> Out of curiosity, when you read the log, did you attempt the suggestion w/o
> success?
Not really (yet):
- for the first one (./spool), I have not clearly identified (yet)
where the file is being created
- for the second they talk about creating a policy module, and even
though I may have to go
From: Robert P. J. Day
> first, while the cpio archive physically contains a number of basic
> /dev special files, the top-level "init" script runs "mknod" to create
> them all, anyway. not a big deal, but is it fair to say that
> populating the initrd.img with those initial /dev files is
From: Zhiyong Zhang
> I am planning to upgrade the operating system from CentOS4.8 to the latest
>CentOS5. Is there a detailed, step by step instruction on the
>installation/.upgrade procedure?
>
Google says: http://wiki.centos.org/Migration/5
JD
__
From: Tom Bishop
>Thanks everyone for the input...I have decided to go with the f2 option,
>however
>
>the rebuild time seems to be taking quite a long time, almost 24hr...I have
>read
>
>that there are options for speeding this up but want to make sure that they
>are
>ok to dohas to do
> I'm now looking at audit2allow:
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux#head-faa96b3fdd922004cdb988c1989e56191c257c01
To follow up on this, audit2allow provided a satisfactory solution
(comments on that kind of approach still welcome!):
grep sendmail /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -m se
>
> On 25/09/10 05:55, Jerry Geis wrote:
> >/ How might I automate such an install script.
> /Might I suggest expect:
> http://oreilly.com/catalog/expect/chapter/ch03.html
>
> Cheers,
> ak.
>
Anthonly
Is expect and send not part of CentOS?
on my x86_64 5.5 I do "whereis expect" and its not f
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 9/24/2010 2:23 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>
>> Well yes, it does work OK. The point being though it's an
>> old (stable) release of Eclipse, but nothing near the current
>> Eclipse 3.6.0 Helios release.
>>
>> I'm in the middle of moving now, but when th
On 9/27/10 7:31 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On 9/24/2010 2:23 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>>
>>> Well yes, it does work OK. The point being though it's an
>>> old (stable) release of Eclipse, but nothing near the current
>>> Eclipse 3.6.0 Helios release.
>>>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Is expect and send not part of CentOS?
Using which to check only works if you have it installed. You might
consider using yum's provides feature since you appear to not have it
already.
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
>
> Using which to check only works if you have it installed. You might
> consider using yum's provides feature since you appear to not have it
> already.
>
Jim,
Thanks - I did the 'yum provides "*/expect"' and found the expect package.
Did the install. However the spawn and send commands dont
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 13:27, Brent L. Bates wrote:
> Just noticed something. Have your serial number reflect the date you
> last updated the file. That way you will know when you last changed it. For
> example, today is September 27, 2010, if you were making your first update
> today, mak
So I'm in the process of building and testing a raid setup and it appeared
to take along time to build I came across some settings for setting the min
amount of time and that helped but it appears that one of the disks is
struggling (100 utilization) vs the other one...I was wondering if anyone
el
On 09/27/2010 08:15 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> So I'm in the process of building and testing a raid setup and it
> appeared to take along time to build I came across some settings for
> setting the min amount of time and that helped but it appears that one
> of the disks is struggling (100 utiliza
On 9/27/2010 12:19 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 09/27/2010 08:15 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
>> So I'm in the process of building and testing a raid setup and it
>> appeared to take along time to build I came across some settings for
>> setting the min amount of time and that helped but it appears that
Greetings all-
My apologies for the slightly OT post. My primary production platform *IS*
CentOS 5.x with a minor scattering of 4.x machines behind firewalls here and
there...
I find that I'm being placed more and more into a 'quasi-developer' role which
strays some from my normal system/netwo
There's a review just now on Slashdot of a book that covers autoconf
and friends -- it sounds like it would cover at least some of what
you're after. There's an older O'Reilly book on Make that might be
helpful too.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010, Tim Nelson wrote:
>Greetings all-
>My apologies for the slightly OT post. My primary production platform *IS*
>CentOS 5.x with a minor scattering of 4.x machines behind firewalls here
>and there...
>I find that I'm being placed more and more into a 'quasi-developer' role
>wh
On 9/27/2010 2:10 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
>
> Another is ``GNU Autoconf, Automake, and Libtool'' by Vaughan,
> Elliston, Tromey, and Taylor.
Vaughan is still active on the autotools lists, and he occasionally pops
in on threads mentioning his book, telling people they should be careful
in apply
Jim Davis wrote:
> There's a review just now on Slashdot of a book that covers autoconf
> and friends -- it sounds like it would cover at least some of what
> you're after. There's an older O'Reilly book on Make that might be
> helpful too.
Um, wait, how long?! Right, 14 years ago, I was *really*
I want to clone a small (80GB) disk on my CentOS server
to a large (1.5TB) disk,
as smart has been giving me warnings of unreadable sectors.
Both disks are Western Digital,
and WD has a WD version of Acronis True Image.
I'm not sure whether to use this or Clonezilla.
My worry with Acronis is that
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 14:56 -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
> Greetings all-
>
> My apologies for the slightly OT post. My primary production platform
> *IS* CentOS 5.x with a minor scattering of 4.x machines behind
> firewalls here and there...
> I find that I'm being placed more and more into a 'quasi-
On 9/27/2010 4:27 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I want to clone a small (80GB) disk on my CentOS server
> to a large (1.5TB) disk,
> as smart has been giving me warnings of unreadable sectors.
>
> Both disks are Western Digital,
> and WD has a WD version of Acronis True Image.
> I'm not sure whether
On 09/27/10 2:27 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I want to clone a small (80GB) disk on my CentOS server
> to a large (1.5TB) disk,
> as smart has been giving me warnings of unreadable sectors.
>
> Both disks are Western Digital,
> and WD has a WD version of Acronis True Image.
> I'm not sure whether
On 9/27/2010 4:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>On 09/27/10 2:27 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I want to clone a small (80GB) disk on my CentOS server
>> to a large (1.5TB) disk,
>> as smart has been giving me warnings of unreadable sectors.
>>
>> Both disks are Western Digital,
>> and WD has a WD v
On 09/28/2010 07:26 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 14:56 -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
>> Greetings all-
>>
>> My apologies for the slightly OT post. My primary production platform
>> *IS* CentOS 5.x with a minor scattering of 4.x machines behind
>> firewalls here and there...
>>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:27:00PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I want to clone a small (80GB) disk on my CentOS server
> to a large (1.5TB) disk,
> as smart has been giving me warnings of unreadable sectors.
>
> Both disks are Western Digital,
> and WD has a WD version of Acronis True Image.
>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 04:52:58PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 9/27/2010 4:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> >On 09/27/10 2:27 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >> I want to clone a small (80GB) disk on my CentOS server
> >> to a large (1.5TB) disk,
> >> as smart has been giving me warnings of unrea
On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 9/27/2010 12:19 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>> On 09/27/2010 08:15 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
>>> So I'm in the process of building and testing a raid setup and it
>>> appeared to take along time to build I came across some settings for
>>> setting t
How to start qemu in textmode
The --curses option are removed
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
SOLVED:
I added myself to the lp group, logged out and back in, and voila.
Not exactly sure why this works, and it seems a little strange to me,
but it works.
Mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cento
Thanks ROss, I poured through my dmesg logs and all looks well, things
appear fine but i don't think the samsung should be running at
100%...something is not right but it hasn't bit me yether are my dmesg
logs...
scsi0 : ahci
scsi1 : ahci
scsi2 : ahci
scsi3 : ahci
scsi4 : ahci
scsi5 : ahci
ata
Here are the iostats:
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz
avgqu-sz await svctm %util
sda 0.15 2.47 0.41 0.8213.0126.3631.97
0.016.98 1.01 0.12
sda1 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.0024.50
0.00
On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:16 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> Here are the iostats:
>
>
> Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz
> avgqu-sz await svctm %util
> sda 0.15 2.47 0.41 0.8213.0126.3631.97
> 0.016.98 1.01 0.12
> sda1
On Sep 27, 2010, at 9:54 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:16 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
>
>> Here are the iostats:
>>
>>
>> Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz
>> avgqu-sz await svctm %util
>> sda 0.15 2.47 0.41 0.8213.0
How do I figure out if it's a 4k sector drive, I've read about that but
never looked into it...is there any way to tell, and when you mean start my
partition, I only have one large partition, since this is just for my data
filesso you mean I should start on 2048 and go up from there??? Thanks
On 09/27/10 7:49 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> How do I figure out if it's a 4k sector drive, I've read about that
> but never looked into it...is there any way to tell, and when you mean
> start my partition, I only have one large partition, since this is
> just for my data filesso you mean I s
36 matches
Mail list logo
