
> restorecon -rv /var/www/html
Is there any received wisdom about when it is more appropriate to use
restorecon directly instead of the fixfiles wrapper? I tend to use
fixfiles, but I haven't really thought it th
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Simon Billis wrote:
> Can you show the output of ls -laZ please? This will show the selinux
> context information for the files - the error is usually to do with the
> context of the files.
Hello and thanks for your reply. The SELinux stuff is new for me.
Yes I h
At Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:13:14 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html
> and vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files.
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio
> wrote:
> >>Â # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello
- Original Message -
| On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
| > Hello all,
| >
| > I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS
| > filesystem as specified in the subject line. The filesystem will be
| > used to
| > store an extremely large number of
ot available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20100929/6cfa9567/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:48:48 +0200
From: Tru Huynh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64
mikm
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> | On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
> | > Hello all,
> | >
> | > I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS
> | > filesystem as specified in the subject line. T
>I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as
>mine resides on a logical volume residing on a hardware-controlled
>RAID 6 device (i.e., one slice as far as the OS is concerned).
25 TB on a single volume, not distributed? Huh, let me know how long
that takes to check the first
> Is there a document with instructions for this?
> I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
> so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
Not to hijack a thread but on a similiar note. I have a Centos 4.x
server with a 500G sata drive working fine except for d
> Is there a way to copy it to a hardware RAID 1 array of two
> drives in a similiar way?
The same way? The underlying OS knows nothing of the physical geometry
behind a hardware raid controller. Find out what dev it is, sd? and do what
you did, so long as it's exactly the same size or bigger.
>
On 30/09/10 12:43 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using the latest CentOS with phpBB 3.0.x + postgreSQL + sendmail
> (relayed through gmail.com) - all those programs working fine,
> with no big modifications of the CentOS defaults (i.e. SELinux is on).
[SNIP
> Does anybody know what
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as
>>mine resides on a logical volume residing on a hardware-controlled
>>RAID 6 device (i.e., one slice as far as the OS is concerned).
>
> 25 TB on a single volume, not dis
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> > | However, given the size of the device I assume that this is a raid of
> > | some
> > | sort. You'll want to make sure to run mkfs.xfs with the proper stripe
> > | parameters to ge
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
>> > | However, given the size of the device I assume that this is a raid of
>> > | some
>> > | sort. You'll want to make s
Alexander Farber sent a missive on 2010-09-29:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Simon Billis wrote:
>> Can you show the output of ls -laZ please? This will show the
>> selinux context information for the files - the error is usually to
>> do with the context of the files.
>
> Hello and thanks
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
...
> >> I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as
> >> mine resides on a logical volume residing on a
Simon Billis wrote:
> Alexander Farber sent a missive on 2010-09-29:
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Simon Billis wrote:
> You can use "setenforce 0" without the quotes to disable selinux from the
> command line till next reboot or until you issue "setenforce 1" - this is
> useful for testing
On 30/09/10 3:21 AM, Simon Billis wrote:
>
> You can use "setenforce 0" without the quotes to disable selinux from the
> command line till next reboot or until you issue "setenforce 1" - this is
> useful for testing as is looking at /var/log/audit/audit.log and also using
> commands such as audit2
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 01:25:11 pm Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> You are a bit mistaken. The raid controller does not "copy data around as it
> sees fit". It stores data on each disk in chunk-size'ed pieces. It then
> stripes this across all drives giving you a stripe-size'ed piece of chunk
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:13:52 pm Matt wrote:
> Is there a way to copy it to a hardware RAID 1 array of two
> drives in a similiar way? If so what not too expensive 2 port
> hardware raid controller do you reccommend and how do you do it?
3ware 9500S; can be had used and NOS (New Old S
Thank you all for the valuable suggestions!
--Tim
- "Jim Davis" wrote:
> There's a review just now on Slashdot of a book that covers autoconf
> and friends...
- "Bill Campbell" wrote:
> My first recommendation is always Kernighan and Pike's ``Unix
> Programming Environment'', ancient b
Quoting Mário Barbosa :
> LostSon wrote:
>> Yes I did run newaliases and still no joy
>>
>> Mark Van Bogart wrote:
>>
>>> Did you run 'newaliases' after editing /etc/aliases?
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:27 AM, lostson wrote:
>>>
Hello
A few weeks ago I sta
On Sep 29, 2010, at 7:23 AM, "mattias" wrote:
> I have it work now a ip from my isps dhcp server
> But verry slow
> Xen are much faster
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Eduardo Grosclaude
> Sent: Wednesday, Sep
On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 01:25:11 pm Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>> You are a bit mistaken. The raid controller does not "copy data around as it
>> sees fit". It stores data on each disk in chunk-size'ed pieces. It then
>> stripes this across
>> Is there a way to copy it to a hardware RAID 1 array of two
>> drives in a similiar way?
>
> The same way? The underlying OS knows nothing of the physical geometry
> behind a hardware raid controller. Find out what dev it is, sd? and do what
> you did, so long as it's exactly the same size or b
on 9-28-2010 5:53 PM Timothy Murphy spake the following:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>
>>> I should have admitted that there is a Windows partition on the old disk.
>>> It came with the machine, but I never use it.
>>> However, I would like to save it if possible,
>>> as there seem to be some operations
>Would going from a single 500G sata to two 500G sata drives in
>hardware raid 1 work? Just wandering if some space will be lost using
>raid 1?
Again like I said: The same or bigger. Often HW raid controllers coerce the
size of a drive down a gig or so slightly different drives can all work
toge
On 9/29/10 5:40 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>> On 9/28/2010 11:30 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>>> Opinions? Maybe there are better software solutions for this - I hope.
>
> On 29.9.2010 3.49, M. Milanuk wrote:
>> markmail.org works pretty well for searching, as does gmane.org... with
>> gmane having the adde
45 matches
Mail list logo
